Christian interpretation of Esther before the Reformation

This contribution to Review & Expositor’s issue on “Esther as Christian Scripture” surveys Esther scholarship before the Reformation with a view to identifying trends and with particular interest in the degree of any continuity that may bridge the Reformation as a point of demarcation. Contrary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Review and expositor (Berne) 2021-05, Vol.118 (2), p.149-160
1. Verfasser: Biddle, Mark E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 160
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Review and expositor (Berne)
container_volume 118
creator Biddle, Mark E
description This contribution to Review & Expositor’s issue on “Esther as Christian Scripture” surveys Esther scholarship before the Reformation with a view to identifying trends and with particular interest in the degree of any continuity that may bridge the Reformation as a point of demarcation. Contrary to what might be expected, this brief survey of the history of Christian Esther interpretation before the Reformation demonstrates that many of the issues confronting contemporary Esther scholarship surfaced in some form prior to the rise of modern critical scholarship (historicity, genre, gender relations, theological significance, etc.). A focus on the hebraica veritas after Jerome influenced Christian interpretation of the book down the path of allegory. Apparently pioneered by Aphrahat, Rhabanus Maurus gave the allegorical reading of Esther a form that became virtually standard in the half-millennium prior to the Reformation. In it, the allegorical significance of Ahasuerus (Jesus), Vashti (Jewry), Esther (the Church, Mary), and a number of details remained constant. The following two features of Esther interpretation surveyed here stand out negatively: the entire absence of concern for the book’s violence and the perverse but persistent interpretation of a book celebrating the deliverance of Jews in a supersessionist, even anti-Semitic, fashion.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00346373211024130
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00346373211024130</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00346373211024130</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_00346373211024130</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-4bdab2c3eccff51829ca5fc0b0d1fd317593bc43837590315e732b01fd0059103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8tKAzEUhoMoOFYfwF1eYOo5uUwmSylVCwVBdD0kmcROsTMliQvf3ox1J7g6H_wXzk_ILcISUak7AC4arjhDBCaQwxmpGEhWayH0OalmvZ4Nl-QqpT0ANEq1FdGrXRxSHsxIhzH7eIw-mzxMI50CXae885FaH6boaWH6MuPhx3BNLoL5SP7m9y7I28P6dfVUb58fN6v7be2waXItbG8sc9w7F4LElmlnZHBgocfQc1RSc-sEb3kh4Ch9GWGhaABSI_AFwVOvi1NK0YfuGIeDiV8dQjdv7_5sL5nlKZPMu-_202ccy4v_BL4B5N9YtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Christian interpretation of Esther before the Reformation</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Biddle, Mark E</creator><creatorcontrib>Biddle, Mark E</creatorcontrib><description>This contribution to Review &amp; Expositor’s issue on “Esther as Christian Scripture” surveys Esther scholarship before the Reformation with a view to identifying trends and with particular interest in the degree of any continuity that may bridge the Reformation as a point of demarcation. Contrary to what might be expected, this brief survey of the history of Christian Esther interpretation before the Reformation demonstrates that many of the issues confronting contemporary Esther scholarship surfaced in some form prior to the rise of modern critical scholarship (historicity, genre, gender relations, theological significance, etc.). A focus on the hebraica veritas after Jerome influenced Christian interpretation of the book down the path of allegory. Apparently pioneered by Aphrahat, Rhabanus Maurus gave the allegorical reading of Esther a form that became virtually standard in the half-millennium prior to the Reformation. In it, the allegorical significance of Ahasuerus (Jesus), Vashti (Jewry), Esther (the Church, Mary), and a number of details remained constant. The following two features of Esther interpretation surveyed here stand out negatively: the entire absence of concern for the book’s violence and the perverse but persistent interpretation of a book celebrating the deliverance of Jews in a supersessionist, even anti-Semitic, fashion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6373</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2052-9449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00346373211024130</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Review and expositor (Berne), 2021-05, Vol.118 (2), p.149-160</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00346373211024130$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00346373211024130$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biddle, Mark E</creatorcontrib><title>Christian interpretation of Esther before the Reformation</title><title>Review and expositor (Berne)</title><description>This