The Ethical Implications of the Five-Stage Skill-Acquisition Model
We assume that acting ethically is a skill. We then use a phenomenological description of five stages of skill acquisition to argue that an ethics based on principles corresponds to a beginner’s reliance on rules and so is developmentally inferior to an ethics based on expert response that claims th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of science, technology & society technology & society, 2004-06, Vol.24 (3), p.251-264 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 264 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Bulletin of science, technology & society |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Dreyfus, Hubert L. Dreyfus, Stuart E. |
description | We assume that acting ethically is a skill. We then use a phenomenological description of five stages of skill acquisition to argue that an ethics based on principles corresponds to a beginner’s reliance on rules and so is developmentally inferior to an ethics based on expert response that claims that, after long experience, the ethical expert learns to respond appropriately to each unique situation. The skills model thus supports an ethics of situated involvement such as that of Aristotle, John Dewey, and Carol Gilligan against the detached, rationalist ethics of Kant, John Rawls, Lawrence Kohlberg, and Jürgen Habermas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0270467604265023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0270467604265023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ689875</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0270467604265023</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ689875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-2a08a1836f3b633f5e048385a2854d81f9e30927ce6f77cde3ca20f1e0807af53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqFw58AhL2BY_zvHUrWlqIhDyzkyjk1d0qbYKRJvT6IgDkicdqVvZrQ7CF0TuCVEqTugCrhUEjiVAig7QRkRgmJONDtFWY9xz8_RRUpbAKCciwzdrzcun7abYE2dL3aHulva0OxT3vi87dgsfDq8as2by1fvoa7x2H4cQwq9KH9qKldfojNv6uSufuYIvcym68kDXj7PF5PxEltKRIupAW26Y6Rnr5IxLxxwzbQwVAteaeILx6CgyjrplbKVY9ZQ8MSBBmW8YCMEQ66NTUrR-fIQw87Er5JA2XdQ_u2gs9wMFheD_ZVPH6UutOoT8YBT9165bY5x3z3wf9w3G4hjbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Ethical Implications of the Five-Stage Skill-Acquisition Model</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Dreyfus, Hubert L. ; Dreyfus, Stuart E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dreyfus, Hubert L. ; Dreyfus, Stuart E.</creatorcontrib><description>We assume that acting ethically is a skill. We then use a phenomenological description of five stages of skill acquisition to argue that an ethics based on principles corresponds to a beginner’s reliance on rules and so is developmentally inferior to an ethics based on expert response that claims that, after long experience, the ethical expert learns to respond appropriately to each unique situation. The skills model thus supports an ethics of situated involvement such as that of Aristotle, John Dewey, and Carol Gilligan against the detached, rationalist ethics of Kant, John Rawls, Lawrence Kohlberg, and Jürgen Habermas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-4676</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4183</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0270467604265023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cognitive Ability ; Ethics ; Phenomenology ; Skill Development</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of science, technology & society, 2004-06, Vol.24 (3), p.251-264</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-2a08a1836f3b633f5e048385a2854d81f9e30927ce6f77cde3ca20f1e0807af53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-2a08a1836f3b633f5e048385a2854d81f9e30927ce6f77cde3ca20f1e0807af53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0270467604265023$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0270467604265023$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ689875$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dreyfus, Hubert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyfus, Stuart E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Ethical Implications of the Five-Stage Skill-Acquisition Model</title><title>Bulletin of science, technology & society</title><description>We assume that acting ethically is a skill. We then use a phenomenological description of five stages of skill acquisition to argue that an ethics based on principles corresponds to a beginner’s reliance on rules and so is developmentally inferior to an ethics based on expert response that claims that, after long experience, the ethical expert learns to respond appropriately to each unique situation. The skills model thus supports an ethics of situated involvement such as that of Aristotle, John Dewey, and Carol Gilligan against the detached, rationalist ethics of Kant, John Rawls, Lawrence Kohlberg, and Jürgen Habermas.</description><subject>Cognitive Ability</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><issn>0270-4676</issn><issn>1552-4183</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqFw58AhL2BY_zvHUrWlqIhDyzkyjk1d0qbYKRJvT6IgDkicdqVvZrQ7CF0TuCVEqTugCrhUEjiVAig7QRkRgmJONDtFWY9xz8_RRUpbAKCciwzdrzcun7abYE2dL3aHulva0OxT3vi87dgsfDq8as2by1fvoa7x2H4cQwq9KH9qKldfojNv6uSufuYIvcym68kDXj7PF5PxEltKRIupAW26Y6Rnr5IxLxxwzbQwVAteaeILx6CgyjrplbKVY9ZQ8MSBBmW8YCMEQ66NTUrR-fIQw87Er5JA2XdQ_u2gs9wMFheD_ZVPH6UutOoT8YBT9165bY5x3z3wf9w3G4hjbA</recordid><startdate>200406</startdate><enddate>200406</enddate><creator>Dreyfus, Hubert L.</creator><creator>Dreyfus, Stuart E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200406</creationdate><title>The Ethical Implications of the Five-Stage Skill-Acquisition Model</title><author>Dreyfus, Hubert L. ; Dreyfus, Stuart E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-2a08a1836f3b633f5e048385a2854d81f9e30927ce6f77cde3ca20f1e0807af53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Ability</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dreyfus, Hubert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyfus, Stuart E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of science, technology & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dreyfus, Hubert L.</au><au>Dreyfus, Stuart E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ689875</ericid><atitle>The Ethical Implications of the Five-Stage Skill-Acquisition Model</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of science, technology & society</jtitle><date>2004-06</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>251-264</pages><issn>0270-4676</issn><eissn>1552-4183</eissn><abstract>We assume that acting ethically is a skill. We then use a phenomenological description of five stages of skill acquisition to argue that an ethics based on principles corresponds to a beginner’s reliance on rules and so is developmentally inferior to an ethics based on expert response that claims that, after long experience, the ethical expert learns to respond appropriately to each unique situation. The skills model thus supports an ethics of situated involvement such as that of Aristotle, John Dewey, and Carol Gilligan against the detached, rationalist ethics of Kant, John Rawls, Lawrence Kohlberg, and Jürgen Habermas.</abstract><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0270467604265023</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-4676 |
ispartof | Bulletin of science, technology & society, 2004-06, Vol.24 (3), p.251-264 |
issn | 0270-4676 1552-4183 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0270467604265023 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Cognitive Ability Ethics Phenomenology Skill Development |
title | The Ethical Implications of the Five-Stage Skill-Acquisition Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A40%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Ethical%20Implications%20of%20the%20Five-Stage%20Skill-Acquisition%20Model&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20science,%20technology%20&%20society&rft.au=Dreyfus,%20Hubert%20L.&rft.date=2004-06&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=251-264&rft.issn=0270-4676&rft.eissn=1552-4183&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0270467604265023&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ689875%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ689875&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0270467604265023&rfr_iscdi=true |