Do objectiue Estimates of chances for Survival Influence Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Treatment?

Do objectiue Estimates of chances for Survival Influence Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Treatment?

The authors studied the impact on clinical decision making of providing feedback of objective prognostic information describing the probability of survival for ICU patients with multiple organ system failure (OSF). The prognostic estimates, derived from a control period (1), were to be provided on a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical decision making 1990-08, Vol.10 (3), p.163-171
Hauptverfasser: Knaus, William A., Rauss, Alain, Alperovitch, Annick, Le Gall, Jean-Roger, Loirat, Philippe, Patois, Elizabeth, Marcus, Stephen E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 171
container_issue 3
container_start_page 163
container_title Medical decision making
container_volume 10
creator Knaus, William A.
Rauss, Alain
Alperovitch, Annick
Le Gall, Jean-Roger
Loirat, Philippe
Patois, Elizabeth
Marcus, Stephen E.
description The authors studied the impact on clinical decision making of providing feedback of objective prognostic information describing the probability of survival for ICU patients with multiple organ system failure (OSF). The prognostic estimates, derived from a control period (1), were to be provided on a daily basis to physicians providing treatment in 25 French ICUs during a subsequent experimental period (2). The types of, frequencies of, and reasons for decisions to limit or stop treatment in the two periods were compared. In the experimental period 2, 17 ICUs participated in the feedback study. Within these 17 units, there was a small but significant (p
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0272989X9001000303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0272989X9001000303</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0272989X9001000303</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0272989X9001000303</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-ee89e66148a783c9065638ca83cafed7f2f707cc2f5e18ea10dba3745cb2e1a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFO-wNpJ9k-yJ5G2aqHgwYq9LdnsxG7ZbiTJVvz2Zqk3wdM8ht8b5j1CbhncMSbEDLjgpSy3JQADgBTSMzJhec6TQrLtOZmMQDISl-TK-33EslJmE4ILS229Rx3aAenSh_agAnpqDdU71esojXX0dXDH9qg6uupNN2Dc0wXq1re29zRY-t6G3c52DY3sqBunvujGoQoH7MP9NbkwqvN48zun5O1xuZk_J-uXp9X8YZ1oDhASRFliUbBMKiFTXUKRF6nUKmplsBGGGwFCa25yZBIVg6ZWqchyXXNkKk-nhJ_uame9d2iqTxcDue-KQTUWVf0tKppmJ5NXH1jt7eD6-ON_jh-lLWrB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do objectiue Estimates of chances for Survival Influence Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Treatment?</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Knaus, William A. ; Rauss, Alain ; Alperovitch, Annick ; Le Gall, Jean-Roger ; Loirat, Philippe ; Patois, Elizabeth ; Marcus, Stephen E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knaus, William A. ; Rauss, Alain ; Alperovitch, Annick ; Le Gall, Jean-Roger ; Loirat, Philippe ; Patois, Elizabeth ; Marcus, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors studied the impact on clinical decision making of providing feedback of objective prognostic information describing the probability of survival for ICU patients with multiple organ system failure (OSF). The prognostic estimates, derived from a control period (1), were to be provided on a daily basis to physicians providing treatment in 25 French ICUs during a subsequent experimental period (2). The types of, frequencies of, and reasons for decisions to limit or stop treatment in the two periods were compared. In the experimental period 2, 17 ICUs participated in the feedback study. Within these 17 units, there was a small but significant (p &lt;0.05) increase in decisions to stop active treatment and provide comfort care that was limited to patients with three or more OSFs. There was no change in decision making in the eight units that did not participate in the feedback study. Although these results suggest a direct causal relationship between the provision of objective prog nostic data and changes in physician decision making, the small increase in comfort care decisions (n = 14) between period 1 and period 2 and the fact that only 17 of the 25 original units participated in the feedback study make it difficult to eliminate other influences. There was no indication in this study, however, that explicit provision of prognostic data led to a sense of therapeutic futility. Key words: prediction; feedback; outcome; prognosis; organ system failure; treatment decisions. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:163-171)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-989X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-681X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><ispartof>Medical decision making, 1990-08, Vol.10 (3), p.163-171</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-ee89e66148a783c9065638ca83cafed7f2f707cc2f5e18ea10dba3745cb2e1a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-ee89e66148a783c9065638ca83cafed7f2f707cc2f5e18ea10dba3745cb2e1a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0272989X9001000303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9001000303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knaus, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauss, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alperovitch, Annick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Gall, Jean-Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loirat, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patois, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><title>Do objectiue Estimates of chances for Survival Influence Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Treatment?