Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States
We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) Calif.), 2021-05, Vol.57 (3), p.856-908 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 908 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 856 |
container_title | Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Craft, Andrea Drucker, Joshua Weber, Rachel |
description | We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selected tax abatements and business assistance) with economic, fiscal, and political characteristics for all municipalities in the largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan. These three states bordering Lake Michigan share similar histories and settings, thus targeting the research focus on the key attributes of interest. Our empirical results demonstrate substantial dissimilarity between incentive types and across states, most likely due to policy structures and reforms at the state level that encourage different municipal development regimes. Whereas municipalities, particularly larger ones, continue to use tax abatements, exemptions, and credits to pursue employment growth, the municipalities gravitating toward tax increment financing tend to be suburbs with low unemployment rates and relatively highly educated residents, and not places with greater employment density or manufacturing employment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1078087420928410 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1078087420928410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1078087420928410</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2511120552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-e1966e436ddb43e5ca5a950377cf5ae2432c102b424ac04b973da7994c4413ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxRdRsFbvHgOeV_PZ7HqTWttCwYOt1yXNzrap3WRN0qL_vakVBMHTDPN-7w28LLsm-JYQKe8IlgUuJKe4pAUn-CTrESFoXjBGT9Oe5Pygn2cXIWwwxgkUvax9Vd6oaJxFxqK4BjQB5eNW2foejT66rTLW2NW3sgiAXING2lnXGo0eYQ9b17VgI5panYbZQzjkzNceAI09qIhm6i0dX6KKEC6zs0ZtA1z9zH62eBrNh5N89jyeDh9muaaliDmQcjAAzgZ1veQMhFZClQIzKXUjFFDOqCaYLjnlSmO-LCWrlSxLrjknTAPrZzfH3M679x2EWG3cztv0sqKCEEJxqiZR-Ehp70Lw0FSdN63ynxXB1aHU6m-pyZIfLUGt4Df0X_4Lyu516g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2511120552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Craft, Andrea ; Drucker, Joshua ; Weber, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Craft, Andrea ; Drucker, Joshua ; Weber, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selected tax abatements and business assistance) with economic, fiscal, and political characteristics for all municipalities in the largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan. These three states bordering Lake Michigan share similar histories and settings, thus targeting the research focus on the key attributes of interest. Our empirical results demonstrate substantial dissimilarity between incentive types and across states, most likely due to policy structures and reforms at the state level that encourage different municipal development regimes. Whereas municipalities, particularly larger ones, continue to use tax abatements, exemptions, and credits to pursue employment growth, the municipalities gravitating toward tax increment financing tend to be suburbs with low unemployment rates and relatively highly educated residents, and not places with greater employment density or manufacturing employment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1078087420928410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cities ; Density ; Economic development ; Economic factors ; Economics ; Employment ; Financing ; Incentives ; Lakes ; Local government ; Municipalities ; Public finance ; Reforms ; Residents ; Suburban areas ; Suburbs ; Tax increment financing ; Taxation ; Unemployment ; Use taxes</subject><ispartof>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021-05, Vol.57 (3), p.856-908</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-e1966e436ddb43e5ca5a950377cf5ae2432c102b424ac04b973da7994c4413ce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4949-8634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1078087420928410$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1078087420928410$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27866,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Craft, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drucker, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States</title><title>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</title><description>We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selected tax abatements and business assistance) with economic, fiscal, and political characteristics for all municipalities in the largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan. These three states bordering Lake Michigan share similar histories and settings, thus targeting the research focus on the key attributes of interest. Our empirical results demonstrate substantial dissimilarity between incentive types and across states, most likely due to policy structures and reforms at the state level that encourage different municipal development regimes. Whereas municipalities, particularly larger ones, continue to use tax abatements, exemptions, and credits to pursue employment growth, the municipalities gravitating toward tax increment financing tend to be suburbs with low unemployment rates and relatively highly educated residents, and not places with greater employment density or manufacturing employment.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Suburban areas</subject><subject>Suburbs</subject><subject>Tax increment financing</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Use taxes</subject><issn>1078-0874</issn><issn>1552-8332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxRdRsFbvHgOeV_PZ7HqTWttCwYOt1yXNzrap3WRN0qL_vakVBMHTDPN-7w28LLsm-JYQKe8IlgUuJKe4pAUn-CTrESFoXjBGT9Oe5Pygn2cXIWwwxgkUvax9Vd6oaJxFxqK4BjQB5eNW2foejT66rTLW2NW3sgiAXING2lnXGo0eYQ9b17VgI5panYbZQzjkzNceAI09qIhm6i0dX6KKEC6zs0ZtA1z9zH62eBrNh5N89jyeDh9muaaliDmQcjAAzgZ1veQMhFZClQIzKXUjFFDOqCaYLjnlSmO-LCWrlSxLrjknTAPrZzfH3M679x2EWG3cztv0sqKCEEJxqiZR-Ehp70Lw0FSdN63ynxXB1aHU6m-pyZIfLUGt4Df0X_4Lyu516g</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Craft, Andrea</creator><creator>Drucker, Joshua</creator><creator>Weber, Rachel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-8634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States</title><author>Craft, Andrea ; Drucker, Joshua ; Weber, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-e1966e436ddb43e5ca5a950377cf5ae2432c102b424ac04b973da7994c4413ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Suburban areas</topic><topic>Suburbs</topic><topic>Tax increment financing</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Use taxes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craft, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drucker, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craft, Andrea</au><au>Drucker, Joshua</au><au>Weber, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States</atitle><jtitle>Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>856</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>856-908</pages><issn>1078-0874</issn><eissn>1552-8332</eissn><abstract>We identify the factors correlated with the use of economic development incentives after the Great Recession of 2007–2009 to determine the presence of entrepreneurial development regimes. We utilize a unique dataset that combines information on incentives (tax increment financing districts and selected tax abatements and business assistance) with economic, fiscal, and political characteristics for all municipalities in the largest Metropolitan Statistical Areas of Illinois, Wisconsin, and Michigan. These three states bordering Lake Michigan share similar histories and settings, thus targeting the research focus on the key attributes of interest. Our empirical results demonstrate substantial dissimilarity between incentive types and across states, most likely due to policy structures and reforms at the state level that encourage different municipal development regimes. Whereas municipalities, particularly larger ones, continue to use tax abatements, exemptions, and credits to pursue employment growth, the municipalities gravitating toward tax increment financing tend to be suburbs with low unemployment rates and relatively highly educated residents, and not places with greater employment density or manufacturing employment.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1078087420928410</doi><tpages>53</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4949-8634</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-0874 |
ispartof | Urban affairs review (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021-05, Vol.57 (3), p.856-908 |
issn | 1078-0874 1552-8332 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1078087420928410 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete; Sociological Abstracts; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cities Density Economic development Economic factors Economics Employment Financing Incentives Lakes Local government Municipalities Public finance Reforms Residents Suburban areas Suburbs Tax increment financing Taxation Unemployment Use taxes |
title | Variation in the Heartland: Explaining the Use of Economic Development Incentives in Three Great Lakes States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A24%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20the%20Heartland:%20Explaining%20the%20Use%20of%20Economic%20Development%20Incentives%20in%20Three%20Great%20Lakes%20States&rft.jtitle=Urban%20affairs%20review%20(Thousand%20Oaks,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Craft,%20Andrea&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=856&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=856-908&rft.issn=1078-0874&rft.eissn=1552-8332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1078087420928410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2511120552%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2511120552&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1078087420928410&rfr_iscdi=true |