Role of Neurosonography in Critically Ill Neonates in NICU
Background Neurosonography has been commonly used for screening in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), for early detection of defects in the central nervous system (CNS) which include findings like intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, cerebral edema, and other structural abnormalities. Aim To de...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neonatology 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.194-198 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 198 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 194 |
container_title | Journal of neonatology |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Rao, Rupesh Taksande, Amar Saqqaf, Syed Athhar Yedve, Sachin Kumar, Sneh |
description | Background
Neurosonography has been commonly used for screening in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), for early detection of defects in the central nervous system (CNS) which include findings like intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, cerebral edema, and other structural abnormalities.
Aim
To detect the CNS abnormality in critically ill neonates by neurosonography.
Materials and Methods
This was a cross-sectional study done in the NICU of AVBR Hospital, Sawangi Meghe, Wardha. Neonates were defined as “critically ill” after taking their detailed history and performing a complete physical examination. Following this, the newborns who fulfilled the studies’ inclusion criteria were subjected to neurosonogram. The following factors were considered: gestational age, clinical examination, investigations, neurosonography findings, and outcomes.
Results
A total of 150 critically ill newborns were subjected to neurosonography, 24 of them had abnormal findings. There was a significant correlation of gestational weeks, mode of delivery, and diagnosis of critically ill neonates with abnormal neurosonography (P = .000, P = .000, and P = .000). Prematurity was the most common diagnosis followed by meningitis. A total of 16% of the newborns had abnormal results in neurosonography. About 6.67% of these had hydrocephalus, 5.34% had an intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), 1.34% had periventricular echogenicity, 0.66% had cerebral edema, 0.67% had germinal matrix hemorrhage, and 0.66% had brain abscess. A total of 109 (72.67%) participants in the study had a positive outcome at the time of discharge from NICU; whereas, 27 (18%) unfortunately did not survive.
Conclusion
Neurosonography is thus a valuable, safe, and effective diagnostic tool used for screening critically ill neonates for abnormalities of the brain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/09732179221113674 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_09732179221113674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09732179221113674</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_09732179221113674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-bd04ec69a99c71f79836771d0b5ca628dc5c56d1f818256c5810f0d4baca410d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01Lw0AQhhepYKn9Ad7yB1J3Npv98CZBbaBUEHsOm_2okTVbdtND_r0JFS-Cpxlm5hmeF6E7wBsAzu-x5AUBLgkBgIJxeoWW8ywnIPjit-fyBq1T6lqMiaACM7pED2_B2yy4bG_PMaTQh2NUp48x6_qsit3QaeX9mNXeTxehV4NN82pfV4dbdO2UT3b9U1fo8Pz0Xm3z3etLXT3ucg1SDnlrMLWaSSWl5uC4FJMhB4PbUitGhNGlLpkBJ0CQkulSAHbY0FZpRQGbYoXg8ldPgila15xi96Xi2ABu5vzNn_wTs7kwSR1t8xnOsZ8U_wG-AWChWSo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of Neurosonography in Critically Ill Neonates in NICU</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Rao, Rupesh ; Taksande, Amar ; Saqqaf, Syed Athhar ; Yedve, Sachin ; Kumar, Sneh</creator><creatorcontrib>Rao, Rupesh ; Taksande, Amar ; Saqqaf, Syed Athhar ; Yedve, Sachin ; Kumar, Sneh</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Neurosonography has been commonly used for screening in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), for early detection of defects in the central nervous system (CNS) which include findings like intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, cerebral edema, and other structural abnormalities.
Aim
To detect the CNS abnormality in critically ill neonates by neurosonography.
Materials and Methods
This was a cross-sectional study done in the NICU of AVBR Hospital, Sawangi Meghe, Wardha. Neonates were defined as “critically ill” after taking their detailed history and performing a complete physical examination. Following this, the newborns who fulfilled the studies’ inclusion criteria were subjected to neurosonogram. The following factors were considered: gestational age, clinical examination, investigations, neurosonography findings, and outcomes.
Results
A total of 150 critically ill newborns were subjected to neurosonography, 24 of them had abnormal findings. There was a significant correlation of gestational weeks, mode of delivery, and diagnosis of critically ill neonates with abnormal neurosonography (P = .000, P = .000, and P = .000). Prematurity was the most common diagnosis followed by meningitis. A total of 16% of the newborns had abnormal results in neurosonography. About 6.67% of these had hydrocephalus, 5.34% had an intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), 1.34% had periventricular echogenicity, 0.66% had cerebral edema, 0.67% had germinal matrix hemorrhage, and 0.66% had brain abscess. A total of 109 (72.67%) participants in the study had a positive outcome at the time of discharge from NICU; whereas, 27 (18%) unfortunately did not survive.
Conclusion
Neurosonography is thus a valuable, safe, and effective diagnostic tool used for screening critically ill neonates for abnormalities of the brain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-2179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-2187</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09732179221113674</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of neonatology, 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.194-198</ispartof><rights>2022 National Neonatology Forum</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-bd04ec69a99c71f79836771d0b5ca628dc5c56d1f818256c5810f0d4baca410d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-bd04ec69a99c71f79836771d0b5ca628dc5c56d1f818256c5810f0d4baca410d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3097-7405</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09732179221113674$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09732179221113674$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rao, Rupesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taksande, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saqqaf, Syed Athhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yedve, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sneh</creatorcontrib><title>Role of Neurosonography in Critically Ill Neonates in NICU</title><title>Journal of neonatology</title><description>Background
Neurosonography has been commonly used for screening in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), for early detection of defects in the central nervous system (CNS) which include findings like intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, cerebral edema, and other structural abnormalities.
