Attention, Negative Affect, and Altruism: An Ecological Validation
This field study attempted to replicate the finding that sadness decreases generosity and also to test the plausi bility of the suggestion that sadness decreases generosity because it decreases the radius of attention. Donations to a well-known charity were collected both prior to and after movies w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Personality & social psychology bulletin 1976-12, Vol.3 (1), p.54-58 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 58 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 54 |
container_title | Personality & social psychology bulletin |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Underwood, Bill Berenson, James F. Berenson, Ronald J. Cheng, Kenneth K. Wilson, Dayna Kulik, James Moore, Bert S. Wenzel, Gary |
description | This field study attempted to replicate the finding that sadness decreases generosity and also to test the plausi bility of the suggestion that sadness decreases generosity because it decreases the radius of attention. Donations to a well-known charity were collected both prior to and after movies which had independently been rated as sad or neutral. The sad movies produced significantly lower donation rates than the neutral movies. An attention manipulation did not alter this relationship, suggesting that the negative mood effect is not mediated by a decreased radius of attention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/014616727600300106 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_014616727600300106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_014616727600300106</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_014616727600300106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1326-b08aa9e996ad2477692a66e9341db4a2f7a4f81faa5e1260898e644235ff64ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRMFZfwNU8QGPv_OROxl0srQpFN-o23CYzISVNZCYVfHsb6k5wdTbfdzgcxm4F3AlhzAKERoFGGgRQAALwjCUiy2RqtFLnLJmAdCIu2VWMOwDQqGXCHopxdP3YDv2cv7iGxvbL8cJ7V41zTn3Ni24Mhzbu73nR81U1dEPTVtTxD-ramibxml146qK7-c0Ze1-v3pZP6eb18XlZbNJKKInpFnIi66xFqqU2Bq0kRGeVFvVWk_SGtM-FJ8qckAi5zR1qLVXmPerKqRmTp94qDDEG58vP0O4pfJcCyumF8u8LR2lxkiI1rtwNh9AfN_5n_AAqxlsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attention, Negative Affect, and Altruism: An Ecological Validation</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Underwood, Bill ; Berenson, James F. ; Berenson, Ronald J. ; Cheng, Kenneth K. ; Wilson, Dayna ; Kulik, James ; Moore, Bert S. ; Wenzel, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Bill ; Berenson, James F. ; Berenson, Ronald J. ; Cheng, Kenneth K. ; Wilson, Dayna ; Kulik, James ; Moore, Bert S. ; Wenzel, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>This field study attempted to replicate the finding that sadness decreases generosity and also to test the plausi bility of the suggestion that sadness decreases generosity because it decreases the radius of attention. Donations to a well-known charity were collected both prior to and after movies which had independently been rated as sad or neutral. The sad movies produced significantly lower donation rates than the neutral movies. An attention manipulation did not alter this relationship, suggesting that the negative mood effect is not mediated by a decreased radius of attention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/014616727600300106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Personality & social psychology bulletin, 1976-12, Vol.3 (1), p.54-58</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1326-b08aa9e996ad2477692a66e9341db4a2f7a4f81faa5e1260898e644235ff64ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1326-b08aa9e996ad2477692a66e9341db4a2f7a4f81faa5e1260898e644235ff64ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014616727600300106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014616727600300106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berenson, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berenson, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Kenneth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Dayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulik, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Bert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Attention, Negative Affect, and Altruism: An Ecological Validation</title><title>Personality & social psychology bulletin</title><description>This field study attempted to replicate the finding that sadness decreases generosity and also to test the plausi bility of the suggestion that sadness decreases generosity because it decreases the radius of attention. Donations to a well-known charity were collected both prior to and after movies which had independently been rated as sad or neutral. The sad movies produced significantly lower donation rates than the neutral movies. An attention manipulation did not alter this relationship, suggesting that the negative mood effect is not mediated by a decreased radius of attention.</description><issn>0146-1672</issn><issn>1552-7433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRMFZfwNU8QGPv_OROxl0srQpFN-o23CYzISVNZCYVfHsb6k5wdTbfdzgcxm4F3AlhzAKERoFGGgRQAALwjCUiy2RqtFLnLJmAdCIu2VWMOwDQqGXCHopxdP3YDv2cv7iGxvbL8cJ7V41zTn3Ni24Mhzbu73nR81U1dEPTVtTxD-ramibxml146qK7-c0Ze1-v3pZP6eb18XlZbNJKKInpFnIi66xFqqU2Bq0kRGeVFvVWk_SGtM-FJ8qckAi5zR1qLVXmPerKqRmTp94qDDEG58vP0O4pfJcCyumF8u8LR2lxkiI1rtwNh9AfN_5n_AAqxlsc</recordid><startdate>197612</startdate><enddate>197612</enddate><creator>Underwood, Bill</creator><creator>Berenson, James F.</creator><creator>Berenson, Ronald J.</creator><creator>Cheng, Kenneth K.</creator><creator>Wilson, Dayna</creator><creator>Kulik, James</creator><creator>Moore, Bert S.</creator><creator>Wenzel, Gary</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197612</creationdate><title>Attention, Negative Affect, and Altruism: An Ecological Validation</title><author>Underwood, Bill ; Berenson, James F. ; Berenson, Ronald J. ; Cheng, Kenneth K. ; Wilson, Dayna ; Kulik, James ; Moore, Bert S. ; Wenzel, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1326-b08aa9e996ad2477692a66e9341db4a2f7a4f81faa5e1260898e644235ff64ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Underwood, Bill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berenson, James F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berenson, Ronald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Kenneth K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Dayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulik, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Bert S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzel, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Underwood, Bill</au><au>Berenson, James F.</au><au>Berenson, Ronald J.</au><au>Cheng, Kenneth K.</au><au>Wilson, Dayna</au><au>Kulik, James</au><au>Moore, Bert S.</au><au>Wenzel, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attention, Negative Affect, and Altruism: An Ecological Validation</atitle><jtitle>Personality & social psychology bulletin</jtitle><date>1976-12</date><risdate>1976</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>54</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>54-58</pages><issn>0146-1672</issn><eissn>1552-7433</eissn><abstract>This field study attempted to replicate the finding that sadness decreases generosity and also to test the plausi bility of the suggestion that sadness decreases generosity because it decreases the radius of attention. Donations to a well-known charity were collected both prior to and after movies which had independently been rated as sad or neutral. The sad movies produced significantly lower donation rates than the neutral movies. An attention manipulation did not alter this relationship, suggesting that the negative mood effect is not mediated by a decreased radius of attention.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/014616727600300106</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-1672 |
ispartof | Personality & social psychology bulletin, 1976-12, Vol.3 (1), p.54-58 |
issn | 0146-1672 1552-7433 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_014616727600300106 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Attention, Negative Affect, and Altruism: An Ecological Validation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T04%3A32%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attention,%20Negative%20Affect,%20and%20Altruism:%20An%20Ecological%20Validation&rft.jtitle=Personality%20&%20social%20psychology%20bulletin&rft.au=Underwood,%20Bill&rft.date=1976-12&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=54-58&rft.issn=0146-1672&rft.eissn=1552-7433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/014616727600300106&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_014616727600300106%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_014616727600300106&rfr_iscdi=true |