Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation
This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Politics (Manchester, England) England), 2016-11, Vol.36 (4), p.346-354 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 354 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 346 |
container_title | Politics (Manchester, England) |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Severs, Eline Celis, Karen Erzeel, Silvia |
description | This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is founded on a relational conception of political power that locates the constitution of power relations within social interactions, such as political representation. As such, intersectionality theory pushes scholarship beyond studying representation inequalities – that are linked to presumably stable societal positions – to also consider the ways in which political representation (re)creates positions of privilege and disadvantage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0263395716630987 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0263395716630987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0263395716630987</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0263395716630987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c0261ebb2ad41ca843fc3e83044666554c61da6edae47e1b57432d5b9ca85923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMoWFfvHvsBjCbNv9abLLouLOhBwVtJk-mapbYliSv99qauJ8HTwLzfG-Y9hC4puaZUqRtSSMYqoaiUjFSlOkIZ5VLhqhDyGGWzjGf9FJ2FsCOEUMl5ht6ehy_wV_no3d51sIVc9za3Lmi7133UW7jN130EH8BEN_S6c3HK4zsMfvpBxyFtnNFd7mH0ECCZZvAcnbS6C3DxOxfo9eH-ZfmIN0-r9fJugw0rWMSVSZ9RaJpCW06NLjlrDYOSEc6llEJwI6nVEqwGroA2QnFWWNFUiRVVwRaIHO4aP4Tgoa1TlA_tp5qSem6m_ttMsuCDJaR49W749ClW-J__BojcZNk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Severs, Eline ; Celis, Karen ; Erzeel, Silvia</creator><creatorcontrib>Severs, Eline ; Celis, Karen ; Erzeel, Silvia</creatorcontrib><description>This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is founded on a relational conception of political power that locates the constitution of power relations within social interactions, such as political representation. As such, intersectionality theory pushes scholarship beyond studying representation inequalities – that are linked to presumably stable societal positions – to also consider the ways in which political representation (re)creates positions of privilege and disadvantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-3957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0263395716630987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Politics (Manchester, England), 2016-11, Vol.36 (4), p.346-354</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c0261ebb2ad41ca843fc3e83044666554c61da6edae47e1b57432d5b9ca85923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c0261ebb2ad41ca843fc3e83044666554c61da6edae47e1b57432d5b9ca85923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0263395716630987$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263395716630987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Severs, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celis, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erzeel, Silvia</creatorcontrib><title>Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation</title><title>Politics (Manchester, England)</title><description>This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is founded on a relational conception of political power that locates the constitution of power relations within social interactions, such as political representation. As such, intersectionality theory pushes scholarship beyond studying representation inequalities – that are linked to presumably stable societal positions – to also consider the ways in which political representation (re)creates positions of privilege and disadvantage.</description><issn>0263-3957</issn><issn>1467-9256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMoWFfvHvsBjCbNv9abLLouLOhBwVtJk-mapbYliSv99qauJ8HTwLzfG-Y9hC4puaZUqRtSSMYqoaiUjFSlOkIZ5VLhqhDyGGWzjGf9FJ2FsCOEUMl5ht6ehy_wV_no3d51sIVc9za3Lmi7133UW7jN130EH8BEN_S6c3HK4zsMfvpBxyFtnNFd7mH0ECCZZvAcnbS6C3DxOxfo9eH-ZfmIN0-r9fJugw0rWMSVSZ9RaJpCW06NLjlrDYOSEc6llEJwI6nVEqwGroA2QnFWWNFUiRVVwRaIHO4aP4Tgoa1TlA_tp5qSem6m_ttMsuCDJaR49W749ClW-J__BojcZNk</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Severs, Eline</creator><creator>Celis, Karen</creator><creator>Erzeel, Silvia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation</title><author>Severs, Eline ; Celis, Karen ; Erzeel, Silvia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c0261ebb2ad41ca843fc3e83044666554c61da6edae47e1b57432d5b9ca85923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Severs, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celis, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erzeel, Silvia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Politics (Manchester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Severs, Eline</au><au>Celis, Karen</au><au>Erzeel, Silvia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation</atitle><jtitle>Politics (Manchester, England)</jtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>346-354</pages><issn>0263-3957</issn><eissn>1467-9256</eissn><abstract>This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is founded on a relational conception of political power that locates the constitution of power relations within social interactions, such as political representation. As such, intersectionality theory pushes scholarship beyond studying representation inequalities – that are linked to presumably stable societal positions – to also consider the ways in which political representation (re)creates positions of privilege and disadvantage.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0263395716630987</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0263-3957 |
ispartof | Politics (Manchester, England), 2016-11, Vol.36 (4), p.346-354 |
issn | 0263-3957 1467-9256 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0263395716630987 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Political Science Complete |
title | Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power,%20privilege%20and%20disadvantage:%20Intersectionality%20theory%20and%20political%20representation&rft.jtitle=Politics%20(Manchester,%20England)&rft.au=Severs,%20Eline&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=346-354&rft.issn=0263-3957&rft.eissn=1467-9256&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0263395716630987&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0263395716630987%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0263395716630987&rfr_iscdi=true |