Who “Who” is, and Other Local Poetics of National Policy: Yunnan Minzu Shibie and Hui in the Process

Starting with the observation that the 1954 minzu shibie Ethnic Categorization Project was part of a continuing process, this article addresses the suspicious finality implied in most narratives of minzu (nationality) formation. In arguing that the process continues, Hui communities of Yunnan serve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:China information 2004-07, Vol.18 (2), p.243-274
1. Verfasser: Caffrey, Kevin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 274
container_issue 2
container_start_page 243
container_title China information
container_volume 18
creator Caffrey, Kevin
description Starting with the observation that the 1954 minzu shibie Ethnic Categorization Project was part of a continuing process, this article addresses the suspicious finality implied in most narratives of minzu (nationality) formation. In arguing that the process continues, Hui communities of Yunnan serve as exemplars of the embodied life minzu shibie is leading today; i.e., as part of the ongoing process of culture. “Culture,” conceived in part as a cultural production process of dynamically (re)producing social relations through structural and practical dialogics, helps illuminate the reality of the Hui situation in Yunnan. It follows that the 1954 minzu shibie project was a new nation-state “ethnicization” of the ongoing social categorization; or in other words, a nation-state appropriation and continuation of an imperial “poetics of the categorical” where the inventiveness of local agency meets state institution in the cultural dialogics of (re)making. Showing how the minzu shibie in 1954 was a conjunctural event where the categorical structure of culture was transformed, it is further argued that the continuing process of categorical (re)making in locally minzu practical poetics is itself part of culture as a symbolically conditioning determinant of the process of everyday life for a community.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0920203X04044686
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0920203X04044686</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0920203X04044686</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0920203X04044686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-c22146a70f6acee1a3bb769db18d15546bf63583f348fa901cb97254c4f823363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1T7tOwzAUtRBIhMLO6A_AcP2IHUssqOIlRZQBRLfIcWyaKtTIDkO3fgj8XL-EhDIhMR3pvHQOQqcUzilV6gI0AwZ8DgKEkIXcQxlVgpJcw3wfZaNMRv0QHaW0BGCSgczQ5csi4O3mc4Dt5gu36QybVYNn_cJFXAZrOvwYXN_ahIPHD6Zvw-qH61q7PkYH3nTJnfziBD3fXD9N70g5u72fXpXEUqF7YhmjQhoFXhrrHDW8rpXUTU2Lhua5kLWXPC-456LwRgO1tVYsF1b4gnEu-QTBrtfGkFJ0vnqP7ZuJ64pCNb6v_r4fImQXSebVVcvwEYfZ6X__N5wGWcI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who “Who” is, and Other Local Poetics of National Policy: Yunnan Minzu Shibie and Hui in the Process</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Caffrey, Kevin</creator><creatorcontrib>Caffrey, Kevin</creatorcontrib><description>Starting with the observation that the 1954 minzu shibie Ethnic Categorization Project was part of a continuing process, this article addresses the suspicious finality implied in most narratives of minzu (nationality) formation. In arguing that the process continues, Hui communities of Yunnan serve as exemplars of the embodied life minzu shibie is leading today; i.e., as part of the ongoing process of culture. “Culture,” conceived in part as a cultural production process of dynamically (re)producing social relations through structural and practical dialogics, helps illuminate the reality of the Hui situation in Yunnan. It follows that the 1954 minzu shibie project was a new nation-state “ethnicization” of the ongoing social categorization; or in other words, a nation-state appropriation and continuation of an imperial “poetics of the categorical” where the inventiveness of local agency meets state institution in the cultural dialogics of (re)making. Showing how the minzu shibie in 1954 was a conjunctural event where the categorical structure of culture was transformed, it is further argued that the continuing process of categorical (re)making in locally minzu practical poetics is itself part of culture as a symbolically conditioning determinant of the process of everyday life for a community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-203X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-590X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0920203X04044686</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>China information, 2004-07, Vol.18 (2), p.243-274</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-c22146a70f6acee1a3bb769db18d15546bf63583f348fa901cb97254c4f823363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0920203X04044686$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0920203X04044686$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caffrey, Kevin</creatorcontrib><title>Who “Who” is, and Other Local Poetics of