Order and justice in ontological security studies
Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cooperation and conflict 2024-10 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Cooperation and conflict |
container_volume | |
creator | Steele, Brent J |
description | Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature within OSS forward by taking on the challenge of acknowledging and speaking to its politics, and its ethics by centralizing the importance of order as a value. The article confronts criticisms against, and challenges of, OS by revisiting the pluralist versus solidarist debates in the “English School” of IR regarding order and justice. It then reads through recent work in OSS with these insights, examining the order versus justice tensions within several domains and topics in OSS. The article concludes that an ethics of OSS can confront and challenge inequalities and violence that follow from certain forms of order, and ordering, without concluding that one must resist all forms of order. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00108367241288080 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00108367241288080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_00108367241288080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-eb5a009528982bf9854be00bcb0d87cb11f3724886c5fc0618b2809f1aa573143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj81KxDAUhYM4YB3nAdzlBar3Jk1yu5TBPxiYja5LkiaSobaStIt5ey26c3UW5_BxPsZuEe4QjbkHQCCpjWhQEAHBBauw0VBL3eIlq9a-XgdX7LqUEwAog7pieMx9yNyOPT8tZU4-8DTyaZynYfpI3g68BL_kNJ95mZc-hXLDNtEOJez-csvenx7f9i_14fj8un841B6FmevglAVolaCWhIstqcYFAOcd9GS8Q4zy5y2R9ip60EhOELQRrVVGYiO3DH-5Pk-l5BC7r5w-bT53CN3q3P1zlt_a7kgs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Order and justice in ontological security studies</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Steele, Brent J</creator><creatorcontrib>Steele, Brent J</creatorcontrib><description>Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature within OSS forward by taking on the challenge of acknowledging and speaking to its politics, and its ethics by centralizing the importance of order as a value. The article confronts criticisms against, and challenges of, OS by revisiting the pluralist versus solidarist debates in the “English School” of IR regarding order and justice. It then reads through recent work in OSS with these insights, examining the order versus justice tensions within several domains and topics in OSS. The article concludes that an ethics of OSS can confront and challenge inequalities and violence that follow from certain forms of order, and ordering, without concluding that one must resist all forms of order.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-8367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00108367241288080</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Cooperation and conflict, 2024-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-eb5a009528982bf9854be00bcb0d87cb11f3724886c5fc0618b2809f1aa573143</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3679-6824</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steele, Brent J</creatorcontrib><title>Order and justice in ontological security studies</title><title>Cooperation and conflict</title><description>Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature within OSS forward by taking on the challenge of acknowledging and speaking to its politics, and its ethics by centralizing the importance of order as a value. The article confronts criticisms against, and challenges of, OS by revisiting the pluralist versus solidarist debates in the “English School” of IR regarding order and justice. It then reads through recent work in OSS with these insights, examining the order versus justice tensions within several domains and topics in OSS. The article concludes that an ethics of OSS can confront and challenge inequalities and violence that follow from certain forms of order, and ordering, without concluding that one must resist all forms of order.</description><issn>0010-8367</issn><issn>1460-3691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplj81KxDAUhYM4YB3nAdzlBar3Jk1yu5TBPxiYja5LkiaSobaStIt5ey26c3UW5_BxPsZuEe4QjbkHQCCpjWhQEAHBBauw0VBL3eIlq9a-XgdX7LqUEwAog7pieMx9yNyOPT8tZU4-8DTyaZynYfpI3g68BL_kNJ95mZc-hXLDNtEOJez-csvenx7f9i_14fj8un841B6FmevglAVolaCWhIstqcYFAOcd9GS8Q4zy5y2R9ip60EhOELQRrVVGYiO3DH-5Pk-l5BC7r5w-bT53CN3q3P1zlt_a7kgs</recordid><startdate>20241031</startdate><enddate>20241031</enddate><creator>Steele, Brent J</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3679-6824</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241031</creationdate><title>Order and justice in ontological security studies</title><author>Steele, Brent J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-eb5a009528982bf9854be00bcb0d87cb11f3724886c5fc0618b2809f1aa573143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steele, Brent J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cooperation and conflict</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steele, Brent J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Order and justice in ontological security studies</atitle><jtitle>Cooperation and conflict</jtitle><date>2024-10-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0010-8367</issn><eissn>1460-3691</eissn><abstract>Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature within OSS forward by taking on the challenge of acknowledging and speaking to its politics, and its ethics by centralizing the importance of order as a value. The article confronts criticisms against, and challenges of, OS by revisiting the pluralist versus solidarist debates in the “English School” of IR regarding order and justice. It then reads through recent work in OSS with these insights, examining the order versus justice tensions within several domains and topics in OSS. The article concludes that an ethics of OSS can confront and challenge inequalities and violence that follow from certain forms of order, and ordering, without concluding that one must resist all forms of order.</abstract><doi>10.1177/00108367241288080</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3679-6824</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-8367 |
ispartof | Cooperation and conflict, 2024-10 |
issn | 0010-8367 1460-3691 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00108367241288080 |
source | SAGE Complete |
title | Order and justice in ontological security studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A36%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Order%20and%20justice%20in%20ontological%20security%20studies&rft.jtitle=Cooperation%20and%20conflict&rft.au=Steele,%20Brent%20J&rft.date=2024-10-31&rft.issn=0010-8367&rft.eissn=1460-3691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00108367241288080&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_00108367241288080%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |