Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training
In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2019-11, Vol.63 (1), p.1669-1673 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1673 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1669 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte Lindheim, Catharina Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen Andreas Pedersen, Pål Robertsen, Rolf Lødemel, Ståle Haukeberg, Per Johan |
description | In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators is both limited and restricted. This experimental study aimed to determine whether simulator-based training in night driving could be beneficial compared to traditional Norwegian training. Two equal-sized groups of learner drivers completed both simulator training and traditional training, and both training sessions were followed by a multiple-choice test mapping the learner drivers’ theoretical knowledge on the topic. The results show that theoretical learning outcome is higher from simulator training compared to traditional training, indicating that an increased use of simulators could be beneficial in driver training. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1071181319631528 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181319631528</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1071181319631528</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1071181319631528</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2818-8d3655cb185717f6d416aa1d901da199773e92550870652bfd1c060df58bc7e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd3j_kHqvkmyy9vY6gTBh7svaRNWjPaZiRtYf-9HRMRwdN7h8978B5C90AeAKR8BCIBFDDQggGn6gItKAidcSLk5S9_jW5S2hNCmWSrBco_fDe2ZggRTy6mMeEhGusHH3rTnrzvfd884TWuQncw0Qx-cjgNoz3iUOPeN58DttFPM_WD36Kr2rTJ3X3rEuUvz_lmm-3eX982611WUQUqU5YJzqsSFJcga2FXIIwBqwlYA1pLyZymnBMlieC0rC1URBBbc1VW0rElIufaKoaUoquLQ_SdiccCSHE6pfh7yhzJzpFkGlfswxjnmel__gt7_2G7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte ; Lindheim, Catharina ; Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen ; Andreas Pedersen, Pål ; Robertsen, Rolf ; Lødemel, Ståle ; Haukeberg, Per Johan</creator><creatorcontrib>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte ; Lindheim, Catharina ; Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen ; Andreas Pedersen, Pål ; Robertsen, Rolf ; Lødemel, Ståle ; Haukeberg, Per Johan</creatorcontrib><description>In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators is both limited and restricted. This experimental study aimed to determine whether simulator-based training in night driving could be beneficial compared to traditional Norwegian training. Two equal-sized groups of learner drivers completed both simulator training and traditional training, and both training sessions were followed by a multiple-choice test mapping the learner drivers’ theoretical knowledge on the topic. The results show that theoretical learning outcome is higher from simulator training compared to traditional training, indicating that an increased use of simulators could be beneficial in driver training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1071181319631528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2019-11, Vol.63 (1), p.1669-1673</ispartof><rights>2019 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2818-8d3655cb185717f6d416aa1d901da199773e92550870652bfd1c060df58bc7e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2818-8d3655cb185717f6d416aa1d901da199773e92550870652bfd1c060df58bc7e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1071181319631528$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1071181319631528$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindheim, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreas Pedersen, Pål</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertsen, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lødemel, Ståle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haukeberg, Per Johan</creatorcontrib><title>Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators is both limited and restricted. This experimental study aimed to determine whether simulator-based training in night driving could be beneficial compared to traditional Norwegian training. Two equal-sized groups of learner drivers completed both simulator training and traditional training, and both training sessions were followed by a multiple-choice test mapping the learner drivers’ theoretical knowledge on the topic. The results show that theoretical learning outcome is higher from simulator training compared to traditional training, indicating that an increased use of simulators could be beneficial in driver training.</description><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKd3j_kHqvkmyy9vY6gTBh7svaRNWjPaZiRtYf-9HRMRwdN7h8978B5C90AeAKR8BCIBFDDQggGn6gItKAidcSLk5S9_jW5S2hNCmWSrBco_fDe2ZggRTy6mMeEhGusHH3rTnrzvfd884TWuQncw0Qx-cjgNoz3iUOPeN58DttFPM_WD36Kr2rTJ3X3rEuUvz_lmm-3eX982611WUQUqU5YJzqsSFJcga2FXIIwBqwlYA1pLyZymnBMlieC0rC1URBBbc1VW0rElIufaKoaUoquLQ_SdiccCSHE6pfh7yhzJzpFkGlfswxjnmel__gt7_2G7</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte</creator><creator>Lindheim, Catharina</creator><creator>Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen</creator><creator>Andreas Pedersen, Pål</creator><creator>Robertsen, Rolf</creator><creator>Lødemel, Ståle</creator><creator>Haukeberg, Per Johan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training</title><author>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte ; Lindheim, Catharina ; Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen ; Andreas Pedersen, Pål ; Robertsen, Rolf ; Lødemel, Ståle ; Haukeberg, Per Johan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2818-8d3655cb185717f6d416aa1d901da199773e92550870652bfd1c060df58bc7e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindheim, Catharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreas Pedersen, Pål</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertsen, Rolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lødemel, Ståle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haukeberg, Per Johan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sætren, Gunhild Birgitte</au><au>Lindheim, Catharina</au><au>Skogstad, Martin Rasmussen</au><au>Andreas Pedersen, Pål</au><au>Robertsen, Rolf</au><au>Lødemel, Ståle</au><au>Haukeberg, Per Johan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1669</spage><epage>1673</epage><pages>1669-1673</pages><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>In recent decades, simulators have become an increasingly accepted part of training in sectors like aviation, medicine, and the petroleum industry. Some countries like the Netherlands, the UK, and Finland have accepted simulators as a part of driver’s education, but in Norway the use of simulators is both limited and restricted. This experimental study aimed to determine whether simulator-based training in night driving could be beneficial compared to traditional Norwegian training. Two equal-sized groups of learner drivers completed both simulator training and traditional training, and both training sessions were followed by a multiple-choice test mapping the learner drivers’ theoretical knowledge on the topic. The results show that theoretical learning outcome is higher from simulator training compared to traditional training, indicating that an increased use of simulators could be beneficial in driver training.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1071181319631528</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-5067 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2019-11, Vol.63 (1), p.1669-1673 |
issn | 2169-5067 1071-1813 2169-5067 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181319631528 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Simulator versus traditional training: A comparative study of night driving training |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A18%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulator%20versus%20traditional%20training:%20A%20comparative%20study%20of%20night%20driving%20training&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=S%C3%A6tren,%20Gunhild%20Birgitte&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1669&rft.epage=1673&rft.pages=1669-1673&rft.issn=2169-5067&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1071181319631528&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1071181319631528%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1071181319631528&rfr_iscdi=true |