Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition

UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical social policy 2024-09
Hauptverfasser: Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey, Beckett Wilson, Helen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Critical social policy
container_volume
creator Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey
Beckett Wilson, Helen
description UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory policies; a lack of training for professionals; and the legacy of prohibitionist constructions of cannabis result in a range of harms, including inequality and stigma. We employ the concepts of ‘stigma power’ and the ‘stigma machine’ to situate these experiences within the UK's contemporary neoliberal agendas and subsequent commitment to prohibition. Patients are not passive recipients of this stigma, employing what we term concealment, (re)construction and evangelism, to resist these processes. Like many of them, we call for comprehensive professional and public education about the legality of medical cannabis. We argue that to reduce stigma and inequality, this must be accompanied by critical reforms of drug policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/02610183241262777
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02610183241262777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_02610183241262777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-f3c30fef43001095b50a0e8cb4bf8c1c96c4758141f66f0ae3d4b5b801cf236e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkMFKAzEURYMoOFY_wF1-YPS9JJPMuJOiViy4qAV3Q5JJ2kibGZIg-ve26M7V5XIPd3EIuUa4QVTqFphEwJYzgUwypdQJqVBIrBXw91NSHff6CJyTi5w_AKBpOlaR1aqEzV6XkN1AdRxoLsnlQ7mj6xdqdYzahEynA-FiyXQXPkPc0BBp2Tpqx1jcV6Gjp1Mat8GEEsZ4Sc683mV39Zczsn58eJsv6uXr0_P8fllbZKrUnlsO3nnBARC6xjSgwbXWCONbi7aTVqimRYFeSg_a8UGYxrSA1jMuHZ8R_P21acw5Od9PKex1-u4R-qOV_p8V_gOiKlVt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey ; Beckett Wilson, Helen</creator><creatorcontrib>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey ; Beckett Wilson, Helen</creatorcontrib><description>UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory policies; a lack of training for professionals; and the legacy of prohibitionist constructions of cannabis result in a range of harms, including inequality and stigma. We employ the concepts of ‘stigma power’ and the ‘stigma machine’ to situate these experiences within the UK's contemporary neoliberal agendas and subsequent commitment to prohibition. Patients are not passive recipients of this stigma, employing what we term concealment, (re)construction and evangelism, to resist these processes. Like many of them, we call for comprehensive professional and public education about the legality of medical cannabis. We argue that to reduce stigma and inequality, this must be accompanied by critical reforms of drug policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-0183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-703X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02610183241262777</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Critical social policy, 2024-09</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-f3c30fef43001095b50a0e8cb4bf8c1c96c4758141f66f0ae3d4b5b801cf236e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckett Wilson, Helen</creatorcontrib><title>Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition</title><title>Critical social policy</title><description>UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory policies; a lack of training for professionals; and the legacy of prohibitionist constructions of cannabis result in a range of harms, including inequality and stigma. We employ the concepts of ‘stigma power’ and the ‘stigma machine’ to situate these experiences within the UK's contemporary neoliberal agendas and subsequent commitment to prohibition. Patients are not passive recipients of this stigma, employing what we term concealment, (re)construction and evangelism, to resist these processes. Like many of them, we call for comprehensive professional and public education about the legality of medical cannabis. We argue that to reduce stigma and inequality, this must be accompanied by critical reforms of drug policies.</description><issn>0261-0183</issn><issn>1461-703X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkMFKAzEURYMoOFY_wF1-YPS9JJPMuJOiViy4qAV3Q5JJ2kibGZIg-ve26M7V5XIPd3EIuUa4QVTqFphEwJYzgUwypdQJqVBIrBXw91NSHff6CJyTi5w_AKBpOlaR1aqEzV6XkN1AdRxoLsnlQ7mj6xdqdYzahEynA-FiyXQXPkPc0BBp2Tpqx1jcV6Gjp1Mat8GEEsZ4Sc683mV39Zczsn58eJsv6uXr0_P8fllbZKrUnlsO3nnBARC6xjSgwbXWCONbi7aTVqimRYFeSg_a8UGYxrSA1jMuHZ8R_P21acw5Od9PKex1-u4R-qOV_p8V_gOiKlVt</recordid><startdate>20240903</startdate><enddate>20240903</enddate><creator>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey</creator><creator>Beckett Wilson, Helen</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240903</creationdate><title>Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition</title><author>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey ; Beckett Wilson, Helen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-f3c30fef43001095b50a0e8cb4bf8c1c96c4758141f66f0ae3d4b5b801cf236e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckett Wilson, Helen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Critical social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey</au><au>Beckett Wilson, Helen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition</atitle><jtitle>Critical social policy</jtitle><date>2024-09-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0261-0183</issn><eissn>1461-703X</eissn><abstract>UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory policies; a lack of training for professionals; and the legacy of prohibitionist constructions of cannabis result in a range of harms, including inequality and stigma. We employ the concepts of ‘stigma power’ and the ‘stigma machine’ to situate these experiences within the UK's contemporary neoliberal agendas and subsequent commitment to prohibition. Patients are not passive recipients of this stigma, employing what we term concealment, (re)construction and evangelism, to resist these processes. Like many of them, we call for comprehensive professional and public education about the legality of medical cannabis. We argue that to reduce stigma and inequality, this must be accompanied by critical reforms of drug policies.</abstract><doi>10.1177/02610183241262777</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-0183
ispartof Critical social policy, 2024-09
issn 0261-0183
1461-703X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02610183241262777
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A51%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stigmatised%20and%20stressed:%20UK%20cannabis%20patients%20living%20in%20the%20context%20of%20prohibition&rft.jtitle=Critical%20social%20policy&rft.au=Metcalf%20McGrath,%20Lindsey&rft.date=2024-09-03&rft.issn=0261-0183&rft.eissn=1461-703X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02610183241262777&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_02610183241262777%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true