Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain
To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical decision making 1986-02, Vol.6 (1), p.12-17 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12 |
container_title | Medical decision making |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Tierney, William M. Fitzgerald, John McHenry, Ross Roth, Bruce J. Psaty, Bruce Stump, David L. Anderson, F. Kim |
description | To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30% of them to intensive care: 53 of the 61 patients with infarctions (sensitivity = 87%) and 96 of the 431 without infarctions (specificity = 78%). Overall, 36% of those admitted had infarctions. The physicians' numeric estimate of the probability of infarction was a good univariate discriminator of infarction, as demonstrated by Receiver Operator Characteristics analysis, and, as indicated by their actual operating point, they seemed to maximize the accuracy of patient classification rather than sensitivity or specificity. Logistic regression analysis identified the physicians' probability estimate as the strongest multivariate predictor of infarction, considering all other clinical information available. Key words: probability; prediction; myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 6:12-17, 1986) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0272989X8600600103 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0272989X8600600103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0272989X8600600103</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0272989X8600600103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-15f66c8c74305e1d9a330b06dfe8991d1496e0a71b51705a7eb2fd41e16d4c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFNuntZm9l92j1qqFir20ENvSzY76aZsE0kist_eLPUmCAMDj98b3jxC7oE9AnC-YClP66reVyVjcYBlF2QGRZEmZQX7SzKbgGQirsmN98eI5HWVz8iw7UevpRbGP9CVD_okAnpqFQ090q2zrWj1oMM4Se-jlcJ1Wgx0bZRwMmhrqDZ0dUJ3QCNH-mztiW5F0GiCp9869FT26EPUtLklV0oMHu9-95zsXla75Vuy-XhdL582iUwZCwkUqixlJXmesQKhq0WWsZaVncKqrqGL0UtkgkNbAGeF4NimqssBoexyCdmcpOez0lnvHarm08W_3NgAa6a6mr91RdPibPLigM3RfjkTI_7n-AEXMmv2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Tierney, William M. ; Fitzgerald, John ; McHenry, Ross ; Roth, Bruce J. ; Psaty, Bruce ; Stump, David L. ; Anderson, F. Kim</creator><creatorcontrib>Tierney, William M. ; Fitzgerald, John ; McHenry, Ross ; Roth, Bruce J. ; Psaty, Bruce ; Stump, David L. ; Anderson, F. Kim</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30% of them to intensive care: 53 of the 61 patients with infarctions (sensitivity = 87%) and 96 of the 431 without infarctions (specificity = 78%). Overall, 36% of those admitted had infarctions. The physicians' numeric estimate of the probability of infarction was a good univariate discriminator of infarction, as demonstrated by Receiver Operator Characteristics analysis, and, as indicated by their actual operating point, they seemed to maximize the accuracy of patient classification rather than sensitivity or specificity. Logistic regression analysis identified the physicians' probability estimate as the strongest multivariate predictor of infarction, considering all other clinical information available. Key words: probability; prediction; myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 6:12-17, 1986)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-989X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-681X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8600600103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><ispartof>Medical decision making, 1986-02, Vol.6 (1), p.12-17</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-15f66c8c74305e1d9a330b06dfe8991d1496e0a71b51705a7eb2fd41e16d4c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-15f66c8c74305e1d9a330b06dfe8991d1496e0a71b51705a7eb2fd41e16d4c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0272989X8600600103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8600600103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tierney, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHenry, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psaty, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stump, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, F. Kim</creatorcontrib><title>Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain</title><title>Medical decision making</title><description>To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30% of them to intensive care: 53 of the 61 patients with infarctions (sensitivity = 87%) and 96 of the 431 without infarctions (specificity = 78%). Overall, 36% of those admitted had infarctions. The physicians' numeric estimate of the probability of infarction was a good univariate discriminator of infarction, as demonstrated