contribution to Review &amp; Expositor’s issue on “Esther as Christian Scripture” surveys Esther scholarship before the Reformation with a view to identifying trends and with particular interest in the degree of any continuity that may bridge the Reformation as a point of demarcation. Contrary to what might be expected, this brief survey of the history of Christian Esther interpretation before the Reformation demonstrates that many of the issues confronting contemporary Esther scholarship surfaced in some form prior to the rise of modern critical scholarship (historicity, genre, gender relations, theological significance, etc.). A focus on the hebraica veritas after Jerome influenced Christian interpretation of the book down the path of allegory. Apparently pioneered by Aphrahat, Rhabanus Maurus gave the allegorical reading of Esther a form that became virtually standard in the half-millennium prior to the Reformation. In it, the allegorical significance of Ahasuerus (Jesus), Vashti (Jewry), Esther (the Church, Mary), and a number of details remained constant. The following two features of Esther interpretation surveyed here stand out negatively: the entire absence of concern for the book’s violence and the perverse but persistent interpretation of a book celebrating the deliverance of Jews in a supersessionist, even anti-Semitic, fashion.</description><issn>0034-6373</issn><issn>2052-9449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j8tKAzEUhoMoOFYfwF1eYOo5uUwmSylVCwVBdD0kmcROsTMliQvf3ox1J7g6H_wXzk_ILcISUak7AC4arjhDBCaQwxmpGEhWayH0OalmvZ4Nl-QqpT0ANEq1FdGrXRxSHsxIhzH7eIw-mzxMI50CXae885FaH6boaWH6MuPhx3BNLoL5SP7m9y7I28P6dfVUb58fN6v7be2waXItbG8sc9w7F4LElmlnZHBgocfQc1RSc-sEb3kh4Ch9GWGhaABSI_AFwVOvi1NK0YfuGIeDiV8dQjdv7_5sL5nlKZPMu-_202ccy4v_BL4B5N9YtA</recordid><startdate>202105</startdate><enddate>202105</enddate><creator>Biddle, Mark E</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202105</creationdate><title>Christian interpretation of Esther before the Reformation</title><author>Biddle, Mark E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-4bdab2c3eccff51829ca5fc0b0d1fd317593bc43837590315e732b01fd0059103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biddle, Mark E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Review and expositor (Berne)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biddle, Mark E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Christian interpretation of Esther before the Reformation</atitle><jtitle>Review and expositor (Berne)</jtitle><date>2021-05</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>160</epage><pages>149-160</pages><issn>0034-6373</issn><eissn>2052-9449</eissn><abstract>This contribution to Review &amp; Expositor’s issue on “Esther as Christian Scripture” surveys Esther scholarship before the Reformation with a view to identifying trends and with particular interest in the degree of any continuity that may bridge the Reformation as a point of demarcation. Contrary to what might be expected, this brief survey of the history of Christian Esther interpretation before the Reformation demonstrates that many of the issues confronting contemporary Esther scholarship surfaced in some form prior to the rise of modern critical scholarship (historicity, genre, gender relations, theological significance, etc.). A focus on the hebraica veritas after Jerome influenced Christian interpretation of the book down the path of allegory. Apparently pioneered by Aphrahat, Rhabanus Maurus gave the allegorical reading of Esther a form that became virtually standard in the half-millennium prior to the Reformation. In it, the allegorical significance of Ahasuerus (Jesus), Vashti (Jewry), Esther (the Church, Mary), and a number of details remained constant. The following two features of Esther interpretation surveyed here stand out negatively: the entire absence of concern for the book’s violence and the perverse but persistent interpretation of a book celebrating the deliverance of Jews in a supersessionist, even anti-Semitic, fashion.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00346373211024130</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6373
ispartof Review and expositor (Berne), 2021-05, Vol.118 (2), p.149-160
issn 0034-6373
2052-9449
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00346373211024130
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Christian interpretation of Esther before the Reformation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T13%3A57%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Christian%20interpretation%20of%20Esther%20before%20the%20Reformation&rft.jtitle=Review%20and%20expositor%20(Berne)&rft.au=Biddle,%20Mark%20E&rft.date=2021-05&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=160&rft.pages=149-160&rft.issn=0034-6373&rft.eissn=2052-9449&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00346373211024130&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_00346373211024130%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00346373211024130&rfr_iscdi=true