Pathways of front-line healthcare professionals’ information anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in China

Exploring information anxiety is critical to protecting the mental health of front-line healthcare professionals. Their information anxiety is impacted by interrelated conditions during public health emergencies, but existing studies have not confirmed the impact of the combination of conditions and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Information development 2024-07
Hauptverfasser: Lu, Quan, Tao, Liang, Peng, Xueying, Chen, Jing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Information development
container_volume
creator Lu, Quan
Tao, Liang
Peng, Xueying
Chen, Jing
description Exploring information anxiety is critical to protecting the mental health of front-line healthcare professionals. Their information anxiety is impacted by interrelated conditions during public health emergencies, but existing studies have not confirmed the impact of the combination of conditions and clarified the pathways of information anxiety. Twenty-four healthcare professionals were recruited for semi-structured interviews. Qualitative Comparative Analysis was used to analyze necessary conditions and pathways of information anxiety. The results showed that information, environment, personal, and content were identified as antecedent conditions, and information quantity anxiety, information quality anxiety, and information content anxiety were identified as outcome conditions. Furthermore, information quality and social environment were necessary conditions. Spontaneous and extrinsic information anxiety were found based on pathways. Identifying conditions and pathways was essential for understanding the information anxiety of front-line healthcare professionals and providing evidence for medical institutions to take target measures in future public health emergencies.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/02666669241261632
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02666669241261632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_02666669241261632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-94e6b91a35606c305254a219d61d5e4d3b05ad709462007e39d0dbbb9301bdc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1OwzAQRi0EEqVwAHa-gMFjO47Mrgp_lSqVRcU2cmKHGKVOsV0gOzgG1-MkJIIdsxlpvm_e4iF0DvQCIM8vKZPTKCaASZCcHaAZ5AKIFFIdotmUk6lwjE5ifKaUAZV8hj4fdGrf9BBx3-Am9D6RznmLW6u71NY6WLwLfWNjdL3XXfz--MLON33Y6jResPbvzqYBm31w_gmn1uJi_bi8JqDwTntjt66-wgv8stedS-PPq8Ux7c0wUnDROq9P0VEzgu3Z356jze3Nprgnq_XdslisSA0sT0QJKysFmmeSyprTjGVCM1BGgsmsMLyimTY5VUIySnPLlaGmqirFKVSm5nMEv9g69DEG25S74LY6DCXQclJY_lPIfwBXj2Xx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pathways of front-line healthcare professionals’ information anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in China</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Lu, Quan ; Tao, Liang ; Peng, Xueying ; Chen, Jing</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, Quan ; Tao, Liang ; Peng, Xueying ; Chen, Jing</creatorcontrib><description>Exploring information anxiety is critical to protecting the mental health of front-line healthcare professionals. Their information anxiety is impacted by interrelated conditions during public health emergencies, but existing studies have not confirmed the impact of the combination of conditions and clarified the pathways of information anxiety. Twenty-four healthcare professionals were recruited for semi-structured interviews. Qualitative Comparative Analysis was used to analyze necessary conditions and pathways of information anxiety. The results showed that information, environment, personal, and content were identified as antecedent conditions, and information quantity anxiety, information quality anxiety, and information content anxiety were identified as outcome conditions. Furthermore, information quality and social environment were necessary conditions. Spontaneous and extrinsic information anxiety were found based on pathways. Identifying conditions and pathways was essential for understanding the information anxiety of front-line healthcare professionals and providing evidence for medical institutions to take target measures in future public health emergencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-6669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-6469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02666669241261632</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Information development, 2024-07</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-94e6b91a35606c305254a219d61d5e4d3b05ad709462007e39d0dbbb9301bdc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7139-1876</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xueying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing</creatorcontrib><title>Pathways of front-line healthcare professionals’ information anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in China</title><title>Information development</title><description>Exploring information anxiety is critical to protecting the mental health of front-line