Tensile properties of composite metal foam and composite metal foam core sandwich panels
Steel-steel composite metal foam (SS-CMF) and composite metal foam core sandwich panels (SS-CMF-CSP) were manufactured and tested under quasi-static tension. The SS-CMF-CSP were manufactured by attaching stainless steel face sheets to a SS-CMF core using solid-state diffusion bonding. SEM imaging wa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of sandwich structures & materials 2021-11, Vol.23 (8), p.3773-3793 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3793 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 3773 |
container_title | The journal of sandwich structures & materials |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Marx, Jacob Rabiei, Afsaneh |
description | Steel-steel composite metal foam (SS-CMF) and composite metal foam core sandwich panels (SS-CMF-CSP) were manufactured and tested under quasi-static tension. The SS-CMF-CSP were manufactured by attaching stainless steel face sheets to a SS-CMF core using solid-state diffusion bonding. SEM imaging was used to inspect the microstructure of SS-CMF and compare it to that of SS-CMF-CSP. The results indicate a cohesive bond line at the interface of the core and the face sheets. The bare SS-CMF samples had an ultimate tensile strength between 75–85 MPa and a failure strain between 7.5–8%. The normalized tensile strength of the SS-CMF was approximately 24 MPa/(g/cm3), 410% higher than other comparable metal foams, with a specific energy absorption of 0.95 J/g under tension. The uniform porosities and strong bonding between the sphere wall and matrix seem to be the strengthening factor of SS-CMF under tension when compared to other metal foams. The ultimate tensile strength of the SS-CMF-CSP was 115% stronger than the bare SS-CMF at 165 MPa with an average failure strain of 23%. The normalized strength of the SS-CMF-CSP was 52% higher than the bare SS-CMF. The modulus of elasticity was approximated using the rule of mixtures for the SS-CMF and the SS-CMF-CSP and the experimental results were found to lie within the calculated upper and lower bounds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1099636220942880 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1099636220942880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1099636220942880</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1099636220942880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7407406cca61baac3f05056a1ec825cd52fc0b85c76bbff6b67fea93596b74cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK7ePeYLRCdpk7RHWfyzsOBlBW8lmZ1ol7YpSUX89nZZT6Iw8AZ-8x7DY-xawo2U1t5KqGtTGKWgLlVVwQlbSF2AsLVVp_M-Y3Hg5-wi5z2AkmVpFux1S0NuO-JjiiOlqaXMY-AY-zHmdiLe0-Q6HqLruRt2fwOMiXie8WeL73x0A3X5kp0F12W6-tEle3m4366exOb5cb262whUlZyELWEeg-iM9M5hEUCDNk4SVkrjTquA4CuN1ngfgvHGBnJ1oWvjbYmhWDI45mKKOScKzZja3qWvRkJzaKb53cxsEUdLdm_U7ONHGuYP_7__Bj5sZM4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tensile properties of composite metal foam and composite metal foam core sandwich panels</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Marx, Jacob ; Rabiei, Afsaneh</creator><creatorcontrib>Marx, Jacob ; Rabiei, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><description>Steel-steel composite metal foam (SS-CMF) and composite metal foam core sandwich panels (SS-CMF-CSP) were manufactured and tested under quasi-static tension. The SS-CMF-CSP were manufactured by attaching stainless steel face sheets to a SS-CMF core using solid-state diffusion bonding. SEM imaging was used to inspect the microstructure of SS-CMF and compare it to that of SS-CMF-CSP. The results indicate a cohesive bond line at the interface of the core and the face sheets. The bare SS-CMF samples had an ultimate tensile strength between 75–85 MPa and a failure strain between 7.5–8%. The normalized tensile strength of the SS-CMF was approximately 24 MPa/(g/cm3), 410% higher than other comparable metal foams, with a specific energy absorption of 0.95 J/g under tension. The uniform porosities and strong bonding between the sphere wall and matrix seem to be the strengthening factor of SS-CMF under tension when compared to other metal foams. The ultimate tensile strength of the SS-CMF-CSP was 115% stronger than the bare SS-CMF at 165 MPa with an average failure strain of 23%. The normalized strength of the SS-CMF-CSP was 52% higher than the bare SS-CMF. The modulus of elasticity was approximated using the rule of mixtures for the SS-CMF and the SS-CMF-CSP and the experimental results were found to lie within the calculated upper and lower bounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-7972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1099636220942880</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>The journal of sandwich structures & materials, 2021-11, Vol.23 (8), p.3773-3793</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7407406cca61baac3f05056a1ec825cd52fc0b85c76bbff6b67fea93596b74cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7407406cca61baac3f05056a1ec825cd52fc0b85c76bbff6b67fea93596b74cf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1091-424X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1099636220942880$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1099636220942880$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marx, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabiei, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><title>Tensile properties of composite metal foam and composite metal