Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition
UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical social policy 2024-09 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Critical social policy |
container_volume | |
creator | Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey Beckett Wilson, Helen |
description | UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory policies; a lack of training for professionals; and the legacy of prohibitionist constructions of cannabis result in a range of harms, including inequality and stigma. We employ the concepts of ‘stigma power’ and the ‘stigma machine’ to situate these experiences within the UK's contemporary neoliberal agendas and subsequent commitment to prohibition. Patients are not passive recipients of this stigma, employing what we term concealment, (re)construction and evangelism, to resist these processes. Like many of them, we call for comprehensive professional and public education about the legality of medical cannabis. We argue that to reduce stigma and inequality, this must be accompanied by critical reforms of drug policies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/02610183241262777 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02610183241262777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_02610183241262777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-f3c30fef43001095b50a0e8cb4bf8c1c96c4758141f66f0ae3d4b5b801cf236e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkMFKAzEURYMoOFY_wF1-YPS9JJPMuJOiViy4qAV3Q5JJ2kibGZIg-ve26M7V5XIPd3EIuUa4QVTqFphEwJYzgUwypdQJqVBIrBXw91NSHff6CJyTi5w_AKBpOlaR1aqEzV6XkN1AdRxoLsnlQ7mj6xdqdYzahEynA-FiyXQXPkPc0BBp2Tpqx1jcV6Gjp1Mat8GEEsZ4Sc683mV39Zczsn58eJsv6uXr0_P8fllbZKrUnlsO3nnBARC6xjSgwbXWCONbi7aTVqimRYFeSg_a8UGYxrSA1jMuHZ8R_P21acw5Od9PKex1-u4R-qOV_p8V_gOiKlVt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey ; Beckett Wilson, Helen</creator><creatorcontrib>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey ; Beckett Wilson, Helen</creatorcontrib><description>UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory policies; a lack of training for professionals; and the legacy of prohibitionist constructions of cannabis result in a range of harms, including inequality and stigma. We employ the concepts of ‘stigma power’ and the ‘stigma machine’ to situate these experiences within the UK's contemporary neoliberal agendas and subsequent commitment to prohibition. Patients are not passive recipients of this stigma, employing what we term concealment, (re)construction and evangelism, to resist these processes. Like many of them, we call for comprehensive professional and public education about the legality of medical cannabis. We argue that to reduce stigma and inequality, this must be accompanied by critical reforms of drug policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-0183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-703X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/02610183241262777</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Critical social policy, 2024-09</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-f3c30fef43001095b50a0e8cb4bf8c1c96c4758141f66f0ae3d4b5b801cf236e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckett Wilson, Helen</creatorcontrib><title>Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition</title><title>Critical social policy</title><description>UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory policies; a lack of training for professionals; and the legacy of prohibitionist constructions of cannabis result in a range of harms, including inequality and stigma. We employ the concepts of ‘stigma power’ and the ‘stigma machine’ to situate these experiences within the UK's contemporary neoliberal agendas and subsequent commitment to prohibition. Patients are not passive recipients of this stigma, employing what we term concealment, (re)construction and evangelism, to resist these processes. Like many of them, we call for comprehensive professional and public education about the legality of medical cannabis. We argue that to reduce stigma and inequality, this must be accompanied by critical reforms of drug policies.</description><issn>0261-0183</issn><issn>1461-703X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkMFKAzEURYMoOFY_wF1-YPS9JJPMuJOiViy4qAV3Q5JJ2kibGZIg-ve26M7V5XIPd3EIuUa4QVTqFphEwJYzgUwypdQJqVBIrBXw91NSHff6CJyTi5w_AKBpOlaR1aqEzV6XkN1AdRxoLsnlQ7mj6xdqdYzahEynA-FiyXQXPkPc0BBp2Tpqx1jcV6Gjp1Mat8GEEsZ4Sc683mV39Zczsn58eJsv6uXr0_P8fllbZKrUnlsO3nnBARC6xjSgwbXWCONbi7aTVqimRYFeSg_a8UGYxrSA1jMuHZ8R_P21acw5Od9PKex1-u4R-qOV_p8V_gOiKlVt</recordid><startdate>20240903</startdate><enddate>20240903</enddate><creator>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey</creator><creator>Beckett Wilson, Helen</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240903</creationdate><title>Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition</title><author>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey ; Beckett Wilson, Helen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-f3c30fef43001095b50a0e8cb4bf8c1c96c4758141f66f0ae3d4b5b801cf236e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckett Wilson, Helen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Critical social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Metcalf McGrath, Lindsey</au><au>Beckett Wilson, Helen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition</atitle><jtitle>Critical social policy</jtitle><date>2024-09-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0261-0183</issn><eissn>1461-703X</eissn><abstract>UK cannabis patients occupy a complex policy space in which prescribing has been lawful since 2018, but the drug remains otherwise illegal. This article draws on qualitative interviews from the first UK sociological study of cannabis patient experiences. The findings demonstrate that contradictory policies; a lack of training for professionals; and the legacy of prohibitionist constructions of cannabis result in a range of harms, including inequality and stigma. We employ the concepts of ‘stigma power’ and the ‘stigma machine’ to situate these experiences within the UK's contemporary neoliberal agendas and subsequent commitment to prohibition. Patients are not passive recipients of this stigma, employing what we term concealment, (re)construction and evangelism, to resist these processes. Like many of them, we call for comprehensive professional and public education about the legality of medical cannabis. We argue that to reduce stigma and inequality, this must be accompanied by critical reforms of drug policies.</abstract><doi>10.1177/02610183241262777</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-0183 |
ispartof | Critical social policy, 2024-09 |
issn | 0261-0183 1461-703X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_02610183241262777 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
title | Stigmatised and stressed: UK cannabis patients living in the context of prohibition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A51%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stigmatised%20and%20stressed:%20UK%20cannabis%20patients%20living%20in%20the%20context%20of%20prohibition&rft.jtitle=Critical%20social%20policy&rft.au=Metcalf%20McGrath,%20Lindsey&rft.date=2024-09-03&rft.issn=0261-0183&rft.eissn=1461-703X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/02610183241262777&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_02610183241262777%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |