Double Remedies: A Feasible Option?

Double Remedies: A Feasible Option?

This paper is an endeavour to specifically discuss the problems of simultaneous imposition of trade remedies in disputes before the World Trade Organization. The authors have undertaken the approach of providing an introduction to the three trade remedies and then analyzing the recent AD-CVD case on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of world investment & trade 2013, Vol.14 (2), p.381-393
Hauptverfasser: Dubey, Akansha, Mukherjee, Puloma
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Dispute Settlement Undertaking
double counting
non-market economy
trade remedies
US China AD-CVD case
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 393
container_issue 2
container_start_page 381
container_title The journal of world investment & trade
container_volume 14
creator Dubey, Akansha
Mukherjee, Puloma
description This paper is an endeavour to specifically discuss the problems of simultaneous imposition of trade remedies in disputes before the World Trade Organization. The authors have undertaken the approach of providing an introduction to the three trade remedies and then analyzing the recent AD-CVD case on the subject of Non-Market economies and imposition of more than one trade remedies. With a background of this dispute the interesting goal is to find a consistency of this measure with the WTO obligations. Further, various situations are scrutinized to assess the future implications of the adoption of this approach in the WTO jurisprudence.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/22119000-01402006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_22119000_01402006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_JKT_5828Q6LC_V</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b306t-b0d7616cfc67dddacd9b14dca15821363d06c09df811c806361589764dcdb04d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01Lw0AQhhdRMNT-AG8Bz2tnsskk8SKlWr8CRalel2R3A6lpU3ZT0H_vhliPngaeed8ZHsYuEa4RScyiCDEHAA4YQwRAJywYGB_gKQuQCHiKGJ2zqXMbDyGJKU-SgF3ddYeqNeGb2RrdGHcTzsOlKV0zwNW-b7rd7QU7q8vWmenvnLD35f168ciL1cPTYl7wSgD1vAKdEpKqFaVa61LpvMJYqxKTLEJBQgMpyHWdIaoMSJBf5Cn5iK4g1mLCcLyrbOecNbXc22Zb2m-JIAdReRSVR1Hf4WOncb35-iuU9lNSKtJEPr-spf-fvVKxkB8-PxvzlW3aVm66g915p38-_ABk2V9k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Double Remedies: A Feasible Option?</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Dubey, Akansha ; Mukherjee, Puloma</creator><creatorcontrib>Dubey, Akansha ; Mukherjee, Puloma</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is an endeavour to specifically discuss the problems of simultaneous imposition of trade remedies in disputes before the World Trade Organization. The authors have undertaken the approach of providing an introduction to the three trade remedies and then analyzing the recent AD-CVD case on the subject of Non-Market economies and imposition of more than one trade remedies. With a background of this dispute the interesting goal is to find a consistency of this measure with the WTO obligations. Further, various situations are scrutinized to assess the future implications of the adoption of this approach in the WTO jurisprudence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-7112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2211-9000</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-7112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/22119000-01402006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers</publisher><subject>Dispute Settlement Undertaking ; double counting ; non-market economy ; trade remedies ; US China AD-CVD case</subject><ispartof>The journal of world investment &amp; trade, 2013, Vol.14 (2), p.381-393</ispartof><rights>2013 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dubey, Akansha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Puloma</creatorcontrib><title>Double Remedies: A Feasible Option?</title><title>The journal of world investment &amp; trade</title><addtitle>JWIT</addtitle><description>This paper is an endeavour to specifically discuss the problems of simultaneous imposition of trade remedies in disputes before the World Trade Organization. The authors have undertaken the approach of providing an introduction to the three trade remedies and then analyzing the recent AD-CVD case on the subject of Non-Market economies and imposition of more than one trade remedies. With a background of this dispute the interesting goal is to find a consistency of this measure with the WTO obligations. Further, various situations are scrutinized to assess the future implications of the adoption of this approach in the WTO jurisprudence.</description><subject>Dispute Settlement Undertaking</subject><subject>double counting</subject><subject>non-market economy</subject><subject>trade remedies</subject><subject>US China AD-CVD case</subject><issn>1660-7112</issn><issn>2211-9000</issn><issn>1660-7112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9j01Lw0AQhhdRMNT-AG8Bz2tnsskk8SKlWr8CRalel2R3A6lpU3ZT0H_vhliPngaeed8ZHsYuEa4RScyiCDEHAA4YQwRAJywYGB_gKQuQCHiKGJ2zqXMbDyGJKU-SgF3ddYeqNeGb2RrdGHcTzsOlKV0zwNW-b7rd7QU7q8vWmenvnLD35f168ciL1cPTYl7wSgD1vAKdEpKqFaVa61LpvMJYqxKTLEJBQgMpyHWdIaoMSJBf5Cn5iK4g1mLCcLyrbOecNbXc22Zb2m-JIAdReRSVR1Hf4WOncb35-iuU9lNSKtJEPr-spf-fvVKxkB8-PxvzlW3aVm66g915p38-_ABk2V9k</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Dubey, Akansha</creator><creator>Mukherjee, Puloma</creator><general>Martinus Nijhoff Publishers</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Double Remedies: A Feasible Option?</title><author>Dubey, Akansha ; Mukherjee, Puloma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b306t-b0d7616cfc67dddacd9b14dca15821363d06c09df811c806361589764dcdb04d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Dispute Settlement Undertaking</topic><topic>double counting</topic><topic>non-market economy</topic><topic>trade remedies</topic><topic>US China AD-CVD case</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dubey, Akansha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Puloma</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of world investment &amp; trade</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dubey, Akansha</au><au>Mukherjee, Puloma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Double Remedies: A Feasible Option?</atitle><jtitle>The journal of world investment &amp; trade</jtitle><addtitle>JWIT</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>381-393</pages><issn>1660-7112</issn><eissn>2211-9000</eissn><eissn>1660-7112</eissn><abstract>This paper is an endeavour to specifically discuss the problems of simultaneous imposition of trade remedies in disputes before the World Trade Organization. The authors have undertaken the approach of providing an introduction to the three trade remedies and then analyzing the recent AD-CVD case on the subject of Non-Market economies and imposition of more than one trade remedies. With a background of this dispute the interesting goal is to find a consistency of this measure with the WTO obligations. Further, various situations are scrutinized to assess the future implications of the adoption of this approach in the WTO jurisprudence.</abstract><cop>Leiden</cop><pub>Martinus Nijhoff Publishers</pub><doi>10.1163/22119000-01402006</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-7112
ispartof The journal of world investment & trade, 2013, Vol.14 (2), p.381-393
issn 1660-7112
2211-9000
1660-7112
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_22119000_01402006
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Dispute Settlement Undertaking
double counting
non-market economy
trade remedies
US China AD-CVD case
title Double Remedies: A Feasible Option?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A28%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Double%20Remedies:%20A%20Feasible%20Option?&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20world%20investment%20&%20trade&rft.au=Dubey,%20Akansha&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=381-393&rft.issn=1660-7112&rft.eissn=2211-9000&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/22119000-01402006&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_JKT_5828Q6LC_V%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true