Are Users Better Able to Correctly Interpret Single or Concatenated Auditory Icons that Convey a Complex Message?
Auditory icons are naturally occurring sounds that systems play to convey information. Systems must convey complex messages. To do so, systems can play: 1) a single sound that represents the entire message, or 2) a single sound that represents the first part of the message, followed by another sound...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2022-09, Vol.66 (1), p.1100-1104 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1100 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Choi, Jinwoo Lodinger, Natalie Jones, Keith S. Siami Namin, Akbar Armstrong, Miriam Sears, David |
description | Auditory icons are naturally occurring sounds that systems play to convey information. Systems must convey complex messages. To do so, systems can play: 1) a single sound that represents the entire message, or 2) a single sound that represents the first part of the message, followed by another sound that represents the next part of that message, etc. The latter are known as concatenated auditory icons. To evaluate those approaches, participants interpreted single and concatenated auditory icons designed to convey their message well and poorly. Single auditory icons designed to convey their message well were correctly interpreted more often than those designed to convey their message poorly; that was not true for concatenated auditory icons. Concatenated auditory icons should not be comprised of a series of sounds that each represents its piece of a message well. The whole of a concatenated auditory icon is not the sum of its parts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1071181322661416 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181322661416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1071181322661416</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1071181322661416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c796-9680ec51bdb078e25e0341c6ba21779a192a6d702a76b34d6647c0dffa97c5ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFOwzAMjRBIjMGdY36gEKdtsp5QmWBMGuLAOFdp6o5NXTOcDLG_J9U4ICQOlp_83rPsx9g1iBsArW9BaIAJpFIqBRmoEzaSoIokF0qf_sLn7ML7jRAy1Wk2Yh8lIX_zSJ7fYwhIvKw75MHxqSNCG7oDn_dxviMM_HXdryLrKLK9NQH7WA0v9806OIpK63rPw7sJg-ATD9xEsN11-MWf0XuzwrtLdtaazuPVTx-z5ePDcvqULF5m82m5SKwuVFKoiUCbQ93UQk9Q5ijSDKyqjYzfFgYKaVSjhTRa1WnWKJVpK5q2NYW2ucF0zMRxrSXnPWFb7Wi9NXSoQFRDYtXfxKIlOVqGO6uN21MfD_xf_w0NLGtm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Users Better Able to Correctly Interpret Single or Concatenated Auditory Icons that Convey a Complex Message?</title><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Choi, Jinwoo ; Lodinger, Natalie ; Jones, Keith S. ; Siami Namin, Akbar ; Armstrong, Miriam ; Sears, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jinwoo ; Lodinger, Natalie ; Jones, Keith S. ; Siami Namin, Akbar ; Armstrong, Miriam ; Sears, David</creatorcontrib><description>Auditory icons are naturally occurring sounds that systems play to convey information. Systems must convey complex messages. To do so, systems can play: 1) a single sound that represents the entire message, or 2) a single sound that represents the first part of the message, followed by another sound that represents the next part of that message, etc. The latter are known as concatenated auditory icons. To evaluate those approaches, participants interpreted single and concatenated auditory icons designed to convey their message well and poorly. Single auditory icons designed to convey their message well were correctly interpreted more often than those designed to convey their message poorly; that was not true for concatenated auditory icons. Concatenated auditory icons should not be comprised of a series of sounds that each represents its piece of a message well. The whole of a concatenated auditory icon is not the sum of its parts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1071181322661416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2022-09, Vol.66 (1), p.1100-1104</ispartof><rights>2022 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c796-9680ec51bdb078e25e0341c6ba21779a192a6d702a76b34d6647c0dffa97c5ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1071181322661416$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1071181322661416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,43612,43613</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jinwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodinger, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siami Namin, Akbar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, David</creatorcontrib><title>Are Users Better Able to Correctly Interpret Single or Concatenated Auditory Icons that Convey a Complex Message?</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>Auditory icons are naturally occurring sounds that systems play to convey information. Systems must convey complex messages. To do so, systems can play: 1) a single sound that represents the entire message, or 2) a single sound that represents the first part of the message, followed by another sound that represents the next part of that message, etc. The latter are known as concatenated auditory icons. To evaluate those approaches, participants interpreted single and concatenated auditory icons designed to convey their message well and poorly. Single auditory icons designed to convey their message well were correctly interpreted more often than those designed to convey their message poorly; that was not true for concatenated auditory icons. Concatenated auditory icons should not be comprised of a series of sounds that each represents its piece of a message well. The whole of a concatenated auditory icon is not the sum of its parts.</description><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMFOwzAMjRBIjMGdY36gEKdtsp5QmWBMGuLAOFdp6o5NXTOcDLG_J9U4ICQOlp_83rPsx9g1iBsArW9BaIAJpFIqBRmoEzaSoIokF0qf_sLn7ML7jRAy1Wk2Yh8lIX_zSJ7fYwhIvKw75MHxqSNCG7oDn_dxviMM_HXdryLrKLK9NQH7WA0v9806OIpK63rPw7sJg-ATD9xEsN11-MWf0XuzwrtLdtaazuPVTx-z5ePDcvqULF5m82m5SKwuVFKoiUCbQ93UQk9Q5ijSDKyqjYzfFgYKaVSjhTRa1WnWKJVpK5q2NYW2ucF0zMRxrSXnPWFb7Wi9NXSoQFRDYtXfxKIlOVqGO6uN21MfD_xf_w0NLGtm</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Choi, Jinwoo</creator><creator>Lodinger, Natalie</creator><creator>Jones, Keith S.</creator><creator>Siami Namin, Akbar</creator><creator>Armstrong, Miriam</creator><creator>Sears, David</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Are Users Better Able to Correctly Interpret Single or Concatenated Auditory Icons that Convey a Complex Message?</title><author>Choi, Jinwoo ; Lodinger, Natalie ; Jones, Keith S. ; Siami Namin, Akbar ; Armstrong, Miriam ; Sears, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c796-9680ec51bdb078e25e0341c6ba21779a192a6d702a76b34d6647c0dffa97c5ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jinwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lodinger, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siami Namin, Akbar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Miriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sears, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Jinwoo</au><au>Lodinger, Natalie</au><au>Jones, Keith S.</au><au>Siami Namin, Akbar</au><au>Armstrong, Miriam</au><au>Sears, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Users Better Able to Correctly Interpret Single or Concatenated Auditory Icons that Convey a Complex Message?</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1100</spage><epage>1104</epage><pages>1100-1104</pages><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>Auditory icons are naturally occurring sounds that systems play to convey information. Systems must convey complex messages. To do so, systems can play: 1) a single sound that represents the entire message, or 2) a single sound that represents the first part of the message, followed by another sound that represents the next part of that message, etc. The latter are known as concatenated auditory icons. To evaluate those approaches, participants interpreted single and concatenated auditory icons designed to convey their message well and poorly. Single auditory icons designed to convey their message well were correctly interpreted more often than those designed to convey their message poorly; that was not true for concatenated auditory icons. Concatenated auditory icons should not be comprised of a series of sounds that each represents its piece of a message well. The whole of a concatenated auditory icon is not the sum of its parts.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1071181322661416</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-5067 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2022-09, Vol.66 (1), p.1100-1104 |
issn | 2169-5067 1071-1813 2169-5067 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181322661416 |
source | SAGE Journals Online |
title | Are Users Better Able to Correctly Interpret Single or Concatenated Auditory Icons that Convey a Complex Message? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A20%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Users%20Better%20Able%20to%20Correctly%20Interpret%20Single%20or%20Concatenated%20Auditory%20Icons%20that%20Convey%20a%20Complex%20Message?&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Choi,%20Jinwoo&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1100&rft.epage=1104&rft.pages=1100-1104&rft.issn=2169-5067&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1071181322661416&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1071181322661416%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1071181322661416&rfr_iscdi=true |