Order and justice in ontological security studies

Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cooperation and conflict 2024-10
1. Verfasser: Steele, Brent J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Cooperation and conflict
container_volume
creator Steele, Brent J
description Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature within OSS forward by taking on the challenge of acknowledging and speaking to its politics, and its ethics by centralizing the importance of order as a value. The article confronts criticisms against, and challenges of, OS by revisiting the pluralist versus solidarist debates in the “English School” of IR regarding order and justice. It then reads through recent work in OSS with these insights, examining the order versus justice tensions within several domains and topics in OSS. The article concludes that an ethics of OSS can confront and challenge inequalities and violence that follow from certain forms of order, and ordering, without concluding that one must resist all forms of order.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00108367241288080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00108367241288080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_00108367241288080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-eb5a009528982bf9854be00bcb0d87cb11f3724886c5fc0618b2809f1aa573143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj81KxDAUhYM4YB3nAdzlBar3Jk1yu5TBPxiYja5LkiaSobaStIt5ey26c3UW5_BxPsZuEe4QjbkHQCCpjWhQEAHBBauw0VBL3eIlq9a-XgdX7LqUEwAog7pieMx9yNyOPT8tZU4-8DTyaZynYfpI3g68BL_kNJ95mZc-hXLDNtEOJez-csvenx7f9i_14fj8un841B6FmevglAVolaCWhIstqcYFAOcd9GS8Q4zy5y2R9ip60EhOELQRrVVGYiO3DH-5Pk-l5BC7r5w-bT53CN3q3P1zlt_a7kgs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Order and justice in ontological security studies</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Steele, Brent J</creator><creatorcontrib>Steele, Brent J</creatorcontrib><description>Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature within OSS forward by taking on the challenge of acknowledging and speaking to its politics, and its ethics by centralizing the importance of order as a value. The article confronts criticisms against, and challenges of, OS by revisiting the pluralist versus solidarist debates in the “English School” of IR regarding order and justice. It then reads through recent work in OSS with these insights, examining the order versus justice tensions within several domains and topics in OSS. The article concludes that an ethics of OSS can confront and challenge inequalities and violence that follow from certain forms of order, and ordering, without concluding that one must resist all forms of order.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-8367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3691</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00108367241288080</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Cooperation and conflict, 2024-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-eb5a009528982bf9854be00bcb0d87cb11f3724886c5fc0618b2809f1aa573143</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3679-6824</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steele, Brent J</creatorcontrib><title>Order and justice in ontological security studies</title><title>Cooperation and conflict</title><description>Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature within OSS forward by taking on the challenge of acknowledging and speaking to its politics, and its ethics by centralizing the importance of order as a value. The article confronts criticisms against, and challenges of, OS by revisiting the pluralist versus solidarist debates in the “English School” of IR regarding order and justice. It then reads through recent work in OSS with these insights, examining the order versus justice tensions within several domains and topics in OSS. The article concludes that an ethics of OSS can confront and challenge inequalities and violence that follow from certain forms of order, and ordering, without concluding that one must resist all forms of order.</description><issn>0010-8367</issn><issn>1460-3691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplj81KxDAUhYM4YB3nAdzlBar3Jk1yu5TBPxiYja5LkiaSobaStIt5ey26c3UW5_BxPsZuEe4QjbkHQCCpjWhQEAHBBauw0VBL3eIlq9a-XgdX7LqUEwAog7pieMx9yNyOPT8tZU4-8DTyaZynYfpI3g68BL_kNJ95mZc-hXLDNtEOJez-csvenx7f9i_14fj8un841B6FmevglAVolaCWhIstqcYFAOcd9GS8Q4zy5y2R9ip60EhOELQRrVVGYiO3DH-5Pk-l5BC7r5w-bT53CN3q3P1zlt_a7kgs</recordid><startdate>20241031</startdate><enddate>20241031</enddate><creator>Steele, Brent J</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3679-6824</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241031</creationdate><title>Order and justice in ontological security studies</title><author>Steele, Brent J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c127t-eb5a009528982bf9854be00bcb0d87cb11f3724886c5fc0618b2809f1aa573143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steele, Brent J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cooperation and conflict</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steele, Brent J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Order and justice in ontological security studies</atitle><jtitle>Cooperation and conflict</jtitle><date>2024-10-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0010-8367</issn><eissn>1460-3691</eissn><abstract>Order is a seemingly key concept in ontological security (OS). Yet work on “order” found in International Relations (IR) is often only treated tangentially (via anxiety, insecurity, and other more central referents) in ontological security studies (OSS). This article seeks to move the literature within OSS forward by taking on the challenge of acknowledging and speaking to its politics, and its ethics by centralizing the importance of order as a value. The article confronts criticisms against, and challenges of, OS by revisiting the pluralist versus solidarist debates in the “English School” of IR regarding order and justice. It then reads through recent work in OSS with these insights, examining the order versus justice tensions within several domains and topics in OSS. The article concludes that an ethics of OSS can confront and challenge inequalities and violence that follow from certain forms of order, and ordering, without concluding that one must resist all forms of order.</abstract><doi>10.1177/00108367241288080</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3679-6824</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-8367
ispartof Cooperation and conflict, 2024-10
issn 0010-8367
1460-3691
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_00108367241288080
source SAGE Complete
title Order and justice in ontological security studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A36%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Order%20and%20justice%20in%20ontological%20security%20studies&rft.jtitle=Cooperation%20and%20conflict&rft.au=Steele,%20Brent%20J&rft.date=2024-10-31&rft.issn=0010-8367&rft.eissn=1460-3691&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00108367241288080&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_00108367241288080%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true