A comparison of two algorithms for the simulation of bending-active structures

Bending-active structures, made from elastically bent materials such as fiberglass rods, offer exciting opportunities in architecture because of their broad formal palette and ease of construction. While they have been relevant since Frei Otto’s Mannheim Multihalle (1974), recent computational devel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of space structures 2018-06, Vol.33 (2), p.73-85
Hauptverfasser: Cuvilliers, Pierre, Yang, Justina R., Coar, Lancelot, Mueller, Caitlin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 85
container_issue 2
container_start_page 73
container_title International journal of space structures
container_volume 33
creator Cuvilliers, Pierre
Yang, Justina R.
Coar, Lancelot
Mueller, Caitlin
description Bending-active structures, made from elastically bent materials such as fiberglass rods, offer exciting opportunities in architecture because of their broad formal palette and ease of construction. While they have been relevant since Frei Otto’s Mannheim Multihalle (1974), recent computational developments that help simulate active-bending processes have renewed interest in them. Such tools are important because they can replace time-consuming and imprecise physical modeling processes. However, physically meaningful simulations, using real materials and full scale, are difficult to create, and there are no good mechanisms to reveal when a simulation is inaccurate. This article offers a conceptual and numerical study of two popular contemporary algorithms for simulations of bending-active structures, mainly through a comparison of their results on the planar elastica. We then offer guidelines on best practice modeling settings and demonstrate possibilities and pitfalls through an architectural-scale case study.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0266351118779979
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0266351118779979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0266351118779979</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0266351118779979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-2b946f4e0fc758e53a9adbfeb88ca417f9a47bcfeab83e25d5b83889402fc7a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAUxIMouKx795gvEE3Spsk7Lov_YNGLnkuSJt3ItlmSVPHbW6knwdPwmPk9hkHomtEbxqS8pbxpKsEYU1ICSDhDK04FEEWr6hytKIiGzDdcok3OwVCuqIKGwwo9b7GNw0mnkOOIo8flM2J97GMK5TBk7GPC5eBwDsN01CUsIePGLow90baEj9ksabJlSi5foQuvj9ltfnWN3u7vXnePZP_y8LTb7oll0BTCDdSNrx31VgrlRKVBd8Y7o5TVNZMedC2N9U4bVTkuOjGrUlBTPhNaVWtEl782xZyT8-0phUGnr5bR9meS9u8kM0IWJOvete9xSuPc8P_8NxDpYpM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of two algorithms for the simulation of bending-active structures</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Cuvilliers, Pierre ; Yang, Justina R. ; Coar, Lancelot ; Mueller, Caitlin</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuvilliers, Pierre ; Yang, Justina R. ; Coar, Lancelot ; Mueller, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><description>Bending-active structures, made from elastically bent materials such as fiberglass rods, offer exciting opportunities in architecture because of their broad formal palette and ease of construction. While they have been relevant since Frei Otto’s Mannheim Multihalle (1974), recent computational developments that help simulate active-bending processes have renewed interest in them. Such tools are important because they can replace time-consuming and imprecise physical modeling processes. However, physically meaningful simulations, using real materials and full scale, are difficult to create, and there are no good mechanisms to reveal when a simulation is inaccurate. This article offers a conceptual and numerical study of two popular contemporary algorithms for simulations of bending-active structures, mainly through a comparison of their results on the planar elastica. We then offer guidelines on best practice modeling settings and demonstrate possibilities and pitfalls through an architectural-scale case study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-0599</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-8033</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0266351118779979</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>International journal of space structures, 2018-06, Vol.33 (2), p.73-85</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-2b946f4e0fc758e53a9adbfeb88ca417f9a47bcfeab83e25d5b83889402fc7a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-2b946f4e0fc758e53a9adbfeb88ca417f9a47bcfeab83e25d5b83889402fc7a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0266351118779979$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0266351118779979$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuvilliers, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Justina