Spillover effects between energies, gold, and stock: the United States versus China

This study investigates the time–frequency dynamics of return and volatility spillovers between the stock market and three commodity markets: natural gas, crude oil, and gold via a comparative analysis between the United States and China is conducted with the help of new empirical methods. Our findi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy & environment (Essex, England) England), 2020-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1416-1447
Hauptverfasser: He, Xie, Takiguchi, Tetsuya, Nakajima, Tadahiro, Hamori, Shigeyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1447
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1416
container_title Energy & environment (Essex, England)
container_volume 31
creator He, Xie
Takiguchi, Tetsuya
Nakajima, Tadahiro
Hamori, Shigeyuki
description This study investigates the time–frequency dynamics of return and volatility spillovers between the stock market and three commodity markets: natural gas, crude oil, and gold via a comparative analysis between the United States and China is conducted with the help of new empirical methods. Our findings are as follows. First, in terms of time, return spillovers between crude oil and the stock market are strongest in two of the three commodity markets. Crude oil emits a net negative return spillover to the US stock market, and a net positive return spillover to the Chinese stock market. By contrast, the strongest volatility spillover effect is transmitted to the stock markets of both countries through gold. However, gold has a net positive volatility spillover effect on the US stock market and a net negative effect on the Chinese stock market. In the frequency domain, most of the return spillover is produced in the short term, and most of the volatility spillover occurs in the long term. In addition, the moving-window method reveals the dynamic nature of the spillover effect. Some extreme events can have a dramatic effect on the spillover index. Conversely, the spillover effect differs significantly between the two countries and is characterized by time variation and frequency dependence.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0958305X20907081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0958305X20907081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26960871</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0958305X20907081</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26960871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-32fc997e72b0e226992ca9ecf5608dad03b182cddd8e366b276cdcdcf400aff53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9T01LxDAUDKJgXb17EfoDtvqStElzlEVXYcGDCt5KmryU1touSVX896ZUPHiQdxge88EMIecULimV8gpUUXIoXhgokFDSA5IwyMssj98hSWY6m_ljchJCBxB1VCWEP-7bvh8_0KfoHJoppDVOn4hDigP6psWwTpuxt-tUDzYN02heT8mR033Asx9ckefbm6fNXbZ72N5vrneZ4UJNGWfOKCVRshqQMaEUM1qhcYWA0moLvKYlM9baErkQNZPC2HguB9DOFXxFYMk1fgzBo6v2vn3T_quiUM2jq7-joyVbLEE3WHXjux9iw__0F4u-i8v8b34sGztKyr8BIORgoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spillover effects between energies, gold, and stock: the United States versus China</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>He, Xie ; Takiguchi, Tetsuya ; Nakajima, Tadahiro ; Hamori, Shigeyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Xie ; Takiguchi, Tetsuya ; Nakajima, Tadahiro ; Hamori, Shigeyuki</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the time–frequency dynamics of return and volatility spillovers between the stock market and three commodity markets: natural gas, crude oil, and gold via a comparative analysis between the United States and China is conducted with the help of new empirical methods. Our findings are as follows. First, in terms of time, return spillovers between crude oil and the stock market are strongest in two of the three commodity markets. Crude oil emits a net negative return spillover to the US stock market, and a net positive return spillover to the Chinese stock market. By contrast, the strongest volatility spillover effect is transmitted to the stock markets of both countries through gold. However, gold has a net positive volatility spillover effect on the US stock market and a net negative effect on the Chinese stock market. In the frequency domain, most of the return spillover is produced in the short term, and most of the volatility spillover occurs in the long term. In addition, the moving-window method reveals the dynamic nature of the spillover effect. Some extreme events can have a dramatic effect on the spillover index. Conversely, the spillover effect differs significantly between the two countries and is characterized by time variation and frequency dependence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-305X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2048-4070</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0958305X20907081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications, Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Energy &amp; environment (Essex, England), 2020-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1416-1447</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-32fc997e72b0e226992ca9ecf5608dad03b182cddd8e366b276cdcdcf400aff53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-32fc997e72b0e226992ca9ecf5608dad03b182cddd8e366b276cdcdcf400aff53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1498-0188</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26960871$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26960871$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Xie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takiguchi, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Tadahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamori, Shigeyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Spillover effects