healthcare professionals. Their information anxiety is impacted by interrelated conditions during public health emergencies, but existing studies have not confirmed the impact of the combination of conditions and clarified the pathways of information anxiety. Twenty-four healthcare professionals were recruited for semi-structured interviews. Qualitative Comparative Analysis was used to analyze necessary conditions and pathways of information anxiety. The results showed that information, environment, personal, and content were identified as antecedent conditions, and information quantity anxiety, information quality anxiety, and information content anxiety were identified as outcome conditions. Furthermore, information quality and social environment were necessary conditions. Spontaneous and extrinsic information anxiety were found based on pathways. Identifying conditions and pathways was essential for understanding the information anxiety of front-line healthcare professionals and providing evidence for medical institutions to take target measures in future public health emergencies.</description><issn>0266-6669</issn><issn>1741-6469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE1OwzAQRi0EEqVwAHa-gMFjO47Mrgp_lSqVRcU2cmKHGKVOsV0gOzgG1-MkJIIdsxlpvm_e4iF0DvQCIM8vKZPTKCaASZCcHaAZ5AKIFFIdotmUk6lwjE5ifKaUAZV8hj4fdGrf9BBx3-Am9D6RznmLW6u71NY6WLwLfWNjdL3XXfz--MLON33Y6jResPbvzqYBm31w_gmn1uJi_bi8JqDwTntjt66-wgv8stedS-PPq8Ux7c0wUnDROq9P0VEzgu3Z356jze3Nprgnq_XdslisSA0sT0QJKysFmmeSyprTjGVCM1BGgsmsMLyimTY5VUIySnPLlaGmqirFKVSm5nMEv9g69DEG25S74LY6DCXQclJY_lPIfwBXj2Xx</recordid><startdate>20240725</startdate><enddate>20240725</enddate><creator>Lu, Quan</creator><creator>Tao, Liang</creator><creator>Peng, Xueying</creator><creator>Chen, Jing</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7139-1876</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240725</creationdate><title>Pathways of front-line healthcare professionals’ information anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in China</title><author>Lu, Quan ; Tao, Liang ; Peng, Xueying ; Chen, Jing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-94e6b91a35606c305254a219d61d5e4d3b05ad709462007e39d0dbbb9301bdc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tao, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Xueying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Information development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Quan</au><au>Tao, Liang</au><au>Peng, Xueying</au><au>Chen, Jing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pathways of front-line healthcare professionals’ information anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in China</atitle><jtitle>Information development</jtitle><date>2024-07-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0266-6669</issn><eissn>1741-6469</eissn><abstract>Exploring information anxiety is critical to protecting the mental health of front-line healthcare professionals. Their information anxiety is impacted by interrelated conditions during public health emergencies, but existing studies have not confirmed the impact of the combination of conditions and clarified the pathways of information anxiety. Twenty-four healthcare professionals were recruited for semi-structured interviews. Qualitative Comparative Analysis was used to analyze necessary conditions and pathways of information anxiety. The results showed that information, environment, personal, and content were identified as antecedent conditions, and information quantity anxiety, information quality anxiety, and information content anxiety were identified as outcome conditions. Furthermore, information quality and social environment were necessary conditions. Spontaneous and extrinsic information anxiety were found based on pathways. Identifying conditions and pathways was essential for understanding the information anxiety of front-line healthcare professionals and providing evidence for medical institutions to take target measures in future public health emergencies.</abstract><doi>10.1177/02666669241261632</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7139-1876</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-6669
ispartof Information development, 2024-07
issn 0266-6669
1741-6469
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02666669241261632
source Access via SAGE
title Pathways of front-line healthcare professionals’ information anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study in China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T23%3A30%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pathways%20of%20front-line%20healthcare%20professionals%E2%80%99%20information%20anxiety%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic:%20A%20qualitative%20study%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Information%20development&rft.au=Lu,%20Quan&rft.date=2024-07-25&rft.issn=0266-6669&rft.eissn=1741-6469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02666669241261632&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_02666669241261632%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true