National Policy: Yunnan Minzu Shibie and Hui in the Process</title><title>China information</title><description>Starting with the observation that the 1954 minzu shibie Ethnic Categorization Project was part of a continuing process, this article addresses the suspicious finality implied in most narratives of minzu (nationality) formation. In arguing that the process continues, Hui communities of Yunnan serve as exemplars of the embodied life minzu shibie is leading today; i.e., as part of the ongoing process of culture. “Culture,” conceived in part as a cultural production process of dynamically (re)producing social relations through structural and practical dialogics, helps illuminate the reality of the Hui situation in Yunnan. It follows that the 1954 minzu shibie project was a new nation-state “ethnicization” of the ongoing social categorization; or in other words, a nation-state appropriation and continuation of an imperial “poetics of the categorical” where the inventiveness of local agency meets state institution in the cultural dialogics of (re)making. Showing how the minzu shibie in 1954 was a conjunctural event where the categorical structure of culture was transformed, it is further argued that the continuing process of categorical (re)making in locally minzu practical poetics is itself part of culture as a symbolically conditioning determinant of the process of everyday life for a community.</description><issn>0920-203X</issn><issn>1741-590X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1T7tOwzAUtRBIhMLO6A_AcP2IHUssqOIlRZQBRLfIcWyaKtTIDkO3fgj8XL-EhDIhMR3pvHQOQqcUzilV6gI0AwZ8DgKEkIXcQxlVgpJcw3wfZaNMRv0QHaW0BGCSgczQ5csi4O3mc4Dt5gu36QybVYNn_cJFXAZrOvwYXN_ahIPHD6Zvw-qH61q7PkYH3nTJnfziBD3fXD9N70g5u72fXpXEUqF7YhmjQhoFXhrrHDW8rpXUTU2Lhua5kLWXPC-456LwRgO1tVYsF1b4gnEu-QTBrtfGkFJ0vnqP7ZuJ64pCNb6v_r4fImQXSebVVcvwEYfZ6X__N5wGWcI</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Caffrey, Kevin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>Who “Who” is, and Other Local Poetics of National Policy</title><author>Caffrey, Kevin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-c22146a70f6acee1a3bb769db18d15546bf63583f348fa901cb97254c4f823363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caffrey, Kevin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>China information</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caffrey, Kevin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who “Who” is, and Other Local Poetics of National Policy: Yunnan Minzu Shibie and Hui in the Process</atitle><jtitle>China information</jtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>274</epage><pages>243-274</pages><issn>0920-203X</issn><eissn>1741-590X</eissn><abstract>Starting with the observation that the 1954 minzu shibie Ethnic Categorization Project was part of a continuing process, this article addresses the suspicious finality implied in most narratives of minzu (nationality) formation. In arguing that the process continues, Hui communities of Yunnan serve as exemplars of the embodied life minzu shibie is leading today; i.e., as part of the ongoing process of culture. “Culture,” conceived in part as a cultural production process of dynamically (re)producing social relations through structural and practical dialogics, helps illuminate the reality of the Hui situation in Yunnan. It follows that the 1954 minzu shibie project was a new nation-state “ethnicization” of the ongoing social categorization; or in other words, a nation-state appropriation and continuation of an imperial “poetics of the categorical” where the inventiveness of local agency meets state institution in the cultural dialogics of (re)making. Showing how the minzu shibie in 1954 was a conjunctural event where the categorical structure of culture was transformed, it is further argued that the continuing process of categorical (re)making in locally minzu practical poetics is itself part of culture as a symbolically conditioning determinant of the process of everyday life for a community.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0920203X04044686</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-203X
ispartof China information, 2004-07, Vol.18 (2), p.243-274
issn 0920-203X
1741-590X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0920203X04044686
source Access via SAGE
title Who “Who” is, and Other Local Poetics of National Policy: Yunnan Minzu Shibie and Hui in the Process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T12%3A45%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20%E2%80%9CWho%E2%80%9D%20is,%20and%20Other%20Local%20Poetics%20of%20National%20Policy:%20Yunnan%20Minzu%20Shibie%20and%20Hui%20in%20the%20Process&rft.jtitle=China%20information&rft.au=Caffrey,%20Kevin&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=274&rft.pages=243-274&rft.issn=0920-203X&rft.eissn=1741-590X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0920203X04044686&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0920203X04044686%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0920203X04044686&rfr_iscdi=true