Posterior capsular opacification in pseudophakic eyes with a silicone or acrylic intraocular lens
To compare posterior capsular opacification in eyes with IOL of two different materials--silicone or acrylic. Eighty consecutive eyes undergoing cataract surgery were prospectively randomized in two groups, 40 eyes receiving a silicone (Sl--30NB) and 40 eyes an acrylic (Acrysof MA60BM) intraocular l...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of ophthalmology 2002-05, Vol.12 (3), p.212-218 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 218 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 212 |
| container_title | European journal of ophthalmology |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | POHJALAINEN, T VESTI, E UUSITALO, R. J LAATIKAINEN, L |
| description | To compare posterior capsular opacification in eyes with IOL of two different materials--silicone or acrylic.
Eighty consecutive eyes undergoing cataract surgery were prospectively randomized in two groups, 40 eyes receiving a silicone (Sl--30NB) and 40 eyes an acrylic (Acrysof MA60BM) intraocular lens (IOL). The same surgeon performed phacoemulsification and the intraocular lens (PHACO IOL) operation in all cases. Patients were re-examined on the first postoperative day, after one week, four months, and 1-2.4 years. Seven eyes were lost to late control.
Clinically significant posterior capsular opacification (PCO) (including eyes with capsulotomy already performed) was equally common in both groups; 25% in the silicone group and 19% in the acrylic group (p=0.53). The posterior capsule remained clear in 61% of the silicone and 76% of the acrylic IOL eyes (p=0.18). In the whole study group, 29% of eyes with and 14% without concurrent ocular diseases had significant PCO (p=0.13). In the silicone IOL group, PCO was more common in eyes with concurrent ocular diseases (44%) than eyes without other diseases (10%) (p=0.049). Eyes with acrylic IOL showed no difference in significant PCO, with or without other diseases (18% and 20%, respectively).
In a consecutive series of 80 cataract eyes central PCO was equally common in eyes receiving a silicone or an acrylic IOL. In the silicone IOL group, however, significant PCO was more common if there was concurrent ocular disease, while with the acrylic IOL concurrent ocular disease did not seem to increase the risk of PCO. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/112067210201200307 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_112067210201200307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>12113567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-ba3d8a38da1abd5a4a30a96172006e486dd2857bc717009404da685d7189bcf03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAhyQLxwDXjuxkyOq-JMqwQHO0cZ2VEMaR3Yi1LfHpZV64LSzq29WmiHkGtgdgFL3AJxJxYFxlhQTTJ2QOSieZ5KBPE06nbMdMSMXMX6xBFY5Pycz4ACikGpO8N3H0QbnA9U4xKnDQP2A2rVO4-h8T11Ph2gn44c1fjtN7dZG-uPGNUUaXee07y1NdtRhm7bEjwG9_vvU2T5ekrMWu2ivDnNBPp8eP5Yv2ert-XX5sMq04NWYNShMiaI0CNiYAnMUDCuZ4jAmbV5KY3hZqEYrUCzFYLlBWRZGQVk1umViQfj-rw4-xmDbeghug2FbA6t3fdX_-0qmm71pmJqNNUfLoaAE3B4AjBq7NmCvXTxyQpV5pSrxCyp9c2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Posterior capsular opacification in pseudophakic eyes with a silicone or acrylic intraocular lens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>POHJALAINEN, T ; VESTI, E ; UUSITALO, R. J ; LAATIKAINEN, L</creator><creatorcontrib>POHJALAINEN, T ; VESTI, E ; UUSITALO, R. J ; LAATIKAINEN, L</creatorcontrib><description>To compare posterior capsular opacification in eyes with IOL of two different materials--silicone or acrylic.
Eighty consecutive eyes undergoing cataract surgery were prospectively randomized in two groups, 40 eyes receiving a silicone (Sl--30NB) and 40 eyes an acrylic (Acrysof MA60BM) intraocular lens (IOL). The same surgeon performed phacoemulsification and the intraocular lens (PHACO IOL) operation in all cases. Patients were re-examined on the first postoperative day, after one week, four months, and 1-2.4 years. Seven eyes were lost to late control.
