Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software

Background: Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage. Questions/purposes: We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hip international 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.16-21
Hauptverfasser: Nishikino, Shoichi, Koyama, Hiroshi, Furuhashi, Hiroki, Hoshino, Hironobu, Matsuyama, Yukihiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Hip international
container_volume 30
creator Nishikino, Shoichi
Koyama, Hiroshi
Furuhashi, Hiroki
Hoshino, Hironobu
Matsuyama, Yukihiro
description Background: Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage. Questions/purposes: We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA), which represents the acetabular coverage of the femoral head at each acetabular edge point on the radial plane. This study validated the accuracy of the RCEA, as calculated by ACX Dynamics, as a quantitative parameter for acetabular coverage. Patients and methods: We reviewed the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of 650 hips from 325 patients who presented with chief complaint of symptoms at the hip joint. Of 109 hip radiographs (68 patients) that satisfied the criteria, 50 randomised, blinded AP pelvic radiographs were chosen. We determined the absolute RCEA difference (°) [= RCEA ACX (°) – RCEA CT (°)], determined the correlation between RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°), and examined the RCEA’s intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in 50 hips. Results: The absolute RCEA difference from A45° to P75° was 1.9–3.1°. The correlation between the RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°) was > 0.7 in all lesions (p < 0.001). Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the intra-observer reliability of the RCEA was 0.83–0.97 in the whole range, which is a highly reproducible and reasonable parameter, and the inter-observer reliability was > 0.80 in A45°–P0°. Conclusions: The RCEA ACX (°) can be used as a simple quantitative parameter for assessing acetabular coverage using AP pelvic radiograph.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1120700018820883
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1120700018820883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1120700018820883</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1120700018820883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-9e015a06ada7ce6b3f2986cb794ed31d1ebf5ef4815d860819beebcc6e1eca83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePcl-gdTZTbK7OZb6FwpeiniRMNmd1JQ0KbtJ1W9vStWD4GkG3u89eI-xSwFTIbS-FkKCBgBhjARj4iM2FlomkQKlj4d_kKO9PmJnIawBpMzS5JSNYlAg40SO2esz1pXDrmob3pYceUPvXE7TG-7RVe3K4_atsrxqHH1w2mHdD2yz4mipw6Kv0XPb7sjjingf9sps_sJDW3bv6OmcnZRYB7r4vhO2vLtdzh-ixdP943y2iKxMdRdlBCJFUOhQW1JFXMrMKFvoLCEXCyeoKFMqEyNSZxQYkRVEhbWKBFk08YTBIdb6NgRPZb711Qb9Zy4g3w-V_x1qsFwdLNu-2JD7NfwsMwDRAQhDtXzd9r4ZGvwf-AWCVHDU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Nishikino, Shoichi ; Koyama, Hiroshi ; Furuhashi, Hiroki ; Hoshino, Hironobu ; Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Nishikino, Shoichi ; Koyama, Hiroshi ; Furuhashi, Hiroki ; Hoshino, Hironobu ; Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage. Questions/purposes: We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA), which represents the acetabular coverage of the femoral head at each acetabular edge point on the radial plane. This study validated the accuracy of the RCEA, as calculated by ACX Dynamics, as a quantitative parameter for acetabular coverage. Patients and methods: We reviewed the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of 650 hips from 325 patients who presented with chief complaint of symptoms at the hip joint. Of 109 hip radiographs (68 patients) that satisfied the criteria, 50 randomised, blinded AP pelvic radiographs were chosen. We determined the absolute RCEA difference (°) [= RCEA ACX (°) – RCEA CT (°)], determined the correlation between RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°), and examined the RCEA’s intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in 50 hips. Results: The absolute RCEA difference from A45° to P75° was 1.9–3.1°. The correlation between the RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°) was &gt; 0.7 in all lesions (p &lt; 0.001). Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the intra-observer reliability of the RCEA was 0.83–0.97 in the whole range, which is a highly reproducible and reasonable parameter, and the inter-observer reliability was &gt; 0.80 in A45°–P0°. Conclusions: The RCEA ACX (°) can be used as a simple quantitative parameter for assessing acetabular coverage using AP pelvic radiograph.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-7000</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1120700018820883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30602342</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging ; Adult ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Femur Head - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Software ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Hip international, 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.16-21</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-9e015a06ada7ce6b3f2986cb794ed31d1ebf5ef4815d860819beebcc6e1eca83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1120700018820883$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1120700018820883$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30602342$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nishikino, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyama, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuhashi, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Hironobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software</title><title>Hip international</title><addtitle>Hip Int</addtitle><description>Background: Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage. Questions/purposes: