Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg

‘Affordable housing’ for Johannesburg’s growing middle class is a developmentalist imperative and potentially lucrative market. However, few greenfield developers have found this market profitable. Fundamental to those who have, is control over land and its development. This paper puts heterodox urb...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment and planning. A 2020-03, Vol.52 (2), p.337-361
1. Verfasser: Butcher, Siân
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 361
container_issue 2
container_start_page 337
container_title Environment and planning. A
container_volume 52
creator Butcher, Siân
description ‘Affordable housing’ for Johannesburg’s growing middle class is a developmentalist imperative and potentially lucrative market. However, few greenfield developers have found this market profitable. Fundamental to those who have, is control over land and its development. This paper puts heterodox urban land rent theory to work vis-à-vis the logics and practices of these developers. I illustrate how greenfield affordable housing developers work to (re)produce differential and monopoly rents in this context. Differential rents rely on investing in cheap land produced through the city’s racialised geography, and controlling land’s development through vertical integration, dynamic negotiations with local government and development finance institutions, and steering money and people into developments. Monopoly rents rely on the power of developers to act together as a class to secure land, give the appearance of competition and lobby the state in their interests. This power is built through racialised control over land and long personal connections. It is also consolidated by the state’s own land development bureaucracy and preference for ‘mega’ developments and recognisable developers. Together, these developer strategies to accrue differential and monopoly rents demonstrate their active role in the everyday making of land and housing markets. They also demand extensions of heterodox urban land rent theory: first, a more articulated understanding of how class monopoly power over land is built through race, and second, a more contingent analysis of capital’s relations to other actors and institutions, especially the state.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0308518X19895278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0308518X19895278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0308518X19895278</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0308518X19895278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-eae8dbfe1af5b7205119e0fbd8035b8659b08d26cf47994ce28a80935d169eb03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LxDAUDKLgunr3mD9QfWmbbeJtWfxkwYuCeClJ89Lt0k3KS1fw39tlPQme5jAfzAxj1wJuhKiqWyhASaE-hFZa5pU6YTNRVnlWlKBP2exAZwf-nF2ktAUAWQo1Y5_LYaA4UGfGLrScMIzcU9zxlhCD77B33HgfyRnbI9_EfZp0d9zhF_ZxQOIDmWbsGky8C_wlbkwImOye2kt25k2f8OoX5-z94f5t9ZStXx-fV8t11hSiHDM0qJz1KIyXtspBCqERvHUKCmnVQmoLyuWLxpeV1mWDuTIKdCGdWGi0UMwZHHMbiikR-nqaszP0XQuoD9_Uf7-ZLNnRkkyL9TbuKUwN_9f_APzIZjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Butcher, Siân</creator><creatorcontrib>Butcher, Siân</creatorcontrib><description>‘Affordable housing’ for Johannesburg’s growing middle class is a developmentalist imperative and potentially lucrative market. However, few greenfield developers have found this market profitable. Fundamental to those who have, is control over land and its development. This paper puts heterodox urban land rent theory to work vis-à-vis the logics and practices of these developers. I illustrate how greenfield affordable housing developers work to (re)produce differential and monopoly rents in this context. Differential rents rely on investing in cheap land produced through the city’s racialised geography, and controlling land’s development through vertical integration, dynamic negotiations with local government and development finance institutions, and steering money and people into developments. Monopoly rents rely on the power of developers to act together as a class to secure land, give the appearance of competition and lobby the state in their interests. This power is built through racialised control over land and long personal connections. It is also consolidated by the state’s own land development bureaucracy and preference for ‘mega’ developments and recognisable developers. Together, these developer strategies to accrue differential and monopoly rents demonstrate their active role in the everyday making of land and housing markets. They also demand extensions of heterodox urban land rent theory: first, a more articulated understanding of how class monopoly power over land is built through race, and second, a more contingent analysis of capital’s relations to other actors and institutions, especially the state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-518X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0308518X19895278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Environment and planning. A, 2020-03, Vol.52 (2), p.337-361</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-eae8dbfe1af5b7205119e0fbd8035b8659b08d26cf47994ce28a80935d169eb03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-eae8dbfe1af5b7205119e0fbd8035b8659b08d26cf47994ce28a80935d169eb03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4978-6991</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0308518X19895278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X19895278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butcher, Siân</creatorcontrib><title>Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg</title><title>Environment