Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit

Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia and intensive care 1997-04, Vol.25 (2), p.138-141
Hauptverfasser: FRAWLEY, G. P, TIBBALLS, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 2
container_start_page 138
container_title Anaesthesia and intensive care
container_volume 25
creator FRAWLEY, G. P
TIBBALLS, J
description Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) and an electrochemical monitor (Pulmonox Research and Development Corp) was 0.52 +/- 6.52 ppm (SD). The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were 3.00 to -1.96 ppm and the limits of agreement between the two techniques were 13.56 to -12.52 ppm. The mean difference between the chemiluminescence monitor and another electrochemical monitor (NOxBox, Bedfont Scientific Inc) was -7.27 +/- 4.29 ppm. The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were -9.02 to -5.56 ppm and limits of agreement of the two techniques were -16.13 to 1.55 ppm. These results suggest that electrochemical monitors may be used to guard against potentially toxic concentrations of NO (greater than 20 ppm). However they do not suggest that either of the electrochemical monitors may be used with confidence in lieu of the chemiluminescence monitor to regulate NO at low clinical NO levels (1-5 ppm).
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0310057X9702500205
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0310057X9702500205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9127655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-77d9796c401356d297e0dc607a761c17b8c2763814b15a65ec7868a3d6e8e9743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gCDk4HV1Jtlkdr2VUj-g4kVB8LCk2axGuh8kW9F_79aWXjzNwPs8w_Aydo5whUh0DRIBFL3mBEIBCFAHbIxpmiUgCA_ZeAMkG-KYncT4CYC5IDVioxwFaaXG7O2xbXzfBt-882EJ3vL225eO3_Apt23dmeBj2_C24v1HcI7XWz5y33DDO-NKb_60L9f0fmWGjFsf7Nr3p-yoMqvoznZzwl5u58-z-2TxdPcwmy4SKwn7hKjMKdc2BZRKlyInB6XVQIY0WqRlZodnZYbpEpXRylnKdGZkqV3mckrlhIntXRvaGIOrii742oSfAqHYFFX8L2qQLrZSt17Wrtwru2aG_HKXm2jNqgqmsT7uMaEFikzKX-1Eb4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>FRAWLEY, G. P ; TIBBALLS, J</creator><creatorcontrib>FRAWLEY, G. P ; TIBBALLS, J</creatorcontrib><description>Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) and an electrochemical monitor (Pulmonox Research and Development Corp) was 0.52 +/- 6.52 ppm (SD). The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were 3.00 to -1.96 ppm and the limits of agreement between the two techniques were 13.56 to -12.52 ppm. The mean difference between the chemiluminescence monitor and another electrochemical monitor (NOxBox, Bedfont Scientific Inc) was -7.27 +/- 4.29 ppm. The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were -9.02 to -5.56 ppm and limits of agreement of the two techniques were -16.13 to 1.55 ppm. These results suggest that electrochemical monitors may be used to guard against potentially toxic concentrations of NO (greater than 20 ppm). However they do not suggest that either of the electrochemical monitors may be used with confidence in lieu of the chemiluminescence monitor to regulate NO at low clinical NO levels (1-5 ppm).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057X9702500205</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9127655</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AINCBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edgecliff: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular system ; Child ; Electrochemistry - instrumentation ; Humans ; Luminescent Measurements ; Medical sciences ; Models, Structural ; Nitric Oxide - analysis ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Vasodilator agents. Cerebral vasodilators ; Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1997-04, Vol.25 (2), p.138-141</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-77d9796c401356d297e0dc607a761c17b8c2763814b15a65ec7868a3d6e8e9743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-77d9796c401356d297e0dc607a761c17b8c2763814b15a65ec7868a3d6e8e9743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2621283$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9127655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FRAWLEY, G. