Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa

As the housing bubble burst in overheated property markets around the world, South Africa’s so-called ‘affordable housing market’ appeared to be bucking the trend. From 2010, affordable housing prices were rising and selling quickly, especially in Gauteng, Johannesburg’s city-region, chronically sho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment and planning. A 2020-02, Vol.52 (1), p.173-199
1. Verfasser: Butcher, Siân
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 199
container_issue 1
container_start_page 173
container_title Environment and planning. A
container_volume 52
creator Butcher, Siân
description As the housing bubble burst in overheated property markets around the world, South Africa’s so-called ‘affordable housing market’ appeared to be bucking the trend. From 2010, affordable housing prices were rising and selling quickly, especially in Gauteng, Johannesburg’s city-region, chronically short of actually affordable housing and with a growing black middle class. Touted as ‘SA’s best-kept investment secret’, the affordable housing market offered a lifeline to the property industry and the potential to democratize segregated property markets. Yet, in practice, the tapping of South Africa’s lower-income housing market by capital has been a limited one, narrowly catering to particular subjects and spaces. Drawing on heterodox approaches to ‘actually existing markets’ and qualitative fieldwork conducted in Johannesburg between 2012 and 2013, this paper traces how the boundaries of the affordable housing and mortgage submarket are produced and shift through the investments of multiple communities with their own theories of housing markets and different interests in ‘making the market work’. Despite these investments and contestations, the submarket is narrowly territorialized within developer-driven housing largely in Gauteng for public-sector workers, to optimize the market within mortgage capital’s frameworks of risk, return, race and space. The South African mortgaged affordable housing submarket is not so much in need of market information or constitutive of a new frontier of global finance, as a territorial fix for domestic capital vis-à-vis development imperatives. To investigate struggles over this submarket, I draw together socio-institutional approaches to markets with critical political economy of housing markets and put them into conversation with critical development studies scholarship on markets. This combination allows us to make space for multiple projects of ‘improvement’ and profit in our analyses of market-making, as well as how these are shaped by, and shape, space and conjuncture. I seek to contribute to a growing literature on the geographies of markets from a Global South context where housing is framed as both a market good and constitutional right by examining a case of apparent ‘market failure’.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0308518X19885391
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0308518X19885391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0308518X19885391</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0308518X19885391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-c6e47ba0516e66806405fc9b22ca26ecf83d63f4f8f3fb221f932ee0da9d78863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxDAUhIMoWFfvHvMDrCZNm6belqKrsOBBBW_lNX1ps9Z2SdKDHvzttqwnwdODb2YewxByydk153l-wwRTGVdvvFAqEwU_IhFP8yQWKSuOSbTI8aKfkjPvd4yxLOUqIt-lQwh2aCnQFvY0dBCohoHWSI3te2xuaTkOPrhJH2xDQwM6Z8PoLPT2a4GhQwrGjK6BukfajZNfsJ_qD3DvGKgd6AamgEN7RZ_HKXR0bZzVcE5ODPQeL37virze372UD_H2afNYrrexFjwNsZaY5jWwjEuUUjGZsszook4SDYlEbZRopDCpUUaYmXJTiASRNVA0uVJSrAg7_NVu9N6hqfbOzt0-K86qZb_q735zJD5EPLRY7cbJDXPD__0_i19ySw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Butcher, Siân</creator><creatorcontrib>Butcher, Siân</creatorcontrib><description>As the housing bubble burst in overheated property markets around the world, South Africa’s so-called ‘affordable housing market’ appeared to be bucking the trend. From 2010, affordable housing prices were rising and selling quickly, especially in Gauteng, Johannesburg’s city-region, chronically short of actually affordable housing and with a growing black middle class. Touted as ‘SA’s best-kept investment secret’, the affordable housing market offered a lifeline to the property industry and the potential to democratize segregated property markets. Yet, in practice, the tapping of South Africa’s lower-income housing market by capital has been a limited one, narrowly catering to particular subjects and spaces. Drawing on heterodox approaches to ‘actually existing markets’ and qualitative fieldwork conducted in Johannesburg between 2012 and 2013, this paper traces how the boundaries of the affordable housing and mortgage submarket are produced and shift through the investments of multiple communities with their own theories of housing markets and different interests in ‘making the market work’. Despite these investments and contestations, the submarket is narrowly territorialized within developer-driven housing largely in Gauteng for public-sector workers, to optimize the market within mortgage capital’s frameworks of risk, return, race and space. The South African mortgaged affordable housing submarket is not so much in need of market information or constitutive of a new frontier of global finance, as a territorial fix for domestic capital vis-à-vis development imperatives. To investigate struggles over this submarket, I draw together socio-institutional approaches to markets with critical political economy of housing markets and put them into conversation with critical development studies scholarship on markets. This combination allows us to make space for multiple projects of ‘improvement’ and profit in our analyses of market-making, as well as how these are shaped by, and shape, space and conjuncture. I seek to contribute to a growing literature on the geographies of markets from a Global South context where housing is framed as both a market good and constitutional right by examining a case of apparent ‘market failure’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-518X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0308518X19885391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Environment and planning. A, 2020-02, Vol.52 (1), p.173-199</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-c6e47ba0516e66806405fc9b22ca26ecf83d63f4f8f3fb221f932ee0da9d78863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-c6e47ba0516e66806405fc9b22ca26ecf83d63f4f8f3fb221f932ee0da9d78863</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4978-6991</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0308518X19885391$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0308518X19885391$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butcher, Siân</creatorcontrib><title>Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa</title><title>Environment