A Shared History? Presenting Australia's Post-Contact Indigenous Past

The colonial origins of museums have often influenced the ways in which they depict the past. In Australia, portrayals of the Indigenous past have focussed exclusively on “traditional life” or the prehistoric period of history, to the detriment of post-contact history. This paper examines ways in wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interpretation research 2005-04, Vol.10 (1), p.31-48
1. Verfasser: Batten, Bronwyn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 48
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Journal of interpretation research
container_volume 10
creator Batten, Bronwyn
description The colonial origins of museums have often influenced the ways in which they depict the past. In Australia, portrayals of the Indigenous past have focussed exclusively on “traditional life” or the prehistoric period of history, to the detriment of post-contact history. This paper examines ways in which museums around Australia are beginning to counter this trend. Museum exhibits that relate to Australia's shared, post-contact past are analyzed in the context of recent developments in museology. This analysis is combined with feedback generated from interviews with heritage professionals. The results suggest that in order to move towards inclusive interpretation of Australian history, multiple voices and perspectives of the past must be incorporated into interpretive programs. This paper argues that there are a variety of ways in which heritage interpreters can attempt to incorporate pluralist perspectives of the past into museum exhibits.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/109258720501000103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_109258720501000103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_109258720501000103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1363-f935c6f16a12e82e400bad27663059f772f51da0d73ae8b6f2beee1bf71926233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFLxDAUhIMoWFf_gKfcPEVfXmzSnKSUdXdhwQX1XNL2Za2srSTZw_57W_TmYZhh-JjDMHYr4V5KYx4kWMwLg5CDBJikzliG2qKwyuhzls2AmIlLdhXjJ8CULWZsWfLXDxeo4-s-pjGcnvguUKQh9cOel8eYgjv07i7y3RiTqMYhuTbxzdD1exrG49S7mK7ZhXeHSDd_vmDvz8u3ai22L6tNVW5FK5VWwluVt9pL7SRSgfQI0LgOjdYKcuuNQZ_LzkFnlKOi0R4bIpKNN9KiRqUWDH932zDGGMjX36H_cuFUS6jnI-r_R6gfC5pPfA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Shared History? Presenting Australia's Post-Contact Indigenous Past</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Batten, Bronwyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Batten, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><description>The colonial origins of museums have often influenced the ways in which they depict the past. In Australia, portrayals of the Indigenous past have focussed exclusively on “traditional life” or the prehistoric period of history, to the detriment of post-contact history. This paper examines ways in which museums around Australia are beginning to counter this trend. Museum exhibits that relate to Australia's shared, post-contact past are analyzed in the context of recent developments in museology. This analysis is combined with feedback generated from interviews with heritage professionals. The results suggest that in order to move towards inclusive interpretation of Australian history, multiple voices and perspectives of the past must be incorporated into interpretive programs. This paper argues that there are a variety of ways in which heritage interpreters can attempt to incorporate pluralist perspectives of the past into museum exhibits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-5872</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2692-9376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/109258720501000103</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of interpretation research, 2005-04, Vol.10 (1), p.31-48</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1363-f935c6f16a12e82e400bad27663059f772f51da0d73ae8b6f2beee1bf71926233</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batten, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><title>A Shared History? Presenting Australia's Post-Contact Indigenous Past</title><title>Journal of interpretation research</title><description>The colonial origins of museums have often influenced the ways in which they depict the past. In Australia, portrayals of the Indigenous past have focussed exclusively on “traditional life” or the prehistoric period of history, to the detriment of post-contact history. This paper examines ways in which museums around Australia are beginning to counter this trend. Museum exhibits that relate to Australia's shared, post-contact past are analyzed in the context of recent developments in museology. This analysis is combined with feedback generated from interviews with heritage professionals. The results suggest that in order to move towards inclusive interpretation of Australian history, multiple voices and perspectives of the past must be incorporated into interpretive programs. This paper argues that there are a variety of ways in which heritage interpreters can attempt to incorporate pluralist perspectives of the past into museum exhibits.</description><issn>1092-5872</issn><issn>2692-9376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEFLxDAUhIMoWFf_gKfcPEVfXmzSnKSUdXdhwQX1XNL2Za2srSTZw_57W_TmYZhh-JjDMHYr4V5KYx4kWMwLg5CDBJikzliG2qKwyuhzls2AmIlLdhXjJ8CULWZsWfLXDxeo4-s-pjGcnvguUKQh9cOel8eYgjv07i7y3RiTqMYhuTbxzdD1exrG49S7mK7ZhXeHSDd_vmDvz8u3ai22L6tNVW5FK5VWwluVt9pL7SRSgfQI0LgOjdYKcuuNQZ_LzkFnlKOi0R4bIpKNN9KiRqUWDH932zDGGMjX36H_cuFUS6jnI-r_R6gfC5pPfA</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Batten, Bronwyn</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>A Shared History? Presenting Australia's Post-Contact Indigenous Past</title><author>Batten, Bronwyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1363-f935c6f16a12e82e400bad27663059f772f51da0d73ae8b6f2beee1bf71926233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batten, Bronwyn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of interpretation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batten, Bronwyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Shared History? Presenting Australia's Post-Contact Indigenous Past</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interpretation research</jtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>31-48</pages><issn>1092-5872</issn><eissn>2692-9376</eissn><abstract>The colonial origins of museums have often influenced the ways in which they depict the past. In Australia, portrayals of the Indigenous past have focussed exclusively on “traditional life” or the prehistoric period of history, to the detriment of post-contact history. This paper examines ways in which museums around Australia are beginning to counter this trend. Museum exhibits that relate to Australia's shared, post-contact past are analyzed in the context of recent developments in museology. This analysis is combined with feedback generated from interviews with heritage professionals. The results suggest that in order to move towards inclusive interpretation of Australian history, multiple voices and perspectives of the past must be incorporated into interpretive programs. This paper argues that there are a variety of ways in which heritage interpreters can attempt to incorporate pluralist perspectives of the past into museum exhibits.</abstract><doi>10.1177/109258720501000103</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-5872
ispartof Journal of interpretation research, 2005-04, Vol.10 (1), p.31-48
issn 1092-5872
2692-9376
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_109258720501000103
source Access via SAGE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title A Shared History? Presenting Australia's Post-Contact Indigenous Past
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A19%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Shared%20History?%20Presenting%20Australia's%20Post-Contact%20Indigenous%20Past&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interpretation%20research&rft.au=Batten,%20Bronwyn&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=31-48&rft.issn=1092-5872&rft.eissn=2692-9376&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/109258720501000103&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_109258720501000103%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true