Agricultural Trade and Ultra-Poor in Pakistan: An Application of CGE Model

In the modern integrated world, the synthesis of countries for trade is often viewed as a crucial source of income and growth disparities across nations. Well-known channels of economic theory can trace the growth effects of trade. However, there is a substantial conflict among empirical studies reg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Millennial Asia 2022-12, Vol.13 (3), p.491-512
Hauptverfasser: Ahmad, Saud, Khan, Muhammad Aamir, Mustafa, Usman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue 3
container_start_page 491
container_title Millennial Asia
container_volume 13
creator Ahmad, Saud
Khan, Muhammad Aamir
Mustafa, Usman
description In the modern integrated world, the synthesis of countries for trade is often viewed as a crucial source of income and growth disparities across nations. Well-known channels of economic theory can trace the growth effects of trade. However, there is a substantial conflict among empirical studies regarding gains from agricultural trade. Therefore, this study examines the economy-wide impact of agriculture trade liberalization/protection on agriculture production, agriculture trade, income redistribution and public welfare. An extension of the GTAP model known as MyGTAP is employed and the world economy is disaggregated into 20 regions and 11 sectors with Pakistan as a home country. Further, results explore greater gains from an increased level of liberalization towards the agriculture sector in terms of agriculture production, real factors’ wage, terms of trade and household welfare. Rural households enjoy relatively higher real income and income inequality declines in Pakistan in the case of liberalization and protection. However, comparatively protectionism reduces inequality by the lower extent, and said study also points out that neither change in real gross domestic product nor public welfare turns out to be a good indicator of assessing potential impact of trade policies on income inequality.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/09763996211010607
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_09763996211010607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09763996211010607</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_09763996211010607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-c9d9db484c0b0c07f6f748d176ba65bd082bb4073fc396dd53677c78f0bdb0793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElHpB7DzD6SM8_DE7KKolKIiumjXkR9xlRLiyE4W_D2pyg6J2dzF3DMaHUIeGawYQ3wCgTwVgieMAQMOeEOiJE1YjFCwWxJd9vGlcE-WIZxhHpElkGNE3sqTb_XUjZOXHT14aRoqe0OP3ehlvHfO07ane_nZhlH2z7TsaTkMXavl2LqeOkurzZq-O9N0D-TOyi40y99ckOPL-lC9xruPzbYqd7FOimyMtTDCqKzINCjQgJZbzArDkCvJc2WgSJTKAFOrU8GNyVOOqLGwoIwCFOmCsOtd7V0IvrH14Nsv6b9rBvXFR_3Hx8ysrkyQp6Y-u8n384v_AD-2j15n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agricultural Trade and Ultra-Poor in Pakistan: An Application of CGE Model</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Ahmad, Saud ; Khan, Muhammad Aamir ; Mustafa, Usman</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Saud ; Khan, Muhammad Aamir ; Mustafa, Usman</creatorcontrib><description>In the modern integrated world, the synthesis of countries for trade is often viewed as a crucial source of income and growth disparities across nations. Well-known channels of economic theory can trace the growth effects of trade. However, there is a substantial conflict among empirical studies regarding gains from agricultural trade. Therefore, this study examines the economy-wide impact of agriculture trade liberalization/protection on agriculture production, agriculture trade, income redistribution and public welfare. An extension of the GTAP model known as MyGTAP is employed and the world economy is disaggregated into 20 regions and 11 sectors with Pakistan as a home country. Further, results explore greater gains from an increased level of liberalization towards the agriculture sector in terms of agriculture production, real factors’ wage, terms of trade and household welfare. Rural households enjoy relatively higher real income and income inequality declines in Pakistan in the case of liberalization and protection. However, comparatively protectionism reduces inequality by the lower extent, and said study also points out that neither change in real gross domestic product nor public welfare turns out to be a good indicator of assessing potential impact of trade policies on income inequality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0976-3996</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2321-7081</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09763996211010607</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Millennial Asia, 2022-12, Vol.13 (3), p.491-512</ispartof><rights>2022 Association of Asia Scholars</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-c9d9db484c0b0c07f6f748d176ba65bd082bb4073fc396dd53677c78f0bdb0793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-c9d9db484c0b0c07f6f748d176ba65bd082bb4073fc396dd53677c78f0bdb0793</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7403-3214 ; 0000-0003-4305-8504</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09763996211010607$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09763996211010607$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Saud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Aamir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustafa, Usman</creatorcontrib><title>Agricultural Trade and Ultra-Poor in Pakistan: An Application of CGE Model</title><title>Millennial Asia</title><description>In the modern integrated world, the synthesis of countries for trade is often viewed as a crucial source of income and growth disparities across nations. Well-known channels of economic theory can trace the growth effects of trade. However, there is a substantial conflict among empirical studies regarding gains from agricultural trade. Therefore, this study examines the economy-wide impact of agriculture trade liberalization/protection on agriculture production, agriculture trade, income redistribution and public welfare. An extension of the GTAP model known as MyGTAP is employed and the world economy is disaggregated into 20 regions and 11 sectors with Pakistan as a home country. Further, results explore greater gains from an increased level of liberalization towards the agriculture sector in terms of agriculture production, real factors’ wage, terms of trade and household welfare. Rural households enjoy relatively higher real income and income inequality declines in Pakistan in the case of liberalization and protection. However, comparatively protectionism reduces inequality by the lower extent, and said study also points out that neither change in real gross domestic product nor public welfare turns out to be a good indicator of assessing potential impact of trade policies on income inequality.</description><issn>0976-3996</issn><issn>2321-7081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EElHpB7DzD6SM8_DE7KKolKIiumjXkR9xlRLiyE4W_D2pyg6J2dzF3DMaHUIeGawYQ3wCgTwVgieMAQMOeEOiJE1YjFCwWxJd9vGlcE-WIZxhHpElkGNE3sqTb_XUjZOXHT14aRoqe0OP3ehlvHfO07ane_nZhlH2z7TsaTkMXavl2LqeOkurzZq-O9N0D-TOyi40y99ckOPL-lC9xruPzbYqd7FOimyMtTDCqKzINCjQgJZbzArDkCvJc2WgSJTKAFOrU8GNyVOOqLGwoIwCFOmCsOtd7V0IvrH14Nsv6b9rBvXFR_3Hx8ysrkyQp6Y-u8n384v_AD-2j15n</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Ahmad, Saud</creator><creator>Khan, Muhammad Aamir</creator><creator>Mustafa, Usman</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7403-3214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4305-8504</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Agricultural Trade and Ultra-Poor in Pakistan: An Application of CGE Model</title><author>Ahmad, Saud ; Khan, Muhammad Aamir ; Mustafa, Usman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-c9d9db484c0b0c07f6f748d176ba65bd082bb4073fc396dd53677c78f0bdb0793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Saud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Muhammad Aamir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustafa, Usman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Millennial Asia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmad, Saud</au><au>Khan, Muhammad Aamir</au><au>Mustafa, Usman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agricultural Trade and Ultra-Poor in Pakistan: An Application of CGE Model</atitle><jtitle>Millennial Asia</jtitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>491-512</pages><issn>0976-3996</issn><eissn>2321-7081</eissn><abstract>In the modern integrated world, the synthesis of countries for trade is often viewed as a crucial source of income and growth disparities across nations. Well-known channels of economic theory can trace the growth effects of trade. However, there is a substantial conflict among empirical studies regarding gains from agricultural trade. Therefore, this study examines the economy-wide impact of agriculture trade liberalization/protection on agriculture production, agriculture trade, income redistribution and public welfare. An extension of the GTAP model known as MyGTAP is employed and the world economy is disaggregated into 20 regions and 11 sectors with Pakistan as a home country. Further, results explore greater gains from an increased level of liberalization towards the agriculture sector in terms of agriculture production, real factors’ wage, terms of trade and household welfare. Rural households enjoy relatively higher real income and income inequality declines in Pakistan in the case of liberalization and protection. However, comparatively protectionism reduces inequality by the lower extent, and said study also points out that neither change in real gross domestic product nor public welfare turns out to be a good indicator of assessing potential impact of trade policies on income inequality.</abstract><cop>New Delhi, India</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/09763996211010607</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7403-3214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4305-8504</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0976-3996
ispartof Millennial Asia, 2022-12, Vol.13 (3), p.491-512
issn 0976-3996
2321-7081
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_09763996211010607
source Access via SAGE
title Agricultural Trade and Ultra-Poor in Pakistan: An Application of CGE Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T00%3A39%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agricultural%20Trade%20and%20Ultra-Poor%20in%20Pakistan:%20An%20Application%20of%20CGE%20Model&rft.jtitle=Millennial%20Asia&rft.au=Ahmad,%20Saud&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=491-512&rft.issn=0976-3996&rft.eissn=2321-7081&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09763996211010607&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_09763996211010607%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09763996211010607&rfr_iscdi=true