Can Users Judge the Stair-Climbing Abilities of Two-Wheeled Self-Balancing Robots?

This experiment examined users’ abilities to judge whether an autonomous robot can accomplish a given task. It was predicted that 1) participants would differentiate the action-capabilities of short and tall robots, 2) participants would base their judgments on an action-relevant scalar, and 3) part...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2012-09, Vol.56 (1), p.1326-1330
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Keith S., Schmidlin, Elizabeth A., Wheeler, Noah J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1330
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1326
container_title Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
container_volume 56
creator Jones, Keith S.
Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.
Wheeler, Noah J.
description This experiment examined users’ abilities to judge whether an autonomous robot can accomplish a given task. It was predicted that 1) participants would differentiate the action-capabilities of short and tall robots, 2) participants would base their judgments on an action-relevant scalar, and 3) participants’ judgments would be accurate. All three predictions were supported. This is important because it suggests that users may be able to accurately judge whether an autonomous robot can accomplish a given task without having previously observed that robot perform that task. The ability to do so will be very important as users increasingly ask their robots to perform tasks that the robots’ designers may have never considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1071181312561383
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181312561383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1071181312561383</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1071181312561383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-b9f7338507862d1471cb85e085d01a94175ad12ac0a2a4ffae312ca3b5ee59853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtqwzAUREVpoelj36V-QK2uZVnyqqSmTwKFPOjSXNtXiYJjF8mh9O_rkK4KXc1i5gzDMHYD8hbAmDuQBsCCgkRnoKw6YZMEslxomZlTNgGdgshH95xdxLiVMlFGpRM2L7Djq0gh8rd9syY-bIgvBvRBFK3fVb5b82nlWz94irx3fPnVi48NUUsNX1DrxAO22NWH3Lyv-iHeX7Ezh22k61-9ZKunx2XxImbvz6_FdCZqyLNBVLkzSlktjc2SBlIDdWU1SasbCZinYDQ2kGAtMcHUOaRxfY2q0kQ6t1pdMnnsrUMfYyBXfga_w_BdgiwPn5R_PxkRcUQirqnc9vvQjQv_z_8AEBRfpg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Users Judge the Stair-Climbing Abilities of Two-Wheeled Self-Balancing Robots?</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Jones, Keith S. ; Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. ; Wheeler, Noah J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S. ; Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. ; Wheeler, Noah J.</creatorcontrib><description>This experiment examined users’ abilities to judge whether an autonomous robot can accomplish a given task. It was predicted that 1) participants would differentiate the action-capabilities of short and tall robots, 2) participants would base their judgments on an action-relevant scalar, and 3) participants’ judgments would be accurate. All three predictions were supported. This is important because it suggests that users may be able to accurately judge whether an autonomous robot can accomplish a given task without having previously observed that robot perform that task. The ability to do so will be very important as users increasingly ask their robots to perform tasks that the robots’ designers may have never considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9312</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1071181312561383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2012-09, Vol.56 (1), p.1326-1330</ispartof><rights>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-b9f7338507862d1471cb85e085d01a94175ad12ac0a2a4ffae312ca3b5ee59853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-b9f7338507862d1471cb85e085d01a94175ad12ac0a2a4ffae312ca3b5ee59853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1071181312561383$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1071181312561383$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,43612,43613</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, Noah J.</creatorcontrib><title>Can Users Judge the Stair-Climbing Abilities of Two-Wheeled Self-Balancing Robots?</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>This experiment examined users’ abilities to judge whether an autonomous robot can accomplish a given task. It was predicted that 1) participants would differentiate the action-capabilities of short and tall robots, 2) participants would base their judgments on an action-relevant scalar, and 3) participants’ judgments would be accurate. All three predictions were supported. This is important because it suggests that users may be able to accurately judge whether an autonomous robot can accomplish a given task without having previously observed that robot perform that task. The ability to do so will be very important as users increasingly ask their robots to perform tasks that the robots’ designers may have never considered.</description><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtqwzAUREVpoelj36V-QK2uZVnyqqSmTwKFPOjSXNtXiYJjF8mh9O_rkK4KXc1i5gzDMHYD8hbAmDuQBsCCgkRnoKw6YZMEslxomZlTNgGdgshH95xdxLiVMlFGpRM2L7Djq0gh8rd9syY-bIgvBvRBFK3fVb5b82nlWz94irx3fPnVi48NUUsNX1DrxAO22NWH3Lyv-iHeX7Ezh22k61-9ZKunx2XxImbvz6_FdCZqyLNBVLkzSlktjc2SBlIDdWU1SasbCZinYDQ2kGAtMcHUOaRxfY2q0kQ6t1pdMnnsrUMfYyBXfga_w_BdgiwPn5R_PxkRcUQirqnc9vvQjQv_z_8AEBRfpg</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Jones, Keith S.</creator><creator>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Wheeler, Noah J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Can Users Judge the Stair-Climbing Abilities of Two-Wheeled Self-Balancing Robots?</title><author>Jones, Keith S. ; Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. ; Wheeler, Noah J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-b9f7338507862d1471cb85e085d01a94175ad12ac0a2a4ffae312ca3b5ee59853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, Noah J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Keith S.</au><au>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Wheeler, Noah J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Users Judge the Stair-Climbing Abilities of Two-Wheeled Self-Balancing Robots?</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1326</spage><epage>1330</epage><pages>1326-1330</pages><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>This experiment examined users’ abilities to judge whether an autonomous robot can accomplish a given task. It was predicted that 1) participants would differentiate the action-capabilities of short and tall robots, 2) participants would base their judgments on an action-relevant scalar, and 3) participants’ judgments would be accurate. All three predictions were supported. This is important because it suggests that users may be able to accurately judge whether an autonomous robot can accomplish a given task without having previously observed that robot perform that task. The ability to do so will be very important as users increasingly ask their robots to perform tasks that the robots’ designers may have never considered.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1071181312561383</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-9312
ispartof Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2012-09, Vol.56 (1), p.1326-1330
issn 1541-9312
1071-1813
2169-5067
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1071181312561383
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Can Users Judge the Stair-Climbing Abilities of Two-Wheeled Self-Balancing Robots?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T04%3A56%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Users%20Judge%20the%20Stair-Climbing%20Abilities%20of%20Two-Wheeled%20Self-Balancing%20Robots?&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Jones,%20Keith%20S.&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1326&rft.epage=1330&rft.pages=1326-1330&rft.issn=1541-9312&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1071181312561383&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1071181312561383%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1071181312561383&rfr_iscdi=true