Perception of care quality and ethical sensitivity in surgical nurses

Background: It is stated that high ethical sensitivity positively affects the quality of nursing care. However, the relationship between nursing care quality and ethical sensitivity has not been clearly demonstrated in researches. Aim: This study was carried out to determine the relationship between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nursing ethics 2020-05, Vol.27 (3), p.673-685, Article 0969733020901830
Hauptverfasser: Mert Boğa, Selda, Aydin Sayilan, Aylin, Kersu, Özlem, Baydemİr, Canan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 685
container_issue 3
container_start_page 673
container_title Nursing ethics
container_volume 27
creator Mert Boğa, Selda
Aydin Sayilan, Aylin
Kersu, Özlem
Baydemİr, Canan
description Background: It is stated that high ethical sensitivity positively affects the quality of nursing care. However, the relationship between nursing care quality and ethical sensitivity has not been clearly demonstrated in researches. Aim: This study was carried out to determine the relationship between surgical nurses’ care behaviors and their ethical sensitivity. Method: The sample of this cross-sectional, descriptive-correlational study consists of 308 nurses who worked at the surgical departments in four Turkish hospitals. The data were collected using the “Nurse Description Form” developed by the researcher, “Caring Behaviours Inventory-24” and “Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire.” Data were evaluated by the Mann Whitney U test, Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Spearman correlation analysis. Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the ethics committee. Verbal and written consent was received from the nurses. Results: It was found in the study that nurses’ Caring Behaviours Inventory-24 total score median was 5.25 (4.83–5.58), nurses’ perception level of caring quality was high, median of Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire total score was 89.00 (75.00–101.00) and nurses’ ethical sensitivity was moderate. A negative significant relation was found between nurses’ Caring Behaviours Inventory-24 total score and Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire total score (r = -0.162; p = 0.009). A negative relation was also detected between nurses’ working period at the current clinic and providing benefit (r = -0.147; p = 0.012), holistic approach (r = -0.139; p = 0.018) and orientation (r = -0.175; p = 0.003) scores of Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire sub-scales. Conclusion: Nurses’ perception levels of caring quality were high and their ethical sensitivity levels were moderate. It was found out that nurses’ ethical sensitivity increased together with their perception of caring quality, and as their working period at the current clinic increased, the ethical sensitivity also increased in terms of the sub-scales of providing benefit, holistic approach, and orientation. The factors that adversely affect the quality of nursing care and ethical sensitivity should be examined and attempts should be made to improve the working environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0969733020901830
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0969733020901830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0969733020901830</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2391184609</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-7e8cfa7e196ebbd87381133ebb7871f36ee7d065be6205c85ae5bd0cf34749e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMoun7cPUnBiyDVSdM0yVEWv0DQg55Lmk7XSDddk1bZf2_qrgqC4GmGmecdZt4h5JDCGaVCnIMqlGAMMlBAJYMNMqG5ECkoqTbJZGynY3-H7IbwAgAik2Kb7LAMcpZn-YRcPqA3uOht55KuSYz2mLwOurX9MtGuTrB_tka3SUAXbG_fxrp1SRj87LPuBh8w7JOtRrcBD9ZxjzxdXT5Ob9K7--vb6cVdaljB-1SgNI0WSFWBVVVLwSSljMVcSEEbViCKGgpeYZEBN5Jr5FUNpmG5yBVStkdOVnMXvnsdMPTl3AaDbasddkMoM8YZl1LSIqLHv9CXbvAubhcpRanMC1CRghVlfBeCx6ZceDvXfllSKEeLy98WR8nRevBQzbH-Fnx5GoHTFfCOVdcEY9EZ_MbiEzjNJAcWMxhPkv-np7bX46um3eD6KE1X0qBn-HPen5t_AJpzovM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2391184609</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception of care quality and ethical sensitivity in surgical nurses</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Mert Boğa, Selda ; Aydin Sayilan, Aylin ; Kersu, Özlem ; Baydemİr, Canan</creator><creatorcontrib>Mert Boğa, Selda ; Aydin Sayilan, Aylin ; Kersu, Özlem ; Baydemİr, Canan</creatorcontrib><description>Background: It is stated that high ethical sensitivity positively affects the quality of nursing care. However, the relationship between nursing care quality and ethical sensitivity has not been clearly demonstrated in researches. Aim: This study was carried out to determine the relationship between surgical nurses’ care behaviors and their ethical sensitivity. Method: The sample of this cross-sectional, descriptive-correlational study consists of 308 nurses who worked at the surgical departments in four Turkish hospitals. The data were collected using the “Nurse Description Form” developed by the researcher, “Caring Behaviours Inventory-24” and “Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire.” Data were evaluated by the Mann Whitney U test, Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Spearman correlation analysis. Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the ethics committee. Verbal and written consent was received from the nurses. Results: It was found in the study that nurses’ Caring Behaviours Inventory-24 total score median was 5.25 (4.83–5.58), nurses’ perception level of caring quality was high, median of Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire total score was 89.00 (75.00–101.00) and nurses’ ethical sensitivity was moderate. A negative significant relation was found between nurses’ Caring Behaviours Inventory-24 total score and Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire total score (r = -0.162; p = 0.009). A negative relation was also detected between nurses’ working period at the current clinic and providing benefit (r = -0.147; p = 0.012), holistic approach (r = -0.139; p = 0.018) and orientation (r = -0.175; p = 0.003) scores of Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire sub-scales. Conclusion: Nurses’ perception levels of caring quality were high and their ethical sensitivity levels were moderate. It was found out that nurses’ ethical sensitivity increased together with their perception