Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States

We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) Calif.), 2021-05, Vol.57 (3), p.856-908
Hauptverfasser: Craft, Andrea, Drucker, Joshua, Weber, Rachel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 908
container_issue 3
container_start_page 856
container_title Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)
container_volume 57
creator Craft, Andrea
Drucker, Joshua
Weber, Rachel
description We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selected tax abatements and business assistance) with economic, fiscal, and political characteristics for all municipalities in the largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan. These three states bordering Lake Michigan share similar histories and settings, thus targeting the research focus on the key attributes of interest. Our empirical results demonstrate substantial dissimilarity between incentive types and across states, most likely due to policy structures and reforms at the state level that encourage different municipal development regimes. Whereas municipalities, particularly larger ones, continue to use tax abatements, exemptions, and credits to pursue employment growth, the municipalities gravitating toward tax increment financing tend to be suburbs with low unemployment rates and relatively highly educated residents, and not places with greater employment density or manufacturing employment.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1078087420928410
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1078087420928410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1078087420928410</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2511120552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-e1966e436ddb43e5ca5a950377cf5ae2432c102b424ac04b973da7994c4413ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxRdRsFbvHgOeV_PZ7HqTWttCwYOt1yXNzrap3WRN0qL_vakVBMHTDPN-7w28LLsm-JYQKe8IlgUuJKe4pAUn-CTrESFoXjBGT9Oe5Pygn2cXIWwwxgkUvax9Vd6oaJxFxqK4BjQB5eNW2foejT66rTLW2NW3sgiAXING2lnXGo0eYQ9b17VgI5panYbZQzjkzNceAI09qIhm6i0dX6KKEC6zs0ZtA1z9zH62eBrNh5N89jyeDh9muaaliDmQcjAAzgZ1veQMhFZClQIzKXUjFFDOqCaYLjnlSmO-LCWrlSxLrjknTAPrZzfH3M679x2EWG3cztv0sqKCEEJxqiZR-Ehp70Lw0FSdN63ynxXB1aHU6m-pyZIfLUGt4Df0X_4Lyu516g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511120552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Craft, Andrea ; Drucker, Joshua ; Weber, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Craft, Andrea ; Drucker, Joshua ; Weber, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selected tax abatements and business assistance) with economic, fiscal, and political characteristics for all municipalities in the largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan. These three states bordering Lake Michigan share similar histories and settings, thus targeting the research focus on the key attributes of interest. Our empirical results demonstrate substantial dissimilarity between incentive types and across states, most likely due to policy structures and reforms at the state level that encourage different municipal development regimes. Whereas municipalities, particularly larger ones, continue to use tax abatements, exemptions, and credits to pursue employment growth, the municipalities gravitating toward tax increment financing tend to be suburbs with low unemployment rates and relatively highly educated residents, and not places with greater employment density or manufacturing employment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1078087420928410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cities ; Density ; Economic development ; Economic factors ; Economics ; Employment ; Financing ; Incentives ; Lakes ; Local government ; Municipalities ; Public finance ; Reforms ; Residents ; Suburban areas ; Suburbs ; Tax increment financing ; Taxation ; Unemployment ; Use taxes</subject><ispartof>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021-05, Vol.57 (3), p.856-908</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-e1966e436ddb43e5ca5a950377cf5ae2432c102b424ac04b973da7994c4413ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4949-8634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1078087420928410$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1078087420928410$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27866,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Craft, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drucker, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States</title><title>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</title><description>We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selected tax abatements and business assistance) with economic, fiscal, and political characteristics for all municipalities in the largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan. These three states bordering Lake Michigan share similar histories and settings, thus targeting the research focus on the key attributes of interest. Our empirical results demonstrate substantial dissimilarity between incentive types and across states, most likely due to policy structures and reforms at the state level that encourage different municipal development regimes. Whereas municipalities, particularly larger ones, continue to use tax abatements, exemptions, and credits to pursue employment growth, the municipalities gravitating toward tax increment financing tend to be suburbs with low unemployment rates and relatively highly educated residents, and not places with greater employment density or manufacturing employment.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Suburban areas</subject><subject>Suburbs</subject><subject>Tax increment financing</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Use taxes</subject><issn>1078-0874</issn><issn>1552-8332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxRdRsFbvHgOeV_PZ7HqTWttCwYOt1yXNzrap3WRN0qL_vakVBMHTDPN-7w28LLsm-JYQKe8IlgUuJKe4pAUn-CTrESFoXjBGT9Oe5Pygn2cXIWwwxgkUvax9Vd6oaJxFxqK4BjQB5eNW2foejT66rTLW2NW3sgiAXING2lnXGo0eYQ9b17VgI5panYbZQzjkzNceAI09qIhm6i0dX6KKEC6zs0ZtA1z9zH62eBrNh5N89jyeDh9muaaliDmQcjAAzgZ1veQMhFZClQIzKXUjFFDOqCaYLjnlSmO-LCWrlSxLrjknTAPrZzfH3M679x2EWG3cztv0sqKCEEJxqiZR-Ehp70Lw0FSdN63ynxXB1aHU6m-pyZIfLUGt4Df0X_4Lyu516g</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Craft, Andrea</creator><creator>Drucker, Joshua</creator><creator>Weber, Rachel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-8634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States</title><author>Craft, Andrea ; Drucker, Joshua ; Weber, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-e1966e436ddb43e5ca5a950377cf5ae2432c102b424ac04b973da7994c4413ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Suburban areas</topic><topic>Suburbs</topic><topic>Tax increment financing</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Use taxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craft, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drucker, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craft, Andrea</au><au>Drucker, Joshua</au><au>Weber, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States</atitle><jtitle>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>856</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>856-908</pages><issn>1078-0874</issn><eissn>1552-8332</eissn><abstract>We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selected tax abatements and business assistance) with economic, fiscal, and political characteristics for all municipalities in the largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan. These three states bordering Lake Michigan share similar histories and settings, thus targeting the research focus on the key attributes of interest. Our empirical results demonstrate substantial dissimilarity between incentive types and across states, most likely due to policy structures and reforms at the state level that encourage different municipal development regimes. Whereas municipalities, particularly larger ones, continue to use tax abatements, exemptions, and credits to pursue employment growth, the municipalities gravitating toward tax increment financing tend to be suburbs with low unemployment rates and relatively highly educated residents, and not places with greater employment density or manufacturing employment.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1078087420928410</doi><tpages>53</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-8634</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-0874
ispartof Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021-05, Vol.57 (3), p.856-908
issn 1078-0874
1552-8332
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1078087420928410
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cities
Density
Economic development
Economic factors
Economics
Employment
Financing
Incentives
Lakes
Local government
Municipalities
Public finance
Reforms
Residents
Suburban areas
Suburbs
Tax increment financing
Taxation
Unemployment
Use taxes
title Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A24%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20the%20Heartland:%20Explaining%20the%20Use%20of%20Economic%20Development%20Incentives%20in%20Three%20Great%20Lakes%20States&rft.jtitle=Urban%20affairs%20review%20(Thousand%20Oaks,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Craft,%20Andrea&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=856&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=856-908&rft.issn=1078-0874&rft.eissn=1552-8332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1078087420928410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2511120552%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511120552&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1078087420928410&rfr_iscdi=true