Passenger Emotional Response Type and Timing during Automated Vehicle Intersection Negotiation

Most automated vehicle studies have focused on limited automation where the role of the user is that of a driver, supervisor or fallback, but comparatively fewer have considered riders. If riders’ experiences are ignored, it could undermine the adoption of the technologies and, consequently, the rea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2019-11, Vol.63 (1), p.2061-2065
Hauptverfasser: Domeyer, Josh, Alsaid, Areen, Liu, Shu-Yuan, Lee, John D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2065
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2061
container_title Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
container_volume 63
creator Domeyer, Josh
Alsaid, Areen
Liu, Shu-Yuan
Lee, John D.
description Most automated vehicle studies have focused on limited automation where the role of the user is that of a driver, supervisor or fallback, but comparatively fewer have considered riders. If riders’ experiences are ignored, it could undermine the adoption of the technologies and, consequently, the realization of their anticipated benefits. A driving simulator study was conducted to evaluate the response of riders to intersection negotiation with conservative, moderate, or aggressive automated driving styles. Riders’ emotional responses—operationalized as changes in facial action units—were detected using video processing software. Results showed that changes in speed, acceleration, and jerk preceded changes in the facial action units and were associated with the magnitude of the change. The speed, acceleration, and jerk changes were represented in different automated driving styles that then affected the magnitude and timing of emotion response. Facial action units may provide a way to gauge riders’ emotional responses to vehicle control algorithms could be used to improve rider experiences.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1071181319631226
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181319631226</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1071181319631226</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1071181319631226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2816-8a4ca08a1d4989d89faa352f944ac92ada81bf3495fe015136cb50b46a3f64843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqWwM_oPBPxsx7HHqipQqQKEAiPRa_IcUjVJZadD_z2NyoCQmO6Gu0-6Y-wWxB1Alt2DyAAsKHBGgZTmjE0kGJekwmTnv_wlu4pxI4RUmdIT9vmKMVJXU-CLth-avsMtf6O467tIPD_siGNX8bxpm67m1T6MMtsPfYsDVfyDvppyS3zZDRQilSOAP1N9JOHor9mFx22kmx-dsveHRT5_SlYvj8v5bJWU0oJJLOoShUWotLOuss4jqlR6pzWWTmKFFtZeaZd6EpCCMuU6FWttUHmjrVZTJk7cMvQxBvLFLjQthkMBohj_Kf7-c6wkp0rEmopNvw_H6fH__DeTbmX3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Passenger Emotional Response Type and Timing during Automated Vehicle Intersection Negotiation</title><source>Sage Journals</source><creator>Domeyer, Josh ; Alsaid, Areen ; Liu, Shu-Yuan ; Lee, John D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Domeyer, Josh ; Alsaid, Areen ; Liu, Shu-Yuan ; Lee, John D.</creatorcontrib><description>Most automated vehicle studies have focused on limited automation where the role of the user is that of a driver, supervisor or fallback, but comparatively fewer have considered riders. If riders’ experiences are ignored, it could undermine the adoption of the technologies and, consequently, the realization of their anticipated benefits. A driving simulator study was conducted to evaluate the response of riders to intersection negotiation with conservative, moderate, or aggressive automated driving styles. Riders’ emotional responses—operationalized as changes in facial action units—were detected using video processing software. Results showed that changes in speed, acceleration, and jerk preceded changes in the facial action units and were associated with the magnitude of the change. The speed, acceleration, and jerk changes were represented in different automated driving styles that then affected the magnitude and timing of emotion response. Facial action units may provide a way to gauge riders’ emotional responses to vehicle control algorithms could be used to improve rider experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1071181319631226</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2019-11, Vol.63 (1), p.2061-2065</ispartof><rights>2019 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2816-8a4ca08a1d4989d89faa352f944ac92ada81bf3495fe015136cb50b46a3f64843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2816-8a4ca08a1d4989d89faa352f944ac92ada81bf3495fe015136cb50b46a3f64843</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1071181319631226$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1071181319631226$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Domeyer, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaid, Areen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shu-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, John D.