Science Envy in Theories of Religion

Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology&q...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Method & theory in the study of religion 2010, Vol.22 (4), p.293-303
1. Verfasser: Hughes, Aaron W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 303
container_issue 4
container_start_page 293
container_title Method & theory in the study of religion
container_volume 22
creator Hughes, Aaron W
description Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology" of religion in the writings traditionally associated with likes of Gerardus van der Leeuw, often by way of Mircea Eliade. I seek to take an initial, tentative step in this reclamation by returning to an admittedly idiosyncratic reading of one version of Heidegger's philosophy that emerges from the pages of his Sein und Zeit. Second, to show how this new theorizing, rather than contribute to the dubious and quasi-theological discourses associated with the philosophy of religion, enables us to focus with renewed energy upon the constant process of self- and group making. In the third section, I try to nudge (with the aim of perhaps dislodging) what could well become the new regnant discourse of current theorizing about religion.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/157006810X531085
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_157006810X531085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23555750</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23555750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b225t-1a0f1711da6cbcdb40dec75c25a69f327156fa2891c4668a53f2dfb7b8d35a2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81LAzEUxIMoWKt3L8IevG59SfqS9KjF74JQq-0tZLOJpq67klSx_71bVnoQPD2Y-c3whpBjCgNKBT-jKAGEorBATkHhDultpLzV2C7pwWjIcw6o9slBSksAqoCPeuT00QZXW5dd1l_rLNTZ7NU1MbiUNT6buiq8hKY-JHveVMkd_d4-ebq6nI1v8snD9e34fJIXjOEqpwY8lZSWRtjClsUQSmclWoZGjDxnkqLwhqkRtUMhlEHuWekLWaiSo2Ge9wl0vTY2KUXn9UcM7yauNQW9Wan_rmwjJ11kmVZN3PKMI6JEaP2880Naue-tb-KbFpJL1Hf3M_08nbOL-ULpRcsPOr6Ioar0svmMdTv5_wd-AN_6acQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Science Envy in Theories of Religion</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hughes, Aaron W</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Aaron W</creatorcontrib><description>Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology" of religion in the writings traditionally associated with likes of Gerardus van der Leeuw, often by way of Mircea Eliade. I seek to take an initial, tentative step in this reclamation by returning to an admittedly idiosyncratic reading of one version of Heidegger's philosophy that emerges from the pages of his Sein und Zeit. Second, to show how this new theorizing, rather than contribute to the dubious and quasi-theological discourses associated with the philosophy of religion, enables us to focus with renewed energy upon the constant process of self- and group making. In the third section, I try to nudge (with the aim of perhaps dislodging) what could well become the new regnant discourse of current theorizing about religion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0943-3058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1570-0682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0943-3058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157006810X531085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Christianity ; Cultural identity ; cultural studies ; Identity ; Identity theory ; Islam ; Judaism ; Martin Heidegger ; Phenomena ; Phenomenology ; Religious studies ; science ; social construction</subject><ispartof>Method &amp; theory in the study of religion, 2010, Vol.22 (4), p.293-303</ispartof><rights>2010 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Koninklijke Brill NV 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23555750$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23555750$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Aaron W</creatorcontrib><title>Science Envy in Theories of Religion</title><title>Method &amp; theory in the study of religion</title><addtitle>MTSR</addtitle><description>Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology" of religion in the writings traditionally associated with likes of Gerardus van der Leeuw, often by way of Mircea Eliade. I seek to take an initial, tentative step in this reclamation by returning to an admittedly idiosyncratic reading of one version of Heidegger's philosophy that emerges from the pages of his Sein und Zeit. Second, to show how this new theorizing, rather than contribute to the dubious and quasi-theological discourses associated with the philosophy of religion, enables us to focus with renewed energy upon the constant process of self- and group making. In the third section, I try to nudge (with the aim of perhaps dislodging) what could well become the new regnant discourse of current theorizing about religion.</description><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>cultural studies</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Identity theory</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Judaism</subject><subject>Martin Heidegger</subject><subject>Phenomena</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Religious studies</subject><subject>science</subject><subject>social construction</subject><issn>0943-3058</issn><issn>1570-0682</issn><issn>0943-3058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81LAzEUxIMoWKt3L8IevG59SfqS9KjF74JQq-0tZLOJpq67klSx_71bVnoQPD2Y-c3whpBjCgNKBT-jKAGEorBATkHhDultpLzV2C7pwWjIcw6o9slBSksAqoCPeuT00QZXW5dd1l_rLNTZ7NU1MbiUNT6buiq8hKY-JHveVMkd_d4-ebq6nI1v8snD9e34fJIXjOEqpwY8lZSWRtjClsUQSmclWoZGjDxnkqLwhqkRtUMhlEHuWekLWaiSo2Ge9wl0vTY2KUXn9UcM7yauNQW9Wan_rmwjJ11kmVZN3PKMI6JEaP2880Naue-tb-KbFpJL1Hf3M_08nbOL-ULpRcsPOr6Ioar0svmMdTv5_wd-AN_6acQ</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Hughes, Aaron W</creator><general>BRILL</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Science Envy in Theories of Religion</title><author>Hughes, Aaron W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b225t-1a0f1711da6cbcdb40dec75c25a69f327156fa2891c4668a53f2dfb7b8d35a2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>cultural studies</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Identity theory</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Judaism</topic><topic>Martin Heidegger</topic><topic>Phenomena</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Religious studies</topic><topic>science</topic><topic>social construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Aaron W</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Method &amp; theory in the study of religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, Aaron W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Science Envy in Theories of Religion</atitle><jtitle>Method &amp; theory in the study of religion</jtitle><addtitle>MTSR</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>293-303</pages><issn>0943-3058</issn><eissn>1570-0682</eissn><eissn>0943-3058</eissn><abstract>Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology" of religion in the writings traditionally associated with likes of Gerardus van der Leeuw, often by way of Mircea Eliade. I seek to take an initial, tentative step in this reclamation by returning to an admittedly idiosyncratic reading of one version of Heidegger's philosophy that emerges from the pages of his Sein und Zeit. Second, to show how this new theorizing, rather than contribute to the dubious and quasi-theological discourses associated with the philosophy of religion, enables us to focus with renewed energy upon the constant process of self- and group making. In the third section, I try to nudge (with the aim of perhaps dislodging) what could well become the new regnant discourse of current theorizing about religion.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/157006810X531085</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0943-3058
ispartof Method & theory in the study of religion, 2010, Vol.22 (4), p.293-303
issn 0943-3058
1570-0682
0943-3058
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_157006810X531085
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Christianity
Cultural identity
cultural studies
Identity
Identity theory
Islam
Judaism
Martin Heidegger
Phenomena
Phenomenology
Religious studies
science
social construction
title Science Envy in Theories of Religion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A32%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Science%20Envy%20in%20Theories%20of%20Religion&rft.jtitle=Method%20&%20theory%20in%20the%20study%20of%20religion&rft.au=Hughes,%20Aaron%20W&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=293-303&rft.issn=0943-3058&rft.eissn=1570-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157006810X531085&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E23555750%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23555750&rfr_iscdi=true