To compare corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy after two different endothelial surgeries
Purpose: To study the features of corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) after successful Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: Thirty-two eyes affected by FECD wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of ophthalmology 2022-03, Vol.32 (2), p.866-874 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 874 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 866 |
container_title | European journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico Abicca, Irene Bono, Valeria Giannini, Daniela Colabelli-Gisoldi, Rossella Annamaria Boni, Nicoletta Komaiha, Chiara Pocobelli, Augusto |
description | Purpose:
To study the features of corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) after successful Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
Methods:
Thirty-two eyes affected by FECD with corneal oedema requiring a corneal graft were treated with DSAEK (15 eyes) or DMEK (17 eyes). All patients underwent in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCCM) at 6 months postoperatively. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and the correlation with IVCCM characteristics.
Results:
Using IVCCM, Z-scan curve analysis showed similar subepithelial reflectivity peaks between the two groups (DSAEK 1256 SU ± 514 vs DMEK 1118 SU ± 408, p = 0.411), while the interface reflectivity was significantly higher in the DMEK group (1511 SU ± 357) than in the DSAEK group (1029 SU ± 413, p = 0.002).
Conclusion:
Comparing the corneal confocal microscopic characteristics after DMEK with those after DSAEK and their correlation with visual outcome at 6 months, we hypothesized that the presence of a third reflectivity peak in the Z-scan curves of DSAEK patients could justify the poorer visual outcome with this endothelial surgery than with DMEK. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/11206721211009451 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_11206721211009451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_11206721211009451</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_11206721211009451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-54a92e5da2cf0364c22e59b5c346bc176ba9f7b78c0f97bd4a0f5f44a1596c5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRbK0-gBfZF0jd2WyS5ijFqiB4qeew2cw2KU027CaU3Dz4Er6eT-LWqCCCp3-G-b-B_yfkEtgcIEmuATiLEw4cgLFURHBEppBwEcQM4mM_-3twMEzImXNbxrh38VMyCcOFCENIp-R1bagydSsterUNyp3XRhvlh7pS1jhl2oEaTXFAR_dVV9JVr0r3_vJGsSlMV-Ku-qRGuhhcZ01bDlTqDi3t9oYWldZosel-Ea63G7QVunNyouXO4cWXzsjz6na9vA8en-4eljePgQoF64JIyJRjVEiuNAtjobjf0jzy1zhXkMS5THWSJwvFdJrkhZBMR1oICVEaqwjDGYHx7yGWs6iz1la1tEMGLDs0mv1p1DNXI9P2eY3FD_FdoTfMR4OTG8y2preNz_DPxw8UDIJZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>To compare corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy after two different endothelial surgeries</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico ; Abicca, Irene ; Bono, Valeria ; Giannini, Daniela ; Colabelli-Gisoldi, Rossella Annamaria ; Boni, Nicoletta ; Komaiha, Chiara ; Pocobelli, Augusto</creator><creatorcontrib>Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico ; Abicca, Irene ; Bono, Valeria ; Giannini, Daniela ; Colabelli-Gisoldi, Rossella Annamaria ; Boni, Nicoletta ; Komaiha, Chiara ; Pocobelli, Augusto</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
To study the features of corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) after successful Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
Methods:
Thirty-two eyes affected by FECD with corneal oedema requiring a corneal graft were treated with DSAEK (15 eyes) or DMEK (17 eyes). All patients underwent in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCCM) at 6 months postoperatively. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and the correlation with IVCCM characteristics.
Results:
Using IVCCM, Z-scan curve analysis showed similar subepithelial reflectivity peaks between the two groups (DSAEK 1256 SU ± 514 vs DMEK 1118 SU ± 408, p = 0.411), while the interface reflectivity was significantly higher in the DMEK group (1511 SU ± 357) than in the DSAEK group (1029 SU ± 413, p = 0.002).
Conclusion:
Comparing the corneal confocal microscopic characteristics after DMEK with those after DSAEK and their correlation with visual outcome at 6 months, we hypothesized that the presence of a third reflectivity peak in the Z-scan curves of DSAEK patients could justify the poorer visual outcome with this endothelial surgery than with DMEK.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-6721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/11206721211009451</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33843319</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>European journal of ophthalmology, 2022-03, Vol.32 (2), p.866-874</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-54a92e5da2cf0364c22e59b5c346bc176ba9f7b78c0f97bd4a0f5f44a1596c5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-54a92e5da2cf0364c22e59b5c346bc176ba9f7b78c0f97bd4a0f5f44a1596c5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1148-6491</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/11206721211009451$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/11206721211009451$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33843319$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abicca, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bono, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colabelli-Gisoldi, Rossella Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boni, Nicoletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komaiha, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pocobelli, Augusto</creatorcontrib><title>To compare corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy after two different endothelial surgeries</title><title>European journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Eur J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose:
To study the features of corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) after successful Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
Methods:
Thirty-two eyes affected by FECD with corneal oedema requiring a corneal graft were treated with DSAEK (15 eyes) or DMEK (17 eyes). All patients underwent in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCCM) at 6 months postoperatively. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and the correlation with IVCCM characteristics.