of caring quality, and as their working period at the current clinic increased, the ethical sensitivity also increased in terms of the sub-scales of providing benefit, holistic approach, and orientation. The factors that adversely affect the quality of nursing care and ethical sensitivity should be examined and attempts should be made to improve the working environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-7330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0989</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0969733020901830</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32043424</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Behavior ; Caregiving ; Correlation of Data ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Ethics ; Ethics, Nursing ; Female ; Holistic approach ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Male ; Medical ethics ; Middle Aged ; Nurses ; Nurses - psychology ; Nurses - standards ; Nurses - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Operating Room Nursing - ethics ; Operating Room Nursing - standards ; Perception ; Psychometrics - instrumentation ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quality ; Quality of care ; Quality of Health Care - ethics ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; Quality of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Questionnaires ; Science &amp; Technology ; Social Sciences ; Social Sciences - Other Topics ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Turkey</subject><ispartof>Nursing ethics, 2020-05, Vol.27 (3), p.673-685, Article 0969733020901830</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>27</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000512850300001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-7e8cfa7e196ebbd87381133ebb7871f36ee7d065be6205c85ae5bd0cf34749e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-7e8cfa7e196ebbd87381133ebb7871f36ee7d065be6205c85ae5bd0cf34749e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8123-2211</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0969733020901830$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0969733020901830$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,28253,28254,31004,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32043424$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mert Boğa, Selda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin Sayilan, Aylin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kersu, Özlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baydemİr, Canan</creatorcontrib><title>Perception of care quality and ethical sensitivity in surgical nurses</title><title>Nursing ethics</title><addtitle>NURS ETHICS</addtitle><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><description>Background: It is stated that high ethical sensitivity positively affects the quality of nursing care. However, the relationship between nursing care quality and ethical sensitivity has not been clearly demonstrated in researches. Aim: This study was carried out to determine the relationship between surgical nurses’ care behaviors and their ethical sensitivity. Method: The sample of this cross-sectional, descriptive-correlational study consists of 308 nurses who worked at the surgical departments in four Turkish hospitals. The data were collected using the “Nurse Description Form” developed by the researcher, “Caring Behaviours Inventory-24” and “Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire.” Data were evaluated by the Mann Whitney U test, Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Spearman correlation analysis. Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the ethics committee. Verbal and written consent was received from the nurses. Results: It was found in the study that nurses’ Caring Behaviours Inventory-24 total score median was 5.25 (4.83–5.58), nurses’ perception level of caring quality was high, median of Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire total score was 89.00 (75.00–101.00) and nurses’ ethical sensitivity was moderate. A negative significant relation was found between nurses’ Caring Behaviours Inventory-24 total score and Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire total score (r = -0.162; p = 0.009). A negative relation was also detected between nurses’ working period at the current clinic and providing benefit (r = -0.147; p = 0.012), holistic approach (r = -0.139; p = 0.018) and orientation (r = -0.175; p = 0.003) scores of Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire sub-scales. Conclusion: Nurses’ perception levels of caring quality were high and their ethical sensitivity levels were moderate. It was found out that nurses’ ethical sensitivity increased together with their perception of caring quality, and as their working period at the current clinic increased, the ethical sensitivity also increased in terms of the sub-scales of providing benefit, holistic approach, and orientation. The factors that adversely affect the quality of nursing care and ethical sensitivity should be examined and attempts should be made to improve the working environment.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Caregiving</subject><subject>Correlation of Data</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics, Nursing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Holistic approach</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nurses - psychology</subject><subject>Nurses - standards</subject><subject>Nurses - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Operating Room Nursing - ethics</subject><subject>Operating Room Nursing - standards</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychometrics - instrumentation</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - ethics</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social Sciences - Other Topics</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><issn>0969-7330</issn><issn>1477-0989</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMoun7cPUnBiyDVSdM0yVEWv0DQg55Lmk7XSDddk1bZf2_qrgqC4GmGmecdZt4h5JDCGaVCnIMqlGAMMlBAJYMNMqG5ECkoqTbJZGynY3-H7IbwAgAik2Kb7LAMcpZn-YRcPqA3uOht55KuSYz2mLwOurX9MtGuTrB_tka3SUAXbG_fxrp1SRj87LPuBh8w7JOtRrcBD9ZxjzxdXT5Ob9K7--vb6cVdaljB-1SgNI0WSFWBVVVLwSSljMVcSEEbViCKGgpeYZEBN5Jr5FUNpmG5yBVStkdOVnMXvnsdMPTl3AaDbasddkMoM8YZl1LSIqLHv9CXbvAubhcpRanMC1CRghVlfBeCx6ZceDvXfllSKEeLy98WR8nRevBQzbH-Fnx5GoHTFfCOVdcEY9EZ_MbiEzjNJAcWMxhPkv-np7bX46um3eD6KE1X0qBn-HPen5t_AJpzovM</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Mert