Modality Preference and the Teaching of Reading: A Review
Teaching to a child's strengths versus improving areas of weakness has long been a key concept in remedial planning for many practitioners. Strengths and weaknesses have often been related to sensory modality capabilities resulting in the notion of auditory learners, visual learners, and learne...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Learning Disabilities 1978, Vol.11 (1), p.17-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Review |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Journal of Learning Disabilities |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Tarver, Sara G. Dawson, Margaret M. |
description | Teaching to a child's strengths versus improving areas of weakness has long been a key concept in remedial planning for many practitioners. Strengths and weaknesses have often been related to sensory modality capabilities resulting in the notion of auditory learners, visual learners, and learners needing haptic and kinesthetic feedback. This excellent review of research which assesses the validity of the modality strength concept finds strikingly little support; thus, practical wisdom is not supported by research data. Because the modality preference/strength concept has intuitive appeal and is apparently useful to many practitioners, the possibility certainly exists that the research is inadequately designed or insufficiently sensitive to validate this central principle. Comments regarding the methods of the studies and the conclusions of this review are invited from practitioners and researchers. — G.M.S. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/002221947801100103 |
format | Review |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_002221947801100103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_002221947801100103</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_002221947801100103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1323-6116d5716373e72222ed4687d406a9122907bfdae2f93cad5c5414ed8a59125e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j91Kw0AQhRdRMFZfwKt9gdiZ_U28K8U_qChSr8O6O2lTaiK7Venbu6HeCV7NYeac4TuMXSJcIVo7BRBCYK1sBYgACPKIFahlVY6rY1aMhnJ0nLKzlDYAoIQ1Basfh-C23W7PnyO1FKn3xF0f-G5NfEnOr7t-xYeWv5ALWV7zWZZfHX2fs5PWbRNd_M4Je729Wc7vy8XT3cN8tig9SiFLg2iCtmiklWQzpaCgTGWDAuNqFKIG-9YGR6KtpXdBe61QUaiczldNcsLE4a-PQ0oZsvmI3buL-wahGcs3f8vn0PQQSm5FzWb4jH1m_C_xA6afVtI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>review</recordtype></control><display><type>review</type><title>Modality Preference and the Teaching of Reading: A Review</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Tarver, Sara G. ; Dawson, Margaret M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tarver, Sara G. ; Dawson, Margaret M.</creatorcontrib><description>Teaching to a child's strengths versus improving areas of weakness has long been a key concept in remedial planning for many practitioners. Strengths and weaknesses have often been related to sensory modality capabilities resulting in the notion of auditory learners, visual learners, and learners needing haptic and kinesthetic feedback. This excellent review of research which assesses the validity of the modality strength concept finds strikingly little support; thus, practical wisdom is not supported by research data. Because the modality preference/strength concept has intuitive appeal and is apparently useful to many practitioners, the possibility certainly exists that the research is inadequately designed or insufficiently sensitive to validate this central principle. Comments regarding the methods of the studies and the conclusions of this review are invited from practitioners and researchers. — G.M.S.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/002221947801100103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1978, Vol.11 (1), p.17-29</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1323-6116d5716373e72222ed4687d406a9122907bfdae2f93cad5c5414ed8a59125e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1323-6116d5716373e72222ed4687d406a9122907bfdae2f93cad5c5414ed8a59125e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002221947801100103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/002221947801100103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21819,27922,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tarver, Sara G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Margaret M.</creatorcontrib><title>Modality Preference and the Teaching of Reading: A Review</title><title>Journal of Learning Disabilities</title><description>Teaching to a child's strengths versus improving areas of weakness has long been a key concept in remedial planning for many practitioners. Strengths and weaknesses have often been related to sensory modality capabilities resulting in the notion of auditory learners, visual learners, and learners needing haptic and kinesthetic feedback. This excellent review of research which assesses the validity of the modality strength concept finds strikingly little support; thus, practical wisdom is not supported by research data. Because the modality preference/strength concept has intuitive appeal and is apparently useful to many practitioners, the possibility certainly exists that the research is inadequately designed or insufficiently sensitive to validate this central principle. Comments regarding the methods of the studies and the conclusions of this review are invited from practitioners and researchers. — G.M.S.</description><issn>0022-2194</issn><issn>1538-4780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>review</rsrctype><creationdate>1978</creationdate><recordtype>review</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j91Kw0AQhRdRMFZfwKt9gdiZ_U28K8U_qChSr8O6O2lTaiK7Venbu6HeCV7NYeac4TuMXSJcIVo7BRBCYK1sBYgACPKIFahlVY6rY1aMhnJ0nLKzlDYAoIQ1Basfh-C23W7PnyO1FKn3xF0f-G5NfEnOr7t-xYeWv5ALWV7zWZZfHX2fs5PWbRNd_M4Je729Wc7vy8XT3cN8tig9SiFLg2iCtmiklWQzpaCgTGWDAuNqFKIG-9YGR6KtpXdBe61QUaiczldNcsLE4a-PQ0oZsvmI3buL-wahGcs3f8vn0PQQSm5FzWb4jH1m_C_xA6afVtI</recordid><startdate>197801</startdate><enddate>197801</enddate><creator>Tarver, Sara G.</creator><creator>Dawson, Margaret M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197801</creationdate><title>Modality Preference and the Teaching of Reading: A Review</title><author>Tarver, Sara G. ; Dawson, Margaret M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1323-6116d5716373e72222ed4687d406a9122907bfdae2f93cad5c5414ed8a59125e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reviews</rsrctype><prefilter>reviews</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1978</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tarver, Sara G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Margaret M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tarver, Sara G.</au><au>Dawson, Margaret M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Modality Preference and the Teaching of Reading: A Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Learning Disabilities</jtitle><date>1978-01</date><risdate>1978</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>17-29</pages><issn>0022-2194</issn><eissn>1538-4780</eissn><abstract>Teaching to a child's strengths versus improving areas of weakness has long been a key concept in remedial planning for many practitioners. Strengths and weaknesses have often been related to sensory modality capabilities resulting in the notion of auditory learners, visual learners, and learners needing haptic and kinesthetic feedback. This excellent review of research which assesses the validity of the modality strength concept finds strikingly little support; thus, practical wisdom is not supported by research data. Because the modality preference/strength concept has intuitive appeal and is apparently useful to many practitioners, the possibility certainly exists that the research is inadequately designed or insufficiently sensitive to validate this central principle. Comments regarding the methods of the studies and the conclusions of this review are invited from practitioners and researchers. — G.M.S.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/002221947801100103</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2194 |
ispartof | Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1978, Vol.11 (1), p.17-29 |
issn | 0022-2194 1538-4780 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_002221947801100103 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Modality Preference and the Teaching of Reading: A Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A39%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modality%20Preference%20and%20the%20Teaching%20of%20Reading:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Learning%20Disabilities&rft.au=Tarver,%20Sara%20G.&rft.date=1978-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=17-29&rft.issn=0022-2194&rft.eissn=1538-4780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/002221947801100103&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_002221947801100103%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_002221947801100103&rfr_iscdi=true |