Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain

To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical decision making 1986-02, Vol.6 (1), p.12-17
Hauptverfasser: Tierney, William M., Fitzgerald, John, McHenry, Ross, Roth, Bruce J., Psaty, Bruce, Stump, David L., Anderson, F. Kim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12
container_title Medical decision making
container_volume 6
creator Tierney, William M.
Fitzgerald, John
McHenry, Ross
Roth, Bruce J.
Psaty, Bruce
Stump, David L.
Anderson, F. Kim
description To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30% of them to intensive care: 53 of the 61 patients with infarctions (sensitivity = 87%) and 96 of the 431 without infarctions (specificity = 78%). Overall, 36% of those admitted had infarctions. The physicians' numeric estimate of the probability of infarction was a good univariate discriminator of infarction, as demonstrated by Receiver Operator Characteristics analysis, and, as indicated by their actual operating point, they seemed to maximize the accuracy of patient classification rather than sensitivity or specificity. Logistic regression analysis identified the physicians' probability estimate as the strongest multivariate predictor of infarction, considering all other clinical information available. Key words: probability; prediction; myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 6:12-17, 1986)
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0272989X8600600103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0272989X8600600103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0272989X8600600103</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0272989X8600600103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-15f66c8c74305e1d9a330b06dfe8991d1496e0a71b51705a7eb2fd41e16d4c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFNuntZm9l92j1qqFir20ENvSzY76aZsE0kist_eLPUmCAMDj98b3jxC7oE9AnC-YClP66reVyVjcYBlF2QGRZEmZQX7SzKbgGQirsmN98eI5HWVz8iw7UevpRbGP9CVD_okAnpqFQ090q2zrWj1oMM4Se-jlcJ1Wgx0bZRwMmhrqDZ0dUJ3QCNH-mztiW5F0GiCp9869FT26EPUtLklV0oMHu9-95zsXla75Vuy-XhdL582iUwZCwkUqixlJXmesQKhq0WWsZaVncKqrqGL0UtkgkNbAGeF4NimqssBoexyCdmcpOez0lnvHarm08W_3NgAa6a6mr91RdPibPLigM3RfjkTI_7n-AEXMmv2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Tierney, William M. ; Fitzgerald, John ; McHenry, Ross ; Roth, Bruce J. ; Psaty, Bruce ; Stump, David L. ; Anderson, F. Kim</creator><creatorcontrib>Tierney, William M. ; Fitzgerald, John ; McHenry, Ross ; Roth, Bruce J. ; Psaty, Bruce ; Stump, David L. ; Anderson, F. Kim</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30% of them to intensive care: 53 of the 61 patients with infarctions (sensitivity = 87%) and 96 of the 431 without infarctions (specificity = 78%). Overall, 36% of those admitted had infarctions. The physicians' numeric estimate of the probability of infarction was a good univariate discriminator of infarction, as demonstrated by Receiver Operator Characteristics analysis, and, as indicated by their actual operating point, they seemed to maximize the accuracy of patient classification rather than sensitivity or specificity. Logistic regression analysis identified the physicians' probability estimate as the strongest multivariate predictor of infarction, considering all other clinical information available. Key words: probability; prediction; myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 6:12-17, 1986)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-989X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-681X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8600600103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><ispartof>Medical decision making, 1986-02, Vol.6 (1), p.12-17</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-15f66c8c74305e1d9a330b06dfe8991d1496e0a71b51705a7eb2fd41e16d4c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-15f66c8c74305e1d9a330b06dfe8991d1496e0a71b51705a7eb2fd41e16d4c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0272989X8600600103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8600600103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tierney, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHenry, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psaty, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stump, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, F. Kim</creatorcontrib><title>Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain</title><title>Medical decision making</title><description>To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30% of them to intensive care: 53 of the 61 patients with infarctions (sensitivity = 87%) and 96 of the 431 without infarctions (specificity = 78%). Overall, 36% of those admitted had infarctions. The physicians' numeric estimate of the probability of infarction was a good univariate discriminator of infarction, as demonstrated by Receiver Operator Characteristics analysis, and, as indicated by their actual operating point, they seemed to maximize the accuracy of patient classification rather than sensitivity or specificity. Logistic regression analysis identified the physicians' probability estimate as the strongest multivariate predictor of infarction, considering all other clinical information available. Key words: probability; prediction; myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 6:12-17, 1986)</description><issn>0272-989X</issn><issn>1552-681X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFNuntZm9l92j1qqFir20ENvSzY76aZsE0kist_eLPUmCAMDj98b3jxC7oE9AnC-YClP66reVyVjcYBlF2QGRZEmZQX7SzKbgGQirsmN98eI5HWVz8iw7UevpRbGP9CVD_okAnpqFQ090q2zrWj1oMM4Se-jlcJ1Wgx0bZRwMmhrqDZ0dUJ3QCNH-mztiW5F0GiCp9869FT26EPUtLklV0oMHu9-95zsXla75Vuy-XhdL582iUwZCwkUqixlJXmesQKhq0WWsZaVncKqrqGL0UtkgkNbAGeF4NimqssBoexyCdmcpOez0lnvHarm08W_3NgAa6a6mr91RdPibPLigM3RfjkTI_7n-AEXMmv2</recordid><startdate>198602</startdate><enddate>198602</enddate><creator>Tierney, William M.</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, John</creator><creator>McHenry, Ross</creator><creator>Roth, Bruce J.</creator><creator>Psaty, Bruce</creator><creator>Stump, David L.</creator><creator>Anderson, F. Kim</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198602</creationdate><title>Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain</title><author>Tierney, William M. ; Fitzgerald, John ; McHenry, Ross ; Roth, Bruce J. ; Psaty, Bruce ; Stump, David L. ; Anderson, F. Kim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-15f66c8c74305e1d9a330b06dfe8991d1496e0a71b51705a7eb2fd41e16d4c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tierney, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHenry, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psaty, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stump, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, F. Kim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical decision making</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tierney, William M.</au><au>Fitzgerald, John</au><au>McHenry, Ross</au><au>Roth, Bruce J.</au><au>Psaty, Bruce</au><au>Stump, David L.</au><au>Anderson, F. Kim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain</atitle><jtitle>Medical decision making</jtitle><date>1986-02</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>12-17</pages><issn>0272-989X</issn><eissn>1552-681X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30% of them to intensive care: 53 of the 61 patients with infarctions (sensitivity = 87%) and 96 of the 431 without infarctions (specificity = 78%). Overall, 36% of those admitted had infarctions. The physicians' numeric estimate of the probability of infarction was a good univariate discriminator of infarction, as demonstrated by Receiver Operator Characteristics analysis, and, as indicated by their actual operating point, they seemed to maximize the accuracy of patient classification rather than sensitivity or specificity. Logistic regression analysis identified the physicians' probability estimate as the strongest multivariate predictor of infarction, considering all other clinical information available. Key words: probability; prediction; myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 6:12-17, 1986)</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0272989X8600600103</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-989X
ispartof Medical decision making, 1986-02, Vol.6 (1), p.12-17
issn 0272-989X
1552-681X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0272989X8600600103
source SAGE Complete
title Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A33%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physicians'%20Estimates%20of%20the%20Probability%20of%20Myocardial%20Infarction%20in%20Emergency%20Boom%20Patients%20with%20chest%20Pain&rft.jtitle=Medical%20decision%20making&rft.au=Tierney,%20William%20M.&rft.date=1986-02&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=12-17&rft.issn=0272-989X&rft.eissn=1552-681X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0272989X8600600103&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0272989X8600600103%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0272989X8600600103&rfr_iscdi=true