Human Nature and Biotechnological Enhancement: Some Theological Considerations

Theologies of human nature routinely reflect the insights of evolutionary biology, for which human biological nature is variable, changing and indeterminate in its boundaries with other living things. However, these theologies do not yet reflect what biotechnology discloses about human biological na...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studies in Christian ethics 2019-05, Vol.32 (2), p.229-240
1. Verfasser: McKenny, Gerald
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 240
container_issue 2
container_start_page 229
container_title Studies in Christian ethics
container_volume 32
creator McKenny, Gerald
description Theologies of human nature routinely reflect the insights of evolutionary biology, for which human biological nature is variable, changing and indeterminate in its boundaries with other living things. However, these theologies do not yet reflect what biotechnology discloses about human biological nature, namely, that it is malleable and indeterminate in its boundaries with machines. Does respect for human biological nature as created by God, or protection of the human person whose nature it is, require us to refrain from taking advantage of its malleability and indeterminacy to select or design functions and traits? Or should we welcome malleability and indeterminacy as conditions for us to fulfill a vocation to determine our nature or bring it to perfection? And do malleability and indeterminacy render obsolete the notion that we look to our nature to determine what our good is? This article answers these questions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0953946819827139
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0953946819827139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0953946819827139</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0953946819827139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-95123ad20b97582b7c500b949d53ca5a26e524966265f23171a029608b782cca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxDAUhIMoWFfvHvsHqslL0zTetKyusKwH13N5TdNtlzaRpD34721Z8SB4moHvzWMYQm4ZvWNMynuqBFdpljOVg2RcnZGIyVQkArg4J9GCk4VfkqsQjpQCgFAR2W2mAW28w3HyJkZbx0-dG41urevdodPYx2vbotVmMHZ8iN_dYOJ9a35p4WzoauNx7GZ3TS4a7IO5-dEV-Xhe74tNsn17eS0et4mGnI2JEgw41kArJUUOldSCzj5VteAaBUJmBKQqyyATDXAmGVJQGc0rmYPWyFeEnv5q70Lwpik_fTeg_yoZLZc9yr97zJHkFAl4MOXRTd7ODf-__wZnfl8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human Nature and Biotechnological Enhancement: Some Theological Considerations</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>McKenny, Gerald</creator><creatorcontrib>McKenny, Gerald</creatorcontrib><description>Theologies of human nature routinely reflect the insights of evolutionary biology, for which human biological nature is variable, changing and indeterminate in its boundaries with other living things. However, these theologies do not yet reflect what biotechnology discloses about human biological nature, namely, that it is malleable and indeterminate in its boundaries with machines. Does respect for human biological nature as created by God, or protection of the human person whose nature it is, require us to refrain from taking advantage of its malleability and indeterminacy to select or design functions and traits? Or should we welcome malleability and indeterminacy as conditions for us to fulfill a vocation to determine our nature or bring it to perfection? And do malleability and indeterminacy render obsolete the notion that we look to our nature to determine what our good is? This article answers these questions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-9468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-5235</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0953946819827139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Studies in Christian ethics, 2019-05, Vol.32 (2), p.229-240</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-95123ad20b97582b7c500b949d53ca5a26e524966265f23171a029608b782cca3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0953946819827139$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0953946819827139$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKenny, Gerald</creatorcontrib><title>Human Nature and Biotechnological Enhancement: Some Theological Considerations</title><title>Studies in Christian ethics</title><description>Theologies of human nature routinely reflect the insights of evolutionary biology, for which human biological nature is variable, changing and indeterminate in its boundaries with other living things. However, these theologies do not yet reflect what biotechnology discloses about human biological nature, namely, that it is malleable and indeterminate in its boundaries with machines. Does respect for human biological nature as created by God, or protection of the human person whose nature it is, require us to refrain from taking advantage of its malleability and indeterminacy to select or design functions and traits? Or should we welcome malleability and indeterminacy as conditions for us to fulfill a vocation to determine our nature or bring it to perfection? And do malleability and indeterminacy render obsolete the notion that we look to our nature to determine what our good is? This article answers these questions.</description><issn>0953-9468</issn><issn>1745-5235</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLxDAUhIMoWFfvHvsHqslL0zTetKyusKwH13N5TdNtlzaRpD34721Z8SB4moHvzWMYQm4ZvWNMynuqBFdpljOVg2RcnZGIyVQkArg4J9GCk4VfkqsQjpQCgFAR2W2mAW28w3HyJkZbx0-dG41urevdodPYx2vbotVmMHZ8iN_dYOJ9a35p4WzoauNx7GZ3TS4a7IO5-dEV-Xhe74tNsn17eS0et4mGnI2JEgw41kArJUUOldSCzj5VteAaBUJmBKQqyyATDXAmGVJQGc0rmYPWyFeEnv5q70Lwpik_fTeg_yoZLZc9yr97zJHkFAl4MOXRTd7ODf-__wZnfl8E</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>McKenny, Gerald</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Human Nature and Biotechnological Enhancement: Some Theological Considerations</title><author>McKenny, Gerald</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-95123ad20b97582b7c500b949d53ca5a26e524966265f23171a029608b782cca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKenny, Gerald</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Studies in Christian ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKenny, Gerald</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human Nature and Biotechnological Enhancement: Some Theological Considerations</atitle><jtitle>Studies in Christian ethics</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>240</epage><pages>229-240</pages><issn>0953-9468</issn><eissn>1745-5235</eissn><abstract>Theologies of human nature routinely reflect the insights of evolutionary biology, for which human biological nature is variable, changing and indeterminate in its boundaries with other living things. However, these theologies do not yet reflect what biotechnology discloses about human biological nature, namely, that it is malleable and indeterminate in its boundaries with machines. Does respect for human biological nature as created by God, or protection of the human person whose nature it is, require us to refrain from taking advantage of its malleability and indeterminacy to select or design functions and traits? Or should we welcome malleability and indeterminacy as conditions for us to fulfill a vocation to determine our nature or bring it to perfection? And do malleability and indeterminacy render obsolete the notion that we look to our nature to determine what our good is? This article answers these questions.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0953946819827139</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0953-9468
ispartof Studies in Christian ethics, 2019-05, Vol.32 (2), p.229-240
issn 0953-9468
1745-5235
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0953946819827139
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Human Nature and Biotechnological Enhancement: Some Theological Considerations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A09%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20Nature%20and%20Biotechnological%20Enhancement:%20Some%20Theological%20Considerations&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20Christian%20ethics&rft.au=McKenny,%20Gerald&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=240&rft.pages=229-240&rft.issn=0953-9468&rft.eissn=1745-5235&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0953946819827139&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0953946819827139%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0953946819827139&rfr_iscdi=true