Evaluation of Full-Depth Reclamation and Cold Central-Plant Recycling Mixtures for Laboratory Compaction, Mechanistic Response, and Performance Properties

Cold recycled mixtures (CRM) are gaining wider acceptability in the United States for rehabilitating existing pavement or new construction while reducing construction costs, environmental impacts, and construction time. However, the technology is still in development owing to inconsistency in design...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research record 2022-05, Vol.2676 (5), p.779-792
Hauptverfasser: Bairgi, Biswajit Kumar, Tarefder, Rafiqul A., Amanul Hasan, Md, Mehedi Hasan, Md, Gburi, Moatasem Al, Khan, Zafrul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 792
container_issue 5
container_start_page 779
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 2676
creator Bairgi, Biswajit Kumar
Tarefder, Rafiqul A.
Amanul Hasan, Md
Mehedi Hasan, Md
Gburi, Moatasem Al
Khan, Zafrul
description Cold recycled mixtures (CRM) are gaining wider acceptability in the United States for rehabilitating existing pavement or new construction while reducing construction costs, environmental impacts, and construction time. However, the technology is still in development owing to inconsistency in design and limited research on mechanistic and engineering properties. To this end, this study evaluates full-depth reclamation (FDR) and cold central-plant recycling (CCPR) materials for evaluating (i) laboratory compaction protocols, (ii) mechanistic properties, and (iii) engineering performances. Two compaction methods—the Superpave gyratory compaction and the modified proctor—were developed for designing test specimens with adequate design properties. The mechanistic properties resilient modulus (MR) and dynamic modulus (|E*|) were evaluated. Laboratory performance testing such as Texas overlay tester, semi-circular bending, and a modified Hamburg wheel tracking (HWT) were performed. This study also proposed a new parameter, loading limit (Nmax), based on the modified HWT test configuration. The study found that the FDR exhibits less temperature dependency compared with the CCPR while subjecting to loading. Based on damage properties such as critical fracture energy, J-integral, crack propagation index, and Nmax, the CCPR exhibits more flexibility and damage resistance than FDR.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/03611981211070551
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_03611981211070551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_03611981211070551</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_03611981211070551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-52b5848101ef595fe9df4339da0433ed352a5f5741c0c2cae825a01e6c87585b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwAdz8AU2xk7hJjqi0gNSKCsE52jrrNpVjR7aD6K_wtSSUGxKXncPMG62GkFvOppxn2R1LZpwXOY85ZxkTgp-RUcxnRZQyEZ-T0eBHQ-CSXHl_YCxJ0iwZka_FB-gOQm0NtYouO62jB2zDnr6i1NCcHDAVnVvdHzTBgY42GkwYIkepa7Oj6_ozdA49VdbRFWytg2DdsYeaFuTQMaFrlHswtQ-17EnfWuNx8lO9QddzDRiJdONsiy7U6K_JhQLt8eZXx-R9uXibP0Wrl8fn-f0qknGehkjEW5GnOWcclSiEwqJSaZIUFbBesEpEDEKJLOWSyVgC5rGAPjyTeSZysU3GhJ96pbPeO1Rl6-oG3LHkrBzGLf-M2zPTE-Nhh-XBds70L_4DfANsWnwk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Full-Depth Reclamation and Cold Central-Plant Recycling Mixtures for Laboratory Compaction, Mechanistic Response, and Performance Properties</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Bairgi, Biswajit Kumar ; Tarefder, Rafiqul A. ; Amanul Hasan, Md ; Mehedi Hasan, Md ; Gburi, Moatasem Al ; Khan, Zafrul</creator><creatorcontrib>Bairgi, Biswajit Kumar ; Tarefder, Rafiqul A. ; Amanul Hasan, Md ; Mehedi Hasan, Md ; Gburi, Moatasem Al ; Khan, Zafrul</creatorcontrib><description>Cold recycled mixtures (CRM) are gaining wider acceptability in the United States for rehabilitating existing pavement or new construction while reducing construction costs, environmental impacts, and construction time. However, the technology is still in development owing to inconsistency in design and limited research on mechanistic and engineering properties. To this end, this study evaluates full-depth reclamation (FDR) and cold central-plant recycling (CCPR) materials for evaluating (i) laboratory compaction protocols, (ii) mechanistic properties, and (iii) engineering performances. Two compaction methods—the Superpave gyratory compaction and the modified proctor—were developed for designing test specimens with adequate design properties. The mechanistic properties resilient modulus (MR) and dynamic modulus (|E*|) were evaluated. Laboratory performance testing such as Texas overlay tester, semi-circular bending, and a modified Hamburg wheel tracking (HWT) were performed. This study also proposed a new parameter, loading limit (Nmax), based on the modified HWT test configuration. The study found that the FDR exhibits less temperature dependency compared with the CCPR while subjecting to loading. Based on damage properties such as critical fracture energy, J-integral, crack propagation index, and Nmax, the CCPR exhibits more flexibility and damage resistance than FDR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03611981211070551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2022-05, Vol.2676 (5), p.779-792</ispartof><rights>National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-52b5848101ef595fe9df4339da0433ed352a5f5741c0c2cae825a01e6c87585b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-52b5848101ef595fe9df4339da0433ed352a5f5741c0c2cae825a01e6c87585b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9029-2139 ; 0000-0003-1061-2169</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03611981211070551$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03611981211070551$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bairgi, Biswajit Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarefder, Rafiqul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amanul Hasan, Md</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehedi Hasan, Md</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gburi, Moatasem Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Zafrul</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Full-Depth Reclamation and Cold Central-Plant Recycling Mixtures for Laboratory Compaction, Mechanistic Response, and Performance