Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation

This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Politics (Manchester, England) England), 2016-11, Vol.36 (4), p.346-354
Hauptverfasser: Severs, Eline, Celis, Karen, Erzeel, Silvia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 354
container_issue 4
container_start_page 346
container_title Politics (Manchester, England)
container_volume 36
creator Severs, Eline
Celis, Karen
Erzeel, Silvia
description This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is founded on a relational conception of political power that locates the constitution of power relations within social interactions, such as political representation. As such, intersectionality theory pushes scholarship beyond studying representation inequalities – that are linked to presumably stable societal positions – to also consider the ways in which political representation (re)creates positions of privilege and disadvantage.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0263395716630987
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0263395716630987</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0263395716630987</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0263395716630987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c0261ebb2ad41ca843fc3e83044666554c61da6edae47e1b57432d5b9ca85923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMoWFfvHvsBjCbNv9abLLouLOhBwVtJk-mapbYliSv99qauJ8HTwLzfG-Y9hC4puaZUqRtSSMYqoaiUjFSlOkIZ5VLhqhDyGGWzjGf9FJ2FsCOEUMl5ht6ehy_wV_no3d51sIVc9za3Lmi7133UW7jN130EH8BEN_S6c3HK4zsMfvpBxyFtnNFd7mH0ECCZZvAcnbS6C3DxOxfo9eH-ZfmIN0-r9fJugw0rWMSVSZ9RaJpCW06NLjlrDYOSEc6llEJwI6nVEqwGroA2QnFWWNFUiRVVwRaIHO4aP4Tgoa1TlA_tp5qSem6m_ttMsuCDJaR49W749ClW-J__BojcZNk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Severs, Eline ; Celis, Karen ; Erzeel, Silvia</creator><creatorcontrib>Severs, Eline ; Celis, Karen ; Erzeel, Silvia</creatorcontrib><description>This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is founded on a relational conception of political power that locates the constitution of power relations within social interactions, such as political representation. As such, intersectionality theory pushes scholarship beyond studying representation inequalities – that are linked to presumably stable societal positions – to also consider the ways in which political representation (re)creates positions of privilege and disadvantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-3957</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0263395716630987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Politics (Manchester, England), 2016-11, Vol.36 (4), p.346-354</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c0261ebb2ad41ca843fc3e83044666554c61da6edae47e1b57432d5b9ca85923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c0261ebb2ad41ca843fc3e83044666554c61da6edae47e1b57432d5b9ca85923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0263395716630987$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0263395716630987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Severs, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celis, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erzeel, Silvia</creatorcontrib><title>Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation</title><title>Politics (Manchester, England)</title><description>This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is founded on a relational conception of political power that locates the constitution of power relations within social interactions, such as political representation. As such, intersectionality theory pushes scholarship beyond studying representation inequalities – that are linked to presumably stable societal positions – to also consider the ways in which political representation (re)creates positions of privilege and disadvantage.</description><issn>0263-3957</issn><issn>1467-9256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LxDAQxYMoWFfvHvsBjCbNv9abLLouLOhBwVtJk-mapbYliSv99qauJ8HTwLzfG-Y9hC4puaZUqRtSSMYqoaiUjFSlOkIZ5VLhqhDyGGWzjGf9FJ2FsCOEUMl5ht6ehy_wV_no3d51sIVc9za3Lmi7133UW7jN130EH8BEN_S6c3HK4zsMfvpBxyFtnNFd7mH0ECCZZvAcnbS6C3DxOxfo9eH-ZfmIN0-r9fJugw0rWMSVSZ9RaJpCW06NLjlrDYOSEc6llEJwI6nVEqwGroA2QnFWWNFUiRVVwRaIHO4aP4Tgoa1TlA_tp5qSem6m_ttMsuCDJaR49W749ClW-J__BojcZNk</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Severs, Eline</creator><creator>Celis, Karen</creator><creator>Erzeel, Silvia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation</title><author>Severs, Eline ; Celis, Karen ; Erzeel, Silvia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-9c0261ebb2ad41ca843fc3e83044666554c61da6edae47e1b57432d5b9ca85923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Severs, Eline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celis, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erzeel, Silvia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Politics (Manchester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Severs, Eline</au><au>Celis, Karen</au><au>Erzeel, Silvia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation</atitle><jtitle>Politics (Manchester, England)</jtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>346</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>346-354</pages><issn>0263-3957</issn><eissn>1467-9256</eissn><abstract>This article critically reviews the extant literature on social group representation and clarifies the advantages of intersectionality theory for studying political representation. It argues that the merit of intersectionality theory can be found in its ontology of power. Intersectionality theory is founded on a relational conception of political power that locates the constitution of power relations within social interactions, such as political representation. As such, intersectionality theory pushes scholarship beyond studying representation inequalities – that are linked to presumably stable societal positions – to also consider the ways in which political representation (re)creates positions of privilege and disadvantage.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0263395716630987</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-3957
ispartof Politics (Manchester, England), 2016-11, Vol.36 (4), p.346-354
issn 0263-3957
1467-9256
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0263395716630987
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Political Science Complete
title Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power,%20privilege%20and%20disadvantage:%20Intersectionality%20theory%20and%20political%20representation&rft.jtitle=Politics%20(Manchester,%20England)&rft.au=Severs,%20Eline&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=346&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=346-354&rft.issn=0263-3957&rft.eissn=1467-9256&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0263395716630987&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0263395716630987%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0263395716630987&rfr_iscdi=true