Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions: An Introduction

The ongoing ‘legitimacy crisis’ in investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) has triggered a comprehensive attempt at multilateral reform. In 2017, Working Group III at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) was entrusted with a broad, open-ended and problem-driven mandat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of world investment & trade 2020-06, Vol.21 (2-3), p.167-187
Hauptverfasser: Langford, Malcolm, Potestà, Michele, Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, Behn, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 187
container_issue 2-3
container_start_page 167
container_title The journal of world investment & trade
container_volume 21
creator Langford, Malcolm
Potestà, Michele
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle
Behn, Daniel
description The ongoing ‘legitimacy crisis’ in investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) has triggered a comprehensive attempt at multilateral reform. In 2017, Working Group III at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) was entrusted with a broad, open-ended and problem-driven mandate. The reform process aims to tackle particular concerns with ISDS: excessive costs and lengthy proceedings, inconsistent and incorrect decisions, and a lack of arbitral diversity and independence. The exclusion of substantive treaty reform has met critique but states are considering a wide range of procedural options from incremental reform to a multilateral court, appellate mechanism, and ISDS alternatives. In this article, we introduce the reform process and the seven articles that follow in this Special Issue of the Journal on World and Investment and Trade. In these contributions, ISDS Academic Forum members analyse the basis for each concern and the potential contribution of leading reform models.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/22119000-12340171
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_22119000_12340171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1163_22119000_12340171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-394d6b817f5a4ddc79d8361cb413e17af51ad1e68b94e7859087da1897a6b28b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMtKxDAYhYMoWMZ5AHd5gWr-ps1ldkPxUqgKc9m4KWmSaqVNhyQj-PZadVYHPs45iw-hayA3AIzeZhmAJISkkNGcAIczlMwsneE5SoAxknKA7BItQ_j4gaTImSyKBL1uD1b3asBVCEe7wvvnstpt1jVWzuDKfdoQR-siXvu2j17FfnJ4Y7vJjyv8pKJ-790bLienrXfhd7SdhuNcC1foolNDsMv_XKD9_d2ufEzrl4eqXNepBpnFlMrcsFYA7wqVG6O5NIIy0G0O1AJXXQHKgGWilbnlopBEcKNASK5Ym4mWLhD8_Wo_heBt1xx8Pyr_1QBpZj_NyU9z8kO_AdGQVx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions: An Introduction</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Langford, Malcolm ; Potestà, Michele ; Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle ; Behn, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Langford, Malcolm ; Potestà, Michele ; Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle ; Behn, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>The ongoing ‘legitimacy crisis’ in investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) has triggered a comprehensive attempt at multilateral reform. In 2017, Working Group III at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) was entrusted with a broad, open-ended and problem-driven mandate. The reform process aims to tackle particular concerns with ISDS: excessive costs and lengthy proceedings, inconsistent and incorrect decisions, and a lack of arbitral diversity and independence. The exclusion of substantive treaty reform has met critique but states are considering a wide range of procedural options from incremental reform to a multilateral court, appellate mechanism, and ISDS alternatives. In this article, we introduce the reform process and the seven articles that follow in this Special Issue of the Journal on World and Investment and Trade. In these contributions, ISDS Academic Forum members analyse the basis for each concern and the potential contribution of leading reform models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-7112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-9000</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/22119000-12340171</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The journal of world investment &amp; trade, 2020-06, Vol.21 (2-3), p.167-187</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langford, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potestà, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behn, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions: An Introduction</title><title>The journal of world investment &amp; trade</title><description>The ongoing ‘legitimacy crisis’ in investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) has triggered a comprehensive attempt at multilateral reform. In 2017, Working Group III at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) was entrusted with a broad, open-ended and problem-driven mandate. The reform process aims to tackle particular concerns with ISDS: excessive costs and lengthy proceedings, inconsistent and incorrect decisions, and a lack of arbitral diversity and independence. The exclusion of substantive treaty reform has met critique but states are considering a wide range of procedural options from incremental reform to a multilateral court, appellate mechanism, and ISDS alternatives. In this article, we introduce the reform process and the seven articles that follow in this Special Issue of the Journal on World and Investment and Trade. In these contributions, ISDS Academic Forum members analyse the basis for each concern and the potential contribution of leading reform models.</description><issn>1660-7112</issn><issn>2211-9000</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kMtKxDAYhYMoWMZ5AHd5gWr-ps1ldkPxUqgKc9m4KWmSaqVNhyQj-PZadVYHPs45iw-hayA3AIzeZhmAJISkkNGcAIczlMwsneE5SoAxknKA7BItQ_j4gaTImSyKBL1uD1b3asBVCEe7wvvnstpt1jVWzuDKfdoQR-siXvu2j17FfnJ4Y7vJjyv8pKJ-790bLienrXfhd7SdhuNcC1foolNDsMv_XKD9_d2ufEzrl4eqXNepBpnFlMrcsFYA7wqVG6O5NIIy0G0O1AJXXQHKgGWilbnlopBEcKNASK5Ym4mWLhD8_Wo_heBt1xx8Pyr_1QBpZj_NyU9z8kO_AdGQVx0</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Langford, Malcolm</creator><creator>Potestà, Michele</creator><creator>Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle</creator><creator>Behn, Daniel</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions</title><author>Langford, Malcolm ; Potestà, Michele ; Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle ; Behn, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192t-394d6b817f5a4ddc79d8361cb413e17af51ad1e68b94e7859087da1897a6b28b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langford, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potestà, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behn, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of world investment &amp; trade</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langford, Malcolm</au><au>Potestà, Michele</au><au>Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle</au><au>Behn, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions: An Introduction</atitle><jtitle>The journal of world investment &amp; trade</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>187</epage><pages>167-187</pages><issn>1660-7112</issn><eissn>2211-9000</eissn><abstract>The ongoing ‘legitimacy crisis’ in investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) has triggered a comprehensive attempt at multilateral reform. In 2017, Working Group III at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) was entrusted with a broad, open-ended and problem-driven mandate. The reform process aims to tackle particular concerns with ISDS: excessive costs and lengthy proceedings, inconsistent and incorrect decisions, and a lack of arbitral diversity and independence. The exclusion of substantive treaty reform has met critique but states are considering a wide range of procedural options from incremental reform to a multilateral court, appellate mechanism, and ISDS alternatives. In this article, we introduce the reform process and the seven articles that follow in this Special Issue of the Journal on World and Investment and Trade. In these contributions, ISDS Academic Forum members analyse the basis for each concern and the potential contribution of leading reform models.</abstract><doi>10.1163/22119000-12340171</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-7112
ispartof The journal of world investment & trade, 2020-06, Vol.21 (2-3), p.167-187
issn 1660-7112
2211-9000
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_22119000_12340171
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
title Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions: An Introduction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A01%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Special%20Issue:%20UNCITRAL%20and%20Investment%20Arbitration%20Reform:%20Matching%20Concerns%20and%20Solutions:%20An%20Introduction&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20world%20investment%20&%20trade&rft.au=Langford,%20Malcolm&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=187&rft.pages=167-187&rft.issn=1660-7112&rft.eissn=2211-9000&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/22119000-12340171&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1163_22119000_12340171%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true