What Counts as Religion? A Study of Federal Endorsing Agencies as Hiring Gatekeepers

What counts as religion, and does the state perpetuate labor stratification on the basis of religion? The labor stratification literature suggests that employers often perpetuate gendered, racial, and socioeconomic inequality in hiring, but in this case study of state-appointed endorsing agencies, f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Labor studies journal 2024-09
Hauptverfasser: Tien, Grace, Cadge, Wendy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Labor studies journal
container_volume
creator Tien, Grace
Cadge, Wendy
description What counts as religion, and does the state perpetuate labor stratification on the basis of religion? The labor stratification literature suggests that employers often perpetuate gendered, racial, and socioeconomic inequality in hiring, but in this case study of state-appointed endorsing agencies, findings suggest that the federal government—a primary chaplain employer—perpetuates stratification by religion. Given the institutional separation of church and state, the state technically does not interfere with the free practice of religion or in constructing religion, but because federal sectors like the military, veterans affairs, and federal prisons require chaplains, the state appoints and recognizes specific groups—endorsing agencies—to vet and evaluate the preparation of chaplains to serve in these federal roles. Endorsing agencies thus act as state-appointed gatekeepers in a system set up by the state that has no clear change mechanism for expanding the number and type of religious endorsing agencies, resulting in the exclusion of religious groups in hiring. Drawing on qualitative data from endorsing agencies and complementary archival material, we argue that the state plays a role in setting up a system that both shapes and perpetuates labor stratification by religion. We conclude by discussing the implications for scholarship on religion, inequality, and labor stratification.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0160449X241274338
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0160449X241274338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_0160449X241274338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1177_0160449X2412743383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjsFqg0AURYeSQE2TD8ju_YDNPEerrooETdZtoNnJEJ92Ujsj83SRvy-W7rrL6sK998ARYovyGTFNdxJfZBzn5yjGKI2Vyh5EgInKwjxNsoUI5j2cD49ixXyVElWUqECcPj71CHs32ZFBM7xRbzrj7CsU8D5OzQ1cCxU15HUPpW2cZ2M7KDqyF0O_yNH4uTrokb6IBvK8FstW90ybv3wSWJWn_TG8eMfsqa0Hb761v9Uo61m__qev7mF-AHbmS_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>What Counts as Religion? A Study of Federal Endorsing Agencies as Hiring Gatekeepers</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Tien, Grace ; Cadge, Wendy</creator><creatorcontrib>Tien, Grace ; Cadge, Wendy</creatorcontrib><description>What counts as religion, and does the state perpetuate labor stratification on the basis of religion? The labor stratification literature suggests that employers often perpetuate gendered, racial, and socioeconomic inequality in hiring, but in this case study of state-appointed endorsing agencies, findings suggest that the federal government—a primary chaplain employer—perpetuates stratification by religion. Given the institutional separation of church and state, the state technically does not interfere with the free practice of religion or in constructing religion, but because federal sectors like the military, veterans affairs, and federal prisons require chaplains, the state appoints and recognizes specific groups—endorsing agencies—to vet and evaluate the preparation of chaplains to serve in these federal roles. Endorsing agencies thus act as state-appointed gatekeepers in a system set up by the state that has no clear change mechanism for expanding the number and type of religious endorsing agencies, resulting in the exclusion of religious groups in hiring. Drawing on qualitative data from endorsing agencies and complementary archival material, we argue that the state plays a role in setting up a system that both shapes and perpetuates labor stratification by religion. We conclude by discussing the implications for scholarship on religion, inequality, and labor stratification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-449X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-9758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0160449X241274338</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Labor studies journal, 2024-09</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1177_0160449X2412743383</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5381-4871</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tien, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadge, Wendy</creatorcontrib><title>What Counts as Religion? A Study of Federal Endorsing Agencies as Hiring Gatekeepers</title><title>Labor studies journal</title><description>What counts as religion, and does the state perpetuate labor stratification on the