We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA), which represents the acetabular coverage of the femoral head at each acetabular edge point on the radial plane. This study validated the accuracy of the RCEA, as calculated by ACX Dynamics, as a quantitative parameter for acetabular coverage. Patients and methods: We reviewed the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of 650 hips from 325 patients who presented with chief complaint of symptoms at the hip joint. Of 109 hip radiographs (68 patients) that satisfied the criteria, 50 randomised, blinded AP pelvic radiographs were chosen. We determined the absolute RCEA difference (°) [= RCEA ACX (°) – RCEA CT (°)], determined the correlation between RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°), and examined the RCEA’s intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in 50 hips. Results: The absolute RCEA difference from A45° to P75° was 1.9–3.1°. The correlation between the RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°) was &gt; 0.7 in all lesions (p &lt; 0.001). Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the intra-observer reliability of the RCEA was 0.83–0.97 in the whole range, which is a highly reproducible and reasonable parameter, and the inter-observer reliability was &gt; 0.80 in A45°–P0°. Conclusions: The RCEA ACX (°) can be used as a simple quantitative parameter for assessing acetabular coverage using AP pelvic radiograph.</description><subject>Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1120-7000</issn><issn>1724-6067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePcl-gdTZTbK7OZb6FwpeiniRMNmd1JQ0KbtJ1W9vStWD4GkG3u89eI-xSwFTIbS-FkKCBgBhjARj4iM2FlomkQKlj4d_kKO9PmJnIawBpMzS5JSNYlAg40SO2esz1pXDrmob3pYceUPvXE7TG-7RVe3K4_atsrxqHH1w2mHdD2yz4mipw6Kv0XPb7sjjingf9sps_sJDW3bv6OmcnZRYB7r4vhO2vLtdzh-ixdP943y2iKxMdRdlBCJFUOhQW1JFXMrMKFvoLCEXCyeoKFMqEyNSZxQYkRVEhbWKBFk08YTBIdb6NgRPZb711Qb9Zy4g3w-V_x1qsFwdLNu-2JD7NfwsMwDRAQhDtXzd9r4ZGvwf-AWCVHDU</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Nishikino, Shoichi</creator><creator>Koyama, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Furuhashi, Hiroki</creator><creator>Hoshino, Hironobu</creator><creator>Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software</title><author>Nishikino, Shoichi ; Koyama, Hiroshi ; Furuhashi, Hiroki ; Hoshino, Hironobu ; Matsuyama, Yukihiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-9e015a06ada7ce6b3f2986cb794ed31d1ebf5ef4815d860819beebcc6e1eca83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nishikino, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyama, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuhashi, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Hironobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hip international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nishikino, Shoichi</au><au>Koyama, Hiroshi</au><au>Furuhashi, Hiroki</au><au>Hoshino, Hironobu</au><au>Matsuyama, Yukihiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software</atitle><jtitle>Hip international</jtitle><addtitle>Hip Int</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>16-21</pages><issn>1120-7000</issn><eissn>1724-6067</eissn><abstract>Background: Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage. Questions/purposes: We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA), which represents the acetabular coverage of the femoral head at each acetabular edge point on the radial plane. This study validated the accuracy of the RCEA, as calculated by ACX Dynamics, as a quantitative parameter for acetabular coverage. Patients and methods: We reviewed the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of 650 hips from 325 patients who presented with chief complaint of symptoms at the hip joint. Of 109 hip radiographs (68 patients) that satisfied the criteria, 50 randomised, blinded AP pelvic radiographs were chosen. We determined the absolute RCEA difference (°) [= RCEA ACX (°) – RCEA CT (°)], determined the correlation between RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°), and examined the RCEA’s intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in 50 hips. Results: The absolute RCEA difference from A45° to P75° was 1.9–3.1°. The correlation between the RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°) was &gt; 0.7 in all lesions (p &lt; 0.001). Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the intra-observer reliability of the RCEA was 0.83–0.97 in the whole range, which is a highly reproducible and reasonable parameter, and the inter-observer reliability was &gt; 0.80 in A45°–P0°. Conclusions: The RCEA ACX (°) can be used as a simple quantitative parameter for assessing acetabular coverage using AP pelvic radiograph.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30602342</pmid><doi>10.1177/1120700018820883</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1120-7000
ispartof Hip international, 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.16-21
issn 1120-7000
1724-6067
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1120700018820883
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging
Adult
Double-Blind Method
Female
Femur Head - diagnostic imaging
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Software
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Young Adult
title Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A26%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20new%202.5D%20radiographic%20index%20evaluating%20acetabular%20coverage%20using%20ACX%20software&rft.jtitle=Hip%20international&rft.au=Nishikino,%20Shoichi&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=16-21&rft.issn=1120-7000&rft.eissn=1724-6067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1120700018820883&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1120700018820883%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30602342&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1120700018820883&rfr_iscdi=true