Academies: a model for school improvement?: Key findings from a five-year longitudinal evaluation

Academies were launched by David Blunkett, the then Secretary of State for Education, in March 2000 in a speech on transforming secondary education. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) was commissioned by the predecessor of the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) in February 2003 to co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management in education 2009-07, Vol.23 (3), p.118-124
Hauptverfasser: Armstrong, David, Bunting, Valerie, Larsen, Judy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue 3
container_start_page 118
container_title Management in education
container_volume 23
creator Armstrong, David
Bunting, Valerie
Larsen, Judy
description Academies were launched by David Blunkett, the then Secretary of State for Education, in March 2000 in a speech on transforming secondary education. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) was commissioned by the predecessor of the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) in February 2003 to conduct an independent longitudinal evaluation of the Academies initiative over a five-year period. The overall aim of the evaluation was to assess the programme's contribution to raising educational standards, particularly in schools with high numbers of pupils with disadvantaged backgrounds, and to examine the key features of Academies, including independence, sponsorship, governance, leadership, teaching and learning, and buildings. Results reveal that pupil performance has improved in Academies, and often at a rate that is greater than the national average and other comparison schools. However, the scale of progress is not uniform across all measures of achievement, and there is considerable diversity between and within individual Academies. Therefore there was insufficient evidence to make a definitive judgement about the Academies as a model for school improvement. Throughout the course of the study the variability of the contexts of each Academy has been highlighted as a factor in relation to school improvement. Moreover, many of the characteristics of Academies, such as high standards, strong leadership and governance, good quality buildings, a strong focus on teaching and learning, and building partnerships with pupils and their families, are universal aspirations for all schools wishing to improve. The evidence suggests that while there is no "simple" uniform Academies "effect" the Academies model is having an impact on the wider educational landscape. (Contains 1 table, 3 figures, and 5 notes.)
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0892020609105805
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0892020609105805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ845702</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0892020609105805</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ845702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-6fdff25ad0f823d6edbaee3b80ac214b8fac18240dbe2c47b80fd809cb9136aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j01LxDAURYMoWEf3Llx0LUTfS9omdSPDMH4x4EbXJU1etMN0MiSj4L-3peJCcHUX594Lh7FzhCtEpa5B1wIEVFAjlBrKA5ahKpDXWstDlo2Yj_yYnaS0BkANsszY5dwaR31H6SY3eR8cbXIfYp7sewibvOt3MXxST9v97Sk78maT6OwnZ-z1bvmyeOCr5_vHxXzFLSrY88o770VpHHgtpKvItYZIthqMFVi02huLWhTgWhK2UAPwTkNt2xplZYycMZh-bQwpRfLNLna9iV8NQjO6Nn9dh8nFNKHY2d_68kkXpQIxYD7hZN6oWYePuB0E_r_7BpasXJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Academies: a model for school improvement?: Key findings from a five-year longitudinal evaluation</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Armstrong, David ; Bunting, Valerie ; Larsen, Judy</creator><contributor>Woods, Glenys J ; Woods, Philip A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, David ; Bunting, Valerie ; Larsen, Judy ; Woods, Glenys J ; Woods, Philip A</creatorcontrib><description>Academies were launched by David Blunkett, the then Secretary of State for Education, in March 2000 in a speech on transforming secondary education. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) was commissioned by the predecessor of the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) in February 2003 to conduct an independent longitudinal evaluation of the Academies initiative over a five-year period. The overall aim of the evaluation was to assess the programme's contribution to raising educational standards, particularly in schools with high numbers of pupils with disadvantaged backgrounds, and to examine the key features of Academies, including independence, sponsorship, governance, leadership, teaching and learning, and buildings. Results reveal that pupil performance has improved in Academies, and often at a rate that is greater than the national average and other comparison schools. However, the scale of progress is not uniform across all measures of achievement, and there is considerable diversity between and within individual Academies. Therefore there was insufficient evidence to make a definitive judgement about the Academies as a model for school improvement. Throughout the course of the study the variability of the contexts of each Academy has been highlighted as a factor in relation to school improvement. Moreover, many of the characteristics of Academies, such as high standards, strong leadership and governance, good quality buildings, a strong focus on teaching and learning, and building partnerships with pupils and their families, are universal aspirations for all schools wishing to improve. The evidence suggests that while there is no "simple" uniform Academies "effect" the Academies model is having an impact on the wider educational landscape. (Contains 1 table, 3 figures, and 5 notes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-0206</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-9883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0892020609105805</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Academic Standards ; Disadvantaged ; Educational Administration ; Educational Change ; Educational Improvement ; Governance ; Instructional Leadership ; Longitudinal Studies ; Profiles ; Program Evaluation</subject><ispartof>Management in education, 2009-07, Vol.23 (3), p.118-124</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0892020609105805$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0892020609105805$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ845702$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Woods, Glenys J</contributor><contributor>Woods, Philip A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunting, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Judy</creatorcontrib><title>Academies: a model for school improvement?: Key findings from a five-year longitudinal evaluation</title><title>Management in education</title><description>Academies were launched by David Blunkett, the then Secretary of State for Education, in March 2000 in a speech on transforming secondary education. