Fieldwork Research and Social Network Analysis: Different Methods Creating Complementary Perspectives
This article suggests that participant observation and social network analysis are able to yield complementary perspectives on youth gangs. Participant observation over a long period yields systematically gathered observations and interview narratives. Such data may provide a close-up look at youth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of contemporary criminal justice 2005-05, Vol.21 (2), p.120-134 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 134 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 120 |
container_title | Journal of contemporary criminal justice |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Fleisher, Mark S. |
description | This article suggests that participant observation and social network analysis are able to yield complementary perspectives on youth gangs. Participant observation over a long period yields systematically gathered observations and interview narratives. Such data may provide a close-up look at youth gangs at street level; however, participant observation has limitations that constrain its applicability in multisite research. Social network methods added to field research protocols can provide a behavioral and social structural vision of youth gangs. An analysis of egocentric social network data collected in a gang neighborhood casts doubton conventional conceptualizations of gangs as groups and gang boundaries. Compositional analyses of personal (egocentric) social networks of same-gang youth provide measures of peer influence processes beyond participant observation. Comparative analyses of opposite-gang adolescents’ egocentric networks show a wide overlap among intergang friends. The article links such findings to personal shifts in life course and adaptations to chronic poverty. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1043986204273436 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1043986204273436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1043986204273436</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1043986204273436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-b1ee99b313d9024a792148641cc34da1146477e48952e2d3ee64438edcece583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j09LAzEQxYMoWKt3j_sFUjPJbP4cS7FaKApt7yFNprp17UpSkX57t9aT4Gke_N57zGPsFsQIwJg7EKic1VKgNAqVPmMDqGvJaxT6vNc95kd-ya5K2QoBSko9YKNpQ2366vJbtaBCIcfXKuxStexiE9rqifY_bLwL7aE05ZpdbEJb6Ob3Dtlqer-aPPL588NsMp7zCOj2fA1Ezq0VqOSExGCcBLQaIUaFKQCgRmMIraslyaSINKKylCJFqq0aMnGqjbkrJdPGf-TmPeSDB-GPc_3fuX2EnyIlvJDfdp-5f7n87_8GLrlTCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fieldwork Research and Social Network Analysis: Different Methods Creating Complementary Perspectives</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Fleisher, Mark S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleisher, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article suggests that participant observation and social network analysis are able to yield complementary perspectives on youth gangs. Participant observation over a long period yields systematically gathered observations and interview narratives. Such data may provide a close-up look at youth gangs at street level; however, participant observation has limitations that constrain its applicability in multisite research. Social network methods added to field research protocols can provide a behavioral and social structural vision of youth gangs. An analysis of egocentric social network data collected in a gang neighborhood casts doubton conventional conceptualizations of gangs as groups and gang boundaries. Compositional analyses of personal (egocentric) social networks of same-gang youth provide measures of peer influence processes beyond participant observation. Comparative analyses of opposite-gang adolescents’ egocentric networks show a wide overlap among intergang friends. The article links such findings to personal shifts in life course and adaptations to chronic poverty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-9862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1043986204273436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of contemporary criminal justice, 2005-05, Vol.21 (2), p.120-134</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-b1ee99b313d9024a792148641cc34da1146477e48952e2d3ee64438edcece583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1043986204273436$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043986204273436$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleisher, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><title>Fieldwork Research and Social Network Analysis: Different Methods Creating Complementary Perspectives</title><title>Journal of contemporary criminal justice</title><description>This article suggests that participant observation and social network analysis are able to yield complementary perspectives on youth gangs. Participant observation over a long period yields systematically gathered observations and interview narratives. Such data may provide a close-up look at youth gangs at street level; however, participant observation has limitations that constrain its applicability in multisite research. Social network methods added to field research protocols can provide a behavioral and social structural vision of youth gangs. An analysis of egocentric social network data collected in a gang neighborhood casts doubton conventional conceptualizations of gangs as groups and gang boundaries. Compositional analyses of personal (egocentric) social networks of same-gang youth provide measures of peer influence processes beyond participant observation. Comparative analyses of opposite-gang adolescents’ egocentric networks show a wide overlap among intergang friends. The article links such findings to personal shifts in life course and adaptations to chronic poverty.</description><issn>1043-9862</issn><issn>1552-5406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j09LAzEQxYMoWKt3j_sFUjPJbP4cS7FaKApt7yFNprp17UpSkX57t9aT4Gke_N57zGPsFsQIwJg7EKic1VKgNAqVPmMDqGvJaxT6vNc95kd-ya5K2QoBSko9YKNpQ2366vJbtaBCIcfXKuxStexiE9rqifY_bLwL7aE05ZpdbEJb6Ob3Dtlqer-aPPL588NsMp7zCOj2fA1Ezq0VqOSExGCcBLQaIUaFKQCgRmMIraslyaSINKKylCJFqq0aMnGqjbkrJdPGf-TmPeSDB-GPc_3fuX2EnyIlvJDfdp-5f7n87_8GLrlTCw</recordid><startdate>200505</startdate><enddate>200505</enddate><creator>Fleisher, Mark S.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200505</creationdate><title>Fieldwork Research and Social Network Analysis</title><author>Fleisher, Mark S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-b1ee99b313d9024a792148641cc34da1146477e48952e2d3ee64438edcece583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleisher, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of contemporary criminal justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleisher, Mark S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fieldwork Research and Social Network Analysis: Different Methods Creating Complementary Perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Journal of contemporary criminal justice</jtitle><date>2005-05</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>120-134</pages><issn>1043-9862</issn><eissn>1552-5406</eissn><abstract>This article suggests that participant observation and social network analysis are able to yield complementary perspectives on youth gangs. Participant observation over a long period yields systematically gathered observations and interview narratives. Such data may provide a close-up look at youth gangs at street level; however, participant observation has limitations that constrain its applicability in multisite research. Social network methods added to field research protocols can provide a behavioral and social structural vision of youth gangs. An analysis of egocentric social network data collected in a gang neighborhood casts doubton conventional conceptualizations of gangs as groups and gang boundaries. Compositional analyses of personal (egocentric) social networks of same-gang youth provide measures of peer influence processes beyond participant observation. Comparative analyses of opposite-gang adolescents’ egocentric networks show a wide overlap among intergang friends. The article links such findings to personal shifts in life course and adaptations to chronic poverty.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1043986204273436</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1043-9862 |
ispartof | Journal of contemporary criminal justice, 2005-05, Vol.21 (2), p.120-134 |
issn | 1043-9862 1552-5406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1043986204273436 |
source | Access via SAGE; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
title | Fieldwork Research and Social Network Analysis: Different Methods Creating Complementary Perspectives |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A56%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fieldwork%20Research%20and%20Social%20Network%20Analysis:%20Different%20Methods%20Creating%20Complementary%20Perspectives&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20contemporary%20criminal%20justice&rft.au=Fleisher,%20Mark%20S.&rft.date=2005-05&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=120-134&rft.issn=1043-9862&rft.eissn=1552-5406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1043986204273436&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1043986204273436%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1043986204273436&rfr_iscdi=true |