Role of Habits in Cell Phone-Related Driver Distractions

Despite increased media attention and legislation banning some forms of cell phone use while driving, drivers continue to engage in illegal cell phone distractions. Several studies have used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to explain why drivers voluntarily engage in cell phone distractions, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research record 2020-12, Vol.2674 (12), p.254-262
Hauptverfasser: Hansma, Braden Joseph, Marulanda, Susana, Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie, Donmez, Birsen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 262
container_issue 12
container_start_page 254
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 2674
creator Hansma, Braden Joseph
Marulanda, Susana
Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie
Donmez, Birsen
description Despite increased media attention and legislation banning some forms of cell phone use while driving, drivers continue to engage in illegal cell phone distractions. Several studies have used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to explain why drivers voluntarily engage in cell phone distractions, and found that TPB constructs (attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioral control) predict intentions to engage in cell phone distractions while driving. Given that cell phone use is ubiquitous, habits that have formed around their general use may lead to automatic engagement in cell phone distractions while driving. This differs from voluntary engagement, in that habits are carried out automatically, with little thought given to the action or its consequences. Thus, in addition to the TPB constructs that explain intentions, habitual factors should also be considered in understanding why drivers use cell phones. A few studies have examined the role of habits in this context, but they only focused on texting behaviors. An online survey was conducted with 227 respondents to investigate the role of habitual cell phone use in driver engagement in a variety of illegal cell phone tasks (e.g., social media, email). Habitual cell phone use was found to explain unique variance in self-reported engagement after controlling for TPB constructs. Overall, the findings indicate that cell-phone-related distractions may not be entirely voluntary; instead, cell phone habits developed outside of the driving context appear to have a significant effect, suggesting that cell phone use while driving may have become automatic to a certain extent.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0361198120953157
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0361198120953157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0361198120953157</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0361198120953157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-efb8120b8443574361981458762b4a1d9c2fc2f8880ec5aac99a1e7fa80383a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j09LxDAUxIMoWFfvHvMFonn50yRH2VVXWFCWvZc0-6JZaitJFfz2tqwnQRh4h3kz_IaQa-A3AMbcclkDOAuCOy1BmxNSCagdU1yLU1LNNpv9c3JRyoFzKZWRFbHboUM6RLr2bRoLTT1dYtfRl7ehR7bFzo-4p6ucvjDTVSpj9mFMQ18uyVn0XcGr37sgu4f73XLNNs-PT8u7DQvCwsgwtjNTa5WS2qiJYmJQ2ppatMrD3gURJ1lrOQbtfXDOA5roLZdWerkg_Fgb8lBKxth85PTu83cDvJmHN3-HTxF2jBT_is1h-Mz9BPj__w-xElYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of Habits in Cell Phone-Related Driver Distractions</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Hansma, Braden Joseph ; Marulanda, Susana ; Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie ; Donmez, Birsen</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansma, Braden Joseph ; Marulanda, Susana ; Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie ; Donmez, Birsen</creatorcontrib><description>Despite increased media attention and legislation banning some forms of cell phone use while driving, drivers continue to engage in illegal cell phone distractions. Several studies have used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to explain why drivers voluntarily engage in cell phone distractions, and found that TPB constructs (attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioral control) predict intentions to engage in cell phone distractions while driving. Given that cell phone use is ubiquitous, habits that have formed around their general use may lead to automatic engagement in cell phone distractions while driving. This differs from voluntary engagement, in that habits are carried out automatically, with little thought given to the action or its consequences. Thus, in addition to the TPB constructs that explain intentions, habitual factors should also be considered in understanding why drivers use cell phones. A few studies have examined the role of habits in this context, but they only focused on texting behaviors. An online survey was conducted with 227 respondents to investigate the role of habitual cell phone use in driver engagement in a variety of illegal cell phone tasks (e.g., social media, email). Habitual cell phone use was found to explain unique variance in self-reported engagement after controlling for TPB constructs. Overall, the findings indicate that cell-phone-related distractions may not be entirely voluntary; instead, cell phone habits developed outside of the driving context appear to have a significant effect, suggesting that cell phone use while driving may have become automatic to a certain extent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0361198120953157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2020-12, Vol.2674 (12), p.254-262</ispartof><rights>National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-efb8120b8443574361981458762b4a1d9c2fc2f8880ec5aac99a1e7fa80383a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-efb8120b8443574361981458762b4a1d9c2fc2f8880ec5aac99a1e7fa80383a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361198120953157$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0361198120953157$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansma, Braden Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marulanda, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Birsen</creatorcontrib><title>Role