Safety Evaluation of Median U-Turn Crossover-Based Intersections

Alternative innovative designs for intersections were defined to enhance traffic operation and safety. Median U-turn (MUT) and restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) intersections are among the types of alternative intersections that enable drivers to make left-turn movements at median U-turn crossovers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research record 2020-07, Vol.2674 (7), p.206-218
Hauptverfasser: Al-Omari, Ma’en Mohammad Ali, Abdel-Aty, Mohamed, Lee, Jaeyoung, Yue, Lishengsa, Abdelrahman, Ahmed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 7
container_start_page 206
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 2674
creator Al-Omari, Ma’en Mohammad Ali
Abdel-Aty, Mohamed
Lee, Jaeyoung
Yue, Lishengsa
Abdelrahman, Ahmed
description Alternative innovative designs for intersections were defined to enhance traffic operation and safety. Median U-turn (MUT) and restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) intersections are among the types of alternative intersections that enable drivers to make left-turn movements at median U-turn crossovers downstream of the main intersection. Recently, municipalities and transport agencies have tended to implement these types of intersections. However, their effectiveness in crash reduction has not been adequately determined in previous studies. This is because of the limited number of alternative intersections that were considered in these studies. In addition, there was no consideration for the unusual new geometric design of these intersections. In this study, a safety evaluation was conducted while considering the new intersection-related areas at MUT and RCUT intersections to clarify and quantify their effectiveness in crash reduction. This study considered 73 MUT and 12 RCUT intersections. Two types of MUT intersections were considered in this study. Crash modification factors for MUT and RCUT intersections were estimated by using before–after and cross-sectional methods. The results indicated that MUT and RCUT intersections are safer than conventional intersections. MUT intersections are effective in reducing total, property damage only (PDO), rear-end, and opposite-direction sideswipe crashes, although they significantly increase single-vehicle and non-motorized crashes. RCUT intersections are effective in reducing fatal-and-injury, injury, head-on, and angle crashes. Findings of this research provide clear evaluation for decision makers about the effectiveness of MUT and RCUT intersections in crash reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0361198120921158
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0361198120921158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0361198120921158</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0361198120921158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1a95cf51e561c4da44b774903687941aa245367f403b50ee682a8661b45dbcac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqWwM_oFDD6-xhsQFahUxEA7RyeOjVKVBNlppb49icqExHSG_6Lv_ITcAr8DsPaeSwPgChDcCQBdnJGZAOOY4lqck9kks0m_JFc5bzmXUlk5Iw8fGMNwpIsD7vY4tH1H-0jfQtNiRzdsvU8dLVOfc38IiT1hDg1ddkNIOfjJna_JRcRdDje_d042z4t1-cpW7y_L8nHFvORuYIBO-6ghaANeNahUba1yI1ZhnQJEobQ0Nioua81DMIXAwhiolW5qj17OCT_1-okmhVh9p_YL07ECXk0LVH8XGCPsFMn4GaptP_4yEv7v_wH2b1nQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety Evaluation of Median U-Turn Crossover-Based Intersections</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Al-Omari, Ma’en Mohammad Ali ; Abdel-Aty, Mohamed ; Lee, Jaeyoung ; Yue, Lishengsa ; Abdelrahman, Ahmed</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Omari, Ma’en Mohammad Ali ; Abdel-Aty, Mohamed ; Lee, Jaeyoung ; Yue, Lishengsa ; Abdelrahman, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><description>Alternative innovative designs for intersections were defined to enhance traffic operation and safety. Median U-turn (MUT) and restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) intersections are among the types of alternative intersections that enable drivers to make left-turn movements at median U-turn crossovers downstream of the main intersection. Recently, municipalities and transport agencies have tended to implement these types of intersections. However, their effectiveness in crash reduction has not been adequately determined in previous studies. This is because of the limited number of alternative intersections that were considered in these studies. In addition, there was no consideration for the unusual new geometric design of these intersections. In this study, a safety evaluation was conducted while considering the new intersection-related areas at MUT and RCUT intersections to clarify and quantify their effectiveness in crash reduction. This study considered 73 MUT and 12 RCUT intersections. Two types of MUT intersections were considered in this study. Crash modification factors for MUT and RCUT intersections were estimated by using before–after and cross-sectional methods. The results indicated that MUT and RCUT intersections are safer than conventional intersections. MUT intersections are effective in reducing total, property damage only (PDO), rear-end, and opposite-direction sideswipe crashes, although they significantly increase single-vehicle and non-motorized crashes. RCUT intersections are effective in reducing fatal-and-injury, injury, head-on, and angle crashes. Findings of this research provide clear evaluation for decision makers about the effectiveness of MUT and RCUT intersections in crash reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0361198120921158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2020-07, Vol.2674 (7), p.206-218</ispartof><rights>National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1a95cf51e561c4da44b774903687941aa245367f403b50ee682a8661b45dbcac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1a95cf51e561c4da44b774903687941aa245367f403b50ee682a8661b45dbcac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0361198120921158$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0361198120921158$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Omari, Ma’en Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Aty, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jaeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Lishengsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelrahman, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><title>Safety