The Polluter Pays Principle in Chinese Environmental Law

Abstract The effective implementation of environmental law has taken on greater urgency in recent times. Behind the multitude of domestic and international environmental instruments sit generally accepted principles like the Polluter Pays Principle (PPP). The PPP can be seen to advance sustainable d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chinese journal of environmental law 2018-07, Vol.2 (1), p.57-82
Hauptverfasser: HAMMAN, Evan, PEI, Liping, BURLOFF, Denise, LOCKHART, Alexandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 57
container_title Chinese journal of environmental law
container_volume 2
creator HAMMAN, Evan
PEI, Liping
BURLOFF, Denise
LOCKHART, Alexandra
description Abstract The effective implementation of environmental law has taken on greater urgency in recent times. Behind the multitude of domestic and international environmental instruments sit generally accepted principles like the Polluter Pays Principle (PPP). The PPP can be seen to advance sustainable development, at least partly, by private operators internalizing the costs of their pollution. This article analyses the application of the PPP in Chinese environmental law by focusing on a case study of Yangtze River pollution in and around the central Chinese city of Wuhan. The authors find evidence of an increasing acceptance of the PPP at the local, regional and national levels in China. At each of these levels, attempts to improve water quality in the Yangtze appear to reflect an acceptance of the PPP's main aims.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/24686042-12340022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>brill_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_24686042_12340022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1163_24686042_12340022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b200t-be8fa228b9ea36fb35ad32561edc31aa5f1a9c1883f16ea1174678da84b1564c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j8tqwzAQRUVpoSHNB3SnH3CjkWRFWRaTPsBQL9K1GNsyUVDkIDkt-fvapOmyqxku9wxzCHkE9gSgxJJLpRWTPAMuJGOc35DZlGVTePu3C3lPFint2VhhIKTUM6K3O0ur3vvTYCOt8JxoFV1o3NFb6gItdi7YZOkmfLnYh4MNA3pa4vcDuevQJ7v4nXPy-bLZFm9Z-fH6XjyXWc0ZG7La6g451_XaolBdLXJsBc8V2LYRgJh3gOsGtBYdKIsAK6lWukUta8iVbMScwOVuE_uUou3MMboDxrMBZiZ7c7U3V_uRWV6YOjrvzb4_xTD--A_xAwN6WWI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Polluter Pays Principle in Chinese Environmental Law</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>HAMMAN, Evan ; PEI, Liping ; BURLOFF, Denise ; LOCKHART, Alexandra</creator><creatorcontrib>HAMMAN, Evan ; PEI, Liping ; BURLOFF, Denise ; LOCKHART, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The effective implementation of environmental law has taken on greater urgency in recent times. Behind the multitude of domestic and international environmental instruments sit generally accepted principles like the Polluter Pays Principle (PPP). The PPP can be seen to advance sustainable development, at least partly, by private operators internalizing the costs of their pollution. This article analyses the application of the PPP in Chinese environmental law by focusing on a case study of Yangtze River pollution in and around the central Chinese city of Wuhan. The authors find evidence of an increasing acceptance of the PPP at the local, regional and national levels in China. At each of these levels, attempts to improve water quality in the Yangtze appear to reflect an acceptance of the PPP's main aims.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2468-6034</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2468-6042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2468-6034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/24686042-12340022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leiden | Boston: Brill | Nijhoff</publisher><ispartof>Chinese journal of environmental law, 2018-07, Vol.2 (1), p.57-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2018 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b200t-be8fa228b9ea36fb35ad32561edc31aa5f1a9c1883f16ea1174678da84b1564c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HAMMAN, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEI, Liping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURLOFF, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOCKHART, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><title>The Polluter Pays Principle in Chinese Environmental Law</title><title>Chinese journal of environmental