Properties</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Cold recycled mixtures (CRM) are gaining wider acceptability in the United States for rehabilitating existing pavement or new construction while reducing construction costs, environmental impacts, and construction time. However, the technology is still in development owing to inconsistency in design and limited research on mechanistic and engineering properties. To this end, this study evaluates full-depth reclamation (FDR) and cold central-plant recycling (CCPR) materials for evaluating (i) laboratory compaction protocols, (ii) mechanistic properties, and (iii) engineering performances. Two compaction methods—the Superpave gyratory compaction and the modified proctor—were developed for designing test specimens with adequate design properties. The mechanistic properties resilient modulus (MR) and dynamic modulus (|E*|) were evaluated. Laboratory performance testing such as Texas overlay tester, semi-circular bending, and a modified Hamburg wheel tracking (HWT) were performed. This study also proposed a new parameter, loading limit (Nmax), based on the modified HWT test configuration. The study found that the FDR exhibits less temperature dependency compared with the CCPR while subjecting to loading. Based on damage properties such as critical fracture energy, J-integral, crack propagation index, and Nmax, the CCPR exhibits more flexibility and damage resistance than FDR.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwAdz8AU2xk7hJjqi0gNSKCsE52jrrNpVjR7aD6K_wtSSUGxKXncPMG62GkFvOppxn2R1LZpwXOY85ZxkTgp-RUcxnRZQyEZ-T0eBHQ-CSXHl_YCxJ0iwZka_FB-gOQm0NtYouO62jB2zDnr6i1NCcHDAVnVvdHzTBgY42GkwYIkepa7Oj6_ozdA49VdbRFWytg2DdsYeaFuTQMaFrlHswtQ-17EnfWuNx8lO9QddzDRiJdONsiy7U6K_JhQLt8eZXx-R9uXibP0Wrl8fn-f0qknGehkjEW5GnOWcclSiEwqJSaZIUFbBesEpEDEKJLOWSyVgC5rGAPjyTeSZysU3GhJ96pbPeO1Rl6-oG3LHkrBzGLf-M2zPTE-Nhh-XBds70L_4DfANsWnwk</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Bairgi, Biswajit Kumar</creator><creator>Tarefder, Rafiqul A.</creator><creator>Amanul Hasan, Md</creator><creator>Mehedi Hasan, Md</creator><creator>Gburi, Moatasem Al</creator><creator>Khan, Zafrul</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-2139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1061-2169</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Full-Depth Reclamation and Cold Central-Plant Recycling Mixtures for Laboratory Compaction, Mechanistic Response, and Performance Properties</title><author>Bairgi, Biswajit Kumar ; Tarefder, Rafiqul A. ; Amanul Hasan, Md ; Mehedi Hasan, Md ; Gburi, Moatasem Al ; Khan, Zafrul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-52b5848101ef595fe9df4339da0433ed352a5f5741c0c2cae825a01e6c87585b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bairgi, Biswajit Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarefder, Rafiqul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amanul Hasan, Md</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehedi Hasan, Md</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gburi, Moatasem Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Zafrul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bairgi, Biswajit Kumar</au><au>Tarefder, Rafiqul A.</au><au>Amanul Hasan, Md</au><au>Mehedi Hasan, Md</au><au>Gburi, Moatasem Al</au><au>Khan, Zafrul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Full-Depth Reclamation and Cold Central-Plant Recycling Mixtures for Laboratory Compaction, Mechanistic Response, and Performance Properties</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2676</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>779</spage><epage>792</epage><pages>779-792</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><abstract>Cold recycled mixtures (CRM) are gaining wider acceptability in the United States for rehabilitating existing pavement or new construction while reducing construction costs, environmental impacts, and construction time. However, the technology is still in development owing to inconsistency in design and limited research on mechanistic and engineering properties. To this end, this study evaluates full-depth reclamation (FDR) and cold central-plant recycling (CCPR) materials for evaluating (i) laboratory compaction protocols, (ii) mechanistic properties, and (iii) engineering performances. Two compaction methods—the Superpave gyratory compaction and the modified proctor—were developed for designing test specimens with adequate design properties. The mechanistic properties resilient modulus (MR) and dynamic modulus (|E*|) were evaluated. Laboratory performance testing such as Texas overlay tester, semi-circular bending, and a modified Hamburg wheel tracking (HWT) were performed. This study also proposed a new parameter, loading limit (Nmax), based on the modified HWT test configuration. The study found that the FDR exhibits less temperature dependency compared with the CCPR while subjecting to loading. Based on damage properties such as critical fracture energy, J-integral, crack propagation index, and Nmax, the CCPR exhibits more flexibility and damage resistance than FDR.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/03611981211070551</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9029-2139</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1061-2169</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2022-05, Vol.2676 (5), p.779-792
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_03611981211070551
source SAGE Complete
title Evaluation of Full-Depth Reclamation and Cold Central-Plant Recycling Mixtures for Laboratory Compaction, Mechanistic Response, and Performance Properties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A18%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Full-Depth%20Reclamation%20and%20Cold%20Central-Plant%20Recycling%20Mixtures%20for%20Laboratory%20Compaction,%20Mechanistic%20Response,%20and%20Performance%20Properties&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Bairgi,%20Biswajit%20Kumar&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=2676&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=779&rft.epage=792&rft.pages=779-792&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03611981211070551&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_03611981211070551%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03611981211070551&rfr_iscdi=true