Promoting Charitable Donations and Volunteering Through Nudge Tools From the Perspective of Behavioral Economics: A Systematic Review

Few research has attempted to synthesize the effects of nudge tools in promoting prosocial behaviors through the lens of behavioral economics. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence of various types of nudges and their effectiveness in promoting charitable donations and volunteering....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly 2024-06
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Samuel Wai, Lu, Shiyu, Cheng, Nicole Hei Ching, Chui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan, Yat-Sang Lum, Terry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly
container_volume
creator Chan, Samuel Wai
Lu, Shiyu
Cheng, Nicole Hei Ching
Chui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan
Yat-Sang Lum, Terry
description Few research has attempted to synthesize the effects of nudge tools in promoting prosocial behaviors through the lens of behavioral economics. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence of various types of nudges and their effectiveness in promoting charitable donations and volunteering. We identified 67 eligible studies with 117 experiments reporting eight nudge tools. We found that the studies focused mainly on three types of nudges (including reframing, referring to descriptive norms, and changing social consequences). We revealed that decreasing physical/cognitive effort, providing reminders, anchoring, and referring to descriptive norms effectively promote charitable donations; only reframing effectively promotes volunteering. Changing social consequences, connecting decisions to benefit or cost, and referring to descriptive norms are not effective in promoting volunteering. This review offers implications for practitioners implementing nudge tools in promoting charitable donations and volunteering. The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/kg836 ).
doi_str_mv 10.1177/08997640241258140
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_08997640241258140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_08997640241258140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-b8e904b6b494129d76d11e7e2403cfb06814cac51dca0d823e2496c38170fb0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFOwzAURC0EEqVwAHb_AgE7ceKYXSkUkCqooLCNHOenMUriynaLegDuTSLYsZrFG81ohpBLRq8YE-Ka5lKKjNOYszjNGadHZMLSNI5EItNjMhl5NBpOyZn3n5SyOOP5hHyvnO1sMP0G5o1yJqiyRbizvQrG9h5UX8GHbXd9QHSja904u9s08LyrNghra1sPiyEDQoOwQue3qIPZI9gabrFRe2OdauFe2952RvsbmMHbwQfshgYNr7g3-HVOTmrVerz40yl5X9yv54_R8uXhaT5bRprFIkRljpLyMiu5HGbKSmQVYygw5jTRdUmzYbhWOmWVVrTK42QgMtNJzgQdMCZTwn5ztbPeO6yLrTOdcoeC0WL8sfj3Y_IDK91nkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Promoting Charitable Donations and Volunteering Through Nudge Tools From the Perspective of Behavioral Economics: A Systematic Review</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chan, Samuel Wai ; Lu, Shiyu ; Cheng, Nicole Hei Ching ; Chui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan ; Yat-Sang Lum, Terry</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Samuel Wai ; Lu, Shiyu ; Cheng, Nicole Hei Ching ; Chui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan ; Yat-Sang Lum, Terry</creatorcontrib><description>Few research has attempted to synthesize the effects of nudge tools in promoting prosocial behaviors through the lens of behavioral economics. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence of various types of nudges and their effectiveness in promoting charitable donations and volunteering. We identified 67 eligible studies with 117 experiments reporting eight nudge tools. We found that the studies focused mainly on three types of nudges (including reframing, referring to descriptive norms, and changing social consequences). We revealed that decreasing physical/cognitive effort, providing reminders, anchoring, and referring to descriptive norms effectively promote charitable donations; only reframing effectively promotes volunteering. Changing social consequences, connecting decisions to benefit or cost, and referring to descriptive norms are not effective in promoting volunteering. This review offers implications for practitioners implementing nudge tools in promoting charitable donations and volunteering. The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/kg836 ).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/08997640241258140</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 2024-06</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-b8e904b6b494129d76d11e7e2403cfb06814cac51dca0d823e2496c38170fb0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9355-4883 ; 0000-0002-3284-5724</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Samuel Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Shiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Nicole Hei Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yat-Sang Lum, Terry</creatorcontrib><title>Promoting Charitable Donations and Volunteering Through Nudge Tools From the Perspective of Behavioral Economics: A Systematic Review</title><title>Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly</title><description>Few research has attempted to synthesize the effects of nudge tools in promoting prosocial behaviors through the lens of behavioral economics. