Science Envy in Theories of Religion
Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology&q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Method & theory in the study of religion 2010, Vol.22 (4), p.293-303 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 303 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 293 |
container_title | Method & theory in the study of religion |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Hughes, Aaron W |
description | Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology" of religion in the writings traditionally associated with likes of Gerardus van der Leeuw, often by way of Mircea Eliade. I seek to take an initial, tentative step in this reclamation by returning to an admittedly idiosyncratic reading of one version of Heidegger's philosophy that emerges from the pages of his Sein und Zeit. Second, to show how this new theorizing, rather than contribute to the dubious and quasi-theological discourses associated with the philosophy of religion, enables us to focus with renewed energy upon the constant process of self- and group making. In the third section, I try to nudge (with the aim of perhaps dislodging) what could well become the new regnant discourse of current theorizing about religion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1163/157006810X531085 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_157006810X531085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23555750</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23555750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b225t-1a0f1711da6cbcdb40dec75c25a69f327156fa2891c4668a53f2dfb7b8d35a2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81LAzEUxIMoWKt3L8IevG59SfqS9KjF74JQq-0tZLOJpq67klSx_71bVnoQPD2Y-c3whpBjCgNKBT-jKAGEorBATkHhDultpLzV2C7pwWjIcw6o9slBSksAqoCPeuT00QZXW5dd1l_rLNTZ7NU1MbiUNT6buiq8hKY-JHveVMkd_d4-ebq6nI1v8snD9e34fJIXjOEqpwY8lZSWRtjClsUQSmclWoZGjDxnkqLwhqkRtUMhlEHuWekLWaiSo2Ge9wl0vTY2KUXn9UcM7yauNQW9Wan_rmwjJ11kmVZN3PKMI6JEaP2880Naue-tb-KbFpJL1Hf3M_08nbOL-ULpRcsPOr6Ioar0svmMdTv5_wd-AN_6acQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Science Envy in Theories of Religion</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Hughes, Aaron W</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Aaron W</creatorcontrib><description>Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology" of religion in the writings traditionally associated with likes of Gerardus van der Leeuw, often by way of Mircea Eliade. I seek to take an initial, tentative step in this reclamation by returning to an admittedly idiosyncratic reading of one version of Heidegger's philosophy that emerges from the pages of his Sein und Zeit. Second, to show how this new theorizing, rather than contribute to the dubious and quasi-theological discourses associated with the philosophy of religion, enables us to focus with renewed energy upon the constant process of self- and group making. In the third section, I try to nudge (with the aim of perhaps dislodging) what could well become the new regnant discourse of current theorizing about religion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0943-3058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1570-0682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0943-3058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/157006810X531085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Netherlands: BRILL</publisher><subject>Christianity ; Cultural identity ; cultural studies ; Identity ; Identity theory ; Islam ; Judaism ; Martin Heidegger ; Phenomena ; Phenomenology ; Religious studies ; science ; social construction</subject><ispartof>Method & theory in the study of religion, 2010, Vol.22 (4), p.293-303</ispartof><rights>2010 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><rights>Koninklijke Brill NV 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23555750$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23555750$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Aaron W</creatorcontrib><title>Science Envy in Theories of Religion</title><title>Method & theory in the study of religion</title><addtitle>MTSR</addtitle><description>Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology" of religion in the writings traditionally associated with likes of Gerardus van der Leeuw, often by way of Mircea Eliade. I seek to take an initial, tentative step in this reclamation by returning to an admittedly idiosyncratic reading of one version of Heidegger's philosophy that emerges from the pages of his Sein und Zeit. Second, to show how this new theorizing, rather than contribute to the dubious and quasi-theological discourses associated with the philosophy of religion, enables us to focus with renewed energy upon the constant process of self- and group making. In the third section, I try to nudge (with the aim of perhaps dislodging) what could well become the new regnant discourse of current theorizing about religion.</description><subject>Christianity</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>cultural studies</subject><subject>Identity</subject><subject>Identity theory</subject><subject>Islam</subject><subject>Judaism</subject><subject>Martin Heidegger</subject><subject>Phenomena</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Religious studies</subject><subject>science</subject><subject>social construction</subject><issn>0943-3058</issn><issn>1570-0682</issn><issn>0943-3058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81LAzEUxIMoWKt3L8IevG59SfqS9KjF74JQq-0tZLOJpq67klSx_71bVnoQPD2Y-c3whpBjCgNKBT-jKAGEorBATkHhDultpLzV2C7pwWjIcw6o9slBSksAqoCPeuT00QZXW5dd1l_rLNTZ7NU1MbiUNT6buiq8hKY-JHveVMkd_d4-ebq6nI1v8snD9e34fJIXjOEqpwY8lZSWRtjClsUQSmclWoZGjDxnkqLwhqkRtUMhlEHuWekLWaiSo2Ge9wl0vTY2KUXn9UcM7yauNQW9Wan_rmwjJ11kmVZN3PKMI6JEaP2880Naue-tb-KbFpJL1Hf3M_08nbOL-ULpRcsPOr6Ioar0svmMdTv5_wd-AN_6acQ</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Hughes, Aaron W</creator><general>BRILL</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Science Envy in Theories of Religion</title><author>Hughes, Aaron W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b225t-1a0f1711da6cbcdb40dec75c25a69f327156fa2891c4668a53f2dfb7b8d35a2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Christianity</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>cultural studies</topic><topic>Identity</topic><topic>Identity theory</topic><topic>Islam</topic><topic>Judaism</topic><topic>Martin Heidegger</topic><topic>Phenomena</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Religious studies</topic><topic>science</topic><topic>social construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Aaron W</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Method & theory in the study of religion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, Aaron W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Science Envy in Theories of Religion</atitle><jtitle>Method & theory in the study of religion</jtitle><addtitle>MTSR</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>293-303</pages><issn>0943-3058</issn><eissn>1570-0682</eissn><eissn>0943-3058</eissn><abstract>Recent theorizing about religion has largely shifted from the cultural to the biological domain. This, however, comes with a cost. To explore this in greater detail, the present essay is divided into three parts: first, I seek to reclaim and redefine what usually passes for the "phenomenology" of religion in the writings traditionally associated with likes of Gerardus van der Leeuw, often by way of Mircea Eliade. I seek to take an initial, tentative step in this reclamation by returning to an admittedly idiosyncratic reading of one version of Heidegger's philosophy that emerges from the pages of his Sein und Zeit. Second, to show how this new theorizing, rather than contribute to the dubious and quasi-theological discourses associated with the philosophy of religion, enables us to focus with renewed energy upon the constant process of self- and group making. In the third section, I try to nudge (with the aim of perhaps dislodging) what could well become the new regnant discourse of current theorizing about religion.</abstract><cop>The Netherlands</cop><pub>BRILL</pub><doi>10.1163/157006810X531085</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0943-3058 |
ispartof | Method & theory in the study of religion, 2010, Vol.22 (4), p.293-303 |
issn | 0943-3058 1570-0682 0943-3058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_157006810X531085 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Christianity Cultural identity cultural studies Identity Identity theory Islam Judaism Martin Heidegger Phenomena Phenomenology Religious studies science social construction |
title | Science Envy in Theories of Religion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A32%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Science%20Envy%20in%20Theories%20of%20Religion&rft.jtitle=Method%20&%20theory%20in%20the%20study%20of%20religion&rft.au=Hughes,%20Aaron%20W&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=293-303&rft.issn=0943-3058&rft.eissn=1570-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/157006810X531085&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E23555750%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23555750&rfr_iscdi=true |