and planning. A</title><description>As the housing bubble burst in overheated property markets around the world, South Africa’s so-called ‘affordable housing market’ appeared to be bucking the trend. From 2010, affordable housing prices were rising and selling quickly, especially in Gauteng, Johannesburg’s city-region, chronically short of actually affordable housing and with a growing black middle class. Touted as ‘SA’s best-kept investment secret’, the affordable housing market offered a lifeline to the property industry and the potential to democratize segregated property markets. Yet, in practice, the tapping of South Africa’s lower-income housing market by capital has been a limited one, narrowly catering to particular subjects and spaces. Drawing on heterodox approaches to ‘actually existing markets’ and qualitative fieldwork conducted in Johannesburg between 2012 and 2013, this paper traces how the boundaries of the affordable housing and mortgage submarket are produced and shift through the investments of multiple communities with their own theories of housing markets and different interests in ‘making the market work’. Despite these investments and contestations, the submarket is narrowly territorialized within developer-driven housing largely in Gauteng for public-sector workers, to optimize the market within mortgage capital’s frameworks of risk, return, race and space. The South African mortgaged affordable housing submarket is not so much in need of market information or constitutive of a new frontier of global finance, as a territorial fix for domestic capital vis-à-vis development imperatives. To investigate struggles over this submarket, I draw together socio-institutional approaches to markets with critical political economy of housing markets and put them into conversation with critical development studies scholarship on markets. This combination allows us to make space for multiple projects of ‘improvement’ and profit in our analyses of market-making, as well as how these are shaped by, and shape, space and conjuncture. I seek to contribute to a growing literature on the geographies of markets from a Global South context where housing is framed as both a market good and constitutional right by examining a case of apparent ‘market failure’.</description><issn>0308-518X</issn><issn>1472-3409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLxDAUhIMoWFfvHvMDrCZNm6belqKrsOBBBW_lNX1ps9Z2SdKDHvzttqwnwdODb2YewxByydk153l-wwRTGVdvvFAqEwU_IhFP8yQWKSuOSbTI8aKfkjPvd4yxLOUqIt-lQwh2aCnQFvY0dBCohoHWSI3te2xuaTkOPrhJH2xDQwM6Z8PoLPT2a4GhQwrGjK6BukfajZNfsJ_qD3DvGKgd6AamgEN7RZ_HKXR0bZzVcE5ODPQeL37virze372UD_H2afNYrrexFjwNsZaY5jWwjEuUUjGZsszook4SDYlEbZRopDCpUUaYmXJTiASRNVA0uVJSrAg7_NVu9N6hqfbOzt0-K86qZb_q735zJD5EPLRY7cbJDXPD__0_i19ySw</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Butcher, Siân</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-6991</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa</title><author>Butcher, Siân</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-c6e47ba0516e66806405fc9b22ca26ecf83d63f4f8f3fb221f932ee0da9d78863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butcher, Siân</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environment and planning. A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butcher, Siân</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Environment and planning. A</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>173-199</pages><issn>0308-518X</issn><eissn>1472-3409</eissn><abstract>As the housing bubble burst in overheated property markets around the world, South Africa’s so-called ‘affordable housing market’ appeared to be bucking the trend. From 2010, affordable housing prices were rising and selling quickly, especially in Gauteng, Johannesburg’s city-region, chronically short of actually affordable housing and with a growing black middle class. Touted as ‘SA’s best-kept investment secret’, the affordable housing market offered a lifeline to the property industry and the potential to democratize segregated property markets. Yet, in practice, the tapping of South Africa’s lower-income housing market by capital has been a limited one, narrowly catering to particular subjects and spaces. Drawing on heterodox approaches to ‘actually existing markets’ and qualitative fieldwork conducted in Johannesburg between 2012 and 2013, this paper traces how the boundaries of the affordable housing and mortgage submarket are produced and shift through the investments of multiple communities with their own theories of housing markets and different interests in ‘making the market work’. Despite these investments and contestations, the submarket is narrowly territorialized within developer-driven housing largely in Gauteng for public-sector workers, to optimize the market within mortgage capital’s frameworks of risk, return, race and space. The South African mortgaged affordable housing submarket is not so much in need of market information or constitutive of a new frontier of global finance, as a territorial fix for domestic capital vis-à-vis development imperatives. To investigate struggles over this submarket, I draw together socio-institutional approaches to markets with critical political economy of housing markets and put them into conversation with critical development studies scholarship on markets. This combination allows us to make space for multiple projects of ‘improvement’ and profit in our analyses of market-making, as well as how these are shaped by, and shape, space and conjuncture. I seek to contribute to a growing literature on the geographies of markets from a Global South context where housing is framed as both a market good and constitutional right by examining a case of apparent ‘market failure’.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0308518X19885391</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-6991</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-518X
ispartof Environment and planning. A, 2020-02, Vol.52 (1), p.173-199
issn 0308-518X
1472-3409
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0308518X19885391
source Access via SAGE
title Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T19%3A48%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Creating%20a%20gap%20that%20can%20be%20filled:%20Constructing%20and%20territorializing%20the%20affordable%20housing%20submarket%20in%20Gauteng,%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20planning.%20A&rft.au=Butcher,%20Si%C3%A2n&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=173-199&rft.issn=0308-518X&rft.eissn=1472-3409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0308518X19885391&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0308518X19885391%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0308518X19885391&rfr_iscdi=true