Dynamic and Daily Partner-Specific Processes of Relationship Uncertainty and Enacted Relationship Talk

Guided by relational turbulence theory (RTT), this intensive longitudinal study examined how within-person daily fluctuations in relationship uncertainty corresponded with individuals’ decisions to engage in daily enacted relationship talk. Using a person-specific approach, this study also examined...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Communication research 2024-10
Hauptverfasser: Bolkan, San, Goodboy, Alan K., Dillow, Megan R., Chiasson, Rebekah M., Vendemia, Megan A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Communication research
container_volume
creator Bolkan, San
Goodboy, Alan K.
Dillow, Megan R.
Chiasson, Rebekah M.
Vendemia, Megan A.
description Guided by relational turbulence theory (RTT), this intensive longitudinal study examined how within-person daily fluctuations in relationship uncertainty corresponded with individuals’ decisions to engage in daily enacted relationship talk. Using a person-specific approach, this study also examined how individuals’ attachment insecurity predicted within-person differences in month-long processes predicted by RTT. College-aged dating partners ( N = 202, between-person) reported their attachment proclivities in a pre-test survey and subsequently reported on their relationship uncertainty and enacted relationship talk once per day over a period of 30 consecutive days ( N = 5,240, within-person). Results indicated that on days when individuals experienced elevated relationship uncertainty, they engaged in less relationship talk than they typically did. Additionally, we found that individuals with more volatility (intraindividual variability) and inertia (day-to-day carryover) in relationship uncertainty throughout the month enacted less relationship talk on average. Finally, results indicated that attachment insecurity predicted person-specific month-long processes consistent with RTT.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00936502241285997
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00936502241285997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_00936502241285997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-6484a38c0553dd9e5de96563c21522aa659bf532ea962d7198288fbc9df6d133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkLtOwzAYRi0EEqXwAGx5gYB_O76NqC0UqRIVlDn664swpE5lZ8nbQ4AFMX3DOTrDR8g10BsApW4pNVwKylgDTAtj1AmZgRCs5hroKZlNvJ6Ec3JRyjulVBlQMxKWY8JDtBUmVy0xdmO1xTwkn-uXo7cxfKFt7q0vxZeqD9Wz73CIfSpv8Vi9JuvzgDEN43dgldAO3v2Vdth9XJKzgF3xV787J7v71W6xrjdPD4-Lu01tgamhlo1ukGtLheDOGS-cN1JIbhkIxhClMPsgOPNoJHMKjGZah701LkgHnM8J_GRt7kvJPrTHHA-YxxZoO_3U_vuJfwKfcFuK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic and Daily Partner-Specific Processes of Relationship Uncertainty and Enacted Relationship Talk</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Bolkan, San ; Goodboy, Alan K. ; Dillow, Megan R. ; Chiasson, Rebekah M. ; Vendemia, Megan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bolkan, San ; Goodboy, Alan K. ; Dillow, Megan R. ; Chiasson, Rebekah M. ; Vendemia, Megan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Guided by relational turbulence theory (RTT), this intensive longitudinal study examined how within-person daily fluctuations in relationship uncertainty corresponded with individuals’ decisions to engage in daily enacted relationship talk. Using a person-specific approach, this study also examined how individuals’ attachment insecurity predicted within-person differences in month-long processes predicted by RTT. College-aged dating partners ( N = 202, between-person) reported their attachment proclivities in a pre-test survey and subsequently reported on their relationship uncertainty and enacted relationship talk once per day over a period of 30 consecutive days ( N = 5,240, within-person). Results indicated that on days when individuals experienced elevated relationship uncertainty, they engaged in less relationship talk than they typically did. Additionally, we found that individuals with more volatility (intraindividual variability) and inertia (day-to-day carryover) in relationship uncertainty throughout the month enacted less relationship talk on average. Finally, results indicated that attachment insecurity predicted person-specific month-long processes consistent with RTT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-6502</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3810</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00936502241285997</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Communication research, 2024-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-6484a38c0553dd9e5de96563c21522aa659bf532ea962d7198288fbc9df6d133</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6865-317X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bolkan, San</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodboy, Alan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillow, Megan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiasson, Rebekah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vendemia, Megan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic and Daily Partner-Specific Processes of Relationship Uncertainty and Enacted Relationship Talk</title><title>Communication research</title><description>Guided