Re-encountering Lefebvre: Toward a critical phenomenology of social space

In this article, I present a critical phenomenological reworking of Lefebvre’s theory of social space from the perspective of minority subjects. To do so, I identify phenomenological themes present in The Production of Space, reading it alongside Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. This rea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environment and planning. D, Society & space Society & space, 2020-02, Vol.38 (1), p.167-186
1. Verfasser: Kinkaid, Eden
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 186
container_issue 1
container_start_page 167
container_title Environment and planning. D, Society & space
container_volume 38
creator Kinkaid, Eden
description In this article, I present a critical phenomenological reworking of Lefebvre’s theory of social space from the perspective of minority subjects. To do so, I identify phenomenological themes present in The Production of Space, reading it alongside Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. This reading emphasizes Lefebvre and Merleau-Ponty’s shared critiques of space, their relational ontologies, and their emphasis on bodily practice. With these shared concerns in view, I then extend this phenomenological reading of Production by bringing it into conversation with scholarship in critical phenomenology. Critical phenomenology has developed largely out of the work of Merleau-Ponty and seeks to revise classical phenomenological accounts to attend to issues of race, gender, sexuality, disability, and other categories of social difference. I demonstrate how critical phenomenology can be brought to bear on Lefebvre’s account of social space and the subject, considering how it can concretize and actualize the political potential Lefebvre attaches to differential embodiment in Production. Bringing these perspectives to bear on Lefebvre’s conception, I argue, does important work to actualize his vision of differential embodiment as a political and spatial practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0263775819854765
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0263775819854765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0263775819854765</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0263775819854765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-befceab7ff37594457f0aaf25cd2bd761ab5090ffe7c9f8fe3e835b2bb49a1b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMouFbvHvMFoskmaTbepPinsCBIPS9JOlO3tJsl2Sr99u5ST4KHYWB-7w2PR8it4HdCGHPPy7k0RlfCVlqZuT4jhVCmZFJJeU6KCbOJX5KrnLecc2mVKMjyHRh0IR66AVLbbWgNCP4rwQNdxW-X1tTRkNqhDW5H-0_o4n6cXdwcaUSaY2jHe-5dgGtygW6X4eZ3z8jH89Nq8crqt5fl4rFmQZZyYB4wgPMGURptldIGuXNY6rAu_drMhfOaW44IJlisECRUUvvSe2Wd8FbOCD_9DSnmnACbPrV7l46N4M1URfO3itHCTpbsNtBs4yF1Y8L_9T-Lal_R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Re-encountering Lefebvre: Toward a critical phenomenology of social space</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Kinkaid, Eden</creator><creatorcontrib>Kinkaid, Eden</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, I present a critical phenomenological reworking of Lefebvre’s theory of social space from the perspective of minority subjects. To do so, I identify phenomenological themes present in The Production of Space, reading it alongside Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. This reading emphasizes Lefebvre and Merleau-Ponty’s shared critiques of space, their relational ontologies, and their emphasis on bodily practice. With these shared concerns in view, I then extend this phenomenological reading of Production by bringing it into conversation with scholarship in critical phenomenology. Critical phenomenology has developed largely out of the work of Merleau-Ponty and seeks to revise classical phenomenological accounts to attend to issues of race, gender, sexuality, disability, and other categories of social difference. I demonstrate how critical phenomenology can be brought to bear on Lefebvre’s account of social space and the subject, considering how it can concretize and actualize the political potential Lefebvre attaches to differential embodiment in Production. Bringing these perspectives to bear on Lefebvre’s conception, I argue, does important work to actualize his vision of differential embodiment as a political and spatial practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-3433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0263775819854765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space, 2020-02, Vol.38 (1), p.167-186</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-befceab7ff37594457f0aaf25cd2bd761ab5090ffe7c9f8fe3e835b2bb49a1b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-befceab7ff37594457f0aaf25cd2bd761ab5090ffe7c9f8fe3e835b2bb49a1b93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0793-2049</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0263775819854765$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263775819854765$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kinkaid, Eden</creatorcontrib><title>Re-encountering