The Independent Lawyer Consultation: A Practicum of Ethics for the Forensic Mental Health Expert
The opportunity to obtain an independent legal consultation on a case protects the forensic mental health expert against being manipulated by the retaining lawyer. Such manipulation—also articulated as attorney seduction/intimidation—presents a serious threat to the integrity of the forensic process...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psychiatry & law 2004-06, Vol.32 (2), p.169-189 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 189 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 169 |
| container_title | Journal of psychiatry & law |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Brakel, S. Jan Goldstein, Diane S. Wilson, Rodgers M. |
| description | The opportunity to obtain an independent legal consultation on a case protects the forensic mental health expert against being manipulated by the retaining lawyer. Such manipulation—also articulated as attorney seduction/intimidation—presents a serious threat to the integrity of the forensic process. A case study is presented to show how the independent legal consultation can save the forensic expert from being misled. The case comes from a workplace in which the availability of a legal consultant is built in. Some speculations are offered regarding the extension of this concept to settings not so endowed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/009318530403200203 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_009318530403200203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_009318530403200203</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_009318530403200203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c202t-8a34f64072f82860901215c1bb88556bcd079c66a5045dbbddcfbf156bc0ce063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFOgzAUhhujiTh9Aa_6ArjTFgp4txDmlmD0Yl5jKa2wMLq0Jbq3H2TemXhzzsX5vj8nP0KPBJ4ISZIlQMZIGjOIgFEACuwKBZRwFpIki65RMAPhTNyiO-f2E8IogwB97lqFt0Ojjmoag8el-D4pi3MzuLH3wndmeMYr_G6F9J0cD9hoXPi2kw5rY7Gf9LWxanCdxK9TgOjxRonet7j4OSrr79GNFr1TD797gT7WxS7fhOXbyzZflaGkQH2YChZpHkFCdUpTDhkQSmJJ6jpN45jXsoEkk5yLGKK4qeumkbrWZL6AVMDZAtFLrrTGOat0dbTdQdhTRaCaO6r-djRJy4vkxJeq9ma0w_Tjf8YZN5Zmhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Independent Lawyer Consultation: A Practicum of Ethics for the Forensic Mental Health Expert</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Brakel, S. Jan ; Goldstein, Diane S. ; Wilson, Rodgers M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brakel, S. Jan ; Goldstein, Diane S. ; Wilson, Rodgers M.</creatorcontrib><description>The opportunity to obtain an independent legal consultation on a case protects the forensic mental health expert against being manipulated by the retaining lawyer. Such manipulation—also articulated as attorney seduction/intimidation—presents a serious threat to the integrity of the forensic process. A case study is presented to show how the independent legal consultation can save the forensic expert from being misled. The case comes from a workplace in which the availability of a legal consultant is built in. Some speculations are offered regarding the extension of this concept to settings not so endowed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-1853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-1794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/009318530403200203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of psychiatry & law, 2004-06, Vol.32 (2), p.169-189</ispartof><rights>2004 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brakel, S. Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Diane S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Rodgers M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Independent Lawyer Consultation: A Practicum of Ethics for the Forensic Mental Health Expert</title><title>Journal of psychiatry & law</title><description>The opportunity to obtain an independent legal consultation on a case protects the forensic mental health expert against being manipulated by the retaining lawyer. Such manipulation—also articulated as attorney seduction/intimidation—presents a serious threat to the integrity of the forensic process. A case study is presented to show how the independent legal consultation can save the forensic expert from being misled. The case comes from a workplace in which the availability of a legal consultant is built in. Some speculations are offered regarding the extension of this concept to settings not so endowed.</description><issn>0093-1853</issn><issn>2163-1794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNFOgzAUhhujiTh9Aa_6ArjTFgp4txDmlmD0Yl5jKa2wMLq0Jbq3H2TemXhzzsX5vj8nP0KPBJ4ISZIlQMZIGjOIgFEACuwKBZRwFpIki65RMAPhTNyiO-f2E8IogwB97lqFt0Ojjmoag8el-D4pi3MzuLH3wndmeMYr_G6F9J0cD9hoXPi2kw5rY7Gf9LWxanCdxK9TgOjxRonet7j4OSrr79GNFr1TD797gT7WxS7fhOXbyzZflaGkQH2YChZpHkFCdUpTDhkQSmJJ6jpN45jXsoEkk5yLGKK4qeumkbrWZL6AVMDZAtFLrrTGOat0dbTdQdhTRaCaO6r-djRJy4vkxJeq9ma0w_Tjf8YZN5Zmhg</recordid><startdate>200406</startdate><enddate>200406</enddate><creator>Brakel, S. Jan</creator><creator>Goldstein, Diane S.</creator><creator>Wilson, Rodgers M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200406</creationdate><title>The Independent Lawyer Consultation: A Practicum of Ethics for the Forensic Mental Health Expert</title><author>Brakel, S. Jan ; Goldstein, Diane S. ; Wilson, Rodgers M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c202t-8a34f64072f82860901215c1bb88556bcd079c66a5045dbbddcfbf156bc0ce063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brakel, S. Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Diane S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Rodgers M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychiatry & law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brakel, S. Jan</au><au>Goldstein, Diane S.</au><au>Wilson, Rodgers M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Independent Lawyer Consultation: A Practicum of Ethics for the Forensic Mental Health Expert</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychiatry & law</jtitle><date>2004-06</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>169-189</pages><issn>0093-1853</issn><eissn>2163-1794</eissn><abstract>The opportunity to obtain an independent legal consultation on a case protects the forensic mental health expert against being manipulated by the retaining lawyer. Such manipulation—also articulated as attorney seduction/intimidation—presents a serious threat to the integrity of the forensic process. A case study is presented to show how the independent legal consultation can save the forensic expert from being misled. The case comes from a workplace in which the availability of a legal consultant is built in. Some speculations are offered regarding the extension of this concept to settings not so endowed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/009318530403200203</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0093-1853 |
| ispartof | Journal of psychiatry & law, 2004-06, Vol.32 (2), p.169-189 |
| issn | 0093-1853 2163-1794 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_009318530403200203 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
| title | The Independent Lawyer Consultation: A Practicum of Ethics for the Forensic Mental Health Expert |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A55%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Independent%20Lawyer%20Consultation:%20A%20Practicum%20of%20Ethics%20for%20the%20Forensic%20Mental%20Health%20Expert&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychiatry%20&%20law&rft.au=Brakel,%20S.%20Jan&rft.date=2004-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=169-189&rft.issn=0093-1853&rft.eissn=2163-1794&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/009318530403200203&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_009318530403200203%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_009318530403200203&rfr_iscdi=true |