</title><title>Medical decision making</title><description>The authors studied the impact on clinical decision making of providing feedback of objective prognostic information describing the probability of survival for ICU patients with multiple organ system failure (OSF). The prognostic estimates, derived from a control period (1), were to be provided on a daily basis to physicians providing treatment in 25 French ICUs during a subsequent experimental period (2). The types of, frequencies of, and reasons for decisions to limit or stop treatment in the two periods were compared. In the experimental period 2, 17 ICUs participated in the feedback study. Within these 17 units, there was a small but significant (p &lt;0.05) increase in decisions to stop active treatment and provide comfort care that was limited to patients with three or more OSFs. There was no change in decision making in the eight units that did not participate in the feedback study. Although these results suggest a direct causal relationship between the provision of objective prog nostic data and changes in physician decision making, the small increase in comfort care decisions (n = 14) between period 1 and period 2 and the fact that only 17 of the 25 original units participated in the feedback study make it difficult to eliminate other influences. There was no indication in this study, however, that explicit provision of prognostic data led to a sense of therapeutic futility. Key words: prediction; feedback; outcome; prognosis; organ system failure; treatment decisions. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:163-171)</description><issn>0272-989X</issn><issn>1552-681X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFO-wNpJ9k-yJ5G2aqHgwYq9LdnsxG7ZbiTJVvz2Zqk3wdM8ht8b5j1CbhncMSbEDLjgpSy3JQADgBTSMzJhec6TQrLtOZmMQDISl-TK-33EslJmE4ILS229Rx3aAenSh_agAnpqDdU71esojXX0dXDH9qg6uupNN2Dc0wXq1re29zRY-t6G3c52DY3sqBunvujGoQoH7MP9NbkwqvN48zun5O1xuZk_J-uXp9X8YZ1oDhASRFliUbBMKiFTXUKRF6nUKmplsBGGGwFCa25yZBIVg6ZWqchyXXNkKk-nhJ_uame9d2iqTxcDue-KQTUWVf0tKppmJ5NXH1jt7eD6-ON_jh-lLWrB</recordid><startdate>199008</startdate><enddate>199008</enddate><creator>Knaus, William A.</creator><creator>Rauss, Alain</creator><creator>Alperovitch, Annick</creator><creator>Le Gall, Jean-Roger</creator><creator>Loirat, Philippe</creator><creator>Patois, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Marcus, Stephen E.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199008</creationdate><title>Do objectiue Estimates of chances for Survival Influence Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Treatment?</title><author>Knaus, William A. ; Rauss, Alain ; Alperovitch, Annick ; Le Gall, Jean-Roger ; Loirat, Philippe ; Patois, Elizabeth ; Marcus, Stephen E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-ee89e66148a783c9065638ca83cafed7f2f707cc2f5e18ea10dba3745cb2e1a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knaus, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauss, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alperovitch, Annick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Gall, Jean-Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loirat, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patois, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcus, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical decision making</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knaus, William A.</au><au>Rauss, Alain</au><au>Alperovitch, Annick</au><au>Le Gall, Jean-Roger</au><au>Loirat, Philippe</au><au>Patois, Elizabeth</au><au>Marcus, Stephen E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do objectiue Estimates of chances for Survival Influence Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Treatment?</atitle><jtitle>Medical decision making</jtitle><date>1990-08</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>163-171</pages><issn>0272-989X</issn><eissn>1552-681X</eissn><abstract>The authors studied the impact on clinical decision making of providing feedback of objective prognostic information describing the probability of survival for ICU patients with multiple organ system failure (OSF). The prognostic estimates, derived from a control period (1), were to be provided on a daily basis to physicians providing treatment in 25 French ICUs during a subsequent experimental period (2). The types of, frequencies of, and reasons for decisions to limit or stop treatment in the two periods were compared. In the experimental period 2, 17 ICUs participated in the feedback study. Within these 17 units, there was a small but significant (p &lt;0.05) increase in decisions to stop active treatment and provide comfort care that was limited to patients with three or more OSFs. There was no change in decision making in the eight units that did not participate in the feedback study. Although these results suggest a direct causal relationship between the provision of objective prog nostic data and changes in physician decision making, the small increase in comfort care decisions (n = 14) between period 1 and period 2 and the fact that only 17 of the 25 original units participated in the feedback study make it difficult to eliminate other influences. There was no indication in this study, however, that explicit provision of prognostic data led to a sense of therapeutic futility. Key words: prediction; feedback; outcome; prognosis; organ system failure; treatment decisions. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:163-171)</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0272989X9001000303</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-989X
ispartof Medical decision making, 1990-08, Vol.10 (3), p.163-171
issn 0272-989X
1552-681X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0272989X9001000303
source SAGE Complete
title Do objectiue Estimates of chances for Survival Influence Decisions to Withhold or Withdraw Treatment?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20objectiue%20Estimates%20of%20chances%20for%20Survival%20Influence%20Decisions%20to%20Withhold%20or%20Withdraw%20Treatment?&rft.jtitle=Medical%20decision%20making&rft.au=Knaus,%20William%20A.&rft.date=1990-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=163-171&rft.issn=0272-989X&rft.eissn=1552-681X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0272989X9001000303&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0272989X9001000303%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0272989X9001000303&rfr_iscdi=true