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIBBALLS, J</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) and an electrochemical monitor (Pulmonox Research and Development Corp) was 0.52 +/- 6.52 ppm (SD). The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were 3.00 to -1.96 ppm and the limits of agreement between the two techniques were 13.56 to -12.52 ppm. The mean difference between the chemiluminescence monitor and another electrochemical monitor (NOxBox, Bedfont Scientific Inc) was -7.27 +/- 4.29 ppm. The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were -9.02 to -5.56 ppm and limits of agreement of the two techniques were -16.13 to 1.55 ppm. These results suggest that electrochemical monitors may be used to guard against potentially toxic concentrations of NO (greater than 20 ppm). However they do not suggest that either of the electrochemical monitors may be used with confidence in lieu of the chemiluminescence monitor to regulate NO at low clinical NO levels (1-5 ppm).</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Electrochemistry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Luminescent Measurements</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Structural</subject><subject>Nitric Oxide - analysis</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Vasodilator agents. Cerebral vasodilators</subject><subject>Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gCDk4HV1Jtlkdr2VUj-g4kVB8LCk2axGuh8kW9F_79aWXjzNwPs8w_Aydo5whUh0DRIBFL3mBEIBCFAHbIxpmiUgCA_ZeAMkG-KYncT4CYC5IDVioxwFaaXG7O2xbXzfBt-882EJ3vL225eO3_Apt23dmeBj2_C24v1HcI7XWz5y33DDO-NKb_60L9f0fmWGjFsf7Nr3p-yoMqvoznZzwl5u58-z-2TxdPcwmy4SKwn7hKjMKdc2BZRKlyInB6XVQIY0WqRlZodnZYbpEpXRylnKdGZkqV3mckrlhIntXRvaGIOrii742oSfAqHYFFX8L2qQLrZSt17Wrtwru2aG_HKXm2jNqgqmsT7uMaEFikzKX-1Eb4s</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>FRAWLEY, G. P</creator><creator>TIBBALLS, J</creator><general>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit</title><author>FRAWLEY, G. P ; TIBBALLS, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-77d9796c401356d297e0dc607a761c17b8c2763814b15a65ec7868a3d6e8e9743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Electrochemistry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Luminescent Measurements</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Structural</topic><topic>Nitric Oxide - analysis</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Vasodilator agents. Cerebral vasodilators</topic><topic>Ventilators, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FRAWLEY, G. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIBBALLS, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FRAWLEY, G. P</au><au>TIBBALLS, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>138-141</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><coden>AINCBS</coden><abstract>Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) and an electrochemical monitor (Pulmonox Research and Development Corp) was 0.52 +/- 6.52 ppm (SD). The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were 3.00 to -1.96 ppm and the limits of agreement between the two techniques were 13.56 to -12.52 ppm. The mean difference between the chemiluminescence monitor and another electrochemical monitor (NOxBox, Bedfont Scientific Inc) was -7.27 +/- 4.29 ppm. The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were -9.02 to -5.56 ppm and limits of agreement of the two techniques were -16.13 to 1.55 ppm. These results suggest that electrochemical monitors may be used to guard against potentially toxic concentrations of NO (greater than 20 ppm). However they do not suggest that either of the electrochemical monitors may be used with confidence in lieu of the chemiluminescence monitor to regulate NO at low clinical NO levels (1-5 ppm).</abstract><cop>Edgecliff</cop><pub>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</pub><pmid>9127655</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057X9702500205</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0310-057X
ispartof Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1997-04, Vol.25 (2), p.138-141
issn 0310-057X
1448-0271
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0310057X9702500205
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cardiovascular system
Child
Electrochemistry - instrumentation
Humans
Luminescent Measurements
Medical sciences
Models, Structural
Nitric Oxide - analysis
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Vasodilator agents. Cerebral vasodilators
Ventilators, Mechanical
title Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T11%3A01%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20nitric%20oxide%20:%20A%20comparison%20of%20three%20monitors%20in%20a%20paediatric%20ventilator%20circuit&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=FRAWLEY,%20G.%20P&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=138-141&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft.coden=AINCBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057X9702500205&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E9127655%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9127655&rfr_iscdi=true