foam core sandwich panels</title><title>The journal of sandwich structures & materials</title><description>Steel-steel composite metal foam (SS-CMF) and composite metal foam core sandwich panels (SS-CMF-CSP) were manufactured and tested under quasi-static tension. The SS-CMF-CSP were manufactured by attaching stainless steel face sheets to a SS-CMF core using solid-state diffusion bonding. SEM imaging was used to inspect the microstructure of SS-CMF and compare it to that of SS-CMF-CSP. The results indicate a cohesive bond line at the interface of the core and the face sheets. The bare SS-CMF samples had an ultimate tensile strength between 75–85 MPa and a failure strain between 7.5–8%. The normalized tensile strength of the SS-CMF was approximately 24 MPa/(g/cm3), 410% higher than other comparable metal foams, with a specific energy absorption of 0.95 J/g under tension. The uniform porosities and strong bonding between the sphere wall and matrix seem to be the strengthening factor of SS-CMF under tension when compared to other metal foams. The ultimate tensile strength of the SS-CMF-CSP was 115% stronger than the bare SS-CMF at 165 MPa with an average failure strain of 23%. The normalized strength of the SS-CMF-CSP was 52% higher than the bare SS-CMF. The modulus of elasticity was approximated using the rule of mixtures for the SS-CMF and the SS-CMF-CSP and the experimental results were found to lie within the calculated upper and lower bounds.</description><issn>1099-6362</issn><issn>1530-7972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMouK7ePeYLRCdpk7RHWfyzsOBlBW8lmZ1ol7YpSUX89nZZT6Iw8AZ-8x7DY-xawo2U1t5KqGtTGKWgLlVVwQlbSF2AsLVVp_M-Y3Hg5-wi5z2AkmVpFux1S0NuO-JjiiOlqaXMY-AY-zHmdiLe0-Q6HqLruRt2fwOMiXie8WeL73x0A3X5kp0F12W6-tEle3m4366exOb5cb262whUlZyELWEeg-iM9M5hEUCDNk4SVkrjTquA4CuN1ngfgvHGBnJ1oWvjbYmhWDI45mKKOScKzZja3qWvRkJzaKb53cxsEUdLdm_U7ONHGuYP_7__Bj5sZM4</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Marx, Jacob</creator><creator>Rabiei, Afsaneh</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1091-424X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Tensile properties of composite metal foam and composite metal foam core sandwich panels</title><author>Marx, Jacob ; Rabiei, Afsaneh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-7407406cca61baac3f05056a1ec825cd52fc0b85c76bbff6b67fea93596b74cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marx, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabiei, Afsaneh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of sandwich structures & materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marx, Jacob</au><au>Rabiei, Afsaneh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tensile properties of composite metal foam and composite metal foam core sandwich panels</atitle><jtitle>The journal of sandwich structures & materials</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3773</spage><epage>3793</epage><pages>3773-3793</pages><issn>1099-6362</issn><eissn>1530-7972</eissn><abstract>Steel-steel composite metal foam (SS-CMF) and composite metal foam core sandwich panels (SS-CMF-CSP) were manufactured and tested under quasi-static tension. The SS-CMF-CSP were manufactured by attaching stainless steel face sheets to a SS-CMF core using solid-state diffusion bonding. SEM imaging was used to inspect the microstructure of SS-CMF and compare it to that of SS-CMF-CSP. The results indicate a cohesive bond line at the interface of the core and the face sheets. The bare SS-CMF samples had an ultimate tensile strength between 75–85 MPa and a failure strain between 7.5–8%. The normalized tensile strength of the SS-CMF was approximately 24 MPa/(g/cm3), 410% higher than other comparable metal foams, with a specific energy absorption of 0.95 J/g under tension. The uniform porosities and strong bonding between the sphere wall and matrix seem to be the strengthening factor of SS-CMF under tension when compared to other metal foams. The ultimate tensile strength of the SS-CMF-CSP was 115% stronger than the bare SS-CMF at 165 MPa with an average failure strain of 23%. The normalized strength of the SS-CMF-CSP was 52% higher than the bare SS-CMF. The modulus of elasticity was approximated using the rule of mixtures for the SS-CMF and the SS-CMF-CSP and the experimental results were found to lie within the calculated upper and lower bounds.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1099636220942880</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1091-424X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1099-6362 |
ispartof | The journal of sandwich structures & materials, 2021-11, Vol.23 (8), p.3773-3793 |
issn | 1099-6362 1530-7972 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1099636220942880 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Tensile properties of composite metal foam and composite metal foam core sandwich panels |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tensile%20properties%20of%20composite%20metal%20foam%20and%20composite%20metal%20foam%20core%20sandwich%20panels&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20sandwich%20structures%20&%20materials&rft.au=Marx,%20Jacob&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3773&rft.epage=3793&rft.pages=3773-3793&rft.issn=1099-6362&rft.eissn=1530-7972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1099636220942880&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1099636220942880%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1099636220942880&rfr_iscdi=true |