Boğa, Selda</creator><creator>Aydin Sayilan, Aylin</creator><creator>Kersu, Özlem</creator><creator>Baydemİr, Canan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-2211</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Perception of care quality and ethical sensitivity in surgical nurses</title><author>Mert Boğa, Selda ; Aydin Sayilan, Aylin ; Kersu, Özlem ; Baydemİr, Canan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-7e8cfa7e196ebbd87381133ebb7871f36ee7d065be6205c85ae5bd0cf34749e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Caregiving</topic><topic>Correlation of Data</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics, Nursing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Holistic approach</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nurses - psychology</topic><topic>Nurses - standards</topic><topic>Nurses - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Operating Room Nursing - ethics</topic><topic>Operating Room Nursing - standards</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychometrics - instrumentation</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - ethics</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social Sciences - Other Topics</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mert Boğa, Selda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydin Sayilan, Aylin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kersu, Özlem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baydemİr, Canan</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mert Boğa, Selda</au><au>Aydin Sayilan, Aylin</au><au>Kersu, Özlem</au><au>Baydemİr, Canan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perception of care quality and ethical sensitivity in surgical nurses</atitle><jtitle>Nursing ethics</jtitle><stitle>NURS ETHICS</stitle><addtitle>Nurs Ethics</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>673</spage><epage>685</epage><pages>673-685</pages><artnum>0969733020901830</artnum><issn>0969-7330</issn><eissn>1477-0989</eissn><abstract>Background: It is stated that high ethical sensitivity positively affects the quality of nursing care. However, the relationship between nursing care quality and ethical sensitivity has not been clearly demonstrated in researches. Aim: This study was carried out to determine the relationship between surgical nurses’ care behaviors and their ethical sensitivity. Method: The sample of this cross-sectional, descriptive-correlational study consists of 308 nurses who worked at the surgical departments in four Turkish hospitals. The data were collected using the “Nurse Description Form” developed by the researcher, “Caring Behaviours Inventory-24” and “Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire.” Data were evaluated by the Mann Whitney U test, Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Spearman correlation analysis. Ethical considerations: The study was approved by the ethics committee. Verbal and written consent was received from the nurses. Results: It was found in the study that nurses’ Caring Behaviours Inventory-24 total score median was 5.25 (4.83–5.58), nurses’ perception level of caring quality was high, median of Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire total score was 89.00 (75.00–101.00) and nurses’ ethical sensitivity was moderate. A negative significant relation was found between nurses’ Caring Behaviours Inventory-24 total score and Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire total score (r = -0.162; p = 0.009). A negative relation was also detected between nurses’ working period at the current clinic and providing benefit (r = -0.147; p = 0.012), holistic approach (r = -0.139; p = 0.018) and orientation (r = -0.175; p = 0.003) scores of Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire sub-scales. Conclusion: Nurses’ perception levels of caring quality were high and their ethical sensitivity levels were moderate. It was found out that nurses’ ethical sensitivity increased together with their perception of caring quality, and as their working period at the current clinic increased, the ethical sensitivity also increased in terms of the sub-scales of providing benefit, holistic approach, and orientation. The factors that adversely affect the quality of nursing care and ethical sensitivity should be examined and attempts should be made to improve the working environment.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>32043424</pmid><doi>10.1177/0969733020901830</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8123-2211</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-7330
ispartof Nursing ethics, 2020-05, Vol.27 (3), p.673-685, Article 0969733020901830
issn 0969-7330
1477-0989
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0969733020901830
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Behavior
Caregiving
Correlation of Data
Cross-Sectional Studies
Ethics
Ethics, Nursing
Female
Holistic approach
Hospitals
Humans
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Male
Medical ethics
Middle Aged
Nurses
Nurses - psychology
Nurses - standards
Nurses - statistics & numerical data
Nursing
Nursing care
Operating Room Nursing - ethics
Operating Room Nursing - standards
Perception
Psychometrics - instrumentation
Psychometrics - methods
Quality
Quality of care
Quality of Health Care - ethics
Quality of Health Care - standards
Quality of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Questionnaires
Science & Technology
Social Sciences
Social Sciences - Other Topics
Statistics, Nonparametric
Surveys and Questionnaires
Turkey
title Perception of care quality and ethical sensitivity in surgical nurses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T23%3A24%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20of%20care%20quality%20and%20ethical%20sensitivity%20in%20surgical%20nurses&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20ethics&rft.au=Mert%20Bo%C4%9Fa,%20Selda&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=673&rft.epage=685&rft.pages=673-685&rft.artnum=0969733020901830&rft.issn=0969-7330&rft.eissn=1477-0989&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0969733020901830&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2391184609%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2391184609&rft_id=info:pmid/32043424&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0969733020901830&rfr_iscdi=true