Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training

In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2019-11, Vol.63 (1), p.1669-1673
Hauptverfasser: Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte, Lindheim, Catharina, Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen, Andreas Pedersen, Pål, Robertsen, Rolf, Lødemel, Ståle, Haukeberg, Per Johan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1673
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1669
container_title Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
container_volume 63
creator Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte
Lindheim, Catharina
Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen
Andreas Pedersen, Pål
Robertsen, Rolf
Lødemel, Ståle
Haukeberg, Per Johan
description In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators is both limited and restricted. This experimental study aimed to determine whether simulator-based training in night driving could be beneficial compared to traditional Norwegian training. Two equal-sized groups of learner drivers completed both simulator training and traditional training, and both training sessions were followed by a multiple-choice test mapping the learner drivers’ theoretical knowledge on the topic. The results show that theoretical learning outcome is higher from simulator training compared to traditional training, indicating that an increased use of simulators could be beneficial in driver training.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1071181319631528
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181319631528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1071181319631528</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1071181319631528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2818-8d3655cb185717f6d416aa1d901da199773e92550870652bfd1c060df58bc7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd3j_kHqvkmyy9vY6gTBh7svaRNWjPaZiRtYf-9HRMRwdN7h8978B5C90AeAKR8BCIBFDDQggGn6gItKAidcSLk5S9_jW5S2hNCmWSrBco_fDe2ZggRTy6mMeEhGusHH3rTnrzvfd884TWuQncw0Qx-cjgNoz3iUOPeN58DttFPM_WD36Kr2rTJ3X3rEuUvz_lmm-3eX982611WUQUqU5YJzqsSFJcga2FXIIwBqwlYA1pLyZymnBMlieC0rC1URBBbc1VW0rElIufaKoaUoquLQ_SdiccCSHE6pfh7yhzJzpFkGlfswxjnmel__gt7_2G7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte ; Lindheim, Catharina ; Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen ; Andreas Pedersen, Pål ; Robertsen, Rolf ; Lødemel, Ståle ; Haukeberg, Per Johan</creator><creatorcontrib>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte ; Lindheim, Catharina ; Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen ; Andreas Pedersen, Pål ; Robertsen, Rolf ; Lødemel, Ståle ; Haukeberg, Per Johan</creatorcontrib><description>In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators is both limited and restricted. This experimental study aimed to determine whether simulator-based training in night driving could be beneficial compared to traditional Norwegian training. Two equal-sized groups of learner drivers completed both simulator training and traditional training, and both training sessions were followed by a multiple-choice test mapping the learner drivers’ theoretical knowledge on the topic. The results show that theoretical learning outcome is higher from simulator training compared to traditional training, indicating that an increased use of simulators could be beneficial in driver training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1071181319631528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2019-11, Vol.63 (1), p.1669-1673</ispartof><rights>2019 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2818-8d3655cb185717f6d416aa1d901da199773e92550870652bfd1c060df58bc7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2818-8d3655cb185717f6d416aa1d901da199773e92550870652bfd1c060df58bc7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1071181319631528$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1071181319631528$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindheim, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreas Pedersen, Pål</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertsen, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lødemel, Ståle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haukeberg, Per Johan</creatorcontrib><title>Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators is both limited and restricted. This experimental study aimed to determine whether simulator-based training in night driving could be beneficial compared to traditional Norwegian training. Two equal-sized groups of learner drivers completed both simulator training and traditional training, and both training sessions were followed by a multiple-choice test mapping the learner drivers’ theoretical knowledge on the topic. The results show that theoretical learning outcome is higher from simulator training compared to traditional training, indicating that an increased use of simulators could be beneficial in driver training.</description><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd3j_kHqvkmyy9vY6gTBh7svaRNWjPaZiRtYf-9HRMRwdN7h8978B5C90AeAKR8BCIBFDDQggGn6gItKAidcSLk5S9_jW5S2hNCmWSrBco_fDe2ZggRTy6mMeEhGusHH3rTnrzvfd884TWuQncw0Qx-cjgNoz3iUOPeN58DttFPM_WD36Kr2rTJ3X3rEuUvz_lmm-3eX982611WUQUqU5YJzqsSFJcga2FXIIwBqwlYA1pLyZymnBMlieC0rC1URBBbc1VW0rElIufaKoaUoquLQ_SdiccCSHE6pfh7yhzJzpFkGlfswxjnmel__gt7_2G7</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte</creator><creator>Lindheim, Catharina</creator><creator>Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen</creator><creator>Andreas Pedersen, Pål</creator><creator>Robertsen, Rolf</creator><creator>Lødemel, Ståle</creator><creator>Haukeberg, Per Johan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training</title><author>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte ; Lindheim, Catharina ; Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen ; Andreas Pedersen, Pål ; Robertsen, Rolf ; Lødemel, Ståle ; Haukeberg, Per Johan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2818-8d3655cb185717f6d416aa1d901da199773e92550870652bfd1c060df58bc7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindheim, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreas Pedersen, Pål</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertsen, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lødemel, Ståle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haukeberg, Per Johan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte</au><au>Lindheim, Catharina</au><au>Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen</au><au>Andreas Pedersen, Pål</au><au>Robertsen, Rolf</au><au>Lødemel, Ståle</au><au>Haukeberg, Per Johan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1669</spage><epage>1673</epage><pages>1669-1673</pages><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators is both limited and restricted. This experimental study aimed to determine whether simulator-based training in night driving could be beneficial compared to traditional Norwegian training. Two equal-sized groups of learner drivers completed both simulator training and traditional training, and both training sessions were followed by a multiple-choice test mapping the learner drivers’ theoretical knowledge on the topic. The results show that theoretical learning outcome is higher from simulator training compared to traditional training, indicating that an increased use of simulators could be beneficial in driver training.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1071181319631528</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-5067
ispartof Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2019-11, Vol.63 (1), p.1669-1673
issn 2169-5067
1071-1813
2169-5067
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181319631528
source Access via SAGE
title Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A18%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulator%20versus%20traditional%20training:%20A%20comparative%20study%20of%20night%20driving%20training&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=S%C3%A6tren,%20Gunhild%20Birgitte&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1669&rft.epage=1673&rft.pages=1669-1673&rft.issn=2169-5067&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1071181319631528&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1071181319631528%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1071181319631528&rfr_iscdi=true