CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing

As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of science, technology & society technology & society, 2022-06, Vol.42 (1-2), p.11-18
Hauptverfasser: Dawson, Wyatt, Paintsil, Ashley, Bingaman, James, Brewer, Paul R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 11
container_title Bulletin of science, technology & society
container_volume 42
creator Dawson, Wyatt
Paintsil, Ashley
Bingaman, James
Brewer, Paul R.
description As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media use predict attitudes toward applications of gene editing. Specifically, the study tests how news use, overall television viewing, and science fiction viewing are related to such attitudes. The analyses draw on original data from two surveys of the U.S. public, one conducted in 2020 and the other in 2021. The results from both surveys indicate that news use and overall television viewing predict support for uses of gene editing, whereas science fiction viewing is not significantly related to opinion. The findings suggest that media frames and images may carry implications for the trajectory of public opinion about gene editing technologies and, ultimately, the social context for their development and adoption.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/02704676221080919
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02704676221080919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_02704676221080919</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_02704676221080919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a6c48b4ec24d6d5672c760319c0641812e02df201e4ef8cfa0ff562fe9ace2203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRMFZ_gLf9A6mzk80m8SCUUGug0lLtOWw2s2VLm5RsevDfm9DeBE9zePM93nuMPQuYCpEkL4AJSJUoRAEpZCK7YYGIYwylSKNbFox6OD7cswfv9wCAUsYBe8s3xdd6w4uj3pF_5Z9UO823nrhuar4-Vwdn-OrkGtc2fFa1554vqCE-r13vmt0ju7P64Onpeids-z7_zj_C5WpR5LNlaFDFfaiVkWklyaCsVR2rBE2iIBKZATUEFEiAtUUQJMmmxmqwNlZoKdOGECGaMHHxNV3rfUe2PHXuqLufUkA5DlD-GWBgphfGD9XKfXvumiHiP8AvtWNYmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Dawson, Wyatt ; Paintsil, Ashley ; Bingaman, James ; Brewer, Paul R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Wyatt ; Paintsil, Ashley ; Bingaman, James ; Brewer, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><description>As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media use predict attitudes toward applications of gene editing. Specifically, the study tests how news use, overall television viewing, and science fiction viewing are related to such attitudes. The analyses draw on original data from two surveys of the U.S. public, one conducted in 2020 and the other in 2021. The results from both surveys indicate that news use and overall television viewing predict support for uses of gene editing, whereas science fiction viewing is not significantly related to opinion. The findings suggest that media frames and images may carry implications for the trajectory of public opinion about gene editing technologies and, ultimately, the social context for their development and adoption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-4676</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02704676221080919</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Bulletin of science, technology &amp; society, 2022-06, Vol.42 (1-2), p.11-18</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a6c48b4ec24d6d5672c760319c0641812e02df201e4ef8cfa0ff562fe9ace2203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a6c48b4ec24d6d5672c760319c0641812e02df201e4ef8cfa0ff562fe9ace2203</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8459-0217 ; 0000-0002-9838-6989</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/02704676221080919$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02704676221080919$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Wyatt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paintsil, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingaman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><title>CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing</title><title>Bulletin of science, technology &amp; society</title><addtitle>Bulletin of Science, Technology &amp; Society</addtitle><description>As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media use predict attitudes toward applications of gene editing. Specifically, the study tests how news use, overall television viewing, and science fiction viewing are related to such attitudes. The analyses draw on original data from two surveys of the U.S. public, one conducted in 2020 and the other in 2021. The results from both surveys indicate that news use and overall television viewing predict support for uses of gene editing, whereas science fiction viewing is not significantly related to opinion. The findings suggest that media frames and images may carry implications for the trajectory of public opinion about gene editing technologies and, ultimately, the social context for their development and adoption.</description><issn>0270-4676</issn><issn>1552-4183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFLw0AQhRdRMFZ_gLf9A6mzk80m8SCUUGug0lLtOWw2s2VLm5RsevDfm9DeBE9zePM93nuMPQuYCpEkL4AJSJUoRAEpZCK7YYGIYwylSKNbFox6OD7cswfv9wCAUsYBe8s3xdd6w4uj3pF_5Z9UO823nrhuar4-Vwdn-OrkGtc2fFa1554vqCE-r13vmt0ju7P64Onpeids-z7_zj_C5WpR5LNlaFDFfaiVkWklyaCsVR2rBE2iIBKZATUEFEiAtUUQJMmmxmqwNlZoKdOGECGaMHHxNV3rfUe2PHXuqLufUkA5DlD-GWBgphfGD9XKfXvumiHiP8AvtWNYmQ</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Dawson, Wyatt</creator><creator>Paintsil, Ashley</creator><creator>Bingaman, James</creator><creator>Brewer, Paul R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-0217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9838-6989</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing</title><author>Dawson, Wyatt ; Paintsil, Ashley ; Bingaman, James ; Brewer, Paul R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-a6c48b4ec24d6d5672c760319c0641812e02df201e4ef8cfa0ff562fe9ace2203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Wyatt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paintsil, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bingaman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of science, technology &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dawson, Wyatt</au><au>Paintsil, Ashley</au><au>Bingaman, James</au><au>Brewer, Paul R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of science, technology &amp; society</jtitle><addtitle>Bulletin of Science, Technology &amp; Society</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>11-18</pages><issn>0270-4676</issn><eissn>1552-4183</eissn><abstract>As gene editing technologies such as CRISPR have become increasingly prominent, so have media portrayals of them. With this in mind, the present study builds on theoretical accounts of framing effects, cultivation effects, and genre-specific viewing effects to examine how different forms of media use predict attitudes toward applications of gene editing. Specifically, the study tests how news use, overall television viewing, and science fiction viewing are related to such attitudes. The analyses draw on original data from two surveys of the U.S. public, one conducted in 2020 and the other in 2021. The results from both surveys indicate that news use and overall television viewing predict support for uses of gene editing, whereas science fiction viewing is not significantly related to opinion. The findings suggest that media frames and images may carry implications for the trajectory of public opinion about gene editing technologies and, ultimately, the social context for their development and adoption.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/02704676221080919</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-0217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9838-6989</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-4676
ispartof Bulletin of science, technology & society, 2022-06, Vol.42 (1-2), p.11-18
issn 0270-4676
1552-4183
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02704676221080919
source SAGE Complete
title CRISPR Images: Media Use and Public Opinion About Gene Editing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T13%3A52%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CRISPR%20Images:%20Media%20Use%20and%20Public%20Opinion%20About%20Gene%20Editing&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20science,%20technology%20&%20society&rft.au=Dawson,%20Wyatt&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=11-18&rft.issn=0270-4676&rft.eissn=1552-4183&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02704676221080919&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_02704676221080919%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_02704676221080919&rfr_iscdi=true