and planning. A</title><description>‘Affordable housing’ for Johannesburg’s growing middle class is a developmentalist imperative and potentially lucrative market. However, few greenfield developers have found this market profitable. Fundamental to those who have, is control over land and its development. This paper puts heterodox urban land rent theory to work vis-à-vis the logics and practices of these developers. I illustrate how greenfield affordable housing developers work to (re)produce differential and monopoly rents in this context. Differential rents rely on investing in cheap land produced through the city’s racialised geography, and controlling land’s development through vertical integration, dynamic negotiations with local government and development finance institutions, and steering money and people into developments. Monopoly rents rely on the power of developers to act together as a class to secure land, give the appearance of competition and lobby the state in their interests. This power is built through racialised control over land and long personal connections. It is also consolidated by the state’s own land development bureaucracy and preference for ‘mega’ developments and recognisable developers. Together, these developer strategies to accrue differential and monopoly rents demonstrate their active role in the everyday making of land and housing markets. They also demand extensions of heterodox urban land rent theory: first, a more articulated understanding of how class monopoly power over land is built through race, and second, a more contingent analysis of capital’s relations to other actors and institutions, especially the state.</description><issn>0308-518X</issn><issn>1472-3409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1LxDAUDKLgunr3mD9QfWmbbeJtWfxkwYuCeClJ89Lt0k3KS1fw39tlPQme5jAfzAxj1wJuhKiqWyhASaE-hFZa5pU6YTNRVnlWlKBP2exAZwf-nF2ktAUAWQo1Y5_LYaA4UGfGLrScMIzcU9zxlhCD77B33HgfyRnbI9_EfZp0d9zhF_ZxQOIDmWbsGky8C_wlbkwImOye2kt25k2f8OoX5-z94f5t9ZStXx-fV8t11hSiHDM0qJz1KIyXtspBCqERvHUKCmnVQmoLyuWLxpeV1mWDuTIKdCGdWGi0UMwZHHMbiikR-nqaszP0XQuoD9_Uf7-ZLNnRkkyL9TbuKUwN_9f_APzIZjg</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Butcher, Siân</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-6991</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg</title><author>Butcher, Siân</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-eae8dbfe1af5b7205119e0fbd8035b8659b08d26cf47994ce28a80935d169eb03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butcher, Siân</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environment and planning. A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butcher, Siân</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg</atitle><jtitle>Environment and planning. A</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>361</epage><pages>337-361</pages><issn>0308-518X</issn><eissn>1472-3409</eissn><abstract>‘Affordable housing’ for Johannesburg’s growing middle class is a developmentalist imperative and potentially lucrative market. However, few greenfield developers have found this market profitable. Fundamental to those who have, is control over land and its development. This paper puts heterodox urban land rent theory to work vis-à-vis the logics and practices of these developers. I illustrate how greenfield affordable housing developers work to (re)produce differential and monopoly rents in this context. Differential rents rely on investing in cheap land produced through the city’s racialised geography, and controlling land’s development through vertical integration, dynamic negotiations with local government and development finance institutions, and steering money and people into developments. Monopoly rents rely on the power of developers to act together as a class to secure land, give the appearance of competition and lobby the state in their interests. This power is built through racialised control over land and long personal connections. It is also consolidated by the state’s own land development bureaucracy and preference for ‘mega’ developments and recognisable developers. Together, these developer strategies to accrue differential and monopoly rents demonstrate their active role in the everyday making of land and housing markets. They also demand extensions of heterodox urban land rent theory: first, a more articulated understanding of how class monopoly power over land is built through race, and second, a more contingent analysis of capital’s relations to other actors and institutions, especially the state.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0308518X19895278</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-6991</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-518X
ispartof Environment and planning. A, 2020-03, Vol.52 (2), p.337-361
issn 0308-518X
1472-3409
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0308518X19895278
source Access via SAGE
title Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T02%3A10%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appropriating%20rent%20from%20greenfield%20affordable%20housing:%20developer%20practices%20in%20Johannesburg&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20planning.%20A&rft.au=Butcher,%20Si%C3%A2n&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=361&rft.pages=337-361&rft.issn=0308-518X&rft.eissn=1472-3409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0308518X19895278&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0308518X19895278%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0308518X19895278&rfr_iscdi=true