</creatorcontrib><title>Passenger Emotional Response Type and Timing during Automated Vehicle Intersection Negotiation</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>Most automated vehicle studies have focused on limited automation where the role of the user is that of a driver, supervisor or fallback, but comparatively fewer have considered riders. If riders’ experiences are ignored, it could undermine the adoption of the technologies and, consequently, the realization of their anticipated benefits. A driving simulator study was conducted to evaluate the response of riders to intersection negotiation with conservative, moderate, or aggressive automated driving styles. Riders’ emotional responses—operationalized as changes in facial action units—were detected using video processing software. Results showed that changes in speed, acceleration, and jerk preceded changes in the facial action units and were associated with the magnitude of the change. The speed, acceleration, and jerk changes were represented in different automated driving styles that then affected the magnitude and timing of emotion response. Facial action units may provide a way to gauge riders’ emotional responses to vehicle control algorithms could be used to improve rider experiences.</description><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqWwM_oPBPxsx7HHqipQqQKEAiPRa_IcUjVJZadD_z2NyoCQmO6Gu0-6Y-wWxB1Alt2DyAAsKHBGgZTmjE0kGJekwmTnv_wlu4pxI4RUmdIT9vmKMVJXU-CLth-avsMtf6O467tIPD_siGNX8bxpm67m1T6MMtsPfYsDVfyDvppyS3zZDRQilSOAP1N9JOHor9mFx22kmx-dsveHRT5_SlYvj8v5bJWU0oJJLOoShUWotLOuss4jqlR6pzWWTmKFFtZeaZd6EpCCMuU6FWttUHmjrVZTJk7cMvQxBvLFLjQthkMBohj_Kf7-c6wkp0rEmopNvw_H6fH__DeTbmX3</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Domeyer, Josh</creator><creator>Alsaid, Areen</creator><creator>Liu, Shu-Yuan</creator><creator>Lee, John D.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Passenger Emotional Response Type and Timing during Automated Vehicle Intersection Negotiation</title><author>Domeyer, Josh ; Alsaid, Areen ; Liu, Shu-Yuan ; Lee, John D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2816-8a4ca08a1d4989d89faa352f944ac92ada81bf3495fe015136cb50b46a3f64843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Domeyer, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsaid, Areen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shu-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, John D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Domeyer, Josh</au><au>Alsaid, Areen</au><au>Liu, Shu-Yuan</au><au>Lee, John D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Passenger Emotional Response Type and Timing during Automated Vehicle Intersection Negotiation</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2061</spage><epage>2065</epage><pages>2061-2065</pages><issn>2169-5067</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>Most automated vehicle studies have focused on limited automation where the role of the user is that of a driver, supervisor or fallback, but comparatively fewer have considered riders. If riders’ experiences are ignored, it could undermine the adoption of the technologies and, consequently, the realization of their anticipated benefits. A driving simulator study was conducted to evaluate the response of riders to intersection negotiation with conservative, moderate, or aggressive automated driving styles. Riders’ emotional responses—operationalized as changes in facial action units—were detected using video processing software. Results showed that changes in speed, acceleration, and jerk preceded changes in the facial action units and were associated with the magnitude of the change. The speed, acceleration, and jerk changes were represented in different automated driving styles that then affected the magnitude and timing of emotion response. Facial action units may provide a way to gauge riders’ emotional responses to vehicle control algorithms could be used to improve rider experiences.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1071181319631226</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-5067
ispartof Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2019-11, Vol.63 (1), p.2061-2065
issn 2169-5067
1071-1813
2169-5067
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181319631226
source Sage Journals
title Passenger Emotional Response Type and Timing during Automated Vehicle Intersection Negotiation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A55%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Passenger%20Emotional%20Response%20Type%20and%20Timing%20during%20Automated%20Vehicle%20Intersection%20Negotiation&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Domeyer,%20Josh&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2061&rft.epage=2065&rft.pages=2061-2065&rft.issn=2169-5067&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1071181319631226&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1071181319631226%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1071181319631226&rfr_iscdi=true