Clinically significant posterior capsular opacification (PCO) (including eyes with capsulotomy already performed) was equally common in both groups; 25% in the silicone group and 19% in the acrylic group (p=0.53). The posterior capsule remained clear in 61% of the silicone and 76% of the acrylic IOL eyes (p=0.18). In the whole study group, 29% of eyes with and 14% without concurrent ocular diseases had significant PCO (p=0.13). In the silicone IOL group, PCO was more common in eyes with concurrent ocular diseases (44%) than eyes without other diseases (10%) (p=0.049). Eyes with acrylic IOL showed no difference in significant PCO, with or without other diseases (18% and 20%, respectively).
In a consecutive series of 80 cataract eyes central PCO was equally common in eyes receiving a silicone or an acrylic IOL. In the silicone IOL group, however, significant PCO was more common if there was concurrent ocular disease, while with the acrylic IOL concurrent ocular disease did not seem to increase the risk of PCO.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-6721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6016</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/112067210201200307</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12113567</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Milano: Wichtig</publisher><subject>Acrylic Resins - adverse effects ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cataract - etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Lens Capsule, Crystalline - pathology ; Lens diseases ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Phacoemulsification ; Prospective Studies ; Pseudophakia - complications ; Silicone Elastomers - adverse effects ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><ispartof>European journal of ophthalmology, 2002-05, Vol.12 (3), p.212-218</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-ba3d8a38da1abd5a4a30a96172006e486dd2857bc717009404da685d7189bcf03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-ba3d8a38da1abd5a4a30a96172006e486dd2857bc717009404da685d7189bcf03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13784979$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12113567$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>POHJALAINEN, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VESTI, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UUSITALO, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAATIKAINEN, L</creatorcontrib><title>Posterior capsular opacification in pseudophakic eyes with a silicone or acrylic intraocular lens</title><title>European journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Eur J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>To compare posterior capsular opacification in eyes with IOL of two different materials--silicone or acrylic.
Eighty consecutive eyes undergoing cataract surgery were prospectively randomized in two groups, 40 eyes receiving a silicone (Sl--30NB) and 40 eyes an acrylic (Acrysof MA60BM) intraocular lens (IOL). The same surgeon performed phacoemulsification and the intraocular lens (PHACO IOL) operation in all cases. Patients were re-examined on the first postoperative day, after one week, four months, and 1-2.4 years. Seven eyes were lost to late control.
Clinically significant posterior capsular opacification (PCO) (including eyes with capsulotomy already performed) was equally common in both groups; 25% in the silicone group and 19% in the acrylic group (p=0.53). The posterior capsule remained clear in 61% of the silicone and 76% of the acrylic IOL eyes (p=0.18). In the whole study group, 29% of eyes with and 14% without concurrent ocular diseases had significant PCO (p=0.13). In the silicone IOL group, PCO was more common in eyes with concurrent ocular diseases (44%) than eyes without other diseases (10%) (p=0.049). Eyes with acrylic IOL showed no difference in significant PCO, with or without other diseases (18% and 20%, respectively).
