Evolution and progress in bladder replacement

Nowadays, the first choice after radical cystectomy both in male and in female patients is no more urinary diversion, but bladder replacement surgery through orthotopic reconstruction. In 2006 we carried out a mail interview among Italian Urology Departments about urinary diversions and orthotopic n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urologia 2007-04, Vol.74 (2), p.49-52
Hauptverfasser: Fontana, D, Destefanis, P, Cugiani, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; ita
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 52
container_issue 2
container_start_page 49
container_title Urologia
container_volume 74
creator Fontana, D
Destefanis, P
Cugiani, A
description Nowadays, the first choice after radical cystectomy both in male and in female patients is no more urinary diversion, but bladder replacement surgery through orthotopic reconstruction. In 2006 we carried out a mail interview among Italian Urology Departments about urinary diversions and orthotopic neobladders; the choice for orthotopic neobladder had increased compared to a previous interview administered five years before. As far as the type of orthotopic neobladders are concerned, it was evident that Italian urologists prefer to use the ileal reservoir, preferably the Studer's neobladder, followed by VIP; the use of Camey II is decreasing while Y-neobladder has gained many consents, being preferred to Hautmann's reservoir. The findings of this interview suggest that the ideal orthotopic neobladder hasn't been proposed, yet, and that Italian urologists are still looking for easier and more reliable solutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/039156030707400201
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_039156030707400201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21086400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-2d6ec6bcff8a947a034d60bf7e524291d1d9902922eb2f4f1310791f82df791d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj81KxDAUhYMoThnnBVxIXyB6702aNEsZxh8YcKPrkjaJVPpH0hF8ezuMuvFuzuZ8h_sxdo1wi6j1HQiDhQIBGrQEIMAzlqEmyRXo4pxlxwI_NlZsk9IHLKeAJIlLtiKEUi1Uxvjuc-wOczsOuR1cPsXxPfqU8nbI684652Me_dTZxvd-mK_YRbBd8pufXLO3h93r9onvXx6ft_d73pCUMyenfKPqJoTSGqktCOkU1EH7YnnAoENnDJAh8jUFGVAgaIOhJBeWdGLN6LTbxDGl6EM1xba38atCqI761X_9Bbo5QdOh7r37Q35lxTeu6VNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution and progress in bladder replacement</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Fontana, D ; Destefanis, P ; Cugiani, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Fontana, D ; Destefanis, P ; Cugiani, A</creatorcontrib><description>Nowadays, the first choice after radical cystectomy both in male and in female patients is no more urinary diversion, but bladder replacement surgery through orthotopic reconstruction. In 2006 we carried out a mail interview among Italian Urology Departments about urinary diversions and orthotopic neobladders; the choice for orthotopic neobladder had increased compared to a previous interview administered five years before. As far as the type of orthotopic neobladders are concerned, it was evident that Italian urologists prefer to use the ileal reservoir, preferably the Studer's neobladder, followed by VIP; the use of Camey II is decreasing while Y-neobladder has gained many consents, being preferred to Hautmann's reservoir. The findings of this interview suggest that the ideal orthotopic neobladder hasn't been proposed, yet, and that Italian urologists are still looking for easier and more reliable solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-5603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/039156030707400201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21086400</identifier><language>eng ; ita</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Urologia, 2007-04, Vol.74 (2), p.49-52</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-2d6ec6bcff8a947a034d60bf7e524291d1d9902922eb2f4f1310791f82df791d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-2d6ec6bcff8a947a034d60bf7e524291d1d9902922eb2f4f1310791f82df791d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21086400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fontana, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Destefanis, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cugiani, A</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution and progress in bladder replacement</title><title>Urologia</title><addtitle>Urologia</addtitle><description>Nowadays, the first choice after radical cystectomy both in male and in female patients is no more urinary diversion, but bladder replacement surgery through orthotopic reconstruction. In 2006 we carried out a mail interview among Italian Urology Departments about urinary diversions and orthotopic neobladders; the choice for orthotopic neobladder had increased compared to a previous interview administered five years before. As far as the type of orthotopic neobladders are concerned, it was evident that Italian urologists prefer to use the ileal reservoir, preferably the Studer's neobladder, followed by VIP; the use of Camey II is decreasing while Y-neobladder has gained many consents, being preferred to Hautmann's reservoir. The findings of this interview suggest that the ideal orthotopic neobladder hasn't been proposed, yet, and that Italian urologists are still looking for easier and more reliable solutions.</description><issn>0391-5603</issn><issn>1724-6075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplj81KxDAUhYMoThnnBVxIXyB6702aNEsZxh8YcKPrkjaJVPpH0hF8ezuMuvFuzuZ8h_sxdo1wi6j1HQiDhQIBGrQEIMAzlqEmyRXo4pxlxwI_NlZsk9IHLKeAJIlLtiKEUi1Uxvjuc-wOczsOuR1cPsXxPfqU8nbI684652Me_dTZxvd-mK_YRbBd8pufXLO3h93r9onvXx6ft_d73pCUMyenfKPqJoTSGqktCOkU1EH7YnnAoENnDJAh8jUFGVAgaIOhJBeWdGLN6LTbxDGl6EM1xba38atCqI761X_9Bbo5QdOh7r37Q35lxTeu6VNU</recordid><startdate>200704</startdate><enddate>200704</enddate><creator>Fontana, D</creator><creator>Destefanis, P</creator><creator>Cugiani, A</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200704</creationdate><title>Evolution and progress in bladder replacement</title><author>Fontana, D ; Destefanis, P ; Cugiani, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-2d6ec6bcff8a947a034d60bf7e524291d1d9902922eb2f4f1310791f82df791d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; ita</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fontana, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Destefanis, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cugiani, A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Urologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fontana, D</au><au>Destefanis, P</au><au>Cugiani, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution and progress in bladder replacement</atitle><jtitle>Urologia</jtitle><addtitle>Urologia</addtitle><date>2007-04</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>49-52</pages><issn>0391-5603</issn><eissn>1724-6075</eissn><abstract>Nowadays, the first choice after radical cystectomy both in male and in female patients is no more urinary diversion, but bladder replacement surgery through orthotopic reconstruction. In 2006 we carried out a mail interview among Italian Urology Departments about urinary diversions and orthotopic neobladders; the choice for orthotopic neobladder had increased compared to a previous interview administered five years before. As far as the type of orthotopic neobladders are concerned, it was evident that Italian urologists prefer to use the ileal reservoir, preferably the Studer's neobladder, followed by VIP; the use of Camey II is decreasing while Y-neobladder has gained many consents, being preferred to Hautmann's reservoir. The findings of this interview suggest that the ideal orthotopic neobladder hasn't been proposed, yet, and that Italian urologists are still looking for easier and more reliable solutions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>21086400</pmid><doi>10.1177/039156030707400201</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0391-5603
ispartof Urologia, 2007-04, Vol.74 (2), p.49-52
issn 0391-5603
1724-6075
language eng ; ita
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_039156030707400201
source SAGE Complete
title Evolution and progress in bladder replacement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A20%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20and%20progress%20in%20bladder%20replacement&rft.jtitle=Urologia&rft.au=Fontana,%20D&rft.date=2007-04&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=49-52&rft.issn=0391-5603&rft.eissn=1724-6075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/039156030707400201&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E21086400%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/21086400&rfr_iscdi=true