A Pig in a Suit Is Still A Pig: A Comment on “Modifying the C Index for Use With Holland Codes of Unequal Length”

A Pig in a Suit Is Still A Pig: A Comment on “Modifying the C Index for Use With Holland Codes of Unequal Length”

In this comment the author reviews briefly the evidence documenting the failure of Holland’s (1997) hexagonal congruence model to predict meaningful vocational outcomes, considers the excuses generally offered for the failure of Holland’s system, and comments briefly on Eggerth and Andrew’s (2006 [t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of career assessment 2006-05, Vol.14 (2), p.283-288
1. Verfasser: Tinsley, Howard E. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Career Choice
Careers
Evaluation Methods
Failure
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 288
container_issue 2
container_start_page 283
container_title Journal of career assessment
container_volume 14
creator Tinsley, Howard E. A.
description In this comment the author reviews briefly the evidence documenting the failure of Holland’s (1997) hexagonal congruence model to predict meaningful vocational outcomes, considers the excuses generally offered for the failure of Holland’s system, and comments briefly on Eggerth and Andrew’s (2006 [this issue]) proposed modification of the C index. The author concludes by proposing a redirection of the research agenda of vocational psychology to advance vocational psychology theory, research, and interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1069072705283780
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1069072705283780</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ735009</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1069072705283780</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ735009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-5625f92bcc8e779de1d8263cd75e6e09e29f708b73d5bdada0fa0cb779fe061c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKw0AURYMoWKt7Fy7eD0RfJk4mcVdKtZWKQi0uwyTzJp2STjSTgN31Q_Tn-iWmVlwIru6Dc--Fdz3vPMDLIBDiKsAoQcEEchaHIsYDrxdwzvxrnuBhd3fY3_Fj78S5JSKyBOOe1w7gyRRgLEiYtaaBiYNZY8oSvsFNJ8NqtSLbQGVhu_l4qJTRa2MLaBYEQ5hYRe-gqxrmjuDFNAsYV2UpreqCihxUGuaW3lpZwpRs0Sy2m89T70jL0tHZj_a9-e3oeTj2p493k-Fg6uchssbnEeM6YVmexyREoihQMYvCXAlOEWFCLNEC40yEimdKKolaYp51Vk0YBXnY93Dfm9eVczXp9LU2K1mv0wDT3Wzp39m6yMU-QrXJf-2jexFyxKTD_h47WVC6rNradg_8X_cFWZJ2Mg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Pig in a Suit Is Still A Pig: A Comment on “Modifying the C Index for Use With Holland Codes of Unequal Length”</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Tinsley, Howard E. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tinsley, Howard E. A.</creatorcontrib><description>In this comment the author reviews briefly the evidence documenting the failure of Holland’s (1997) hexagonal congruence model to predict meaningful vocational outcomes, considers the excuses generally offered for the failure of Holland’s system, and comments briefly on Eggerth and Andrew’s (2006 [this issue]) proposed modification of the C index. The author concludes by proposing a redirection of the research agenda of vocational psychology to advance vocational psychology theory, research, and interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-0727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4590</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1069072705283780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Career Choice ; Careers ; Evaluation Methods ; Failure</subject><ispartof>Journal of career assessment, 2006-05, Vol.14 (2), p.283-288</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-5625f92bcc8e779de1d8263cd75e6e09e29f708b73d5bdada0fa0cb779fe061c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-5625f92bcc8e779de1d8263cd75e6e09e29f708b73d5bdada0fa0cb779fe061c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1069072705283780$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1069072705283780$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ735009$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tinsley, Howard E. A.</creatorcontrib><title>A Pig in a Suit Is Still A Pig: A Comment on “Modifying the C Index for Use With Holland Codes of Unequal Length”</title><title>Journal of career assessment</title><description>In this comment the author reviews briefly the evidence documenting the failure of Holland’s (1997) hexagonal congruence model to predict meaningful vocational outcomes, considers the excuses generally offered for the failure of Holland’s system, and comments briefly on Eggerth and Andrew’s (2006 [this issue]) proposed modification of the C index. The author concludes by proposing a redirection of the research agenda of vocational psychology to advance vocational psychology theory, research, and interventions.</description><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Failure</subject><issn>1069-0727</issn><issn>1552-4590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKw0AURYMoWKt7Fy7eD0RfJk4mcVdKtZWKQi0uwyTzJp2STjSTgN31Q_Tn-iWmVlwIru6Dc--Fdz3vPMDLIBDiKsAoQcEEchaHIsYDrxdwzvxrnuBhd3fY3_Fj78S5JSKyBOOe1w7gyRRgLEiYtaaBiYNZY8oSvsFNJ8NqtSLbQGVhu_l4qJTRa2MLaBYEQ5hYRe-gqxrmjuDFNAsYV2UpreqCihxUGuaW3lpZwpRs0Sy2m89T70jL0tHZj_a9-e3oeTj2p493k-Fg6uchssbnEeM6YVmexyREoihQMYvCXAlOEWFCLNEC40yEimdKKolaYp51Vk0YBXnY93Dfm9eVczXp9LU2K1mv0wDT3Wzp39m6yMU-QrXJf-2jexFyxKTD_h47WVC6rNradg_8X_cFWZJ2Mg</recordid><startdate>20060501</startdate><enddate>20060501</enddate><creator>Tinsley, Howard E. A.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060501</creationdate><title>A Pig in a Suit Is Still A Pig: A Comment on “Modifying the C Index for Use With Holland Codes of Unequal Length”</title><author>Tinsley, Howard E. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-5625f92bcc8e779de1d8263cd75e6e09e29f708b73d5bdada0fa0cb779fe061c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tinsley, Howard E. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of career assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tinsley, Howard E. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ735009</ericid><atitle>A Pig in a Suit Is Still A Pig: A Comment on “Modifying the C Index for Use With Holland Codes of Unequal Length”</atitle><jtitle>Journal of career assessment</jtitle><date>2006-05-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>283-288</pages><issn>1069-0727</issn><eissn>1552-4590</eissn><abstract>In this comment the author reviews briefly the evidence documenting the failure of Holland’s (1997) hexagonal congruence model to predict meaningful vocational outcomes, considers the excuses generally offered for the failure of Holland’s system, and comments briefly on Eggerth and Andrew’s (2006 [this issue]) proposed modification of the C index. The author concludes by proposing a redirection of the research agenda of vocational psychology to advance vocational psychology theory, research, and interventions.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1069072705283780</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-0727
ispartof Journal of career assessment, 2006-05, Vol.14 (2), p.283-288
issn 1069-0727
1552-4590
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1069072705283780
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Career Choice
Careers
Evaluation Methods
Failure
title A Pig in a Suit Is Still A Pig: A Comment on “Modifying the C Index for Use With Holland Codes of Unequal Length”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A52%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Pig%20in%20a%20Suit%20Is%20Still%20A%20Pig:%20A%20Comment%20on%20%E2%80%9CModifying%20the%20C%20Index%20for%20Use%20With%20Holland%20Codes%20of%20Unequal%20Length%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20career%20assessment&rft.au=Tinsley,%20Howard%20E.%20A.&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=283-288&rft.issn=1069-0727&rft.eissn=1552-4590&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1069072705283780&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ735009%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ735009&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1069072705283780&rfr_iscdi=true