In a consecutive series of 80 cataract eyes central PCO was equally common in eyes receiving a silicone or an acrylic IOL. In the silicone IOL group, however, significant PCO was more common if there was concurrent ocular disease, while with the acrylic IOL concurrent ocular disease did not seem to increase the risk of PCO.</description><subject>Acrylic Resins - adverse effects</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cataract - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lens Capsule, Crystalline - pathology</subject><subject>Lens diseases</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pseudophakia - complications</subject><subject>Silicone Elastomers - adverse effects</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><issn>1120-6721</issn><issn>1724-6016</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAhyQLxwDXjuxkyOq-JMqwQHO0cZ2VEMaR3Yi1LfHpZV64LSzq29WmiHkGtgdgFL3AJxJxYFxlhQTTJ2QOSieZ5KBPE06nbMdMSMXMX6xBFY5Pycz4ACikGpO8N3H0QbnA9U4xKnDQP2A2rVO4-h8T11Ph2gn44c1fjtN7dZG-uPGNUUaXee07y1NdtRhm7bEjwG9_vvU2T5ekrMWu2ivDnNBPp8eP5Yv2ert-XX5sMq04NWYNShMiaI0CNiYAnMUDCuZ4jAmbV5KY3hZqEYrUCzFYLlBWRZGQVk1umViQfj-rw4-xmDbeghug2FbA6t3fdX_-0qmm71pmJqNNUfLoaAE3B4AjBq7NmCvXTxyQpV5pSrxCyp9c2A</recordid><startdate>20020501</startdate><enddate>20020501</enddate><creator>POHJALAINEN, T</creator><creator>VESTI, E</creator><creator>UUSITALO, R. J</creator><creator>LAATIKAINEN, L</creator><general>Wichtig</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020501</creationdate><title>Posterior capsular opacification in pseudophakic eyes with a silicone or acrylic intraocular lens</title><author>POHJALAINEN, T ; VESTI, E ; UUSITALO, R. J ; LAATIKAINEN, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-ba3d8a38da1abd5a4a30a96172006e486dd2857bc717009404da685d7189bcf03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Acrylic Resins - adverse effects</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cataract - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lens Capsule, Crystalline - pathology</topic><topic>Lens diseases</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pseudophakia - complications</topic><topic>Silicone Elastomers - adverse effects</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>POHJALAINEN, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VESTI, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UUSITALO, R. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAATIKAINEN, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>POHJALAINEN, T</au><au>VESTI, E</au><au>UUSITALO, R. J</au><au>LAATIKAINEN, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Posterior capsular opacification in pseudophakic eyes with a silicone or acrylic intraocular lens</atitle><jtitle>European journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2002-05-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>212-218</pages><issn>1120-6721</issn><eissn>1724-6016</eissn><abstract>To compare posterior capsular opacification in eyes with IOL of two different materials--silicone or acrylic.
Eighty consecutive eyes undergoing cataract surgery were prospectively randomized in two groups, 40 eyes receiving a silicone (Sl--30NB) and 40 eyes an acrylic (Acrysof MA60BM) intraocular lens (IOL). The same surgeon performed phacoemulsification and the intraocular lens (PHACO IOL) operation in all cases. Patients were re-examined on the first postoperative day, after one week, four months, and 1-2.4 years. Seven eyes were lost to late control.
Clinically significant posterior capsular opacification (PCO) (including eyes with capsulotomy already performed) was equally common in both groups; 25% in the silicone group and 19% in the acrylic group (p=0.53). The posterior capsule remained clear in 61% of the silicone and 76% of the acrylic IOL eyes (p=0.18). In the whole study group, 29% of eyes with and 14% without concurrent ocular diseases had significant PCO (p=0.13). In the silicone IOL group, PCO was more common in eyes with concurrent ocular diseases (44%) than eyes without other diseases (10%) (p=0.049). Eyes with acrylic IOL showed no difference in significant PCO, with or without other diseases (18% and 20%, respectively).
In a consecutive series of 80 cataract eyes central PCO was equally common in eyes receiving a silicone or an acrylic IOL. In the silicone IOL group, however, significant PCO was more common if there was concurrent ocular disease, while with the acrylic IOL concurrent ocular disease did not seem to increase the risk of PCO.</abstract><cop>Milano</cop><pub>Wichtig</pub><pmid>12113567</pmid><doi>10.1177/112067210201200307</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1120-6721 |
| ispartof | European journal of ophthalmology, 2002-05, Vol.12 (3), p.212-218 |
| issn | 1120-6721 1724-6016 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_112067210201200307 |
| source | MEDLINE; SAGE Journals |
| subjects | Acrylic Resins - adverse effects Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Cataract - etiology Female Humans Lens Capsule, Crystalline - pathology Lens diseases Lens Implantation, Intraocular Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Ophthalmology Phacoemulsification Prospective Studies Pseudophakia - complications Silicone Elastomers - adverse effects Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the eye and orbit |
| title | Posterior capsular opacification in pseudophakic eyes with a silicone or acrylic intraocular lens |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A21%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Posterior%20capsular%20opacification%20in%20pseudophakic%20eyes%20with%20a%20silicone%20or%20acrylic%20intraocular%20lens&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=POHJALAINEN,%20T&rft.date=2002-05-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=212-218&rft.issn=1120-6721&rft.eissn=1724-6016&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/112067210201200307&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E12113567%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/12113567&rfr_iscdi=true |