Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit
Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anaesthesia and intensive care 1997-04, Vol.25 (2), p.138-141 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 138 |
container_title | Anaesthesia and intensive care |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | FRAWLEY, G. P TIBBALLS, J |
description | Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) and an electrochemical monitor (Pulmonox Research and Development Corp) was 0.52 +/- 6.52 ppm (SD). The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were 3.00 to -1.96 ppm and the limits of agreement between the two techniques were 13.56 to -12.52 ppm. The mean difference between the chemiluminescence monitor and another electrochemical monitor (NOxBox, Bedfont Scientific Inc) was -7.27 +/- 4.29 ppm. The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were -9.02 to -5.56 ppm and limits of agreement of the two techniques were -16.13 to 1.55 ppm. These results suggest that electrochemical monitors may be used to guard against potentially toxic concentrations of NO (greater than 20 ppm). However they do not suggest that either of the electrochemical monitors may be used with confidence in lieu of the chemiluminescence monitor to regulate NO at low clinical NO levels (1-5 ppm). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0310057X9702500205 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0310057X9702500205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>9127655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-77d9796c401356d297e0dc607a761c17b8c2763814b15a65ec7868a3d6e8e9743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gCDk4HV1Jtlkdr2VUj-g4kVB8LCk2axGuh8kW9F_79aWXjzNwPs8w_Aydo5whUh0DRIBFL3mBEIBCFAHbIxpmiUgCA_ZeAMkG-KYncT4CYC5IDVioxwFaaXG7O2xbXzfBt-882EJ3vL225eO3_Apt23dmeBj2_C24v1HcI7XWz5y33DDO-NKb_60L9f0fmWGjFsf7Nr3p-yoMqvoznZzwl5u58-z-2TxdPcwmy4SKwn7hKjMKdc2BZRKlyInB6XVQIY0WqRlZodnZYbpEpXRylnKdGZkqV3mckrlhIntXRvaGIOrii742oSfAqHYFFX8L2qQLrZSt17Wrtwru2aG_HKXm2jNqgqmsT7uMaEFikzKX-1Eb4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>FRAWLEY, G. P ; TIBBALLS, J</creator><creatorcontrib>FRAWLEY, G. P ; TIBBALLS, J</creatorcontrib><description>Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) and an electrochemical monitor (Pulmonox Research and Development Corp) was 0.52 +/- 6.52 ppm (SD). The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were 3.00 to -1.96 ppm and the limits of agreement between the two techniques were 13.56 to -12.52 ppm. The mean difference between the chemiluminescence monitor and another electrochemical monitor (NOxBox, Bedfont Scientific Inc) was -7.27 +/- 4.29 ppm. The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were -9.02 to -5.56 ppm and limits of agreement of the two techniques were -16.13 to 1.55 ppm. These results suggest that electrochemical monitors may be used to guard against potentially toxic concentrations of NO (greater than 20 ppm). However they do not suggest that either of the electrochemical monitors may be used with confidence in lieu of the chemiluminescence monitor to regulate NO at low clinical NO levels (1-5 ppm).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057X9702500205</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9127655</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AINCBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edgecliff: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular system ; Child ; Electrochemistry - instrumentation ; Humans ; Luminescent Measurements ; Medical sciences ; Models, Structural ; Nitric Oxide - analysis ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Vasodilator agents. Cerebral vasodilators ; Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1997-04, Vol.25 (2), p.138-141</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-77d9796c401356d297e0dc607a761c17b8c2763814b15a65ec7868a3d6e8e9743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-77d9796c401356d297e0dc607a761c17b8c2763814b15a65ec7868a3d6e8e9743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2621283$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9127655$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FRAWLEY, G. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIBBALLS, J</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) and an electrochemical monitor (Pulmonox Research and Development Corp) was 0.52 +/- 6.52 ppm (SD). The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were 3.00 to -1.96 ppm and the limits of agreement between the two techniques were 13.56 to -12.52 ppm. The mean difference between the chemiluminescence monitor and another electrochemical monitor (NOxBox, Bedfont Scientific Inc) was -7.27 +/- 4.29 ppm. The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were -9.02 to -5.56 ppm and limits of agreement of the two techniques were -16.13 to 1.55 ppm. These results suggest that electrochemical monitors may be used to guard against potentially toxic concentrations of NO (greater than 20 ppm). However they do not suggest that either of the electrochemical monitors may be used with confidence in lieu of the chemiluminescence monitor to regulate NO at low clinical NO levels (1-5 ppm).