by relational turbulence theory (RTT), this intensive longitudinal study examined how within-person daily fluctuations in relationship uncertainty corresponded with individuals’ decisions to engage in daily enacted relationship talk. Using a person-specific approach, this study also examined how individuals’ attachment insecurity predicted within-person differences in month-long processes predicted by RTT. College-aged dating partners ( N = 202, between-person) reported their attachment proclivities in a pre-test survey and subsequently reported on their relationship uncertainty and enacted relationship talk once per day over a period of 30 consecutive days ( N = 5,240, within-person). Results indicated that on days when individuals experienced elevated relationship uncertainty, they engaged in less relationship talk than they typically did. Additionally, we found that individuals with more volatility (intraindividual variability) and inertia (day-to-day carryover) in relationship uncertainty throughout the month enacted less relationship talk on average. Finally, results indicated that attachment insecurity predicted person-specific month-long processes consistent with RTT.</description><issn>0093-6502</issn><issn>1552-3810</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkLtOwzAYRi0EEqXwAGx5gYB_O76NqC0UqRIVlDn664swpE5lZ8nbQ4AFMX3DOTrDR8g10BsApW4pNVwKylgDTAtj1AmZgRCs5hroKZlNvJ6Ec3JRyjulVBlQMxKWY8JDtBUmVy0xdmO1xTwkn-uXo7cxfKFt7q0vxZeqD9Wz73CIfSpv8Vi9JuvzgDEN43dgldAO3v2Vdth9XJKzgF3xV787J7v71W6xrjdPD4-Lu01tgamhlo1ukGtLheDOGS-cN1JIbhkIxhClMPsgOPNoJHMKjGZah701LkgHnM8J_GRt7kvJPrTHHA-YxxZoO_3U_vuJfwKfcFuK</recordid><startdate>20241008</startdate><enddate>20241008</enddate><creator>Bolkan, San</creator><creator>Goodboy, Alan K.</creator><creator>Dillow, Megan R.</creator><creator>Chiasson, Rebekah M.</creator><creator>Vendemia, Megan A.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6865-317X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241008</creationdate><title>Dynamic and Daily Partner-Specific Processes of Relationship Uncertainty and Enacted Relationship Talk</title><author>Bolkan, San ; Goodboy, Alan K. ; Dillow, Megan R. ; Chiasson, Rebekah M. ; Vendemia, Megan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-6484a38c0553dd9e5de96563c21522aa659bf532ea962d7198288fbc9df6d133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bolkan, San</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodboy, Alan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillow, Megan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiasson, Rebekah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vendemia, Megan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Communication research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bolkan, San</au><au>Goodboy, Alan K.</au><au>Dillow, Megan R.</au><au>Chiasson, Rebekah M.</au><au>Vendemia, Megan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic and Daily Partner-Specific Processes of Relationship Uncertainty and Enacted Relationship Talk</atitle><jtitle>Communication research</jtitle><date>2024-10-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0093-6502</issn><eissn>1552-3810</eissn><abstract>Guided by relational turbulence theory (RTT), this intensive longitudinal study examined how within-person daily fluctuations in relationship uncertainty corresponded with individuals’ decisions to engage in daily enacted relationship talk. Using a person-specific approach, this study also examined how individuals’ attachment insecurity predicted within-person differences in month-long processes predicted by RTT. College-aged dating partners ( N = 202, between-person) reported their attachment proclivities in a pre-test survey and subsequently reported on their relationship uncertainty and enacted relationship talk once per day over a period of 30 consecutive days ( N = 5,240, within-person). Results indicated that on days when individuals experienced elevated relationship uncertainty, they engaged in less relationship talk than they typically did. Additionally, we found that individuals with more volatility (intraindividual variability) and inertia (day-to-day carryover) in relationship uncertainty throughout the month enacted less relationship talk on average. Finally, results indicated that attachment insecurity predicted person-specific month-long processes consistent with RTT.</abstract><doi>10.1177/00936502241285997</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6865-317X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0093-6502
ispartof Communication research, 2024-10
issn 0093-6502
1552-3810
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00936502241285997
source Access via SAGE
title Dynamic and Daily Partner-Specific Processes of Relationship Uncertainty and Enacted Relationship Talk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A31%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20and%20Daily%20Partner-Specific%20Processes%20of%20Relationship%20Uncertainty%20and%20Enacted%20Relationship%20Talk&rft.jtitle=Communication%20research&rft.au=Bolkan,%20San&rft.date=2024-10-08&rft.issn=0093-6502&rft.eissn=1552-3810&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00936502241285997&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_00936502241285997%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true