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) was commissioned by the predecessor of the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) in February 2003 to conduct an independent longitudinal evaluation of the Academies initiative over a five-year period. The overall aim of the evaluation was to assess the programme's contribution to raising educational standards, particularly in schools with high numbers of pupils with disadvantaged backgrounds, and to examine the key features of Academies, including independence, sponsorship, governance, leadership, teaching and learning, and buildings. Results reveal that pupil performance has improved in Academies, and often at a rate that is greater than the national average and other comparison schools. However, the scale of progress is not uniform across all measures of achievement, and there is considerable diversity between and within individual Academies. Therefore there was insufficient evidence to make a definitive judgement about the Academies as a model for school improvement. Throughout the course of the study the variability of the contexts of each Academy has been highlighted as a factor in relation to school improvement. Moreover, many of the characteristics of Academies, such as high standards, strong leadership and governance, good quality buildings, a strong focus on teaching and learning, and building partnerships with pupils and their families, are universal aspirations for all schools wishing to improve. The evidence suggests that while there is no "simple" uniform Academies "effect" the Academies model is having an impact on the wider educational landscape. (Contains 1 table, 3 figures, and 5 notes.)</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Educational Administration</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Instructional Leadership</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><issn>0892-0206</issn><issn>1741-9883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j01LxDAURYMoWEf3Llx0LUTfS9omdSPDMH4x4EbXJU1etMN0MiSj4L-3peJCcHUX594Lh7FzhCtEpa5B1wIEVFAjlBrKA5ahKpDXWstDlo2Yj_yYnaS0BkANsszY5dwaR31H6SY3eR8cbXIfYp7sewibvOt3MXxST9v97Sk78maT6OwnZ-z1bvmyeOCr5_vHxXzFLSrY88o770VpHHgtpKvItYZIthqMFVi02huLWhTgWhK2UAPwTkNt2xplZYycMZh-bQwpRfLNLna9iV8NQjO6Nn9dh8nFNKHY2d_68kkXpQIxYD7hZN6oWYePuB0E_r_7BpasXJQ</recordid><startdate>200907</startdate><enddate>200907</enddate><creator>Armstrong, David</creator><creator>Bunting, Valerie</creator><creator>Larsen, Judy</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200907</creationdate><title>Academies: a model for school improvement?</title><author>Armstrong, David ; Bunting, Valerie ; Larsen, Judy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c170t-6fdff25ad0f823d6edbaee3b80ac214b8fac18240dbe2c47b80fd809cb9136aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Educational Administration</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Instructional Leadership</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunting, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larsen, Judy</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Management in education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armstrong, David</au><au>Bunting, Valerie</au><au>Larsen, Judy</au><au>Woods, Glenys J</au><au>Woods, Philip A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ845702</ericid><atitle>Academies: a model for school improvement?: Key findings from a five-year longitudinal evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Management in education</jtitle><date>2009-07</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>118-124</pages><issn>0892-0206</issn><eissn>1741-9883</eissn><abstract>Academies were launched by David Blunkett, the then Secretary of State for Education, in March 2000 in a speech on transforming secondary education. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) was commissioned by the predecessor of the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) in February 2003 to conduct an independent longitudinal evaluation of the Academies initiative over a five-year period. The overall aim of the evaluation was to assess the programme's contribution to raising educational standards, particularly in schools with high numbers of pupils with disadvantaged backgrounds, and to examine the key features of Academies, including independence, sponsorship, governance, leadership, teaching and learning, and buildings. Results reveal that pupil performance has improved in Academies, and often at a rate that is greater than the national average and other comparison schools. However, the scale of progress is not uniform across all measures of achievement, and there is considerable diversity between and within individual Academies. Therefore there was insufficient evidence to make a definitive judgement about the Academies as a model for school improvement. Throughout the course of the study the variability of the contexts of each Academy has been highlighted as a factor in relation to school improvement. Moreover, many of the characteristics of Academies, such as high standards, strong leadership and governance, good quality buildings, a strong focus on teaching and learning, and building partnerships with pupils and their families, are universal aspirations for all schools wishing to improve. The evidence suggests that while there is no "simple" uniform Academies "effect" the Academies model is having an impact on the wider educational landscape. (Contains 1 table, 3 figures, and 5 notes.)</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0892020609105805</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-0206
ispartof Management in education, 2009-07, Vol.23 (3), p.118-124
issn 0892-0206
1741-9883
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0892020609105805
source SAGE Complete
subjects Academic Achievement
Academic Standards
Disadvantaged
Educational Administration
Educational Change
Educational Improvement
Governance
Instructional Leadership
Longitudinal Studies
Profiles
Program Evaluation
title Academies: a model for school improvement?: Key findings from a five-year longitudinal evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A18%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Academies:%20a%20model%20for%20school%20improvement?:%20Key%20findings%20from%20a%20five-year%20longitudinal%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Management%20in%20education&rft.au=Armstrong,%20David&rft.date=2009-07&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=118-124&rft.issn=0892-0206&rft.eissn=1741-9883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0892020609105805&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ845702%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ845702&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0892020609105805&rfr_iscdi=true