by Receiver Operator Characteristics analysis, and, as indicated by their actual operating point, they seemed to maximize the accuracy of patient classification rather than sensitivity or specificity. Logistic regression analysis identified the physicians' probability estimate as the strongest multivariate predictor of infarction, considering all other clinical information available. Key words: probability; prediction; myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 6:12-17, 1986)</description><issn>0272-989X</issn><issn>1552-681X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFNuntZm9l92j1qqFir20ENvSzY76aZsE0kist_eLPUmCAMDj98b3jxC7oE9AnC-YClP66reVyVjcYBlF2QGRZEmZQX7SzKbgGQirsmN98eI5HWVz8iw7UevpRbGP9CVD_okAnpqFQ090q2zrWj1oMM4Se-jlcJ1Wgx0bZRwMmhrqDZ0dUJ3QCNH-mztiW5F0GiCp9869FT26EPUtLklV0oMHu9-95zsXla75Vuy-XhdL582iUwZCwkUqixlJXmesQKhq0WWsZaVncKqrqGL0UtkgkNbAGeF4NimqssBoexyCdmcpOez0lnvHarm08W_3NgAa6a6mr91RdPibPLigM3RfjkTI_7n-AEXMmv2</recordid><startdate>198602</startdate><enddate>198602</enddate><creator>Tierney, William M.</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, John</creator><creator>McHenry, Ross</creator><creator>Roth, Bruce J.</creator><creator>Psaty, Bruce</creator><creator>Stump, David L.</creator><creator>Anderson, F. Kim</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198602</creationdate><title>Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain</title><author>Tierney, William M. ; Fitzgerald, John ; McHenry, Ross ; Roth, Bruce J. ; Psaty, Bruce ; Stump, David L. ; Anderson, F. Kim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-15f66c8c74305e1d9a330b06dfe8991d1496e0a71b51705a7eb2fd41e16d4c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tierney, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McHenry, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Bruce J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psaty, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stump, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, F. Kim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medical decision making</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tierney, William M.</au><au>Fitzgerald, John</au><au>McHenry, Ross</au><au>Roth, Bruce J.</au><au>Psaty, Bruce</au><au>Stump, David L.</au><au>Anderson, F. Kim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain</atitle><jtitle>Medical decision making</jtitle><date>1986-02</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>12-17</pages><issn>0272-989X</issn><eissn>1552-681X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the ability of emergency room physicians to estimate the probability of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain, the authors gathered historical, physical, and electrocardiographic information from 492 patients at the time of their presentation. The physicians admitted 30% of them to intensive care: 53 of the 61 patients with infarctions (sensitivity = 87%) and 96 of the 431 without infarctions (specificity = 78%). Overall, 36% of those admitted had infarctions. The physicians' numeric estimate of the probability of infarction was a good univariate discriminator of infarction, as demonstrated by Receiver Operator Characteristics analysis, and, as indicated by their actual operating point, they seemed to maximize the accuracy of patient classification rather than sensitivity or specificity. Logistic regression analysis identified the physicians' probability estimate as the strongest multivariate predictor of infarction, considering all other clinical information available. Key words: probability; prediction; myocardial infarction. (Med Decis Making 6:12-17, 1986)</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0272989X8600600103</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-989X |
ispartof | Medical decision making, 1986-02, Vol.6 (1), p.12-17 |
issn | 0272-989X 1552-681X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0272989X8600600103 |
source | SAGE Complete |
title | Physicians' Estimates of the Probability of Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Boom Patients with chest Pain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A33%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physicians'%20Estimates%20of%20the%20Probability%20of%20Myocardial%20Infarction%20in%20Emergency%20Boom%20Patients%20with%20chest%20Pain&rft.jtitle=Medical%20decision%20making&rft.au=Tierney,%20William%20M.&rft.date=1986-02&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=12-17&rft.issn=0272-989X&rft.eissn=1552-681X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0272989X8600600103&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0272989X8600600103%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0272989X8600600103&rfr_iscdi=true |