</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Electrochemistry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Luminescent Measurements</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Structural</subject><subject>Nitric Oxide - analysis</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Vasodilator agents. Cerebral vasodilators</subject><subject>Ventilators, Mechanical</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gCDk4HV1Jtlkdr2VUj-g4kVB8LCk2axGuh8kW9F_79aWXjzNwPs8w_Aydo5whUh0DRIBFL3mBEIBCFAHbIxpmiUgCA_ZeAMkG-KYncT4CYC5IDVioxwFaaXG7O2xbXzfBt-882EJ3vL225eO3_Apt23dmeBj2_C24v1HcI7XWz5y33DDO-NKb_60L9f0fmWGjFsf7Nr3p-yoMqvoznZzwl5u58-z-2TxdPcwmy4SKwn7hKjMKdc2BZRKlyInB6XVQIY0WqRlZodnZYbpEpXRylnKdGZkqV3mckrlhIntXRvaGIOrii742oSfAqHYFFX8L2qQLrZSt17Wrtwru2aG_HKXm2jNqgqmsT7uMaEFikzKX-1Eb4s</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>FRAWLEY, G. P</creator><creator>TIBBALLS, J</creator><general>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit</title><author>FRAWLEY, G. P ; TIBBALLS, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-77d9796c401356d297e0dc607a761c17b8c2763814b15a65ec7868a3d6e8e9743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Electrochemistry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Luminescent Measurements</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Structural</topic><topic>Nitric Oxide - analysis</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Vasodilator agents. Cerebral vasodilators</topic><topic>Ventilators, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FRAWLEY, G. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TIBBALLS, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FRAWLEY, G. P</au><au>TIBBALLS, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>138-141</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><coden>AINCBS</coden><abstract>Simultaneous measurements of nitric oxide (NO) (0-80 ppm) using a chemiluminescence monitor and two electrochemical monitors were performed during simulated paediatric mechanical ventilation. The mean difference (bias) between the chemiluminescence (Model 42H Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc) and an electrochemical monitor (Pulmonox Research and Development Corp) was 0.52 +/- 6.52 ppm (SD). The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were 3.00 to -1.96 ppm and the limits of agreement between the two techniques were 13.56 to -12.52 ppm. The mean difference between the chemiluminescence monitor and another electrochemical monitor (NOxBox, Bedfont Scientific Inc) was -7.27 +/- 4.29 ppm. The 95% confidence limits of the mean difference were -9.02 to -5.56 ppm and limits of agreement of the two techniques were -16.13 to 1.55 ppm. These results suggest that electrochemical monitors may be used to guard against potentially toxic concentrations of NO (greater than 20 ppm). However they do not suggest that either of the electrochemical monitors may be used with confidence in lieu of the chemiluminescence monitor to regulate NO at low clinical NO levels (1-5 ppm).</abstract><cop>Edgecliff</cop><pub>Anaesthesia and Intensive Care</pub><pmid>9127655</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057X9702500205</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0310-057X |
ispartof | Anaesthesia and intensive care, 1997-04, Vol.25 (2), p.138-141 |
issn | 0310-057X 1448-0271 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0310057X9702500205 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cardiovascular system Child Electrochemistry - instrumentation Humans Luminescent Measurements Medical sciences Models, Structural Nitric Oxide - analysis Pharmacology. Drug treatments Vasodilator agents. Cerebral vasodilators Ventilators, Mechanical |
title | Monitoring nitric oxide : A comparison of three monitors in a paediatric ventilator circuit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T11%3A01%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20nitric%20oxide%20:%20A%20comparison%20of%20three%20monitors%20in%20a%20paediatric%20ventilator%20circuit&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=FRAWLEY,%20G.%20P&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=138-141&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft.coden=AINCBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057X9702500205&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E9127655%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/9127655&rfr_iscdi=true |