Systematic Analyses of Reliabilities: Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist and the Behaviour Problem Checklist

Systematic Analyses of Reliabilities: Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist and the Behaviour Problem Checklist

This paper describes two experiments designed to assess the reliability of two behavioural checklists which are commonly used in the United States, the Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist (WPBIC) and the Behaviour Problem Checklist (BPC). Intra-rater reliability was assessed on the WPB...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:School psychology international 1983-10, Vol.4 (4), p.199-202
Hauptverfasser: Barton, Lyle E., Brulle, Andrew R., Repp, Alan C., Gallagher, James F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 202
container_issue 4
container_start_page 199
container_title School psychology international
container_volume 4
creator Barton, Lyle E.
Brulle, Andrew R.
Repp, Alan C.
Gallagher, James F.
description This paper describes two experiments designed to assess the reliability of two behavioural checklists which are commonly used in the United States, the Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist (WPBIC) and the Behaviour Problem Checklist (BPC). Intra-rater reliability was assessed on the WPBIC and then on the BPC. Results indicated that both checklists would be adequate for screening, but that neither checklist exhibited sufficient reliability to be used for programmatic purposes.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0143034383044002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0143034383044002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0143034383044002</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0143034383044002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-8a7a9ac5bbe7b7e06967aca0dfc601e51ca4fe6e0882e986fbfd720e032254fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j01LxDAURYMoWEf3LrtwG30vSZN0OQzqCAOCH-vymnmRDB0rTV303ztlXAmu7uLec-EIcY1wi-jcHaDRoI32GowBUCeiQGNROu3MqSjmWs79ubjIeQeAHmpbiJvXKY-8pzGFcvlJ3ZQ5l30sX7hL1KYujYnzpTiL1GW--s2FeH-4f1ut5eb58Wm13MiAph6lJ0c1hapt2bWOwdbWUSDYxmABucJAJrJl8F5x7W1s49YpYNBKVSYGvRBw_A1Dn_PAsfka0p6GqUFoZsvmr-UBkUck0wc3u_57OEjk__c_hexREg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic Analyses of Reliabilities: Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist and the Behaviour Problem Checklist</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Barton, Lyle E. ; Brulle, Andrew R. ; Repp, Alan C. ; Gallagher, James F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barton, Lyle E. ; Brulle, Andrew R. ; Repp, Alan C. ; Gallagher, James F.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes two experiments designed to assess the reliability of two behavioural checklists which are commonly used in the United States, the Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist (WPBIC) and the Behaviour Problem Checklist (BPC). Intra-rater reliability was assessed on the WPBIC and then on the BPC. Results indicated that both checklists would be adequate for screening, but that neither checklist exhibited sufficient reliability to be used for programmatic purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-0343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0143034383044002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>1 St. Anne's Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 3UN: Holt, Rinehart and Winston</publisher><ispartof>School psychology international, 1983-10, Vol.4 (4), p.199-202</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-8a7a9ac5bbe7b7e06967aca0dfc601e51ca4fe6e0882e986fbfd720e032254fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0143034383044002$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0143034383044002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,43612,43613</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barton, Lyle E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brulle, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repp, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, James F.</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic Analyses of Reliabilities: Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist and the Behaviour Problem Checklist</title><title>School psychology international</title><description>This paper describes two experiments designed to assess the reliability of two behavioural checklists which are commonly used in the United States, the Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist (WPBIC) and the Behaviour Problem Checklist (BPC). Intra-rater reliability was assessed on the WPBIC and then on the BPC. Results indicated that both checklists would be adequate for screening, but that neither checklist exhibited sufficient reliability to be used for programmatic purposes.</description><issn>0143-0343</issn><issn>1461-7374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j01LxDAURYMoWEf3LrtwG30vSZN0OQzqCAOCH-vymnmRDB0rTV303ztlXAmu7uLec-EIcY1wi-jcHaDRoI32GowBUCeiQGNROu3MqSjmWs79ubjIeQeAHmpbiJvXKY-8pzGFcvlJ3ZQ5l30sX7hL1KYujYnzpTiL1GW--s2FeH-4f1ut5eb58Wm13MiAph6lJ0c1hapt2bWOwdbWUSDYxmABucJAJrJl8F5x7W1s49YpYNBKVSYGvRBw_A1Dn_PAsfka0p6GqUFoZsvmr-UBkUck0wc3u_57OEjk__c_hexREg</recordid><startdate>198310</startdate><enddate>198310</enddate><creator>Barton, Lyle E.</creator><creator>Brulle, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Repp, Alan C.</creator><creator>Gallagher, James F.</creator><general>Holt, Rinehart and Winston</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198310</creationdate><title>Systematic Analyses of Reliabilities</title><author>Barton, Lyle E. ; Brulle, Andrew R. ; Repp, Alan C. ; Gallagher, James F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c149t-8a7a9ac5bbe7b7e06967aca0dfc601e51ca4fe6e0882e986fbfd720e032254fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barton, Lyle E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brulle, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repp, Alan C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, James F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>School psychology international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barton, Lyle E.</au><au>Brulle, Andrew R.</au><au>Repp, Alan C.</au><au>Gallagher, James F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic Analyses of Reliabilities: Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist and the Behaviour Problem Checklist</atitle><jtitle>School psychology international</jtitle><date>1983-10</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>199-202</pages><issn>0143-0343</issn><eissn>1461-7374</eissn><abstract>This paper describes two experiments designed to assess the reliability of two behavioural checklists which are commonly used in the United States, the Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist (WPBIC) and the Behaviour Problem Checklist (BPC). Intra-rater reliability was assessed on the WPBIC and then on the BPC. Results indicated that both checklists would be adequate for screening, but that neither checklist exhibited sufficient reliability to be used for programmatic purposes.</abstract><cop>1 St. Anne's Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 3UN</cop><pub>Holt, Rinehart and Winston</pub><doi>10.1177/0143034383044002</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-0343
ispartof School psychology international, 1983-10, Vol.4 (4), p.199-202
issn 0143-0343
1461-7374
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0143034383044002
source SAGE Journals
title Systematic Analyses of Reliabilities: Walker Problem Behaviour Identification Checklist and the Behaviour Problem Checklist
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A24%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20Analyses%20of%20Reliabilities:%20Walker%20Problem%20Behaviour%20Identification%20Checklist%20and%20the%20Behaviour%20Problem%20Checklist&rft.jtitle=School%20psychology%20international&rft.au=Barton,%20Lyle%20E.&rft.date=1983-10&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=199-202&rft.issn=0143-0343&rft.eissn=1461-7374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0143034383044002&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0143034383044002%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0143034383044002&rfr_iscdi=true