R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coar, Lancelot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of two algorithms for the simulation of bending-active structures</title><title>International journal of space structures</title><description>Bending-active structures, made from elastically bent materials such as fiberglass rods, offer exciting opportunities in architecture because of their broad formal palette and ease of construction. While they have been relevant since Frei Otto’s Mannheim Multihalle (1974), recent computational developments that help simulate active-bending processes have renewed interest in them. Such tools are important because they can replace time-consuming and imprecise physical modeling processes. However, physically meaningful simulations, using real materials and full scale, are difficult to create, and there are no good mechanisms to reveal when a simulation is inaccurate. This article offers a conceptual and numerical study of two popular contemporary algorithms for simulations of bending-active structures, mainly through a comparison of their results on the planar elastica. We then offer guidelines on best practice modeling settings and demonstrate possibilities and pitfalls through an architectural-scale case study.</description><issn>0956-0599</issn><issn>2059-8033</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAUxIMouKx795gvEE3Spsk7Lov_YNGLnkuSJt3ItlmSVPHbW6knwdPwmPk9hkHomtEbxqS8pbxpKsEYU1ICSDhDK04FEEWr6hytKIiGzDdcok3OwVCuqIKGwwo9b7GNw0mnkOOIo8flM2J97GMK5TBk7GPC5eBwDsN01CUsIePGLow90baEj9ksabJlSi5foQuvj9ltfnWN3u7vXnePZP_y8LTb7oll0BTCDdSNrx31VgrlRKVBd8Y7o5TVNZMedC2N9U4bVTkuOjGrUlBTPhNaVWtEl782xZyT8-0phUGnr5bR9meS9u8kM0IWJOvete9xSuPc8P_8NxDpYpM</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Cuvilliers, Pierre</creator><creator>Yang, Justina R.</creator><creator>Coar, Lancelot</creator><creator>Mueller, Caitlin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>A comparison of two algorithms for the simulation of bending-active structures</title><author>Cuvilliers, Pierre ; Yang, Justina R. ; Coar, Lancelot ; Mueller, Caitlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c196t-2b946f4e0fc758e53a9adbfeb88ca417f9a47bcfeab83e25d5b83889402fc7a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuvilliers, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Justina R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coar, Lancelot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of space structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuvilliers, Pierre</au><au>Yang, Justina R.</au><au>Coar, Lancelot</au><au>Mueller, Caitlin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of two algorithms for the simulation of bending-active structures</atitle><jtitle>International journal of space structures</jtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>73-85</pages><issn>0956-0599</issn><eissn>2059-8033</eissn><abstract>Bending-active structures, made from elastically bent materials such as fiberglass rods, offer exciting opportunities in architecture because of their broad formal palette and ease of construction. While they have been relevant since Frei Otto’s Mannheim Multihalle (1974), recent computational developments that help simulate active-bending processes have renewed interest in them. Such tools are important because they can replace time-consuming and imprecise physical modeling processes. However, physically meaningful simulations, using real materials and full scale, are difficult to create, and there are no good mechanisms to reveal when a simulation is inaccurate. This article offers a conceptual and numerical study of two popular contemporary algorithms for simulations of bending-active structures, mainly through a comparison of their results on the planar elastica. We then offer guidelines on best practice modeling settings and demonstrate possibilities and pitfalls through an architectural-scale case study.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0266351118779979</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-0599
ispartof International journal of space structures, 2018-06, Vol.33 (2), p.73-85
issn 0956-0599
2059-8033
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0266351118779979
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title A comparison of two algorithms for the simulation of bending-active structures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A56%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20two%20algorithms%20for%20the%20simulation%20of%20bending-active%20structures&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20space%20structures&rft.au=Cuvilliers,%20Pierre&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=73-85&rft.issn=0956-0599&rft.eissn=2059-8033&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0266351118779979&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0266351118779979%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0266351118779979&rfr_iscdi=true