between energies, gold, and stock: the United States versus China</title><title>Energy &amp; environment (Essex, England)</title><description>This study investigates the time–frequency dynamics of return and volatility spillovers between the stock market and three commodity markets: natural gas, crude oil, and gold via a comparative analysis between the United States and China is conducted with the help of new empirical methods. Our findings are as follows. First, in terms of time, return spillovers between crude oil and the stock market are strongest in two of the three commodity markets. Crude oil emits a net negative return spillover to the US stock market, and a net positive return spillover to the Chinese stock market. By contrast, the strongest volatility spillover effect is transmitted to the stock markets of both countries through gold. However, gold has a net positive volatility spillover effect on the US stock market and a net negative effect on the Chinese stock market. In the frequency domain, most of the return spillover is produced in the short term, and most of the volatility spillover occurs in the long term. In addition, the moving-window method reveals the dynamic nature of the spillover effect. Some extreme events can have a dramatic effect on the spillover index. Conversely, the spillover effect differs significantly between the two countries and is characterized by time variation and frequency dependence.</description><issn>0958-305X</issn><issn>2048-4070</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9T01LxDAUDKJgXb17EfoDtvqStElzlEVXYcGDCt5KmryU1touSVX896ZUPHiQdxge88EMIecULimV8gpUUXIoXhgokFDSA5IwyMssj98hSWY6m_ljchJCBxB1VCWEP-7bvh8_0KfoHJoppDVOn4hDigP6psWwTpuxt-tUDzYN02heT8mR033Asx9ckefbm6fNXbZ72N5vrneZ4UJNGWfOKCVRshqQMaEUM1qhcYWA0moLvKYlM9baErkQNZPC2HguB9DOFXxFYMk1fgzBo6v2vn3T_quiUM2jq7-joyVbLEE3WHXjux9iw__0F4u-i8v8b34sGztKyr8BIORgoQ</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>He, Xie</creator><creator>Takiguchi, Tetsuya</creator><creator>Nakajima, Tadahiro</creator><creator>Hamori, Shigeyuki</creator><general>Sage Publications, Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1498-0188</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Spillover effects between energies, gold, and stock</title><author>He, Xie ; Takiguchi, Tetsuya ; Nakajima, Tadahiro ; Hamori, Shigeyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-32fc997e72b0e226992ca9ecf5608dad03b182cddd8e366b276cdcdcf400aff53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Xie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takiguchi, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Tadahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamori, Shigeyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; environment (Essex, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Xie</au><au>Takiguchi, Tetsuya</au><au>Nakajima, Tadahiro</au><au>Hamori, Shigeyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spillover effects between energies, gold, and stock: the United States versus China</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; environment (Essex, England)</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1416</spage><epage>1447</epage><pages>1416-1447</pages><issn>0958-305X</issn><eissn>2048-4070</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the time–frequency dynamics of return and volatility spillovers between the stock market and three commodity markets: natural gas, crude oil, and gold via a comparative analysis between the United States and China is conducted with the help of new empirical methods. Our findings are as follows. First, in terms of time, return spillovers between crude oil and the stock market are strongest in two of the three commodity markets. Crude oil emits a net negative return spillover to the US stock market, and a net positive return spillover to the Chinese stock market. By contrast, the strongest volatility spillover effect is transmitted to the stock markets of both countries through gold. However, gold has a net positive volatility spillover effect on the US stock market and a net negative effect on the Chinese stock market. In the frequency domain, most of the return spillover is produced in the short term, and most of the volatility spillover occurs in the long term. In addition, the moving-window method reveals the dynamic nature of the spillover effect. Some extreme events can have a dramatic effect on the spillover index. Conversely, the spillover effect differs significantly between the two countries and is characterized by time variation and frequency dependence.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0958305X20907081</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1498-0188</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-305X
ispartof Energy & environment (Essex, England), 2020-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1416-1447
issn 0958-305X
2048-4070
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0958305X20907081
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SAGE Complete
title Spillover effects between energies, gold, and stock: the United States versus China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T17%3A59%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spillover%20effects%20between%20energies,%20gold,%20and%20stock:%20the%20United%20States%20versus%20China&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20environment%20(Essex,%20England)&rft.au=He,%20Xie&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1416&rft.epage=1447&rft.pages=1416-1447&rft.issn=0958-305X&rft.eissn=2048-4070&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0958305X20907081&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26960871%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26960871&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0958305X20907081&rfr_iscdi=true