basis of religion? The labor stratification literature suggests that employers often perpetuate gendered, racial, and socioeconomic inequality in hiring, but in this case study of state-appointed endorsing agencies, findings suggest that the federal government—a primary chaplain employer—perpetuates stratification by religion. Given the institutional separation of church and state, the state technically does not interfere with the free practice of religion or in constructing religion, but because federal sectors like the military, veterans affairs, and federal prisons require chaplains, the state appoints and recognizes specific groups—endorsing agencies—to vet and evaluate the preparation of chaplains to serve in these federal roles. Endorsing agencies thus act as state-appointed gatekeepers in a system set up by the state that has no clear change mechanism for expanding the number and type of religious endorsing agencies, resulting in the exclusion of religious groups in hiring. Drawing on qualitative data from endorsing agencies and complementary archival material, we argue that the state plays a role in setting up a system that both shapes and perpetuates labor stratification by religion. We conclude by discussing the implications for scholarship on religion, inequality, and labor stratification.</description><issn>0160-449X</issn><issn>1538-9758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdjsFqg0AURYeSQE2TD8ju_YDNPEerrooETdZtoNnJEJ92Ujsj83SRvy-W7rrL6sK998ARYovyGTFNdxJfZBzn5yjGKI2Vyh5EgInKwjxNsoUI5j2cD49ixXyVElWUqECcPj71CHs32ZFBM7xRbzrj7CsU8D5OzQ1cCxU15HUPpW2cZ2M7KDqyF0O_yNH4uTrokb6IBvK8FstW90ybv3wSWJWn_TG8eMfsqa0Hb761v9Uo61m__qev7mF-AHbmS_s</recordid><startdate>20240912</startdate><enddate>20240912</enddate><creator>Tien, Grace</creator><creator>Cadge, Wendy</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5381-4871</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240912</creationdate><title>What Counts as Religion? A Study of Federal Endorsing Agencies as Hiring Gatekeepers</title><author>Tien, Grace ; Cadge, Wendy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1177_0160449X2412743383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tien, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cadge, Wendy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Labor studies journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tien, Grace</au><au>Cadge, Wendy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What Counts as Religion? A Study of Federal Endorsing Agencies as Hiring Gatekeepers</atitle><jtitle>Labor studies journal</jtitle><date>2024-09-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0160-449X</issn><eissn>1538-9758</eissn><abstract>What counts as religion, and does the state perpetuate labor stratification on the basis of religion? The labor stratification literature suggests that employers often perpetuate gendered, racial, and socioeconomic inequality in hiring, but in this case study of state-appointed endorsing agencies, findings suggest that the federal government—a primary chaplain employer—perpetuates stratification by religion. Given the institutional separation of church and state, the state technically does not interfere with the free practice of religion or in constructing religion, but because federal sectors like the military, veterans affairs, and federal prisons require chaplains, the state appoints and recognizes specific groups—endorsing agencies—to vet and evaluate the preparation of chaplains to serve in these federal roles. Endorsing agencies thus act as state-appointed gatekeepers in a system set up by the state that has no clear change mechanism for expanding the number and type of religious endorsing agencies, resulting in the exclusion of religious groups in hiring. Drawing on qualitative data from endorsing agencies and complementary archival material, we argue that the state plays a role in setting up a system that both shapes and perpetuates labor stratification by religion. We conclude by discussing the implications for scholarship on religion, inequality, and labor stratification.</abstract><doi>10.1177/0160449X241274338</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5381-4871</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0160-449X
ispartof Labor studies journal, 2024-09
issn 0160-449X
1538-9758
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0160449X241274338
source SAGE Complete; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
title What Counts as Religion? A Study of Federal Endorsing Agencies as Hiring Gatekeepers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A47%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20Counts%20as%20Religion?%20A%20Study%20of%20Federal%20Endorsing%20Agencies%20as%20Hiring%20Gatekeepers&rft.jtitle=Labor%20studies%20journal&rft.au=Tien,%20Grace&rft.date=2024-09-12&rft.issn=0160-449X&rft.eissn=1538-9758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0160449X241274338&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_0160449X241274338%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true