Toward a More Powerful Experimental Communication Science: An Assessment of Two Decades’ Research (2001–2023)

Low statistical power undermines a credible scientific discipline. This paper presents a statistical power assessment of experimental communication research based on a random sample of 416 studies published in five central communication journals over the last two decades (2001–2023). Our analyses sh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communication research 2025-01
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Ye, Shen, Lijiang, Pan, Zhongdang, Qian, Sijia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Communication research
container_volume
creator Sun, Ye
Shen, Lijiang
Pan, Zhongdang
Qian, Sijia
description Low statistical power undermines a credible scientific discipline. This paper presents a statistical power assessment of experimental communication research based on a random sample of 416 studies published in five central communication journals over the last two decades (2001–2023). Our analyses showed that there was a lack of attention to power and power analysis, with the majority of studies not even mentioning statistical power. We also demonstrated that between-subjects studies were overall underpowered for two-group, one-way multi-group, and factorial designs. Our findings suggest that conducting power analyses to ensure adequate statistical power should be a key priority for experimental communication research.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00936502241308599
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00936502241308599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_00936502241308599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-15962257343890d38f691ba9ad51d9cf92aac5bff9c0b48bf798a8cdb1ddf9353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkDtOAzEURS0EEiGwADqXUAy8Z8exTReF8JGCQBDqkccfMSgZBzvRQJc9ULG9rARG0FHd4h5d6R5CjhHOEKU8B9B8KICxAXJQQusd0kMhWMEVwi7pdX3RAfvkIOdXAJAaZY-8zWJrkqOG3sXk6UNsfQrrOZ28L32qF75ZmTkdx8Vi3dTWrOrY0Cdb-8b6Czpq6Chnn3OH0RjorI300lvjfN5uvuijz94k-0JPGABuN58MGD89JHvBzLM_-ss-eb6azMY3xfT--nY8mhYWmVwVKPSQMSH5gCsNjqsw1FgZbZxAp23QzBgrqhC0hWqgqiC1Msq6Cp0LmgveJ_i7a1PMOflQLn8OmfRRIpSds_KfM_4NWElf0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward a More Powerful Experimental Communication Science: An Assessment of Two Decades’ Research (2001–2023)</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Sun, Ye ; Shen, Lijiang ; Pan, Zhongdang ; Qian, Sijia</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ye ; Shen, Lijiang ; Pan, Zhongdang ; Qian, Sijia</creatorcontrib><description>Low statistical power undermines a credible scientific discipline. This paper presents a statistical power assessment of experimental communication research based on a random sample of 416 studies published in five central communication journals over the last two decades (2001–2023). Our analyses showed that there was a lack of attention to power and power analysis, with the majority of studies not even mentioning statistical power. We also demonstrated that between-subjects studies were overall underpowered for two-group, one-way multi-group, and factorial designs. Our findings suggest that conducting power analyses to ensure adequate statistical power should be a key priority for experimental communication research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-6502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00936502241308599</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Communication research, 2025-01</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-15962257343890d38f691ba9ad51d9cf92aac5bff9c0b48bf798a8cdb1ddf9353</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8551-2037 ; 0000-0001-7949-1153 ; 0000-0003-4870-4878</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Lijiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhongdang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Sijia</creatorcontrib><title>Toward a More Powerful Experimental Communication Science: An Assessment of Two Decades’ Research (2001–2023)</title><title>Communication research</title><description>Low statistical power undermines a credible scientific discipline. This paper presents a statistical power assessment of experimental communication research based on a random sample of 416 studies published in five central communication journals over the last two decades (2001–2023). Our analyses showed that there was a lack of attention to power and power analysis, with the majority of studies not even mentioning statistical power. We also demonstrated that between-subjects studies were overall underpowered for two-group, one-way multi-group, and factorial designs. Our findings suggest that conducting power analyses to ensure adequate statistical power should be a key priority for experimental communication research.</description><issn>0093-6502</issn><issn>1552-3810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkDtOAzEURS0EEiGwADqXUAy8Z8exTReF8JGCQBDqkccfMSgZBzvRQJc9ULG9rARG0FHd4h5d6R5CjhHOEKU8B9B8KICxAXJQQusd0kMhWMEVwi7pdX3RAfvkIOdXAJAaZY-8zWJrkqOG3sXk6UNsfQrrOZ28L32qF75ZmTkdx8Vi3dTWrOrY0Cdb-8b6Czpq6Chnn3OH0RjorI300lvjfN5uvuijz94k-0JPGABuN58MGD89JHvBzLM_-ss-eb6azMY3xfT--nY8mhYWmVwVKPSQMSH5gCsNjqsw1FgZbZxAp23QzBgrqhC0hWqgqiC1Msq6Cp0LmgveJ_i7a1PMOflQLn8OmfRRIpSds_KfM_4NWElf0g</recordid><startdate>20250102</startdate><enddate>20250102</enddate><creator>Sun, Ye</creator><creator>Shen, Lijiang</creator><creator>Pan, Zhongdang</creator><creator>Qian, Sijia</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-2037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-1153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4870-4878</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250102</creationdate><title>Toward a More Powerful Experimental Communication Science: An Assessment of Two Decades’ Research (2001–2023)</title><author>Sun, Ye ; Shen, Lijiang ; Pan, Zhongdang ; Qian, Sijia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-15962257343890d38f691ba9ad51d9cf92aac5bff9c0b48bf798a8cdb1ddf9353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Lijiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhongdang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Sijia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communication research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Ye</au><au>Shen, Lijiang</au><au>Pan, Zhongdang</au><au>Qian, Sijia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward a More Powerful Experimental Communication Science: An Assessment of Two Decades’ Research (2001–2023)</atitle><jtitle>Communication research</jtitle><date>2025-01-02</date><risdate>2025</risdate><issn>0093-6502</issn><eissn>1552-3810</eissn><abstract>Low statistical power undermines a credible scientific discipline. This paper presents a statistical power assessment of experimental communication research based on a random sample of 416 studies published in five central communication journals over the last two decades (2001–2023). Our analyses showed that there was a lack of attention to power and power analysis, with the majority of studies not even mentioning statistical power. We also demonstrated that between-subjects studies were overall underpowered for two-group, one-way multi-group, and factorial designs. Our findings suggest that conducting power analyses to ensure adequate statistical power should be a key priority for experimental communication research.</abstract><doi>10.1177/00936502241308599</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8551-2037</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7949-1153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4870-4878</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-6502
ispartof Communication research, 2025-01
issn 0093-6502
1552-3810
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00936502241308599
source SAGE Complete
title Toward a More Powerful Experimental Communication Science: An Assessment of Two Decades’ Research (2001–2023)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T10%3A26%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20a%20More%20Powerful%20Experimental%20Communication%20Science:%20An%20Assessment%20of%20Two%20Decades%E2%80%99%20Research%20(2001%E2%80%932023)&rft.jtitle=Communication%20research&rft.au=Sun,%20Ye&rft.date=2025-01-02&rft.issn=0093-6502&rft.eissn=1552-3810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00936502241308599&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_00936502241308599%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true