of Habits in Cell Phone-Related Driver Distractions</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Despite increased media attention and legislation banning some forms of cell phone use while driving, drivers continue to engage in illegal cell phone distractions. Several studies have used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to explain why drivers voluntarily engage in cell phone distractions, and found that TPB constructs (attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioral control) predict intentions to engage in cell phone distractions while driving. Given that cell phone use is ubiquitous, habits that have formed around their general use may lead to automatic engagement in cell phone distractions while driving. This differs from voluntary engagement, in that habits are carried out automatically, with little thought given to the action or its consequences. Thus, in addition to the TPB constructs that explain intentions, habitual factors should also be considered in understanding why drivers use cell phones. A few studies have examined the role of habits in this context, but they only focused on texting behaviors. An online survey was conducted with 227 respondents to investigate the role of habitual cell phone use in driver engagement in a variety of illegal cell phone tasks (e.g., social media, email). Habitual cell phone use was found to explain unique variance in self-reported engagement after controlling for TPB constructs. Overall, the findings indicate that cell-phone-related distractions may not be entirely voluntary; instead, cell phone habits developed outside of the driving context appear to have a significant effect, suggesting that cell phone use while driving may have become automatic to a certain extent.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j09LxDAUxIMoWFfvHvMFonn50yRH2VVXWFCWvZc0-6JZaitJFfz2tqwnQRh4h3kz_IaQa-A3AMbcclkDOAuCOy1BmxNSCagdU1yLU1LNNpv9c3JRyoFzKZWRFbHboUM6RLr2bRoLTT1dYtfRl7ehR7bFzo-4p6ucvjDTVSpj9mFMQ18uyVn0XcGr37sgu4f73XLNNs-PT8u7DQvCwsgwtjNTa5WS2qiJYmJQ2ppatMrD3gURJ1lrOQbtfXDOA5roLZdWerkg_Fgb8lBKxth85PTu83cDvJmHN3-HTxF2jBT_is1h-Mz9BPj__w-xElYk</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Hansma, Braden Joseph</creator><creator>Marulanda, Susana</creator><creator>Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie</creator><creator>Donmez, Birsen</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Role of Habits in Cell Phone-Related Driver Distractions</title><author>Hansma, Braden Joseph ; Marulanda, Susana ; Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie ; Donmez, Birsen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-efb8120b8443574361981458762b4a1d9c2fc2f8880ec5aac99a1e7fa80383a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansma, Braden Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marulanda, Susana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donmez, Birsen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansma, Braden Joseph</au><au>Marulanda, Susana</au><au>Chen, Huei-Yen Winnie</au><au>Donmez, Birsen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of Habits in Cell Phone-Related Driver Distractions</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2674</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>254</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>254-262</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><abstract>Despite increased media attention and legislation banning some forms of cell phone use while driving, drivers continue to engage in illegal cell phone distractions. Several studies have used the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to explain why drivers voluntarily engage in cell phone distractions, and found that TPB constructs (attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioral control) predict intentions to engage in cell phone distractions while driving. Given that cell phone use is ubiquitous, habits that have formed around their general use may lead to automatic engagement in cell phone distractions while driving. This differs from voluntary engagement, in that habits are carried out automatically, with little thought given to the action or its consequences. Thus, in addition to the TPB constructs that explain intentions, habitual factors should also be considered in understanding why drivers use cell phones. A few studies have examined the role of habits in this context, but they only focused on texting behaviors. An online survey was conducted with 227 respondents to investigate the role of habitual cell phone use in driver engagement in a variety of illegal cell phone tasks (e.g., social media, email). Habitual cell phone use was found to explain unique variance in self-reported engagement after controlling for TPB constructs. Overall, the findings indicate that cell-phone-related distractions may not be entirely voluntary; instead, cell phone habits developed outside of the driving context appear to have a significant effect, suggesting that cell phone use while driving may have become automatic to a certain extent.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0361198120953157</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2020-12, Vol.2674 (12), p.254-262
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0361198120953157
source SAGE Complete
title Role of Habits in Cell Phone-Related Driver Distractions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20Habits%20in%20Cell%20Phone-Related%20Driver%20Distractions&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Hansma,%20Braden%20Joseph&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=2674&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=254&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=254-262&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0361198120953157&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0361198120953157%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0361198120953157&rfr_iscdi=true