Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software
Background: Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage. Questions/purposes: We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hip international 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.16-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Hip international |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Nishikino, Shoichi Koyama, Hiroshi Furuhashi, Hiroki Hoshino, Hironobu Matsuyama, Yukihiro |
description | Background:
Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage.
Questions/purposes:
We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA), which represents the acetabular coverage of the femoral head at each acetabular edge point on the radial plane. This study validated the accuracy of the RCEA, as calculated by ACX Dynamics, as a quantitative parameter for acetabular coverage.
Patients and methods:
We reviewed the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of 650 hips from 325 patients who presented with chief complaint of symptoms at the hip joint. Of 109 hip radiographs (68 patients) that satisfied the criteria, 50 randomised, blinded AP pelvic radiographs were chosen. We determined the absolute RCEA difference (°) [= RCEA ACX (°) – RCEA CT (°)], determined the correlation between RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°), and examined the RCEA’s intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in 50 hips.
Results:
The absolute RCEA difference from A45° to P75° was 1.9–3.1°. The correlation between the RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°) was > 0.7 in all lesions (p < 0.001). Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the intra-observer reliability of the RCEA was 0.83–0.97 in the whole range, which is a highly reproducible and reasonable parameter, and the inter-observer reliability was > 0.80 in A45°–P0°.
Conclusions:
The RCEA ACX (°) can be used as a simple quantitative parameter for assessing acetabular coverage using AP pelvic radiograph. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1120700018820883 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1120700018820883</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1120700018820883</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1120700018820883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-9e015a06ada7ce6b3f2986cb794ed31d1ebf5ef4815d860819beebcc6e1eca83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePcl-gdTZTbK7OZb6FwpeiniRMNmd1JQ0KbtJ1W9vStWD4GkG3u89eI-xSwFTIbS-FkKCBgBhjARj4iM2FlomkQKlj4d_kKO9PmJnIawBpMzS5JSNYlAg40SO2esz1pXDrmob3pYceUPvXE7TG-7RVe3K4_atsrxqHH1w2mHdD2yz4mipw6Kv0XPb7sjjingf9sps_sJDW3bv6OmcnZRYB7r4vhO2vLtdzh-ixdP943y2iKxMdRdlBCJFUOhQW1JFXMrMKFvoLCEXCyeoKFMqEyNSZxQYkRVEhbWKBFk08YTBIdb6NgRPZb711Qb9Zy4g3w-V_x1qsFwdLNu-2JD7NfwsMwDRAQhDtXzd9r4ZGvwf-AWCVHDU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Nishikino, Shoichi ; Koyama, Hiroshi ; Furuhashi, Hiroki ; Hoshino, Hironobu ; Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Nishikino, Shoichi ; Koyama, Hiroshi ; Furuhashi, Hiroki ; Hoshino, Hironobu ; Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage.
Questions/purposes:
We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA), which represents the acetabular coverage of the femoral head at each acetabular edge point on the radial plane. This study validated the accuracy of the RCEA, as calculated by ACX Dynamics, as a quantitative parameter for acetabular coverage.
Patients and methods:
We reviewed the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of 650 hips from 325 patients who presented with chief complaint of symptoms at the hip joint. Of 109 hip radiographs (68 patients) that satisfied the criteria, 50 randomised, blinded AP pelvic radiographs were chosen. We determined the absolute RCEA difference (°) [= RCEA ACX (°) – RCEA CT (°)], determined the correlation between RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°), and examined the RCEA’s intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in 50 hips.
Results:
The absolute RCEA difference from A45° to P75° was 1.9–3.1°. The correlation between the RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°) was > 0.7 in all lesions (p < 0.001). Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the intra-observer reliability of the RCEA was 0.83–0.97 in the whole range, which is a highly reproducible and reasonable parameter, and the inter-observer reliability was > 0.80 in A45°–P0°.
Conclusions:
The RCEA ACX (°) can be used as a simple quantitative parameter for assessing acetabular coverage using AP pelvic radiograph.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-7000</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1120700018820883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30602342</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging ; Adult ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Femur Head - diagnostic imaging ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reproducibility of Results ; Software ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Hip international, 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.16-21</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-9e015a06ada7ce6b3f2986cb794ed31d1ebf5ef4815d860819beebcc6e1eca83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1120700018820883$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1120700018820883$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30602342$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nishikino, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyama, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuhashi, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Hironobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software</title><title>Hip international</title><addtitle>Hip Int</addtitle><description>Background:
Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage.
Questions/purposes:
We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA), which represents the acetabular coverage of the femoral head at each acetabular edge point on the radial plane. This study validated the accuracy of the RCEA, as calculated by ACX Dynamics, as a quantitative parameter for acetabular coverage.
Patients and methods:
We reviewed the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of 650 hips from 325 patients who presented with chief complaint of symptoms at the hip joint. Of 109 hip radiographs (68 patients) that satisfied the criteria, 50 randomised, blinded AP pelvic radiographs were chosen. We determined the absolute RCEA difference (°) [= RCEA ACX (°) – RCEA CT (°)], determined the correlation between RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°), and examined the RCEA’s intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in 50 hips.
