CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing
As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media us...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of science, technology & society technology & society, 2022-06, Vol.42 (1-2), p.11-18 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Bulletin of science, technology & society |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Dawson, Wyatt Paintsil, Ashley Bingaman, James Brewer, Paul R. |
description | As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media use predict attitudes toward applications of gene editing. Specifically, the study tests how news use, overall television viewing, and science fiction viewing are related to such attitudes. The analyses draw on original data from two surveys of the U.S. public, one conducted in 2020 and the other in 2021. The results from both surveys indicate that news use and overall television viewing predict support for uses of gene editing, whereas science fiction viewing is not significantly related to opinion. The findings suggest that media frames and images may carry implications for the trajectory of public opinion about gene editing technologies and, ultimately, the social context for their development and adoption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/02704676221080919 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02704676221080919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02704676221080919</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_02704676221080919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a6c48b4ec24d6d5672c760319c0641812e02df201e4ef8cfa0ff562fe9ace2203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRMFZ_gLf9A6mzk80m8SCUUGug0lLtOWw2s2VLm5RsevDfm9DeBE9zePM93nuMPQuYCpEkL4AJSJUoRAEpZCK7YYGIYwylSKNbFox6OD7cswfv9wCAUsYBe8s3xdd6w4uj3pF_5Z9UO823nrhuar4-Vwdn-OrkGtc2fFa1554vqCE-r13vmt0ju7P64Onpeids-z7_zj_C5WpR5LNlaFDFfaiVkWklyaCsVR2rBE2iIBKZATUEFEiAtUUQJMmmxmqwNlZoKdOGECGaMHHxNV3rfUe2PHXuqLufUkA5DlD-GWBgphfGD9XKfXvumiHiP8AvtWNYmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Dawson, Wyatt ; Paintsil, Ashley ; Bingaman, James ; Brewer, Paul R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Wyatt ; Paintsil, Ashley ; Bingaman, James ; Brewer, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><description>As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media use predict attitudes toward applications of gene editing. Specifically, the study tests how news use, overall television viewing, and science fiction viewing are related to such attitudes. The analyses draw on original data from two surveys of the U.S. public, one conducted in 2020 and the other in 2021. The results from both surveys indicate that news use and overall television viewing predict support for uses of gene editing, whereas science fiction viewing is not significantly related to opinion. The findings suggest that media frames and images may carry implications for the trajectory of public opinion about gene editing technologies and, ultimately, the social context for their development and adoption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-4676</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02704676221080919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Bulletin of science, technology & society, 2022-06, Vol.42 (1-2), p.11-18</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a6c48b4ec24d6d5672c760319c0641812e02df201e4ef8cfa0ff562fe9ace2203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a6c48b4ec24d6d5672c760319c0641812e02df201e4ef8cfa0ff562fe9ace2203</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8459-0217 ; 0000-0002-9838-6989</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/02704676221080919$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02704676221080919$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Wyatt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paintsil, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingaman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><title>CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing</title><title>Bulletin of science, technology & society</title><addtitle>Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society</addtitle><description>As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media use predict attitudes toward applications of gene editing. Specifically, the study tests how news use, overall television viewing, and science fiction viewing are related to such attitudes. The analyses draw on original data from two surveys of the U.S. public, one conducted in 2020 and the other in 2021. The results from both surveys indicate that news use and overall television viewing predict support for uses of gene editing, whereas science fiction viewing is not significantly related to opinion. The findings suggest that media frames and images may carry implications for the trajectory of public opinion about gene editing technologies and, ultimately, the social context for their development and adoption.</description><issn>0270-4676</issn><issn>1552-4183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRMFZ_gLf9A6mzk80m8SCUUGug0lLtOWw2s2VLm5RsevDfm9DeBE9zePM93nuMPQuYCpEkL4AJSJUoRAEpZCK7YYGIYwylSKNbFox6OD7cswfv9wCAUsYBe8s3xdd6w4uj3pF_5Z9UO823nrhuar4-Vwdn-OrkGtc2fFa1554vqCE-r13vmt0ju7P64Onpeids-z7_zj_C5WpR5LNlaFDFfaiVkWklyaCsVR2rBE2iIBKZATUEFEiAtUUQJMmmxmqwNlZoKdOGECGaMHHxNV3rfUe2PHXuqLufUkA5DlD-GWBgphfGD9XKfXvumiHiP8AvtWNYmQ</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Dawson, Wyatt</creator><creator>Paintsil, Ashley</creator><creator>Bingaman, James</creator><creator>Brewer, Paul R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-0217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9838-6989</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing</title><author>Dawson, Wyatt ; Paintsil, Ashley ; Bingaman, James ; Brewer, Paul R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a6c48b4ec24d6d5672c760319c0641812e02df201e4ef8cfa0ff562fe9ace2203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Wyatt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paintsil, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingaman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of science, technology & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dawson, Wyatt</au><au>Paintsil, Ashley</au><au>Bingaman, James</au><au>Brewer, Paul R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of science, technology & society</jtitle><addtitle>Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>11-18</pages><issn>0270-4676</issn><eissn>1552-4183</eissn><abstract>As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media use predict attitudes toward applications of gene editing. Specifically, the study tests how news use, overall television viewing, and science fiction viewing are related to such attitudes. The analyses draw on original data from two surveys of the U.S. public, one conducted in 2020 and the other in 2021. The results from both surveys indicate that news use and overall television viewing predict support for uses of gene editing, whereas science fiction viewing is not significantly related to opinion. The findings suggest that media frames and images may carry implications for the trajectory of public opinion about gene editing technologies and, ultimately, the social context for their development and adoption.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/02704676221080919</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-0217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9838-6989</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-4676 |
ispartof | Bulletin of science, technology & society, 2022-06, Vol.42 (1-2), p.11-18 |
issn | 0270-4676 1552-4183 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02704676221080919 |
source | SAGE Complete |
title | CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T13%3A52%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CRISPR%20Images:%20Media%20Use%20and%20Public%20Opinion%20About%20Gene%20Editing&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20science,%20technology%20&%20society&rft.au=Dawson,%20Wyatt&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=11-18&rft.issn=0270-4676&rft.eissn=1552-4183&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02704676221080919&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_02704676221080919%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02704676221080919&rfr_iscdi=true |