Results:
Using IVCCM, Z-scan curve analysis showed similar subepithelial reflectivity peaks between the two groups (DSAEK 1256 SU ± 514 vs DMEK 1118 SU ± 408, p = 0.411), while the interface reflectivity was significantly higher in the DMEK group (1511 SU ± 357) than in the DSAEK group (1029 SU ± 413, p = 0.002).
Conclusion:
Comparing the corneal confocal microscopic characteristics after DMEK with those after DSAEK and their correlation with visual outcome at 6 months, we hypothesized that the presence of a third reflectivity peak in the Z-scan curves of DSAEK patients could justify the poorer visual outcome with this endothelial surgery than with DMEK.</description><issn>1120-6721</issn><issn>1724-6016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRbK0-gBfZF0jd2WyS5ijFqiB4qeew2cw2KU027CaU3Dz4Er6eT-LWqCCCp3-G-b-B_yfkEtgcIEmuATiLEw4cgLFURHBEppBwEcQM4mM_-3twMEzImXNbxrh38VMyCcOFCENIp-R1bagydSsterUNyp3XRhvlh7pS1jhl2oEaTXFAR_dVV9JVr0r3_vJGsSlMV-Ku-qRGuhhcZ01bDlTqDi3t9oYWldZosel-Ea63G7QVunNyouXO4cWXzsjz6na9vA8en-4eljePgQoF64JIyJRjVEiuNAtjobjf0jzy1zhXkMS5THWSJwvFdJrkhZBMR1oICVEaqwjDGYHx7yGWs6iz1la1tEMGLDs0mv1p1DNXI9P2eY3FD_FdoTfMR4OTG8y2preNz_DPxw8UDIJZ</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico</creator><creator>Abicca, Irene</creator><creator>Bono, Valeria</creator><creator>Giannini, Daniela</creator><creator>Colabelli-Gisoldi, Rossella Annamaria</creator><creator>Boni, Nicoletta</creator><creator>Komaiha, Chiara</creator><creator>Pocobelli, Augusto</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-6491</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>To compare corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy after two different endothelial surgeries</title><author>Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico ; Abicca, Irene ; Bono, Valeria ; Giannini, Daniela ; Colabelli-Gisoldi, Rossella Annamaria ; Boni, Nicoletta ; Komaiha, Chiara ; Pocobelli, Augusto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-54a92e5da2cf0364c22e59b5c346bc176ba9f7b78c0f97bd4a0f5f44a1596c5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abicca, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bono, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannini, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colabelli-Gisoldi, Rossella Annamaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boni, Nicoletta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komaiha, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pocobelli, Augusto</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schiano-Lomoriello, Domenico</au><au>Abicca, Irene</au><au>Bono, Valeria</au><au>Giannini, Daniela</au><au>Colabelli-Gisoldi, Rossella Annamaria</au><au>Boni, Nicoletta</au><au>Komaiha, Chiara</au><au>Pocobelli, Augusto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To compare corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy after two different endothelial surgeries</atitle><jtitle>European journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>866</spage><epage>874</epage><pages>866-874</pages><issn>1120-6721</issn><eissn>1724-6016</eissn><abstract>Purpose:
To study the features of corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) after successful Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
Methods:
Thirty-two eyes affected by FECD with corneal oedema requiring a corneal graft were treated with DSAEK (15 eyes) or DMEK (17 eyes). All patients underwent in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCCM) at 6 months postoperatively. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and the correlation with IVCCM characteristics.
Results:
Using IVCCM, Z-scan curve analysis showed similar subepithelial reflectivity peaks between the two groups (DSAEK 1256 SU ± 514 vs DMEK 1118 SU ± 408, p = 0.411), while the interface reflectivity was significantly higher in the DMEK group (1511 SU ± 357) than in the DSAEK group (1029 SU ± 413, p = 0.002).
Conclusion:
Comparing the corneal confocal microscopic characteristics after DMEK with those after DSAEK and their correlation with visual outcome at 6 months, we hypothesized that the presence of a third reflectivity peak in the Z-scan curves of DSAEK patients could justify the poorer visual outcome with this endothelial surgery than with DMEK.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33843319</pmid><doi>10.1177/11206721211009451</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-6491</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1120-6721 |
ispartof | European journal of ophthalmology, 2022-03, Vol.32 (2), p.866-874 |
issn | 1120-6721 1724-6016 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_11206721211009451 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | To compare corneal confocal microscopy of eyes with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy after two different endothelial surgeries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A55%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20compare%20corneal%20confocal%20microscopy%20of%20eyes%20with%20Fuchs%E2%80%99%20endothelial%20corneal%20dystrophy%20after%20two%20different%20endothelial%20surgeries&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Schiano-Lomoriello,%20Domenico&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=866&rft.epage=874&rft.pages=866-874&rft.issn=1120-6721&rft.eissn=1724-6016&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/11206721211009451&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_11206721211009451%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33843319&rft_sage_id=10.1177_11206721211009451&rfr_iscdi=true |