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence of various types of nudges and their effectiveness in promoting charitable donations and volunteering. We identified 67 eligible studies with 117 experiments reporting eight nudge tools. We found that the studies focused mainly on three types of nudges (including reframing, referring to descriptive norms, and changing social consequences). We revealed that decreasing physical/cognitive effort, providing reminders, anchoring, and referring to descriptive norms effectively promote charitable donations; only reframing effectively promotes volunteering. Changing social consequences, connecting decisions to benefit or cost, and referring to descriptive norms are not effective in promoting volunteering. This review offers implications for practitioners implementing nudge tools in promoting charitable donations and volunteering. The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/kg836 ).</description><issn>0899-7640</issn><issn>1552-7395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkEFOwzAURC0EEqVwAHb_AgE7ceKYXSkUkCqooLCNHOenMUriynaLegDuTSLYsZrFG81ohpBLRq8YE-Ka5lKKjNOYszjNGadHZMLSNI5EItNjMhl5NBpOyZn3n5SyOOP5hHyvnO1sMP0G5o1yJqiyRbizvQrG9h5UX8GHbXd9QHSja904u9s08LyrNghra1sPiyEDQoOwQue3qIPZI9gabrFRe2OdauFe2952RvsbmMHbwQfshgYNr7g3-HVOTmrVerz40yl5X9yv54_R8uXhaT5bRprFIkRljpLyMiu5HGbKSmQVYygw5jTRdUmzYbhWOmWVVrTK42QgMtNJzgQdMCZTwn5ztbPeO6yLrTOdcoeC0WL8sfj3Y_IDK91nkg</recordid><startdate>20240620</startdate><enddate>20240620</enddate><creator>Chan, Samuel Wai</creator><creator>Lu, Shiyu</creator><creator>Cheng, Nicole Hei Ching</creator><creator>Chui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan</creator><creator>Yat-Sang Lum, Terry</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9355-4883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3284-5724</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240620</creationdate><title>Promoting Charitable Donations and Volunteering Through Nudge Tools From the Perspective of Behavioral Economics: A Systematic Review</title><author>Chan, Samuel Wai ; Lu, Shiyu ; Cheng, Nicole Hei Ching ; Chui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan ; Yat-Sang Lum, Terry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-b8e904b6b494129d76d11e7e2403cfb06814cac51dca0d823e2496c38170fb0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Samuel Wai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Shiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Nicole Hei Ching</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yat-Sang Lum, Terry</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Samuel Wai</au><au>Lu, Shiyu</au><au>Cheng, Nicole Hei Ching</au><au>Chui, Cheryl Hiu-Kwan</au><au>Yat-Sang Lum, Terry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Promoting Charitable Donations and Volunteering Through Nudge Tools From the Perspective of Behavioral Economics: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly</jtitle><date>2024-06-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0899-7640</issn><eissn>1552-7395</eissn><abstract>Few research has attempted to synthesize the effects of nudge tools in promoting prosocial behaviors through the lens of behavioral economics. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence of various types of nudges and their effectiveness in promoting charitable donations and volunteering. We identified 67 eligible studies with 117 experiments reporting eight nudge tools. We found that the studies focused mainly on three types of nudges (including reframing, referring to descriptive norms, and changing social consequences). We revealed that decreasing physical/cognitive effort, providing reminders, anchoring, and referring to descriptive norms effectively promote charitable donations; only reframing effectively promotes volunteering. Changing social consequences, connecting decisions to benefit or cost, and referring to descriptive norms are not effective in promoting volunteering. This review offers implications for practitioners implementing nudge tools in promoting charitable donations and volunteering. The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/kg836 ).</abstract><doi>10.1177/08997640241258140</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9355-4883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3284-5724</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-7640
ispartof Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly, 2024-06
issn 0899-7640
1552-7395
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_08997640241258140
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Promoting Charitable Donations and Volunteering Through Nudge Tools From the Perspective of Behavioral Economics: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A52%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Promoting%20Charitable%20Donations%20and%20Volunteering%20Through%20Nudge%20Tools%20From%20the%20Perspective%20of%20Behavioral%20Economics:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Nonprofit%20and%20voluntary%20sector%20quarterly&rft.au=Chan,%20Samuel%20Wai&rft.date=2024-06-20&rft.issn=0899-7640&rft.eissn=1552-7395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/08997640241258140&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_08997640241258140%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true