The laureate as celebrity genius: How Scientific American ’s John Horgan profiled Nobel Prize winners

When scientists become Nobel laureates, they become famous in science and public life, but few studies have examined the nature of their scientific celebrity. This article examines how Scientific American portrayed laureates in order to identify and explain core features of Nobel fame. It examines t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) England), 2018-05, Vol.27 (4), p.433-445
1. Verfasser: Fahy, Declan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 445
container_issue 4
container_start_page 433
container_title Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
container_volume 27
creator Fahy, Declan
description When scientists become Nobel laureates, they become famous in science and public life, but few studies have examined the nature of their scientific celebrity. This article examines how Scientific American portrayed laureates in order to identify and explain core features of Nobel fame. It examines the portrayals of seven laureates – Francis Crick, Linus Pauling, Hans Bethe, Murray Gell-Mann, Brian Josephson, Philip Anderson and Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar – in magazine profiles written between 1992 and 1995 by science writer John Horgan. Its textual analysis finds the scientists are portrayed as combining the sociological characteristics of genius, including enormous productivity and lasting impact, with the representational characteristics of celebrities, such as the merging of public and private lives. Their form of scientific celebrity is grounded in their field-changing research, which is presented as a product of their idiosyncratic personalities. Nobel science is presented as knowledge created by an ultra-elite of exceptional individuals.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0963662518762663
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0963662518762663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_0963662518762663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c883-dd8d8bef84a120e0673942f10077daf01bb0a1bc97ddf29675dd2b47adfe00d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1OwzAUhC0EEqWwZ-kLBJ7t1E7YVRVQUAVIZB_55zk1SpPKblWVFdfo9TgJjWDFaqT5RrP4CLlmcMOYUrdQSiEln7BCSS6lOCEjJiTLpITylIwGnA38nFyk9AEAIudyRJpqibTV24h6g1QnarFFE8NmTxvswjbd0Xm_o-82YLcJPlg6XWEMVnf0--uQ6HO_7I6L2ByLdex9aNHRl95gS99i-ES6C12HMV2SM6_bhFd_OSbVw301m2eL18en2XSR2aIQmXOFKwz6IteMA4JUosy5ZwBKOe2BGQOaGVsq5zwvpZo4x02utPMI4ECMCfze2tinFNHX6xhWOu5rBvXgqf7vSfwAA55cwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The laureate as celebrity genius: How Scientific American ’s John Horgan profiled Nobel Prize winners</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Fahy, Declan</creator><creatorcontrib>Fahy, Declan</creatorcontrib><description>When scientists become Nobel laureates, they become famous in science and public life, but few studies have examined the nature of their scientific celebrity. This article examines how Scientific American portrayed laureates in order to identify and explain core features of Nobel fame. It examines the portrayals of seven laureates – Francis Crick, Linus Pauling, Hans Bethe, Murray Gell-Mann, Brian Josephson, Philip Anderson and Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar – in magazine profiles written between 1992 and 1995 by science writer John Horgan. Its textual analysis finds the scientists are portrayed as combining the sociological characteristics of genius, including enormous productivity and lasting impact, with the representational characteristics of celebrities, such as the merging of public and private lives. Their form of scientific celebrity is grounded in their field-changing research, which is presented as a product of their idiosyncratic personalities. Nobel science is presented as knowledge created by an ultra-elite of exceptional individuals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-6625</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0963662518762663</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2018-05, Vol.27 (4), p.433-445</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c883-dd8d8bef84a120e0673942f10077daf01bb0a1bc97ddf29675dd2b47adfe00d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c883-dd8d8bef84a120e0673942f10077daf01bb0a1bc97ddf29675dd2b47adfe00d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fahy, Declan</creatorcontrib><title>The laureate as celebrity genius: How Scientific American ’s John Horgan profiled Nobel Prize winners</title><title>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</title><description>When scientists become Nobel laureates, they become famous in science and public life, but few studies have examined the nature of their scientific celebrity. This article examines how Scientific American portrayed laureates in order to identify and explain core features of Nobel fame. It examines the portrayals of seven laureates – Francis Crick, Linus Pauling, Hans Bethe, Murray Gell-Mann, Brian Josephson, Philip Anderson and Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar – in magazine profiles written between 1992 and 1995 by science writer John Horgan. Its textual analysis finds the scientists are portrayed as combining the sociological characteristics of genius, including enormous productivity and lasting impact, with the representational characteristics of celebrities, such as the merging of public and private lives. Their form of scientific celebrity is grounded in their field-changing research, which is presented as a product of their idiosyncratic personalities. Nobel science is presented as knowledge created by an ultra-elite of exceptional individuals.</description><issn>0963-6625</issn><issn>1361-6609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1OwzAUhC0EEqWwZ-kLBJ7t1E7YVRVQUAVIZB_55zk1SpPKblWVFdfo9TgJjWDFaqT5RrP4CLlmcMOYUrdQSiEln7BCSS6lOCEjJiTLpITylIwGnA38nFyk9AEAIudyRJpqibTV24h6g1QnarFFE8NmTxvswjbd0Xm_o-82YLcJPlg6XWEMVnf0--uQ6HO_7I6L2ByLdex9aNHRl95gS99i-ES6C12HMV2SM6_bhFd_OSbVw301m2eL18en2XSR2aIQmXOFKwz6IteMA4JUosy5ZwBKOe2BGQOaGVsq5zwvpZo4x02utPMI4ECMCfze2tinFNHX6xhWOu5rBvXgqf7vSfwAA55cwA</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Fahy, Declan</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>The laureate as celebrity genius: How Scientific American ’s John Horgan profiled Nobel Prize winners</title><author>Fahy, Declan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c883-dd8d8bef84a120e0673942f10077daf01bb0a1bc97ddf29675dd2b47adfe00d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fahy, Declan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fahy, Declan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The laureate as celebrity genius: How Scientific American ’s John Horgan profiled Nobel Prize winners</atitle><jtitle>Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)</jtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>433</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>433-445</pages><issn>0963-6625</issn><eissn>1361-6609</eissn><abstract>When scientists become Nobel laureates, they become famous in science and public life, but few studies have examined the nature of their scientific celebrity. This article examines how Scientific American portrayed laureates in order to identify and explain core features of Nobel fame. It examines the portrayals of seven laureates – Francis Crick, Linus Pauling, Hans Bethe, Murray Gell-Mann, Brian Josephson, Philip Anderson and Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar – in magazine profiles written between 1992 and 1995 by science writer John Horgan. Its textual analysis finds the scientists are portrayed as combining the sociological characteristics of genius, including enormous productivity and lasting impact, with the representational characteristics of celebrities, such as the merging of public and private lives. Their form of scientific celebrity is grounded in their field-changing research, which is presented as a product of their idiosyncratic personalities. Nobel science is presented as knowledge created by an ultra-elite of exceptional individuals.</abstract><doi>10.1177/0963662518762663</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-6625
ispartof Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2018-05, Vol.27 (4), p.433-445
issn 0963-6625
1361-6609
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0963662518762663
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title The laureate as celebrity genius: How Scientific American ’s John Horgan profiled Nobel Prize winners
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A49%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20laureate%20as%20celebrity%20genius:%20How%20Scientific%20American%20%E2%80%99s%20John%20Horgan%20profiled%20Nobel%20Prize%20winners&rft.jtitle=Public%20understanding%20of%20science%20(Bristol,%20England)&rft.au=Fahy,%20Declan&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=433&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=433-445&rft.issn=0963-6625&rft.eissn=1361-6609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0963662518762663&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_0963662518762663%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true