Results:
The absolute RCEA difference from A45° to P75° was 1.9–3.1°. The correlation between the RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°) was > 0.7 in all lesions (p < 0.001). Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the intra-observer reliability of the RCEA was 0.83–0.97 in the whole range, which is a highly reproducible and reasonable parameter, and the inter-observer reliability was > 0.80 in A45°–P0°.
Conclusions:
The RCEA ACX (°) can be used as a simple quantitative parameter for assessing acetabular coverage using AP pelvic radiograph.</description><subject>Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1120-7000</issn><issn>1724-6067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRbK3ePcl-gdTZTbK7OZb6FwpeiniRMNmd1JQ0KbtJ1W9vStWD4GkG3u89eI-xSwFTIbS-FkKCBgBhjARj4iM2FlomkQKlj4d_kKO9PmJnIawBpMzS5JSNYlAg40SO2esz1pXDrmob3pYceUPvXE7TG-7RVe3K4_atsrxqHH1w2mHdD2yz4mipw6Kv0XPb7sjjingf9sps_sJDW3bv6OmcnZRYB7r4vhO2vLtdzh-ixdP943y2iKxMdRdlBCJFUOhQW1JFXMrMKFvoLCEXCyeoKFMqEyNSZxQYkRVEhbWKBFk08YTBIdb6NgRPZb711Qb9Zy4g3w-V_x1qsFwdLNu-2JD7NfwsMwDRAQhDtXzd9r4ZGvwf-AWCVHDU</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Nishikino, Shoichi</creator><creator>Koyama, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Furuhashi, Hiroki</creator><creator>Hoshino, Hironobu</creator><creator>Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software</title><author>Nishikino, Shoichi ; Koyama, Hiroshi ; Furuhashi, Hiroki ; Hoshino, Hironobu ; Matsuyama, Yukihiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-9e015a06ada7ce6b3f2986cb794ed31d1ebf5ef4815d860819beebcc6e1eca83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur Head - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nishikino, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyama, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuhashi, Hiroki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoshino, Hironobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuyama, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hip international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nishikino, Shoichi</au><au>Koyama, Hiroshi</au><au>Furuhashi, Hiroki</au><au>Hoshino, Hironobu</au><au>Matsuyama, Yukihiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software</atitle><jtitle>Hip international</jtitle><addtitle>Hip Int</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>16-21</pages><issn>1120-7000</issn><eissn>1724-6067</eissn><abstract>Background:
Several radiographic signs have been described to assess acetabular coverage. However, plain radiographs only have 2 dimensions (2D) and cannot accurately show acetabular coverage.
Questions/purposes:
We developed the ACX Dynamics software to calculate the radial centre-edge angle (RCEA), which represents the acetabular coverage of the femoral head at each acetabular edge point on the radial plane. This study validated the accuracy of the RCEA, as calculated by ACX Dynamics, as a quantitative parameter for acetabular coverage.
Patients and methods:
We reviewed the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of 650 hips from 325 patients who presented with chief complaint of symptoms at the hip joint. Of 109 hip radiographs (68 patients) that satisfied the criteria, 50 randomised, blinded AP pelvic radiographs were chosen. We determined the absolute RCEA difference (°) [= RCEA ACX (°) – RCEA CT (°)], determined the correlation between RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°), and examined the RCEA’s intra-observer and inter-observer reliability in 50 hips.
Results:
The absolute RCEA difference from A45° to P75° was 1.9–3.1°. The correlation between the RCEA ACX (°) and RCEA CT (°) was > 0.7 in all lesions (p < 0.001). Using the intraclass correlation coefficient, the intra-observer reliability of the RCEA was 0.83–0.97 in the whole range, which is a highly reproducible and reasonable parameter, and the inter-observer reliability was > 0.80 in A45°–P0°.
Conclusions:
The RCEA ACX (°) can be used as a simple quantitative parameter for assessing acetabular coverage using AP pelvic radiograph.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30602342</pmid><doi>10.1177/1120700018820883</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1120-7000 |
ispartof | Hip international, 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.16-21 |
issn | 1120-7000 1724-6067 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1120700018820883 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
subjects | Acetabulum - diagnostic imaging Adult Double-Blind Method Female Femur Head - diagnostic imaging Humans Male Middle Aged Reproducibility of Results Software Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Young Adult |
title | Validation of a new 2.5D radiographic index evaluating acetabular coverage using ACX software |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A26%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20new%202.5D%20radiographic%20index%20evaluating%20acetabular%20coverage%20using%20ACX%20software&rft.jtitle=Hip%20international&rft.au=Nishikino,%20Shoichi&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=16-21&rft.issn=1120-7000&rft.eissn=1724-6067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1120700018820883&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1120700018820883%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/30602342&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1120700018820883&rfr_iscdi=true |