law</title><description>Abstract The effective implementation of environmental law has taken on greater urgency in recent times. Behind the multitude of domestic and international environmental instruments sit generally accepted principles like the Polluter Pays Principle (PPP). The PPP can be seen to advance sustainable development, at least partly, by private operators internalizing the costs of their pollution. This article analyses the application of the PPP in Chinese environmental law by focusing on a case study of Yangtze River pollution in and around the central Chinese city of Wuhan. The authors find evidence of an increasing acceptance of the PPP at the local, regional and national levels in China. At each of these levels, attempts to improve water quality in the Yangtze appear to reflect an acceptance of the PPP's main aims.</description><issn>2468-6034</issn><issn>2468-6042</issn><issn>2468-6034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j8tqwzAQRUVpoSHNB3SnH3CjkWRFWRaTPsBQL9K1GNsyUVDkIDkt-fvapOmyqxku9wxzCHkE9gSgxJJLpRWTPAMuJGOc35DZlGVTePu3C3lPFint2VhhIKTUM6K3O0ur3vvTYCOt8JxoFV1o3NFb6gItdi7YZOkmfLnYh4MNA3pa4vcDuevQJ7v4nXPy-bLZFm9Z-fH6XjyXWc0ZG7La6g451_XaolBdLXJsBc8V2LYRgJh3gOsGtBYdKIsAK6lWukUta8iVbMScwOVuE_uUou3MMboDxrMBZiZ7c7U3V_uRWV6YOjrvzb4_xTD--A_xAwN6WWI</recordid><startdate>20180723</startdate><enddate>20180723</enddate><creator>HAMMAN, Evan</creator><creator>PEI, Liping</creator><creator>BURLOFF, Denise</creator><creator>LOCKHART, Alexandra</creator><general>Brill | Nijhoff</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180723</creationdate><title>The Polluter Pays Principle in Chinese Environmental Law</title><author>HAMMAN, Evan ; PEI, Liping ; BURLOFF, Denise ; LOCKHART, Alexandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b200t-be8fa228b9ea36fb35ad32561edc31aa5f1a9c1883f16ea1174678da84b1564c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HAMMAN, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEI, Liping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BURLOFF, Denise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOCKHART, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Chinese journal of environmental law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HAMMAN, Evan</au><au>PEI, Liping</au><au>BURLOFF, Denise</au><au>LOCKHART, Alexandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Polluter Pays Principle in Chinese Environmental Law</atitle><jtitle>Chinese journal of environmental law</jtitle><date>2018-07-23</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>57-82</pages><issn>2468-6034</issn><eissn>2468-6042</eissn><eissn>2468-6034</eissn><abstract>Abstract The effective implementation of environmental law has taken on greater urgency in recent times. Behind the multitude of domestic and international environmental instruments sit generally accepted principles like the Polluter Pays Principle (PPP). The PPP can be seen to advance sustainable development, at least partly, by private operators internalizing the costs of their pollution. This article analyses the application of the PPP in Chinese environmental law by focusing on a case study of Yangtze River pollution in and around the central Chinese city of Wuhan. The authors find evidence of an increasing acceptance of the PPP at the local, regional and national levels in China. At each of these levels, attempts to improve water quality in the Yangtze appear to reflect an acceptance of the PPP's main aims.</abstract><cop>Leiden | Boston</cop><pub>Brill | Nijhoff</pub><doi>10.1163/24686042-12340022</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2468-6034
ispartof Chinese journal of environmental law, 2018-07, Vol.2 (1), p.57-82
issn 2468-6034
2468-6042
2468-6034
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_24686042_12340022
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
title The Polluter Pays Principle in Chinese Environmental Law
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T16%3A55%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-brill_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Polluter%20Pays%20Principle%20in%20Chinese%20Environmental%20Law&rft.jtitle=Chinese%20journal%20of%20environmental%20law&rft.au=HAMMAN,%20Evan&rft.date=2018-07-23&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=57-82&rft.issn=2468-6034&rft.eissn=2468-6042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/24686042-12340022&rft_dat=%3Cbrill_cross%3E10_1163_24686042_12340022%3C/brill_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true