Aim
To detect the CNS abnormality in critically ill neonates by neurosonography.
Materials and Methods
This was a cross-sectional study done in the NICU of AVBR Hospital, Sawangi Meghe, Wardha. Neonates were defined as “critically ill” after taking their detailed history and performing a complete physical examination. Following this, the newborns who fulfilled the studies’ inclusion criteria were subjected to neurosonogram. The following factors were considered: gestational age, clinical examination, investigations, neurosonography findings, and outcomes.
Results
A total of 150 critically ill newborns were subjected to neurosonography, 24 of them had abnormal findings. There was a significant correlation of gestational weeks, mode of delivery, and diagnosis of critically ill neonates with abnormal neurosonography (P = .000, P = .000, and P = .000). Prematurity was the most common diagnosis followed by meningitis. A total of 16% of the newborns had abnormal results in neurosonography. About 6.67% of these had hydrocephalus, 5.34% had an intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), 1.34% had periventricular echogenicity, 0.66% had cerebral edema, 0.67% had germinal matrix hemorrhage, and 0.66% had brain abscess. A total of 109 (72.67%) participants in the study had a positive outcome at the time of discharge from NICU; whereas, 27 (18%) unfortunately did not survive.
Conclusion
Neurosonography is thus a valuable, safe, and effective diagnostic tool used for screening critically ill neonates for abnormalities of the brain.</description><issn>0973-2179</issn><issn>0973-2187</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j01Lw0AQhhepYKn9Ad7yB1J3Npv98CZBbaBUEHsOm_2okTVbdtND_r0JFS-Cpxlm5hmeF6E7wBsAzu-x5AUBLgkBgIJxeoWW8ywnIPjit-fyBq1T6lqMiaACM7pED2_B2yy4bG_PMaTQh2NUp48x6_qsit3QaeX9mNXeTxehV4NN82pfV4dbdO2UT3b9U1fo8Pz0Xm3z3etLXT3ucg1SDnlrMLWaSSWl5uC4FJMhB4PbUitGhNGlLpkBJ0CQkulSAHbY0FZpRQGbYoXg8ldPgila15xi96Xi2ABu5vzNn_wTs7kwSR1t8xnOsZ8U_wG-AWChWSo</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Rao, Rupesh</creator><creator>Taksande, Amar</creator><creator>Saqqaf, Syed Athhar</creator><creator>Yedve, Sachin</creator><creator>Kumar, Sneh</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-7405</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Role of Neurosonography in Critically Ill Neonates in NICU</title><author>Rao, Rupesh ; Taksande, Amar ; Saqqaf, Syed Athhar ; Yedve, Sachin ; Kumar, Sneh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199t-bd04ec69a99c71f79836771d0b5ca628dc5c56d1f818256c5810f0d4baca410d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rao, Rupesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taksande, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saqqaf, Syed Athhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yedve, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sneh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of neonatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rao, Rupesh</au><au>Taksande, Amar</au><au>Saqqaf, Syed Athhar</au><au>Yedve, Sachin</au><au>Kumar, Sneh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of Neurosonography in Critically Ill Neonates in NICU</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neonatology</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>194-198</pages><issn>0973-2179</issn><eissn>0973-2187</eissn><abstract>Background
Neurosonography has been commonly used for screening in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), for early detection of defects in the central nervous system (CNS) which include findings like intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, cerebral edema, and other structural abnormalities.
Aim
To detect the CNS abnormality in critically ill neonates by neurosonography.
Materials and Methods
This was a cross-sectional study done in the NICU of AVBR Hospital, Sawangi Meghe, Wardha. Neonates were defined as “critically ill” after taking their detailed history and performing a complete physical examination. Following this, the newborns who fulfilled the studies’ inclusion criteria were subjected to neurosonogram. The following factors were considered: gestational age, clinical examination, investigations, neurosonography findings, and outcomes.
Results
A total of 150 critically ill newborns were subjected to neurosonography, 24 of them had abnormal findings. There was a significant correlation of gestational weeks, mode of delivery, and diagnosis of critically ill neonates with abnormal neurosonography (P = .000, P = .000, and P = .000). Prematurity was the most common diagnosis followed by meningitis. A total of 16% of the newborns had abnormal results in neurosonography. About 6.67% of these had hydrocephalus, 5.34% had an intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), 1.34% had periventricular echogenicity, 0.66% had cerebral edema, 0.67% had germinal matrix hemorrhage, and 0.66% had brain abscess. A total of 109 (72.67%) participants in the study had a positive outcome at the time of discharge from NICU; whereas, 27 (18%) unfortunately did not survive.
Conclusion
Neurosonography is thus a valuable, safe, and effective diagnostic tool used for screening critically ill neonates for abnormalities of the brain.</abstract><cop>New Delhi, India</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/09732179221113674</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-7405</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0973-2179 |
ispartof | Journal of neonatology, 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.194-198 |
issn | 0973-2179 0973-2187 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_09732179221113674 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Role of Neurosonography in Critically Ill Neonates in NICU |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T02%3A58%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20Neurosonography%20in%20Critically%20Ill%20Neonates%20in%20NICU&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neonatology&rft.au=Rao,%20Rupesh&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=194-198&rft.issn=0973-2179&rft.eissn=0973-2187&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09732179221113674&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_09732179221113674%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09732179221113674&rfr_iscdi=true |