Evaluation of Median U-Turn Crossover-Based Intersections</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Alternative innovative designs for intersections were defined to enhance traffic operation and safety. Median U-turn (MUT) and restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) intersections are among the types of alternative intersections that enable drivers to make left-turn movements at median U-turn crossovers downstream of the main intersection. Recently, municipalities and transport agencies have tended to implement these types of intersections. However, their effectiveness in crash reduction has not been adequately determined in previous studies. This is because of the limited number of alternative intersections that were considered in these studies. In addition, there was no consideration for the unusual new geometric design of these intersections. In this study, a safety evaluation was conducted while considering the new intersection-related areas at MUT and RCUT intersections to clarify and quantify their effectiveness in crash reduction. This study considered 73 MUT and 12 RCUT intersections. Two types of MUT intersections were considered in this study. Crash modification factors for MUT and RCUT intersections were estimated by using before–after and cross-sectional methods. The results indicated that MUT and RCUT intersections are safer than conventional intersections. MUT intersections are effective in reducing total, property damage only (PDO), rear-end, and opposite-direction sideswipe crashes, although they significantly increase single-vehicle and non-motorized crashes. RCUT intersections are effective in reducing fatal-and-injury, injury, head-on, and angle crashes. Findings of this research provide clear evaluation for decision makers about the effectiveness of MUT and RCUT intersections in crash reduction.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqWwM_oFDD6-xhsQFahUxEA7RyeOjVKVBNlppb49icqExHSG_6Lv_ITcAr8DsPaeSwPgChDcCQBdnJGZAOOY4lqck9kks0m_JFc5bzmXUlk5Iw8fGMNwpIsD7vY4tH1H-0jfQtNiRzdsvU8dLVOfc38IiT1hDg1ddkNIOfjJna_JRcRdDje_d042z4t1-cpW7y_L8nHFvORuYIBO-6ghaANeNahUba1yI1ZhnQJEobQ0Nioua81DMIXAwhiolW5qj17OCT_1-okmhVh9p_YL07ECXk0LVH8XGCPsFMn4GaptP_4yEv7v_wH2b1nQ</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Al-Omari, Ma’en Mohammad Ali</creator><creator>Abdel-Aty, Mohamed</creator><creator>Lee, Jaeyoung</creator><creator>Yue, Lishengsa</creator><creator>Abdelrahman, Ahmed</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Safety Evaluation of Median U-Turn Crossover-Based Intersections</title><author>Al-Omari, Ma’en Mohammad Ali ; Abdel-Aty, Mohamed ; Lee, Jaeyoung ; Yue, Lishengsa ; Abdelrahman, Ahmed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-1a95cf51e561c4da44b774903687941aa245367f403b50ee682a8661b45dbcac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Omari, Ma’en Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Aty, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jaeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Lishengsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelrahman, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Omari, Ma’en Mohammad Ali</au><au>Abdel-Aty, Mohamed</au><au>Lee, Jaeyoung</au><au>Yue, Lishengsa</au><au>Abdelrahman, Ahmed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety Evaluation of Median U-Turn Crossover-Based Intersections</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2674</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>206</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>206-218</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><abstract>Alternative innovative designs for intersections were defined to enhance traffic operation and safety. Median U-turn (MUT) and restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) intersections are among the types of alternative intersections that enable drivers to make left-turn movements at median U-turn crossovers downstream of the main intersection. Recently, municipalities and transport agencies have tended to implement these types of intersections. However, their effectiveness in crash reduction has not been adequately determined in previous studies. This is because of the limited number of alternative intersections that were considered in these studies. In addition, there was no consideration for the unusual new geometric design of these intersections. In this study, a safety evaluation was conducted while considering the new intersection-related areas at MUT and RCUT intersections to clarify and quantify their effectiveness in crash reduction. This study considered 73 MUT and 12 RCUT intersections. Two types of MUT intersections were considered in this study. Crash modification factors for MUT and RCUT intersections were estimated by using before–after and cross-sectional methods. The results indicated that MUT and RCUT intersections are safer than conventional intersections. MUT intersections are effective in reducing total, property damage only (PDO), rear-end, and opposite-direction sideswipe crashes, although they significantly increase single-vehicle and non-motorized crashes. RCUT intersections are effective in reducing fatal-and-injury, injury, head-on, and angle crashes. Findings of this research provide clear evaluation for decision makers about the effectiveness of MUT and RCUT intersections in crash reduction.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0361198120921158</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2020-07, Vol.2674 (7), p.206-218
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0361198120921158
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Safety Evaluation of Median U-Turn Crossover-Based Intersections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T22%3A51%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20Evaluation%20of%20Median%20U-Turn%20Crossover-Based%20Intersections&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Al-Omari,%20Ma%E2%80%99en%20Mohammad%20Ali&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=2674&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=206-218&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0361198120921158&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0361198120921158%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0361198120921158&rfr_iscdi=true