Lefebvre: Toward a critical phenomenology of social space</title><title>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space</title><description>In this article, I present a critical phenomenological reworking of Lefebvre’s theory of social space from the perspective of minority subjects. To do so, I identify phenomenological themes present in The Production of Space, reading it alongside Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. This reading emphasizes Lefebvre and Merleau-Ponty’s shared critiques of space, their relational ontologies, and their emphasis on bodily practice. With these shared concerns in view, I then extend this phenomenological reading of Production by bringing it into conversation with scholarship in critical phenomenology. Critical phenomenology has developed largely out of the work of Merleau-Ponty and seeks to revise classical phenomenological accounts to attend to issues of race, gender, sexuality, disability, and other categories of social difference. I demonstrate how critical phenomenology can be brought to bear on Lefebvre’s account of social space and the subject, considering how it can concretize and actualize the political potential Lefebvre attaches to differential embodiment in Production. Bringing these perspectives to bear on Lefebvre’s conception, I argue, does important work to actualize his vision of differential embodiment as a political and spatial practice.</description><issn>0263-7758</issn><issn>1472-3433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMouFbvHvMFoskmaTbepPinsCBIPS9JOlO3tJsl2Sr99u5ST4KHYWB-7w2PR8it4HdCGHPPy7k0RlfCVlqZuT4jhVCmZFJJeU6KCbOJX5KrnLecc2mVKMjyHRh0IR66AVLbbWgNCP4rwQNdxW-X1tTRkNqhDW5H-0_o4n6cXdwcaUSaY2jHe-5dgGtygW6X4eZ3z8jH89Nq8crqt5fl4rFmQZZyYB4wgPMGURptldIGuXNY6rAu_drMhfOaW44IJlisECRUUvvSe2Wd8FbOCD_9DSnmnACbPrV7l46N4M1URfO3itHCTpbsNtBs4yF1Y8L_9T-Lal_R</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Kinkaid, Eden</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-2049</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Re-encountering Lefebvre: Toward a critical phenomenology of social space</title><author>Kinkaid, Eden</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-befceab7ff37594457f0aaf25cd2bd761ab5090ffe7c9f8fe3e835b2bb49a1b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kinkaid, Eden</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kinkaid, Eden</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Re-encountering Lefebvre: Toward a critical phenomenology of social space</atitle><jtitle>Environment and planning. D, Society &amp; space</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>167-186</pages><issn>0263-7758</issn><eissn>1472-3433</eissn><abstract>In this article, I present a critical phenomenological reworking of Lefebvre’s theory of social space from the perspective of minority subjects. To do so, I identify phenomenological themes present in The Production of Space, reading it alongside Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. This reading emphasizes Lefebvre and Merleau-Ponty’s shared critiques of space, their relational ontologies, and their emphasis on bodily practice. With these shared concerns in view, I then extend this phenomenological reading of Production by bringing it into conversation with scholarship in critical phenomenology. Critical phenomenology has developed largely out of the work of Merleau-Ponty and seeks to revise classical phenomenological accounts to attend to issues of race, gender, sexuality, disability, and other categories of social difference. I demonstrate how critical phenomenology can be brought to bear on Lefebvre’s account of social space and the subject, considering how it can concretize and actualize the political potential Lefebvre attaches to differential embodiment in Production. Bringing these perspectives to bear on Lefebvre’s conception, I argue, does important work to actualize his vision of differential embodiment as a political and spatial practice.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0263775819854765</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-2049</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-7758
ispartof Environment and planning. D, Society & space, 2020-02, Vol.38 (1), p.167-186
issn 0263-7758
1472-3433
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0263775819854765
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Re-encountering Lefebvre: Toward a critical phenomenology of social space
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A41%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Re-encountering%20Lefebvre:%20Toward%20a%20critical%20phenomenology%20of%20social%20space&rft.jtitle=Environment%20and%20planning.%20D,%20Society%20&%20space&rft.au=Kinkaid,%20Eden&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=167-186&rft.issn=0263-7758&rft.eissn=1472-3433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0263775819854765&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0263775819854765%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0263775819854765&rfr_iscdi=true